Novel systemic therapies in the treatment of fibrolamellar carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16161-e16161
Author(s):  
Sara Gottlieb ◽  
Ariel Gliksberg ◽  
Erik Schadde ◽  
Paul Kent
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Multi Agent ◽  
Fibrolamellar Carcinoma ◽  
Systemic Therapies

e16161 Background: Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is an exceedingly rare liver cancer affecting children and young adults without underlying liver disease. Complete surgical resection is the primary treatment option, but recurrence is common. There are currently no established systemic therapies. We have treated patients in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting with three novel combination therapies: 5-fluorouracil/interferon/nivolumab (“Triple Therapy” or TT), gemcitabine/oxaliplatin/lenvatinib (GOL), and nivolumab/lenvatinib/quercetin (NLQ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate objective responses and tolerability of three multi-agent systemic therapies in the treatment of FLC. Methods: Data from all patients with FLC who received TT, GOL, or NLQ between May 2018 and February 2021 were reviewed. Patients who received a minimum of six cycles of systemic therapy with follow up scans at least two months after initiation were assessed based on objective response, survival, and toxicity. Results: Twenty-nine patients with FLC who were treated with novel multi-agent systemic therapy were evaluable based on the above criteria. Median age at start of treatment was 20 (7-52; 16F, 12M, 1 non-disclosed). Twenty-three patients received one combination therapy (13 TT, 8 GOL, 2 NLQ), five received two different lines (3 TT/NLQ, 2 TT/GOL), and one patient received all three novel combinations. Between our 29 patients, they had relapsed 36 total times, and 11 had already tried 2+ systemic therapies. Best RECIST 1.1 objective response (clinical remission + partial response) and tumor control rate (clinical remission + partial response + stable disease) were 58%/95%, 55%/100%, and 33%/83% for TT, GOL, and NLQ respectively. The median longest Progression Free Survival (PFS) on any novel multi-agent regimen was 9 months (2-29; 9.5 for TT, 7 for GOL, 6.5 for NLQ), with 18 patients still receiving the therapy extending their PFS. Of those with previous relapses, 56% have a PFS longer than their previous longest remission and 69% have a PFS longer than their previous shortest time to relapse. Half of patients with previous relapses are still receiving the treatment responsible for their longest PFS. Fever, chills, and nausea were the most common adverse effects experienced throughout all three regimens. Seven patients experienced 1+ grade 3 adverse event. There were no toxic deaths or organ failure. Two patients died as a result of disease; their longest PFS (1 on GOL, 1 on TT) were nine and 10 months. Conclusions: FLC is a devastating cancer with patients often relapsing even after successful surgical remission. There is a strong need for effective and tolerable systemic therapies for those with unresectable, relapsed, progressive, or metastatic disease. We have had promising results in treating FLC and prolonging survival with minimal toxicities using novel multi-agent regimens.

Early Experiences with Triple Immunochemotherapy in Adolescents and Young Adults with High-Risk Fibrolamellar Carcinoma

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 310-317
Author(s):  
Sara Gottlieb ◽  
Claire O’Grady ◽  
Ariel Gliksberg ◽  
Paul Kent
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Fibrolamellar Carcinoma

Introduction: There are no standard systemic therapies for the treatment of fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC), as surgery remains the only definitive option. We share our experiences using systemic “triple therapy” (TT) with 5-fluorouracil, interferon, and nivolumab for the treatment of relapsed, refractory, metastatic, or unresectable FLC. Methods: Data from all patients who received TT from May 2018 to July 2020 were reviewed to assess response, survival, and toxicity. Results: A total of 22 patients were treated with TT, of which 14 (median age of 21 years) were evaluable. They received a median of 18 cycles (8–44). At the time of analysis, the median progression-free survival was 9 months (4.5–26), 29% longer than prior to TT, with 5 patients achieving clinical remission, 8 patients stable or improving, and 1 progression. Overall objective response (clinical remission + partial response) was 50% and tumor control rate (clinical remission + partial response + stable disease) was 93%. Two patients withdrew from treatment due to side effects. Discussion/Conclusion: Our early results support TT as a promising medical option to slow disease progression and prolong survival in high-risk patients with FLC. TT can be administered in the outpatient setting and has shown good tolerability. Further longitudinal data is needed to confirm outcomes, especially in patients still early in their treatment.

Response to selpercatinib versus prior systemic therapy in patients (pts) with RET fusion+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9032-9032
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Drilon ◽  
Oliver Gautschi ◽  
Benjamin Besse ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Systemic Therapies

9032 Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective, potent, CNS-active RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of RET fusion+ lung or thyroid cancers. Selpercatinib demonstrated durable antitumor activity in previously treated pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC in an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial, LIBRETTO-001 (Besse et al., ASCO 2021). Methods: Pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC enrolled in the global, multicenter, LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128; 16 countries, 89 sites). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety. This post-hoc intrapatient analysis was based on a 30 March 2020 data cutoff date. Historical physician-reported best overall response (BOR) from last systemic therapy received prior to enrollment was compared with selpercatinib BOR by independent review committee per RECIST v1.1, with each patient serving as his/her own control. Results: In efficacy-evaluable pts (N = 218) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo), median pt age was 61 years, the majority with ECOG of 0/1 (37%/61%), with a median of 2 (range: 1-15) prior systemic therapies. Overall, 57% of patients responded to selpercatinib while 16% responded to the immediate prior therapy. ORR improvements with selpercatinib were observed regardless of prior therapy: chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (57% vs 14%), single-agent ICI (48% vs 3%), or chemotherapy (58% vs 15%). A total of 108 patients (49%) did not respond to immediate prior therapy but responded to selpercatinib. Fewer patients had progressive disease as their BOR with selpercatinib (2%) compared to the immediate prior therapy (28%). The median duration of therapy for selpercatinib was notably extended compared with that of the immediate prior therapy (11.8 vs. 3.4 months, respectively). Conclusions: In pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC treated on LIBRETTO-001, systemic therapies administered prior to enrollment achieved less meaningful clinical benefit than selpercatinib. Selpercatinib demonstrated consistent efficacy regardless of the type of prior therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.

Novel systemic therapies in hard to treat fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16653-e16653
Author(s):  
Ariel Gliksberg ◽  
Claire O'Grady ◽  
Paul Kent
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Multi Agent ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Systemic Therapies

e16653 Background: Fibrolamellar Carcinoma (FLC) is a very rare liver malignancy of young adults without underlying liver disease (0.02 per 100,000 in the US).. Complete resection is the primary therapy, but recurrence rates are still > 50%. Currently there are no established systemic treatments, especially for high-risk disease (unresectable, relapse, progression, or metastatic disease). At our institution triple therapy “TT” with Nivolumab/5FU/Interferon α-2b is our first line, followed by other novel combination therapies such as Gemcitabine/Oxaliplatin/Lenvantinib (GOL) or Nivolumb/Lenvantinib/Quecertin (NLQ). Objective: To evaluate the tolerability and early response of multi-agent systemic therapies in patients with high-risk FLC. Methods: Data from all patients with FLC who received systemic therapies from 5/2018 to 2/2020 was reviewed to assess tolerability, survival and toxicity. Results: Nineteen patients were treated with systemic therapies of which 16 (10F, 6M median age of 19) were evaluable based on follow up scans. Between our 16 patients they had relapsed 28 times, 12 had metastatic disease and 7 had tried 2+ systemic therapies. RECIST 1.1 objective response (CR+PR) and tumor control (CR+PR+SD) are 44% and 69%. Since starting multi-agent therapy, all 6 patients who had previously been treated with monotherapy, have already exceeded their previous longest time to progression. Thirteen patients were treated with “TT” [12.5 median cycles (6-38)]. Three patients were treated with NLQ including 2 who failed TT. Of these, the 1 evaluable patient achieved CR. Two patients were treated with GOL, 1 who failed TT and one who was post liver transplant, both had sustained PR of 6 and 9 months. Subsequently one died and one achieved CR. For the 6 patients who achieved remission before or during therapy, only 1 has relapsed. To date the period of response is already 68% longer than the previous best length of response. There was 1 withdrawal due to grade 3 colitis and 2 dose adjustments. All experienced mild adverse effects, most commonly fever, headache, and hypertension, with 3 patients with grade 3 toxicities. Conclusions: FLC is a devastating disease with patients often relapsing even after successful surgical remission. Currently there is a need for tolerable systemic therapies. Although at our institution, TT is our frontline therapy, there are other combinations of immunochemotherapies that we have used to treat FLC with preliminary success and minimal toxicities. Our early results show that multi-agent systemic therapy in hard-to-treat FLC is worthy of further study.

Early experiences with triple immunochemotherapy in young adults with high-risk fibrolamellar carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 510-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire O'Grady ◽  
Ariel Gliksberg ◽  
Paul Kent
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Interferon Alpha 2B ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Fibrolamellar Carcinoma

510 Background: Fibrolamellar Carcinoma (FLC) is a rare liver cancer affecting young adults without underlying liver disease. Surgery is the only proven therapy, and recurrence is common. There are no proven systemic treatments, especially for high-risk FLC (unresectable, relapse, progression, metastatic). Research suggests that immunotherapy may work. We share our experience using systemic “triple immunochemotherapy” (TT): 2 week cycles of 7 days continuous infusion 5FU or oral capecitabine, interferon alpha-2b on days 1,3,5,7 or PEG-Interferon and nivolumab on day 1. Methods: Data from all patients who received TT from 5/2018 to 9/2019 was reviewed to assess tolerability, survival and toxicity. Results: 14 patients were treated with TT of which 10 (8F,2M with a median age of 20) were evaluable. They received a median of 13 cycles (6-31). At time of analysis, the median progression free survival was 6 months, 22% longer than prior to TT, with 80% of patients (8) stable or improving, 1 progression, and 1 who died 2 months after initiating TT. For the 4 patients who achieved surgical remission, none have relapsed (PFS 9 months). Overall objective response (CR+PR) and tumor control rate (CR+PR+SD) were 60% and 80%, respectively. There were no withdrawals from treatment due to side effects, though 2 had dose adjustments. All experienced mild adverse effects, most commonly fever and headache, but only 2 patients had grade 3 toxicity. Conclusions: Our early results of TT for high-risk FLC are promising, with good tolerability and treatment response, particularly in patients who have achieved surgical CR. Further longitudinal data is needed to confirm outcomes, especially in patients still early in their treatment. [Table: see text]

Alkylating agent rechallenge in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ophelie De Rycke ◽  
Thomas Walter ◽  
Marine Perrier ◽  
Olivia Hentic ◽  
Catherine Lombard-Bohas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mgmt Expression ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

A rechallenge is common after initial efficacy of alkylating-based chemotherapy (ALK) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET). High MGMT expression seems associated with lower response to ALK. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ALK rechallenge in PanNET. Secondly, to assess the evolution of MGMT expression under ALK. All consecutive patients with advanced PanNETs who received initial ALK (achieving tumor control) followed by a pause > 3 months, then an ALK rechallenge (ALK2) upon progression were retrospectively studied (Cohort A). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival under ALK2 (PFS2). The MGMT expression was retrospectively assessed by immunohistochemistry (H-score) in consecutive PanNET surgically resected following ALK (Cohort B). We foud that cohort A included 62 patients (median Ki67 8%), for which ALK1 followed by pause achieved an objective response rate of 55%, and a PFS1 of 23.7 months (95% IC, 19.8-27.6). ALK2 achieved no objective response, and stability in 62% of patients. The median PFS2 was 9.2 months (IC 95% 7.1-11.3). At multivariable analysis, a hormonal syndrome (p=0.032) and a pause longer than 12 months (p=0.041) were associated with a longer PFS2. In the cohort B (17 patients), the median MGMT H-score increased from 45 (IQR 18-105) before ALK, to 100 (IQR 56-180) after ALK (p=0.003). We conclude that after initial efficacy of ALK treatment, a pause followed by ALK rechallenge might be appropriate to prolong tumor control, improve quality of life and limit long-term adverse events. Increased MGMT expression under ALK might explain low efficacy of ALK rechallenge.

scholarly journals 177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Radiosensitizing Capecitabine Versus Octreotide Long-Acting Release as First-Line Systemic Therapy in Advanced Grade 1 or 2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1167-1175
Author(s):  
Swayamjeet Satapathy ◽  
Bhagwant R. Mittal ◽  
Ashwani Sood ◽  
Apurva Sood ◽  
Rakesh Kapoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Octreotide Lar ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Long Acting

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) as first-line systemic therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable or metastatic grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs treated with first-line 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine or octreotide LAR from September 2012 to December 2019 were collected and analyzed for response, toxicity, and survival outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (median age: 53 years; range 14-81 years) with treatment-naïve advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs were included. Thirty-six patients received a median cumulative dose of 27.3 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE intravenously at 8-12 weeks' intervals along with 1,250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 0-14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE, whereas 40 patients were administered 30 mg octreotide LAR intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor 1.1, the objective response rate was 38% in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with 15% in the octreotide LAR arm ( P = .025), whereas the disease control rates were 88% and 67% in 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms, respectively ( P = .035). The median durations of progression-free survival in the 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms were 54 months and 16 months, respectively ( P = .017), whereas the median overall survival was not reached and not significantly different across both the arms. Of the treatment-related adverse events, no major difference was observed in the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION First-line systemic 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine achieved better radiologic response and longer progression-free survival compared with octreotide LAR in patients with advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs. Future randomized controlled trials are, however, required to determine the best treatment sequence for the treatment-naïve patients with advanced GEP-NETs.

Matched therapies for advanced gastric cancer based on genotype: A real-world study in China.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16098-e16098
Author(s):  
Qin Liu ◽  
Ju Yang ◽  
Nandie Wu ◽  
Song Liu ◽  
Yipeng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Kit Mutation

e16098 Background: Systemic therapy options for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) are limited. We here presented the efficacy results for advanced GC patients matched to targeted therapies or immunotherapies based on the identification of tumor tissue genotypes. Methods: We selected 30 patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2020 with advanced GC at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School identified with actionable alterations and received ≥1 matched therapies. Tumor biopsy specimens from the patients were analyzed using NGS and/or selected immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results: In these 30 patients, median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 28-83) and 6 (20%) were female. In total, 11 (37%) harbored c-MET amplification/overexpression (received savolitinib or crizotinib, cohort A), 9 (30%) harbored HER2 mutation/overexpression (received RC48-ADC or trastuzumab, cohort B), 6 (20%) dMMR/MSI-H/TMB-H (received sintilimab, pembrolizumab, tislelizumab or nivolumab, combined with antivascular or not, cohort C), 2 (7%) KIT mutation/amplification (received imatinib or anlotinib, cohort D), 1 (3%) BRAF V600E mutation (received vemurafenib, cohort E) and 1 (3%) EGFR mutation (received afatinib, cohort F). Except for three patients in cohort C, all patients received at least one previous line systemic therapy. In cohort A, three of 11 patients had an objective response (1 complete response and 2 partial responses, objective response rate (ORR) 27%), disease control rate (DCR) was 45%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 2.1 months, and median overall survival (mOS) was 3.7 months. In cohort B, ORR was 44% (4/9), DCR was 78% (7/9), mPFS and mOS was 3.1 months and 5.5 months, respectively. In cohort C, ORR was 17% (1/6), DCR was 67% (4/6), mPFS and mOS was 1.9 months and 6.8 months, respectively. In cohort D, no patient had objective response or disease control. In cohort E, the one patient had PR. Stable disease was observed in the patient in cohort F. In all cohorts, ORR was 30% (9/30), DCR was 60% (18/30), mPFS and mOS was 2.7 months and 5.8 months, respectively. Conclusions: Overall, 30 patients with advanced GC were treated with matched therapies according to specific genotype. These real-world outcomes suggested that matched therapies for advanced GC has promising efficacy, supporting the adoption of genotyping in treatment determination.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies in advanced head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-555
Author(s):  
Lingrong Tang ◽  
Tingting Liu ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Jun Dang ◽  
Guang Li
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Aim: We assessed the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors relative to other systemic therapies in previously treated recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Materials & methods: Relative treatment effects were assessed from eligible randomized controlled trials using Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: Among 15 trials evaluating 14 treatments, nivolumab achieved the best overall survival (OS) benefit; zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel provided the best progression-free survival benefit and objective response rate. Buparlisib + paclitaxel and zalutumumab were associated with the best OS rate at 6 and 12 months, respectively; nivolumab yielded the best OS rate at 18–24 months. Conclusion: Nivolumab was the most favorable treatment. Zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel had better efficiency, and might be a better selection for patients with programmed death-ligand 1-low/negative tumors than other treatments.

Safety and Antitumor Activity of Pembrolizumab in Advanced Programmed Death Ligand 1–Positive Endometrial Cancer: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (22) ◽  
pp. 2535-2541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Ott ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Dominique Berton-Rigaud ◽  
Elena Elez ◽  
Michael J. Pishvaian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Programmed Death Ligand 1 ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Purpose The multicohort phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 (NCT02054806) study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab, an anti–programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) –positive advanced solid tumors. The results from the advanced endometrial cancer cohort are reported. Patients and Methods Female patients with locally advanced or metastatic PD-L1–positive endometrial cancer who had experienced progression after standard therapy were eligible. Patients received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 24 months or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary efficacy end point was objective response rate by RECIST (version 1.1). Secondary end points included safety, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, and overall survival. The data cutoff was February 17, 2016. Results Of 75 patients screened, 36 (48.0%) had PD-L1–positive tumors, and 24 (32.0%) were enrolled. Fifteen (62.5%) of these 24 patients had received at least two previous lines of therapy for advanced disease. Three patients (13.0%) achieved confirmed partial response (95% CI, 2.8% to 33.6%); the median DOR was not reached. Two patients were still receiving treatment and exhibiting continued response at time of data cutoff. Three additional patients (13.0%) achieved stable disease, with a median duration of 24.6 weeks. One patient who achieved partial response had a polymerase E mutation. Thirteen patients (54.2%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs), with fatigue (20.8%), pruritus (16.7%), pyrexia (12.5%), and decreased appetite (12.5%) occurring in ≥ 10% of patients. Grade 3 treatment-related AEs were reported in four patients. No patient experienced a grade 4 AE, and no patient discontinued treatment because of an AE. Conclusion Pembrolizumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile and durable antitumor activity in a subgroup of patients with heavily pretreated advanced PD-L1–positive endometrial cancer.

scholarly journals Effect of third- and fourth-line systemic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sei Naito ◽  
Osamu Ichiyanagi ◽  
Tomoyuki Kato ◽  
Hidenori Kanno ◽  
Takafumi Narisawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

Abstract Data on the outcomes of third- or fourth-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of therapy beyond the second line. We retrospectively analysed data of mRCC patients who underwent systemic therapy at Yamagata University Hospital. The best objective response (BOR), response rate (RR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed for each line of treatment. To investigate the correlation between overall survival (OS) and the number of treatment lines during a patient’s lifetime, the median OS was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. In the first-, second-, and third-line therapies, approximately 20% of patients had long PFS of >15 months. In targeted treatments beyond the third line, only one treatment suppressed disease progression for >10 months. Among patients who died during the follow-up period, those treated with triple and quadruple lines had similar OS (42.5 months vs. 48.4 months, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with triple or more lines of therapy had better OS; however, quadruple or more lines of therapy was not an independent prognostic factor. We concluded that third-line systemic therapy could improve OS; however, fourth-line therapy could not.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document