Statistical Methodology for Evaluating Combination Therapy in Clinical Trials

Antibodies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Iftikhar ◽  
Hamza Hassan ◽  
Nimra Iftikhar ◽  
Adeela Mushtaq ◽  
Atif Sohail ◽  
...  

Background: Immunotherapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has been the focus in recent years due to its myeloma-specific immune responses. We reviewed the literature on non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to highlight future perspectives. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov to include phase I/II clinical trials. Data from 39 studies (1906 patients) were included. Of all the agents, Isatuximab (Isa, anti-CD38) and F50067 (anti-CXCR4) were the only mAbs to produce encouraging results as monotherapy with overall response rates (ORRs) of 66.7% and 32% respectively. Isa showed activity when used in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (Dex), producing a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 83%. Additionally, Isa used in combination with pomalidomide (Pom) and Dex resulted in a CBR of 73%. Indatuximab Ravtansine (anti-CD138 antibody-drug conjugate) produced an ORR of 78% and 79% when used in combination with Len-Dex and Pom-Dex, respectively. Conclusions: Combination therapy using mAbs such as indatuximab, pembrolizumab, lorvotuzumab, siltuximab or dacetuzumab with chemotherapy agents produced better outcomes as compared to monotherapies. Further clinical trials investigating mAbs targeting CD38 used in combination therapy are warranted.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9

Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome in which patients have symptoms of Heart Failure (HF), such as dyspnea and fatigue, a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and evidence of cardiac dysfunction as a cause of symptoms, such as abnormal Left Ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction with elevated filling pressures. Besides LV diastolic dysfunction, recent investigations suggest a more complex and heterogeneous pathophysiology, including systolic reserve abnormalities, chronotropic incompetence, stiffening of ventricular tissue, atrial dysfunction, secondary Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), impaired vasodilatation and endothelial dysfunction. Unlike Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), clinical trials over the years have not yet identified effective treatments that reduce mortality in patients with HFpEF. A database on use of carvedilol in a private cardiologist's practice was begun in 1997 and concluded at the end of 2018. We used this database to test the hypothesis that combining pharmacological interventions to address diastolic dysfunction (carvedilol), volume overload (spironolactone/eplerenone) and endothelial dysfunction (statins) with weight loss may benefit patients with HFpEF. We report analysis of 335 patients with HFpEF comprised of 61% female (mean age 74 ± 8) and 39% males (mean age 72 ± 7). Initial EF ranged between 50 and 77% with mean EF of 57 ± 6%. Only 15 patients were changed to metoprolol succinate, verapamil or diltiazem because of adverse side effects. Two hundred and twenty of the patients were in normal sinus rhythm when started on carvedilol, spironolactone/eplerenone and statin therapy with weight loss counseling. After 5 years, 191 patients were still on combination therapy, and only 31 (17%) had developed Atrial Fibrillation (AF). Compared to previous HFpEF trials reporting a 32% risk of developing atrial fibrillation after 4 years, our combination therapy significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the risk of developing AF over 5 years. Thus, irrespective of age and sex with comorbidities of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), patients with HFpEF can be managed successfully with carvedilol, spironolactone/eplerenone and statins with a clinical benefit being a reduced risk of developing AF. We consider these data hypothesis-generating and hope these results will be tested further in database analyses and clinical trials.


Author(s):  
F. Jessen

Over the last several years, many clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have failed and in those with a positive signal, the effect size was of limited magnitude. It has become clear that the molecular mechanisms, which underlie neuronal damage and clinical worsening in AD are complex; maybe even too complex to be sufficiently impacted upon by a single molecular target approach. As in many other diseases, combination therapy might be a way forward to in achieve effects, which eventually are large enough to robustly prove efficacy and to provide patient related benefit.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2096-2096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Buske ◽  
Shalal Sadullah ◽  
Efsthatios Kastritis ◽  
Giulia Benevolo ◽  
Ramon Garcia-Sanz ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare indolent lymphoma with a low incidence of ~3 cases per million per year. There are few randomized trials and no well-established treatment standards in WM. Treatment landscapes for treatment-naïve and relapsed WM are heterogeneous and data on treatment choices and their outcome in patients (pts) outside clinical trials are lacking. The goal of this project was to generate data on epidemiologic/treatment patterns and efficacy outcomes for WM over a prolonged period of time (~10 yr) in a large pan-European effort. Methods In this observational chart review, physicians completed a retrospective electronic record for pts who fit the following inclusion criteria: confirmed WM, symptomatic disease at treatment initiation, front line treatment initiated between Jan 2000-Jan 2014, and availability of complete clinical/biologic evaluation at diagnosis/initial therapy. Study endpoints included initial/subsequent lines of treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The number of pt records per country was prespecified to balance the distribution between European countries. Results Of 454 pt records reviewed, cases were from France (n=92), United Kingdom (UK; n=72), Germany (n=66), Spain (n=60), Italy (n=56), Greece (n=25), Netherlands (n=25), Poland (n=21), Austria (n=19), and Czech Republic (n=16). Data were summarized across 5 lines of treatment for 454, 397, 160, 61, and 26 pts, respectively. Median age at initiation of front-line treatment was 65 yr (range, 29-89); 61% were male. The most common reasons for initiating treatment at diagnosis were constitutional symptoms (58%), cytopenias (72%; anemia [69%]), and IgM-related symptoms (57%). Choice of therapy varied with line of treatment; monotherapy fell from 31% in front-line to 20%/21% in 2nd/3rd-line ( Table 1). Combination therapy with antibody increased from 40% in front-line to 64%/56% in 2nd/3rd-line. Across all lines, rituximab followed by cyclophosphamide, and to a lesser extent, chlorambucil, fludarabine, vincristine, and bendamustine, were the most common agents, excluding steroids, that were used as monotherapy or in any combination with use varying between countries (Table 1). Median PFS decreased with successive lines of treatment (29 vs 23 vs 16 mo), (Figure 1) and varied by country and choice of agents (Table 1). Median OS was 123 mo, but significantly lower in pts ≥75 yr (75 mo) or with high-risk IPSSWM risk score (91 mo) and similar for pts with low/intermediate risk groups. Considerable country-specific OS differences were noted. Other malignancies were reported in 12% after diagnosis of WM. Conclusions The retrospective chart review of WM pts treated in Europe shows that constitutional symptoms and anemia are the most common reasons for initiating therapy. Rituximab was the most commonly used agent across all lines of treatment. Outside clinical trials, monotherapy is widely used even at first relapse with notable differences between countries. This large observational dataset will be an important tool to improve understanding of treatment practice and survival of WM pts in Europe outside of clinical trials, as well as unmet medical needs in the community. Table 1. Use of Monotherapy or Combination Regimens and Median PFS in Front -, 2nd -, and 3rd-Line Settings Overall and by Country Country Number of Cases, n Monotherapy, % Combination Therapy With Antibody†, % Combination Therapy Without Antibody, % Median PFS,Months (95% CI) Front line 2nd line 3rd line Front line 2nd line 3rd line Front line 2nd line 3rd line Front line 2nd line 3rd line Front line 2nd line 3rd line Overall 454 397 160 31 20 21 40 63 56 28 14 21 29.0 (25-31) 23.0 (20-26) 16.0 (10-18) France 92 86 43 62 26 16 24 66 70 14 8 14 28.5 (22-32) 30.0 (20-37) 16.0 (9-32) United Kingdom 72 64 19 18 22 21 19 55 42 63 23 37 31.5 (25-36) 20.0 (11-35) 13.0 (9-33) Germany 66 52 18 9 8 22 61 81 50 30 8 11 36.5 (29-44) 24.0 (16-29) 8.0 (3-16) Spain 60 58 21 43 28 38 38 59 52 18 12 5 18.0 (15-25) 16.0 (12-24) 11.0 (9-24) Italy 56 47 20 20 17 15 57 68 70 23 6 15 30.5 (20-39) 30.0 (18-42) 17.0 (4-21) Eastern European* 37 30 12 8 13 8 32 40 0 60 47 92 33.0 (26-38) 20.0 (16-26) 20.5 (4-38) Smaller European** 71 60 27 35 22 26 56 67 63 7 12 11 23.0 (18-29) 16.0 (13-25) 16.0 (7-26) * Includes Czech Republic and Poland **Includes Austria, Greece, and Netherlands † Antibodies other than rituximab, <1% Figure 1. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier PFS Estimates by Line of Treatment Disclosures Buske: CELLTRION, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sadullah:Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; NAPP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; TEVA: Consultancy; Boehringer: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Kastritis:Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Garcia-Sanz:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Novartis: Research Funding. Leleu:Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; TEVA: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria. Willenbacher:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; CTI: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Hajek:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Cheng:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Graef:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Dimopoulos:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Research Funding.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
Ekaterina P Fadeeva ◽  
Alla S Lisyanskaya ◽  
Georgiy M Manikhas ◽  
Ruslan I Glushakov ◽  
Natalia I Tapilskaya

This review provides the current evidence of clinical studies on the effectiveness of endocrine therapy for breast cancer and endometrial cancer, including endometrial stromal sarcoma, by aromatase inhibitor (AI) III generation. The review presents dates from clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of AI and tamoxifen, as well as dates on combination therapy AI with inhibitors of mTOR pathway (BOLERO-2 trial), an antiestrogen (SWOG S0226, FACT, FIRST trials), an inhibitor of CDK4 / 6 (PALOMA -1 trial) and other drugs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1063-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Combe ◽  
Frank Behrens ◽  
Neil McHugh ◽  
Fiona Brock ◽  
Urs Kerkmann ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate the clinical/functional outcomes associated with etanercept (ETN) monotherapy versus combination therapy in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Methods.Data from patients with PsA who received ETN alone (n = 322) or combined with methotrexate (MTX; n = 152) for 24 weeks in 2 placebo-controlled clinical trials were summarized across studies.Results.Similar proportions of patients in the monotherapy and combination therapy groups achieved the PsA Response Criteria (80% and 83%) and the American College of Rheumatology improvements of 20% (ACR20; both 70%); numerically higher proportions receiving monotherapy achieved ACR50 (55% vs 48%) and ACR70 (35% vs 27%). Little between-group difference was observed in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index improvement.Conclusion.ETN with and without MTX provided similar benefits in active PsA.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 243-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl-Erik Andersson ◽  
Nurul Choudhury ◽  
Jean-Nicolas Cornu ◽  
Moses Huang ◽  
Cees Korstanje ◽  
...  

Urgency is the prevalent and most bothersome symptom of overactive bladder (OAB) and the treatment of urgency is the primary objective in the management of OAB. Urgency has a major impact on other symptoms of OAB and culminates in an increased frequency of micturition and reduced volume voided, which may contribute to shorter intervals between the need to void. Antimuscarinic agents and mirabegron, a β3-adrenoceptor agonist, constitute the main oral pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of urgency and other OAB symptoms. The reduction of urgency and other OAB symptoms significantly improve health-related quality of life. This review will explore the distinct mechanisms of action and effects of antimuscarinic agents and mirabegron, in relation to their effect on the pathophysiology of urgency. The review will also provide an overview of the various validated measurements of urgency and the numerous clinical trials regarding antimuscarinic agent monotherapy, mirabegron monotherapy, or combination treatment with mirabegron added on to the antimuscarinic agent solifenacin. A narrative review of the literature relating to pathophysiology of urgency, the validated measurements of urgency, and clinical trials relating to the pharmacological treatment of urgency. Antimuscarinic agent monotherapy, mirabegron monotherapy, or combination treatment with mirabegron added on to the antimuscarinic agent solifenacin statistically significantly reduce the symptoms of urgency compared with placebo. Combination therapy with mirabegron added on to solifenacin also statistically significantly reduces the symptoms of severe urgency compared with antimuscarinic agent monotherapy. A critique of the clinical benefits of combination therapy is also provided. Combination therapy provides an alternative treatment in patients with OAB that includes urgency who respond poorly to first-line monotherapy and who may otherwise often move on to more invasive treatments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document