Impact of timing of antibiotic use on clinical outcomes in patients with urothelial cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5045-5045
Author(s):  
Chana Weinstock ◽  
Pradeep Bandaru ◽  
Laura L Fernandes ◽  
Elaine Chang ◽  
Andrew Girvin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drug Approval ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Study Results

5045 Background: Although recent evidence has suggested that patients who receive antibiotics (ABX) during the course of ICI treatment might decrease overall survival (OS) (1), our previous analysis did not support a difference in OS in urothelial cancer patients who did and did not use ABX during the course of ICI treatment without regard to timing (2). This updated analysis aims to addresses the question of timing; specifically, use of ABX in the 30-day window pre- or post- initiation of ICI treatment. Methods: We pooled data from 7 trials that led to drug approval and which included 1747 patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with an ICI. Five trials enrolled patients who received prior platinum and 2 enrolled cisplatin-ineligible patients. Concomitant medication datasets were searched for systemic ABX use. The association between ABX use and survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by study. Results: Overall, 56% of patients were exposed to antibiotics (ABX+) and 43% were not exposed (ABX-). In an exploratory analysis, median OS was similar between arms: 9.7 vs. 9.3 months in ABX+ vs. ABX- patients, respectively (HR 0.96). However, OS results differed in the 27% of patients who were exposed to antibiotics in the 30-day window pre- or post- initiation of ICI treatment, for whom median OS was 4.7 months vs. 11.5 months in the ABX+ vs. ABX- patients, respectively (HR 1.8). This remained true after controlling for baseline risk prognostic factors (Bajorin and Bellmunt scores). Similar trends were observed for progression-free survival (PFS). Conclusions: Patients treated with ABX while on therapy with an ICI for urothelial cancer had similar OS outcomes to those not treated with ABX. However, in an exploratory analysis looking at ABX use in the 30-day window pre- or post-initiation of ICI treatment, OS appeared decreased in ABX+ vs ABX- patients. Our exploratory analyses appear to show an association of OS/PFS with timing of antibiotics. References: 1) Routy B, Science (2017) 2) Weinstock C, ASCO 2019, abstract. [Table: see text]

Changing paradigm in oncology clinical trials: Cox-TEL—Adjustment made ready for early crossover and tail tale.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15067-e15067
Author(s):  
Emily Pei-Ying Lin ◽  
Chih-Yuan Hsu ◽  
Pan-Chyr Yang ◽  
Yu Shyr
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Oncology Clinical Trials

e15067 Background: Approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were made based on positive clinical trial results analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards (PH) model. With ICI data, however, long tails and early crossover in survival curves, which violate the Cox PH assumption, can lead to misinterpretation of clinical significance of findings. Here we introduce the Cox-TEL and show the differences of study results before and after Cox-TEL adjustment using KEYNOTE 042 and 045 as examples. Methods: Cox-TEL is built on the mathematical foundation of Taylor expansion. As an easily implemented alternative of PH cure model, it not only infers associations between survival probabilities of the two study arms among patients without long-term survival (poor-responders), but also estimates differences in proportion (DP) between arms among patients in the long-tail segment of the survival curve (true-responders). Results: In KEYNOTE 042, the Cox-TEL HRs for death were statistically insignificant across all subgroups. The trend of DP, on the other hand, is positively related to that of PD-L1 TPS and inverted related to that of Cox HR when the PD-L1 ≥50% cohort is covered. In KEYNOTE 045, the Cox-TEL HRs suggested that for the poor-responders, pembrolizumab did not do better than chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and might do harm to the patients in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). For the true-responders, DPs of OS and PFS were both statistically significant (Table). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated the biases derived from insufficient data analyses and strengthened the necessity of analytic model revisits in the new oncology era of which cure for advanced cancers is no longer impossible. [Table: see text]

The Relationship of Diabetes Mellitus to Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Oded Jacobi ◽  
Yosef Landman ◽  
Daniel Reinhorn ◽  
Oded Icht ◽  
Michal Sternschuss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Diabetic Patients

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are the new standard therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). Metformin, previously associated with improved chemotherapy efficacy in diabetic and nondiabetic cancer patients, was recently associated with increased ICI efficacy. In this study, we aimed to explore the correlations between diabetes mellitus (DM), metformin use, and benefit from ICI in mNSCLC patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> All mNSCLC patients treated with ICI in our center between February 2015 and April 2018 were identified. Demographic and clinical data were extracted retrospectively. Cox proportional hazards regression, <i>t</i> tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were employed to evaluate associations of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR), with DM status, metformin use, and HbA1c levels, as appropriate. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 249 mNSCLC patients treated with ICI, 57 (22.8%) had DM. Thirty-seven (64.9% of all diabetic patients) patients were treated with metformin. A significant negative correlation of DM with PFS and OS was demonstrated (HR 1.5 [1.01–2.06], <i>p</i> = 0.011, and HR 1.5 [1.08–2.08], <i>p</i> = 0.017, respectively). Metformin exposure had no significant correlation with PFS or OS in diabetic mNSCLC patients (HR 1.08 [0.61–1.93], <i>p</i> = 0.79, and HR 1.29 [0.69–2.39], <i>p</i> = 0.42, respectively). There were no differences between groups with respect to ORR and DCR. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our data show a potential negative relationship between DM and ICI efficacy in mNSCLC patients. In contrast to reports with chemotherapy, we found no positive relationship between metformin use and ICI therapy in diabetic patients with mNSCLC. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of metformin in nondiabetic mNSCLC patients.

Real-world outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and autoimmune disease (AD) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 110-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Khozin ◽  
Mark S. Walker ◽  
Monika Jun ◽  
Li Chen ◽  
Edward Stepanski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
The Impact

110 Background: Anecdotal and early evidence suggest ICIs are being used in patients with advanced malignancies and history of AD, despite such patients being typically excluded from traditional clinical trials. We compared the outcomes of patients with or without AD, all of whom had ICI treatment for aNSCLC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study using de-identified, curated data in ASCO’s CancerLinQ. Patients with Stage III or IV NSCLC who received ≥1 dose of an ICI and had ≥2 visits from Jan 2011 to Nov 2018 were included. AD status prior to ICI treatment was identified using ICD-9/ICD-10 codes or AD medications (including steroids). Symphony claims data were linked via tokenization to build cohorts. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), time to next treatment (TTNT), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared across the two cohorts using the log-rank test. Cox Proportional Hazards Model was used to adjust for covariates. Adverse events (AEs) were compared using Chi-Square and Fisher’s Exact Test. Active AD was defined as evidence of autoimmune disease in the year prior to starting ICIs. Results: Among 2425 patients with aNSCLC treated with ICIs, AD was present in 22% (N=538). Median OS in all patients was 12.4 months (95% CI 11.3-13.5). TTD, TTNT, rwPFS and OS did not differ between the two cohorts (Table). There was no association between AD status and outcomes. There was no increased incidence of AEs in the AD group; however a sub-analysis among patients with active AD showed higher rates of select AEs including endocrine, GI and blood disorders. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that patients with evidence of AD prior to receiving ICI have similar outcomes compared to patients with no evidence of AD. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of active AD on the risk of AEs and patient outcomes. [Table: see text]

Impact of antibiotic use on clinical outcomes in patients with urothelial cancer receiving a programmed death protein 1 or programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) antibody.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4557-4557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chana Weinstock ◽  
Virginia Ellen Maher ◽  
Laura L Fernandes ◽  
Shenghui Tang ◽  
Sundeep Agrawal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drug Approval ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Programmed Death Protein 1

4557 Background: Previous data has suggested that patients treated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies who receive antibiotics during their therapy might have dramatically decreased progression-free and overall survival 1,2. This has clinical implications for management of patients with suspected bacterial infection while on treatment with these agents. We assessed the relationship between antibiotic use and tumor response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in a large dataset of patients with urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies. Methods: We examined seven trials that led to drug approval and which included 1747 patients with metastatic or locally advanced urothelial cancer treated with an anti-PD-1/L1 antibody. Five trials enrolled patients who had received prior platinum-based therapy and two enrolled patients who were cisplatin-ineligible. Six were single arm trials and one was a randomized controlled trial whose control arm is not included in these analyses. Concomitant medication datasets were searched for systemic antibiotic used by each patient while on treatment. Results: Overall, 51% of patients (n=892) were exposed to antibiotics (ABX+) and 49% (n=855) were not exposed (ABX-). In these exploratory analyses, small numeric differences in OS, PFS, and ORR were seen in ABX+ vs. ABX- patients. Median OS was 9.23 vs. 9.86 months, median PFS was 105 vs 101 days, and ORR was 20% vs. 21% in ABX+ vs. ABX- patients, respectively. Conclusions: Patients who were treated with antibiotics while on therapy with an anti-PD-1/L1 antibody for urothelial cancer had similar outcomes to those who were not treated with antibiotics. Numeric differences in outcomes were not significant and did not duplicate previous analysis demonstrating a median OS that was doubled in ABX- patients1. Our exploratory analyses do not appear to demonstrate a clear need for practitioners to avoid antibiotic use in patients treated with PD-1/L1 agents for fear of significantly impacting clinical outcomes. References: 1) Tinsley et. al., ASCO annual meeting 2018, abstract 3010 2) Routy et. al., Science 05 Jan 2018: Vol. 359, Issue 6371. [Table: see text]

Response and outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) based on prior intravesical BCG.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4537-4537
Author(s):  
Rafee Talukder ◽  
Dimitrios Makrakis ◽  
Daniel Castellano ◽  
Vadim S Koshkin ◽  
Ajjai Shivaram Alva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Score ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Treatment Line ◽  
Intravesical Bcg ◽  
Selection For

4537 Background: Little is known regarding response and outcomes to ICI for patients (pts) with aUC who were previously treated with BCG for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. We hypothesized that prior intravesical BCG would not be associated with changes in objective response or survival in pts with aUC treated with ICI. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study across 25 institutions. Demographic, intravesical BCG history, treatment and outcomes data were collected for pts with aUC who received ICI. Pts with aUC treated with ICIs were included, pts with pure non-UC, those treated with combination or on clinical trials, pts with multiple ICI treatment lines and those with upper tract UC were excluded. Pts were stratified to prior exposure versus no exposure to BCG. We compared overall response rate (ORR) using logistic regression; and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards. All analyses were performed in the overall population and further stratified by treatment line (first-line [1L] vs salvage [2+L]) and multivariable models. The stratified analysis was also adjusted for an internally developed risk score for 1L and Bellmunt risk score for 2+L; p<0.05 was significant. Results: 1026 aUC pts treated with ICI were identified; 614 pts, 617 pts, and 641 pts were included in ORR, OS and PFS analyses, respectively. Overall, mean age at CPI initiation was 70, 76% were men, 70% were current or former smokers, 75% White, 29% with mixed histology, and 24% had prior exposure to BCG. ORR to ICI in pts with or without prior exposure to BCG was similar, 27% and 28% respectively (OR=0.93 [95% CI 0.61-1.42], p=0.73). Median OS (mOS) for pts with vs without prior BCG exposure was 9 vs 10 mo (HR=1.13 [95% CI 0.88-1.44], p=0.35). Median PFS (mPFS) was 4 months (mo) in both groups (HR=1.02 [95% CI 0.82-1.27], p=0.83). ORR, PFS and OS analyses stratified by ICI treatment line (1L vs 2+L) are listed in the table. Conclusions: In this multi-institutional retrospective analysis, prior intravesical BCG was not associated with objective response or survival in pts with aUC treated with ICI. Limitations of this study include retrospective nature, lack of randomization and possible confounding, but it does provide important preliminary data that selection for ICI treatment should not be impacted by prior exposure to BCG. Further clinical and molecular biomarker exploration is needed to refine patient selection for ICI in aUC.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors versus VEGF Targeted Therapy as Second Line Regimen in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2682
Author(s):  
Anwaar Saeed ◽  
Hannah Hildebrand ◽  
Robin Park ◽  
Mohammed Al-Jumayli ◽  
Saqib Abbasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Treatment Optimization

Several targeted agents including multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) and immunotherapy (IO) agents have been approved for use beyond the frontline setting in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Due to lack of prospective head-to-head comparative trials, there is no standardized way for alternating those agents beyond frontline. Therefore, we performed a retrospective review of the Kansas University (KU) cancer registry to determine whether IO may be superior to non-IO therapy. Patients with advanced HCC were divided into two groups based on the second-line systemic regimen received (IO vs. non-IO). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated under the Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. No statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were found, although a non-significant delayed separation in the survival curve favoring IO was identified (median PFS 3.9 months vs. 3 months; median OS 10 months vs. 10 months respectively for IO vs. non-IO). This retrospective analysis is one of the earliest and largest studies comparing second-line IO and non-IO therapies thus far reported. Future studies should aim to define specific biomarkers for response prediction and treatment optimization based on individual patient and tumor characteristics. Furthermore, combinatorial therapeutic strategies is an evolving approach showing early promising signal.

671 Update of a systematic review and meta-analysis studying the association between antibiotic use and clinical outcomes of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A708-A708
Author(s):  
Pierre-Alain Bandinelli ◽  
Julie Cervesi ◽  
Clément Le Bescop ◽  
Renaud Buffet ◽  
Jean De Gunzburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Hazard Ratios

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to improve patients‘ clinical outcomes in a variety of cancers, but with variable efficacy. Prior research has also suggested that systemic antibiotic (ABX) exposure may impact the intestinal microbiota and result in suboptimal ICI treatment outcomes. Our team published a systematic review and meta-analysis showing that ABX use could indeed decrease the survival of patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and treated with ICIs.1 The present abstract aims at updating this meta-analysis by incorporating new studies that have been published in the period ranging from September 2019 to August 2020.MethodsMedline (through PubMed), the Cochrane Library and major oncology conferences proceedings were systematically searched to identify studies assessing the impact of ABX use on the clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Studies were found eligible for inclusion when they mentioned a hazard ratio (HR) or Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) based on antibiotic exposure. Pooled HRs for OS and PFS and HRs for OS and PFS according to different time windows for ABX exposure were calculated.Results6 eligible new studies were identified between September 2019 and August 2020 while 3 other studies were updated with new information. Altogether, 27 studies reported data for OS (6,436 patients, 826 of whom coming from new studies) and 24 for PFS (3,751 patients, 786 of whom coming from new studies). The pooled HR was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38–2.23) for OS and 1.57 (95% CI: 1.28–1.92) for PFS, confirming a significantly reduced survival in patients with NSCLC exposed to ABX. The detailed analysis in subgroups based on the time window of exposure (figure 1, figure 2) suggests that the deleterious effect of ABX is stronger when the exposition happens shortly before and after the initiation of the ICI treatment.Abstract 671 Figure 1Forest plot of hazard ratios for overall survival of patients diagnosed with NSCLC and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics, according to the time window of antibiotic exposureAbstract 671 Figure 2Forest plot of hazard ratios for progression-free survival of patients diagnosed with NSCLC and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics, according to the time window of antibiotic exposureConclusionsThe update of the meta-analysis confirms the previously reported deleterious effect of ABX on ICI treatment outcomes, taking into account the latest publications in the field. The topic deserves further research to uncover if the effect will stand with 1st line use of ICI together with chemotherapies and/or other approved combinations, elucidate the mechanisms at stake and improve care of patients.ReferencesLurienne L, Cervesi J, Duhalde L, de Gunzburg J, Andremont A, Zalcman G, et al. NSCLC immunotherapy efficacy and antibiotic use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2020;15:1147–1159.

7 Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with Anti-PD-1 therapy – the melimmune score

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A7-A7
Author(s):  
Soraia Lobo-Martins ◽  
Diogo Martins-Branco ◽  
Patrícia Miguel Semedo ◽  
Cecília Melo Alvim ◽  
Ana Maria Monteiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Line Setting

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have changed the paradigm of advanced malignant melanoma (MM). Several prognostic factors, mostly linked to inflammation, have been under scope to better select patients for such therapies. We aimed to build and apply a prognostic score in this setting.MethodsBaseline characteristics and outcomes on 147 patients with advanced MM treated with an anti-PD1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) in monotherapy, between Jan-2016 and Oct-2019, in the 1st, 2nd or 3rd line setting were collected from two centres in Portugal. Data cut-off for follow-up was May-2020. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS.ResultsWith a median FU of 28.93 months (95% CI [22.52–33.54]), mOS for the whole cohort was 14.75 months (95% CI, [10.80–18.71]). Overall, 43 and 104 patients were treated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab, respectively. We identified four adverse prognostic factors that were independent predictors of bad prognosis: number of metastatic sites >2 (p<0.001), baseline PS-ECOG =1 (p<0.001), presence of baseline lymphopenia (over lower limit of normal) (p=0.002) or very high baseline LDH (>2x upper limit of normal) (p<0.001).Patients were separated into three risk categories according to the number of risk factors present: favourable prognosis (no risk factors; n=34), intermediate prognosis (one risk factor; n=65) and poor prognosis (two or more risk factors; n=48). mOS was 43.41 (95% CI [32.13–54.69], 14.39 (95% CI [6.78–22.01]) and 6.53 months (95% CI [3.61–9.44]), for favourable, intermediate, and poor prognosis group, respectively (p<0.001; figure 1). AUC of ROC curve for OS was 0.737 (95% CI [0.654–0.819], p<0.001).Abstract 7 Figure 1Time to death - Kaplan-Meier survival plotConclusionsUsing easily accessible parameters from our daily practice, we propose the MELImmune prognostic score for advanced MM patients treated with anti-PD1 in monotherapy that could be incorporated to the daily clinical practice and clinical trials. We further aim to validate this score in an independent larger sample.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by both institutions’ Ethics Committee.

scholarly journals Impact of Pathological Stratification on the Clinical Outcomes of Advanced Well-Differentiated/Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Treated with Trabectedin

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1453
Author(s):  
Chiara Fabbroni ◽  
Giovanni Fucà ◽  
Francesca Ligorio ◽  
Elena Fumagalli ◽  
Marta Barisella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
The Impact

Background. We previously showed that grading can prognosticate the outcome of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LPS). In the present study, we aimed to explore the impact of pathological stratification using grading on the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced well-differentiated LPS (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS) treated with trabectedin. Patients: We included patients with advanced WDLPS and DDLPS treated with trabectedin at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori between April 2003 and November 2019. Tumors were categorized in WDLPS, low-grade DDLPS, and high-grade DDLPS according to the 2020 WHO classification. Patients were divided in two cohorts: Low-grade (WDLPS/low-grade DDLPS) and high-grade (high-grade DDLPS). Results: A total of 49 patients were included: 17 (35%) in the low-grade cohort and 32 (65%) in the high-grade cohort. Response rate was 47% in the low-grade cohort versus 9.4% in the high-grade cohort (logistic regression p = 0.006). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.7 months in the low-grade cohort and 3.2 months in the high-grade cohort. Grading was confirmed as an independent predictor of PFS in the Cox proportional-hazards regression multivariable model (adjusted hazard ratio low-grade vs. high-grade: 0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.22–0.94; adjusted p = 0.035). Conclusions: In this retrospective case series, sensitivity to trabectedin was higher in WDLPS/low-grade DDLPS than in high-grade DDLPS. If confirmed in larger series, grading could represent an effective tool to personalize the treatment with trabectedin in patients with advanced LPS.

Differential response rates in early-phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCT).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3133-3133
Author(s):  
Rozana Abdul Rahman ◽  
Neethu Billy Graham Mariam ◽  
Hitesh Mistry ◽  
Sreeja Aruketty ◽  
Matt Church ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Sustained Response ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Significant Difference

3133 Background: The primary objective of EPCCT (phase I and non-randomised phase II trials) is to determine the safety and tolerability of new therapeutic agents. Response rates (RR) in these trials have typically been reported at around 10-15%. Increasingly RR and survival outcomes are now investigated in EPCCT as primary or secondary objectives. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on patients (pts) enrolled onto an EPCCT between January 2018 and December 2019 at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Data on demographics, prior systemic treatment, sites of disease, performance status, comorbidities, types of therapy, RR, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with univariable and multivariable models. Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of pts with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Duration of response (DOR) was from initial response to progressive disease (PD). Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as CR+PR+ stable disease (SD). Results: A total of 247 pts were treated across 46 EPCCTs. Median age 61 years; 57% female. Sixty-six percent of pts had ≥2 lines of treatment and the majority were ECOG PS 0/1 (98%). Eighty-one percent of pts had ≥2 sites of metastatic disease, and 13 major tumour types were included. Monotherapy trials (159 pts) were predominantly targeted therapies (TT; 60%), or immunotherapies (IO; 20%). Combination therapy trials (88 pts) were TT-based (68%) or IO-based (32%). Data for RR analyses was available for 231 pts. ORR across all trials was 15% (CR 2%) and DCR was 63%. The median DOR was 8.3 months (mos) (95% CI: 7.0 – 9.7) with 28% of pts responding for >6 mos and 7% for >12 mos. ORR in pooled IO treated pts was 27%, DCR was 65% with sustained response >6 mos seen in 37% of these pts. ORR in pooled TT treated pts was 9.4%, DCR was 60% and sustained response > 6 mos seen in 25% of pts. ORR for IO v TT treated pts was significantly different, p=0.007 (pearson chi square), but no significant difference was seen for DCR. Median PFS for all patients was 5.0 mos (95% CI: 4.1 – 6.0) and OS was 10.4 mos (95% CI: 8.4 – 13.0). OS for those with a PR is not reached (HR for PR v PD, 0.006 (95% CI: 0.002 – 0.18). Pts with SD appear to have significantly better OS compared to those with PD (14.6 v 4.2 mos, HR 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1 – 0.3). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis for OS was significant for male gender (HR 1.9, p=0.002), presence of liver metastasis (HR 2.0, p=0.001), low Hb (HR 0.8, p=0.03) and log (LDH) (HR 1.9, p<0.001). Conclusions: Two-thirds of pts enrolled on EPCCTs benefitted in terms of DCR with significant OS improvement in those with PR and SD. Higher ORR were seen in pts receiving IO-based treatments however DCR was similar in IO and TT pts. Gender, presence of liver metastases, Hb count and LDH level contributed significantly to survival differences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document