Bevacizumab beyond progression: Impact of subsequent bevacizumab retreatment in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer after progression.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5557-5557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Ann Previs ◽  
Daniel Spinosa ◽  
Bryan M. Fellman ◽  
Amelia Lorenzo ◽  
Isabelle Mulder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fallopian Tube ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference

5557 Background: The Food and Drug Administration approved the use of bevacizumab for treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma (OC) in combination with chemotherapy. This study evaluates whether patients immediately retreated with bevacizumab derive benefit after progressing on a bevacizumab-containing regimen. Methods: This multi-institutional, retrospective study compared patients with high grade non-mucinous epithelial OC who received bevacizumab followed directly by another bevacizumab-containing treatment regimen to patients who received bevacizumab followed by a regimen that did not contain bevacizumab (or received no further treatment). All patient retreated with bevacizumab had stable or progressive disease on prior bevacizumab containing regimen. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan and Meier product-limit estimator and modeled via Cox proportional hazards regression. PFS was measured from the date of first bevacizumab treatment to the date of first progression, date of death or date of last clinic visit. OS was measured from the date of first bevacizumab treatment after progression to the date of death or date of last contact/clinic visit. Statistical significance was defined at the 0.05 level. Results: 275 patients received bevacizumab, of which 226 were evaluable; 102 received sequential treatment with bevacizumab and 124 received a bevacizumab containing regimen followed by a non-bevacizumab containing regimen at the time of progression. There was no significant difference between tumor grade, stage, or BRCA mutation. Median follow-up for all subjects was 17 months (range: 1.2-138.2 months). Median PFS was 10.21 months (95%CI: 8.05 - 11.79) and median OS was 22.14 months (95%CI: 17.1 – 27.4). Median PFS for patients who received bevacizumab without retreatment was 5.1 months (95%CI: 4.3 – 6.3) and 17.6 months (95%CI: 14.3 – 21.3) for patients who received sequential bevacizumab retreatment (p < 0.001). Median OS for patients who received bevacizumab without retreatment was 12.9 months (95%CI: 9.3 – 16.7) and 30.1 months (95%CI: 26.1 – 35.4) for patients who received sequential bevacizumab retreatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study shows OC patients treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens sequentially at the time of progression have significantly prolonged survival outcomes compared to those patients who received no re-treatment with bevacizumab.

Differential response rates in early-phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCT).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3133-3133
Author(s):  
Rozana Abdul Rahman ◽  
Neethu Billy Graham Mariam ◽  
Hitesh Mistry ◽  
Sreeja Aruketty ◽  
Matt Church ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Sustained Response ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Significant Difference

3133 Background: The primary objective of EPCCT (phase I and non-randomised phase II trials) is to determine the safety and tolerability of new therapeutic agents. Response rates (RR) in these trials have typically been reported at around 10-15%. Increasingly RR and survival outcomes are now investigated in EPCCT as primary or secondary objectives. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on patients (pts) enrolled onto an EPCCT between January 2018 and December 2019 at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Data on demographics, prior systemic treatment, sites of disease, performance status, comorbidities, types of therapy, RR, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with univariable and multivariable models. Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of pts with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Duration of response (DOR) was from initial response to progressive disease (PD). Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as CR+PR+ stable disease (SD). Results: A total of 247 pts were treated across 46 EPCCTs. Median age 61 years; 57% female. Sixty-six percent of pts had ≥2 lines of treatment and the majority were ECOG PS 0/1 (98%). Eighty-one percent of pts had ≥2 sites of metastatic disease, and 13 major tumour types were included. Monotherapy trials (159 pts) were predominantly targeted therapies (TT; 60%), or immunotherapies (IO; 20%). Combination therapy trials (88 pts) were TT-based (68%) or IO-based (32%). Data for RR analyses was available for 231 pts. ORR across all trials was 15% (CR 2%) and DCR was 63%. The median DOR was 8.3 months (mos) (95% CI: 7.0 – 9.7) with 28% of pts responding for >6 mos and 7% for >12 mos. ORR in pooled IO treated pts was 27%, DCR was 65% with sustained response >6 mos seen in 37% of these pts. ORR in pooled TT treated pts was 9.4%, DCR was 60% and sustained response > 6 mos seen in 25% of pts. ORR for IO v TT treated pts was significantly different, p=0.007 (pearson chi square), but no significant difference was seen for DCR. Median PFS for all patients was 5.0 mos (95% CI: 4.1 – 6.0) and OS was 10.4 mos (95% CI: 8.4 – 13.0). OS for those with a PR is not reached (HR for PR v PD, 0.006 (95% CI: 0.002 – 0.18). Pts with SD appear to have significantly better OS compared to those with PD (14.6 v 4.2 mos, HR 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1 – 0.3). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis for OS was significant for male gender (HR 1.9, p=0.002), presence of liver metastasis (HR 2.0, p=0.001), low Hb (HR 0.8, p=0.03) and log (LDH) (HR 1.9, p<0.001). Conclusions: Two-thirds of pts enrolled on EPCCTs benefitted in terms of DCR with significant OS improvement in those with PR and SD. Higher ORR were seen in pts receiving IO-based treatments however DCR was similar in IO and TT pts. Gender, presence of liver metastases, Hb count and LDH level contributed significantly to survival differences.

Integration of bone scan (BS) and computerized tomography (CT) findings as an endpoint to assess bone metastasis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Author(s):  
Scott J. Parker ◽  
Gregory Russell Pond ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
Anitha Alex ◽  
Marta Elise Heilbrun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ct Findings ◽  
Significant Difference

191 Background: Progression of bone metastasis in mCRPC is assessed solely by BS findings and correlates modestly with overall survival (OS). Given the lack of reliability of BS findings and the ready availability of routinely performed CT scans, which commonly identify bone metastases, we aimed to better assess progression in bone by integrating BS and CT findings and to explore their association with OS. Methods: Data were obtained from patients treated at the University of Utah receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy (D) or post-docetaxel therapy with orteronel (O). Patients with both baseline and on-therapy CT and BS within 90 days were eligible for analysis. CT and BS underwent central radiology review for bone lesions by a single radiologist. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as ≥ 1 new lesion. Survival was measured from start of therapy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore potential prognosticators of overall survival (OS). Statistical significance was defined as 2-sided p < 0.05. Therapy was a stratification factor. Results: Twenty-eight patients were evaluable including 18 patients receiving D, and 10 receiving O post-docetaxel. The mean age of these patients was 71.4 years and median (95% CI) overall survival was 18.4 (9.7-35.4) months. Four patients had PD on both BS and CT, while 2 (7%) had PD on CT but not BS and 3 had PD on BS but not CT. Patients with PD on BS or CT had worse OS (HR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.04-6.90, p = 0.041) than those with no PD on either CT or BS. Looking at individual lesions, 4 (14%) patients had new lesions identified on CT which was not observed using BS, and they were associated with worse OS (HR = 3.72, 1.01-13.66, p = 0.048). Conversely, no significant difference in OS was observed for 4 patients with lesions identified on BS which were not observed using CT (HR = 2.67, 0.58-12.32, p = 0.21). Conclusions: This hypothesis-generating study suggests that CT can complement and enhance the ability of BS to capture PD and predict OS. Integration of BS findings using Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-3 guidelines to define PD and CT bone findings should be investigated in a larger study as an intermediate endpoint.

Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study Comparing Patupilone (EPO906) With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Platinum-Refractory or -Resistant Patients With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (31) ◽  
pp. 3841-3847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Elzbieta Kutarska ◽  
Meletios Dimopoulos ◽  
Duk-Soo Bae ◽  
Izabella Rzepka-Gorska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fallopian Tube ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Platinum Refractory

Purpose This study compared the efficacy and safety of patupilone with those of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum-refractory or -resistant epithelial ovarian, primary fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with three or fewer prior regimens were eligible if they had received first-line taxane/platinum-based combination chemotherapy and were platinum refractory or resistant. Patients were randomly assigned to receive patupilone (10 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks) or PLD (50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks). Results A total of 829 patients were randomly assigned (patupilone, n = 412; PLD, n = 417). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS), the primary end point, between the patupilone and PLD arms (P = .195; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.09), with median OS rates of 13.2 and 12.7 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months for both arms. The overall response rate (all partial responses) was higher in the patupilone arm than in the PLD arm (15.5% v 7.9%; odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.36 to 3.29), although disease control rates were similar (59.5% v 56.3%, respectively). Frequently observed adverse events (AEs) of any grade included diarrhea (85.3%) and peripheral neuropathy (39.3%) in the patupilone arm and mucositis/stomatitis (43%) and hand-foot syndrome (41.8%) in the PLD arm. Conclusion Patupilone did not demonstrate significant improvement in OS compared with the active control, PLD. No new or unexpected serious AEs were identified.

Real-world outcomes in recurrent versus de novo metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 387-387
Author(s):  
Laura Miotke ◽  
Christopher Duane Nevala-Plagemann ◽  
Jian Ying ◽  
Vaia Florou ◽  
Benjamin Haaland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Recurrent Disease ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Significant Difference

387 Background: Optimal management of patients with recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unknown. In the clinical trials that established a survival benefit with combination chemotherapy compared to single agent gemcitabine, patients with recurrent PDAC were either excluded (PRODIGE-4) or severely underrepresented (MPACT). In this study, we evaluated clinical outcomes of recurrent PDAC patients who receive systemic therapy and compared outcomes to patients with de novo advanced PDAC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with advanced PDAC between 2014 and October of 2019 were included using the nationwide Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database. Patients without a clinic visit or initiation of treatment within 90 days of diagnosis were excluded. Patients were characterized as either de novo or recurrent PDAC based on stage at diagnosis and history of surgery. Patients with recurrent PDAC were further stratified based on time to recurrent disease. Overall survival (OS) was summarized within groups via Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and compared between groups in the context of univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The covariates adjusted for were gender, age, race, ECOG, smoking status, primary site, CA199, albumin, lymphocytes, neutrophils and monocytes. Results: We included 5170 patients with advanced PDAC, of which 1101 (21.3%) met criteria for recurrent disease. Patients with recurrent PDAC were more likely to have tumors in the head of the pancreas (71% vs 40%, p < 0.001) and had lower median CA19-9 (92.8 vs 617, p < 0.001), compared to the de novo PDAC patients. Median OS for the recurrent group was 10.8 m (95% CI = 9.9-11.7) vs. 7.3 m (95% CI = 7.0-7.7) in the de novo group (p < 0.001, both univariate and multivariable adjusted analyses). The most common first line palliative chemotherapy in patients with recurrent disease was Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (41%) or FOLFIRINOX (21%). Patients who recurred within six months of surgery (28%) had an OS of 10.0 m (95% CI = 8.7 -11) vs. 11.6 m (95% CI 10-12, p = 0.256) in those who recurred greater than six months from surgery. Conclusions: Our data suggest that patients with recurrent disease have significantly better survival outcomes compared to patients with de novo metastatic disease. We did not observe a significant difference in survival of patients who recurred within 6 months of resection compared to those who recurred greater than six months after surgery. These data support the inclusion of patients with recurrent PDAC in clinical trials, including those who develop recurrent disease within 6 months of surgery, with appropriate stratification for these variables.

Clinical benefit from pemetrexed before and after crizotinib exposure in patients with ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7601-7601
Author(s):  
Eamon Berge ◽  
Maxon Delee ◽  
Xian Lu ◽  
Anna E. Barón ◽  
Benjamin J. Solomon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Enhanced Sensitivity ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Significant Difference

7601 Background: Crizotinib (Criz) produces high response rates and prolonged progression free survival (PFS) in ALK+ NSCLC. Retrospective analyses suggest enhanced sensitivity to pemetrexed (Pem) in Criz-naïve ALK+ NSCLC. Different biological mechanisms of Criz resistance have recently been discovered. Clinical cross-resistance between Criz and Pem has not been previously investigated. Methods: Patients with stage IV ALK+ NSCLC treated in sequence with Pem then Criz (Pem-Criz), or Criz then Pem (Criz-Pem) were identified. Excluding CNS only progression events when no new systemic treated was started, PFS was compared using Cox Proportional Hazards. Correlations between molecular features of ALK positivity and Pem PFS were analyzed using Spearman correlations. Treatment sequence effect was explored using Fisher’s exact test. Results: We identified 19 Pem-Criz and 9 Criz-Pem ALK+ patients. Pem was given as monotherapy in 37% vs. 66%, and as median 2nd vs. 3rd line cytotoxic in the Pem-Criz and Criz-Pem groups, respectively. For the Pem-Criz group,median PFS was 8.9 months with Pem (range: 1-21.5 months), and 14.7 months with Criz (range:2.9+ -27.5 months). For the Criz-Pem group, median PFS was 8.4 months with Criz (range: 2-29 months), and 4.4 months with Pem (range: 0.5-10.5+ months). Patients were more likely to progress on Pem given after Criz than before, but confidence intervals were wide (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.626-3.66). Neither native or rearranged signal copy number, nor percent cells ALK+ in the tumors correlated with PFS on Pem. Conclusions: Both Criz and Pem appear to be active drugs in ALK+NSCLC given in either order. Numerically, benefit from Pem was less when given post-Criz compared to pre-Criz, however this difference was not statistically significant. Several potential confounders exist in our small dataset (notably differences in line of therapy and use in combo vs. monotherapy). To fully address whether there may be a significant difference in overlap of induced specific drug resistance mechanisms, the clinical effect of Criz/Pem sequencing should be explored in a larger series adjusting for confounding effects.

Analysis of the GERCOR index in KRAS Exon2 WT patients with mCRC treated with salvage-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy: HGCSG0901.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 781-781
Author(s):  
Ayumu Hosokawa ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hiroshi Nakatsumi ◽  
Kazuteru Hatanaka ◽  
Yasushi Tsuji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Significant Difference

781 Background: The GERCOR index (GI) based on performance status and serum LDH was reported to be useful to predict survival for patients with previously untreated mCRC. However, in the salvage setting, the validity of the GI has not been reported in patients treated with cetuximab (Cmab)-based chemotherapy. Methods: 269 patients with mCRC treated with Cmab contained chemotherapy were retrospectively registered from 27 centers in Japan. This analysis was included in the KRAS Exon2 wild type patients who were refractory to or intolerant of 5-FU / irinotecan/ oxaliplatin and were never administered anti-EGFR-antibody. Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) were performed using patient characteristics. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. The analysis was also designed to determine whether the GERCOR index could be extended to progression-free survival (PFS). Results: All data were available for prognostic categorization in 132 patients. Median OS and PFS were 9.8 and 4.3 months. The distribution and median OS / PFS for GI were as follows: low risk (L)(n = 28; 17.9/3.8 months), intermediate risk (I)(n = 52; 12.2/5.0 months), and high risk (H)(n = 52; 7.5/4.1 months). For OS, there was significant difference between L and H (p < 0.001) and between I and H (p < 0.001), but not between L and I (p = 0.076). For PFS, there was significant difference between I and H (p = 0.017), but not between L and I (p = 0.407), and between L and H (p = 0.222). In the Cox multivariate analysis, GI showed an independent prognostic impact (L vs. I ; HR 2.195, p=0.003 / L vs. H ; HR 4.028, p<0.001), but not predictive impact (L vs. I ; HR 0.987, p=0.958 / L vs. H ; HR 1.314, p=0.268). Conclusions: In this analysis, GI might be a prognostic factor in salvage treatment with Cmab-based chemotherapy.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and pain progression with enzalutamide (ENZ) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) from the ARCHES study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5044-5044
Author(s):  
Arnulf Stenzl ◽  
Curtis Dunshee ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Boris Alekseev ◽  
Taro Iguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Pain Severity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

5044 Background: The Phase 3 ARCHES trial (NCT02677896) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ENZ + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs placebo (PBO) + ADT in 1150 men with mHSPC. Here we report patient-reported outcome (PRO) data using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF). Methods: FACT-P and BPI-SF were assessed at baseline (BL), week (wk) 13, and then every 12 wks until disease progression. Longitudinal changes were assessed using mean scores and mixed-model repeated measures; lower BPI-SF scores represent less pain/interference; higher FACT-P scores represent better HRQoL. Time from BL to first deterioration in PRO score was assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Clinically meaningful difference was defined by change from baseline ≥10 for FACT-P total and ≥2 for worst pain/severity. Results: PRO instrument completion rates were high (88−96%) up to wk 73. At BL, men in both arms were generally asymptomatic and reported good HRQoL (FACT-P total: ENZ + ADT, 113.9; PBO + ADT, 112.7) and low pain (worst pain [item 3]: ENZ + ADT, 1.80; PBO + ADT, 1.77). HRQoL and pain scores remained stable over time and there were no clinically meaningful differences between groups in change from BL to wk 73. The proportion of men with no change or improvement in PRO scores (67–88%) was similar in both groups at all time points up to wk 73. There was no significant difference between arms for time to deterioration in FACT-P total (HR 0.90 [95% CI] (0.74, 1.09); p = 0.2998). ENZ + ADT significantly delayed time to pain progression for worst pain (HR 0.82 [0.69, 0.98]; p = 0.0322) and pain severity (HR 0.79 [0.65, 0.97]; p = 0.0209) vs PBO + ADT. Conclusions: Men with mHSPC were generally asymptomatic and had high levels of HRQoL and low levels of pain at BL, likely due to most men initiating ADT several months prior to study entry. No clinically meaningful differences in HRQoL were observed between ENZ and PBO. The prolongation in radiographic progression-free survival observed with ENZ + ADT was accompanied by a significantly prolonged time to progression of worst pain and pain severity vs PBO + ADT. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896.

scholarly journals Albumin-To-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio as a Novel and Promising Prognostic Biomarker in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy for Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianying Zhu ◽  
Dongni Chen ◽  
Shuangjiang Li ◽  
Wenbiao Zhang ◽  
Yongjiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Significant Difference

BackgroundAlbumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) has been reported as a novel prognostic predictor for numerous solid tumors. We aimed to assess the prognostic role of preoperative AAPR in surgically resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with predictive nomograms.MethodsOur study was conducted in a single-center prospective database between June 2009 and December 2012. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to distinguish the difference in survival outcomes between patients stratified by an AAPR threshold. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was finally generated to specify independent prognostic markers for the entire and PSM cohorts.ResultsA total of 497 patients with ESCC were included in this study. An AAPR of 0.50 was determined as the optimal cutoff point for prognostic outcome stratification. Patients with AAPR&lt;0.50 had significantly worse overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with AAPR≥0.50 (Log-rank P&lt;0.001). This significant difference remained stable in the PSM analysis. Multivariable analyses based on the entire and PSM cohorts consistently showed that AAPR&lt;0.50 might be one of the most predominant prognostic factors resulting in unfavorable OS and PFS of ESCC patients undergoing esophagectomy (P&lt;0.001). The nomograms consisting of AAPR and other independent prognostic factors further demonstrated a plausible predictive accuracy of postoperative OS and PFS.ConclusionAAPR can be considered as a simple, convenient and noninvasive biomarker with a significant prognostic effect in surgically resected ESCC.

scholarly journals Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Plus Apatinib for First-line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Glioma: From One Single Research Institute

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao FU ◽  
Xiaoyan Li ◽  
Wenmin YING ◽  
lvjuan CAI ◽  
Guo LI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Glioma ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Retrospective Case

Abstract Objective: To explore the effectiveness and safety of apatinib in patients with malignant glioma. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study in a single center. Patients with new postoperative pathological diagnosis of malignant glioma (WHO Ⅲ~Ⅳ) were selected. Enrolled patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (60Gy/30f/6w; TMZ75mg/m2,po,d1-d42)combined with or without apatinib (250mg, po, d1-d42,qd), then maintain 6 cycles(28 days a cycle)of TMZ chemotherapy(200mg/m2, d1-d5) .The primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and the grade of peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) evaluated by edema index(EI). The secondary endpoint was overall survival(OS). Hazard ratios of PFS and OS were compared between trials in a Cox proportional hazards model.Results: 48 patients (24 in apatinib group and 24 in control group) were enrolled in this study. The results elucidated that the mPFS of the apatinib group was longer than control group, but the difference was not statistically significant(9.63 vs. 7.33 months; P=0.073).As for mOS, the results of two groups were almost similar.(15.47 vs. 14.70 months, P=0.612). Cox multivariate regression model revealed that Apatinib was not a prognostic factor for PFS and OS (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor grade was an important risk factor for PFS and OS.The grade of PTBE was improved in 15 of 23 patients (65.2%) in apatinib group versus 6 of 24 (25%) in control group. There was no grade 3 or 4 adverse events and serious adverse events.Conclusion: Apatinib group can improve mPFS by 2.3 months in patients with malignant glioma,but there was no statistical significance (P>0.05).The results also indicated that apatinib conferred a significant beneficial effect on PTBE improvement. All occurred adverse reactions were moderate and controllable.

Association of KRAS and BRAF mutations with progression-free survival (PFS) with second-line FOLFIRI +/- regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 196-196
Author(s):  
Federico Innocenti ◽  
Sara R. Selitsky ◽  
Joel S. Parker ◽  
James Todd Auman ◽  
Kelli Hammond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Angiogenic Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference

196 Background: LCCC1029 was a 2:1 randomized phase II trial of 2nd-line FOLFIRI plus either regorafenib or placebo in mCRC. The addition of regorafenib improved PFS (median PFS 6.1 vs 5.3 mo, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01). However, the effect of somatic mutations on regorafenib activity has not been tested. Methods: We performed whole exome sequencing on archival primary tumor tissue and paired normal tissue in 85 patients of LCCC1029. We compared PFS and OS using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards method. Results: Among the 85 subjects, 54 (64%) had tumors wild-type (WT) for KRAS and BRAF, 26 (31%) had tumors with KRAS mutations in exons 2-4, and 5 (6%) had tumors with BRAF V600E. The addition of regorafenib to FOLFIRI improved PFS in the KRAS/ BRAF WT subgroup (median PFS 8.0 vs 4.9 mo, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97, log-rank p=0.028), but not in the KRAS mutant subgroup (median PFS 6.8 vs 5.5 mo, HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.61-1.35, log-rank p=0.617) or the BRAF mutant subgroup (log-rank p=0.156). In all of these subgroups, the addition of regorafenib was not associated with significant difference in OS. BRAF V600E was prognostic and associated with significantly worse OS (median OS 8.4 vs 18.0 mo, HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.01-6.66, log-rank p=0.04). Conclusions: The addition of regorafenib to FOLFIRI improves PFS among the subgroup of patients with KRAS and BRAF dual WT CRC, but not among the KRAS mutant subgroup. These results indicate that the addition of anti-angiogenic therapy to second-line chemotherapy backbones may be more effective in KRAS/ BRAF WT tumors in particular. More confirmatory studies are needed to corroborate this finding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document