Ecodiagnostics of ethno-natural processes in the European region of Russia

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Kochurov ◽  
Petr Merkulov ◽  
Svetlana Merkulova

The book deals with theoretical issues of ecodiagnostics, interaction of ethnic groups and landscapes, analyzes the history of the development of the geo-ecological approach and ethnocultural landscape studies in geographical science. The stages of interaction between human society and the natural environment on the territory of the ethnogenesis of the Mordovian people in the Holocene are described in detail. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the current ecological and economic state of the territory of the Republic of Mordovia. The focus is on the study of bioclimatic characteristics of the territory of the Republic, the geo-ecological state of the air basin and surface waters, as well as their impact on the health of the population. The publication is intended for geoecologists, geographers, local historians, school teachers, as well as management employees involved in planning environmental and socio-economic activities at the level of the Russian Federation.

Author(s):  
Evgeny P. Alekseev ◽  

This review examines Art of Comprehending Art, a collection of scholarly articles based on the materials of the conference Historical and Theoretical Issues of Art Studies: For N. A. Dmitrieva’s 100th Birthday (held on April 24–25, 2017 at the State Institute of Art Studies of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation). The first part of the collection presents colleagues’ memories about N. A. Dmitrieva’s work revealing various facets of her talent. In the second part of the book, scholarly articles by contemporary art historians are devoted to the issues that N. A. Dmitrieva examined, i.e. the history of art criticism and art education in Russia, theoretical and methodological issues (image and word, issues of interpretation, kitsch), the creative work of P. Picasso, M. Vrubel, and A. Chekhov. The third section contains fragments of N. A. Dmitrieva’s diary, as well as two previously unpublished articles.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melnikov Victor Yurievich

Human society is not a history of ideas, as such, of the activities or the vicissitudes of destinies, the so-called historical personalities acting according to the arbitrariness of their mind and heart. The history of society has its “earthly basis”. This is, first of all, the history of the development of people, their existence, traditions of the people, spirituality, moral values, economic development, rules of conduct, laws of the country in which you live, in short, the ideology of the state and how it is presented by the authorities through the media.  But in Russia, as stated in article 13 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, "No ideology can be established as a state or mandatory." The same Constitution recognizes “ideological diversity”.  Subsequent postulates of the same Constitution of the Russian Federation refute the foregoing.


Author(s):  
S. O. Kurbanov ◽  
◽  

The article deals with the question what date is historically correct to trace the history of the beginning of diplomatic relations between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea to. The author questioned validity of fixing 1990 as the date when the diplomatic relations between Russia and South Korea started taking into account peculiarities and historical significance of the Russian-Korean treaties of 1992 and 1884.


Author(s):  
Rashid Kholmurodov ◽  
◽  
Dilshod Kholmurodov ◽  

The article provides a scientific analysis of the history of cooperation between archaeologists of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Russian Federation on the basis of scientific research of archaeologists. It is scientifically based that the cooperation between the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Russian Federation in the field of archeology is developing, which not only develops the rich ancient culture of Uzbekistan, but also serves to further strengthen the ties of friendship between the two peoples.


Author(s):  
Marina Khasanova

This article is dedicated to examination of the role of Parliamentary Assembly in development of the Union State. The goal is to trace the parliamentary activity in the Union State throughout the entire time of its existence, the objectives that were pursued, their transformation, and change of conditions for their accomplishment. This topic is especially relevant in the current context. A new milestone has passed in the history of Union State: December 2019 marked twenty years since its creation. Agreement on the formation of Parliamentary Assembly of the Community of Belarus-Russia Union State was signed earlier, in 1996. The novelty of this works consists in comprehensive and detailed analysis of different stages in formation of Parliamentary Assembly, which allows describing their role in further consolidation of the Union State. The scientific problem of this article can be articulated as follows: Parliamentary Assembly is not just a legislative institution that formulates the agenda for development of the Union State; it is also a platform for a continuous dialogue between Russia and Belarus. Therefore, examination of this government institution in an urgent scientific problem that allows revealing the key aspects of evolution of the Union State. As the resources for this article, the author explored the legislative acts of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation, legal information from official portals of the Union State and the Parliamentary Assembly. This underline the need for further development of parliamentarism in Russia-Belarus Union State for the purpose of improvement and strengthening of relations between the countries in the current conditions of international transformation. The article is based on most relevant documents pertaining to Russia-Belarus relations for the period from 1991 to the present.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
Furkat Toshboev ◽  
◽  
Dilshod Kholmurodov

The article provides a scientific analysis of the history of the study of archaeological monuments of Uzbekistan by the Russian intelligentsia. Archaeological excavations can be viewed in two ways. In the first direction, the study of settlements in agricultural micro-districts -settlements, settlements (fortified communal settlements), caravanserais, defensive structures, castles and cities. The second direction is the study of cemeteries associated with the culture of livestock breeders.


Author(s):  
Irina Sergeevna Astakhova

The paper presents the results of a study on the expansion of places of traditional residence and traditional economic activities of indigenous small-numbered peoples of the Russian Federation. A comparative analysis of the approaches of the Kha-barovsk region and the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) to including territories in the official List of such places is carried out. The main criteria for classifying territories as places of traditional residence and tra-ditional economic activities of minor indigenous peoples are highlighted. Examples that cause the greatest difficulties are given, in particular the inclu-sion of urban settlements in the List. On the basis of the developed criteria with the use of field data, the possibility of including the municipal formation “City of Tommot” of Aldansky district of the Repub-lic of Sakha (Yakutia) in the List is considered. The research results can be used in the preparation of analytical materials in order to improve Russian leg-islation.


Author(s):  
П.А. Кузьминов ◽  
Л.А. Чибиров

В статье проанализирован сложный процесс становления научной шко- лы профессора В.Д. Дзидзоева, в рамках которой работают десятки молодых специ- алистов из разных регионов РФ. Дзидзоев опубликовал более 460 научных и научно- популярных трудов (около 50 из них в соавторстве), в том числе 32 монографии и брошюры. Под руководством Дзидзоева защищены 40 кандидатских и 7 докторских диссертаций. Его последователи защищали кандидатские и докторские диссерта- ции по трем специальностям: 1. Отечественная история – 07.00.02; 2. Политология – 23.00.02 («Политические институты, этнополитическая конфликтология, нацио- нальные и политические процессы и технологии»); 3. Теория и история права и го- сударства. В.Д. Дзидзоев удостоен почетных званий «Заслуженный деятель науки»: Республики Северная Осетия-Алания (2000 г.), Республики Южная Осетия (2001 г.), Кабардино-Балкарской Республики (2012 г.), Республики Дагестан (2017 г.). Является ВАКовским профессором по трем специальностям: отечественная история (1995 г.), политология (2001 г.), теория государства и права (2017 г.). The article analyzes the complex process of the formation of the scientifi c school of Professor V. D. Dzidzoev, which employs dozens of young specialists from different regions of the Russian Federation. Dzidzoev has published more than 460 scientifi c and popular scientifi c works (about 50 of them in co-authorship), including 32 monographs and pamphlets. Under the leadership of Dzidzoev, 40 candidate’s and 7 doctoral theses were defended in three specialties: 1. Russian history – 07.00.02; 2. Political Science – 23.00.02 («Political institutions, ethnopolitical confl ictology, national and political processes and technologies»); 3. Theory and history of law and state. Professor V.D. Dzidzoev was awarded the honorary titles of «Honored Scientist» of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania (2000), the Republic of South Ossetia (2001), the Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria (2012), the Republic of Dagestan (2017). He is a professor of the Higher Attestation Commission in three specialties: national history (1995), political science (2001), theory of state and law (2017).


Author(s):  
E.V. Antonov ◽  
V.I. Antonov

The article investigates criminal law with administrative prejudice, as well as the history of the emergence and development of norms with administrative prejudice in the modern criminal legislation of Russia and foreign countries on various grounds. The problems of the application of norms with administrative prejudice in practice are considered. The criminal legislation of the states of the former Soviet Union, in particular the Republic of Belarus and the Republic of Kazakhstan, is analyzed from the point of view of further development of the criminal legislation of these countries towards improving the institution of administrative prejudice and increasing the number of norms with administrative prejudice. It is noted that some post-Soviet states (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia) in their criminal legislation abandoned the institution of administrative prejudice and tried to replace the norms with administrative prejudice with others. Attention is drawn to the problems with the registration of administrative offenses and the application of data on registered administrative offenses for the correct application of the rules with administrative prejudice in practice by the law enforcement bodies of the Russian Federation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document