Perspectives from a pediatrician about diagnostic errors

Diagnosis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geeta Singhal

AbstractThis opinion paper provides perspectives from a pediatrician about diagnostic challenges in caring for children. This essay shares personal experiences and lessons learned from a pediatric hospitalist about caring for children and making errors in diagnosis. This piece offers guidance about how to teach medical learners key concepts about error in diagnosis with underscoring the importance of developing critical thinking skills. Finally, the author offers tips from the literature about how physicians and other care providers can reorganize their own thinking (metacognition) to address their clinical practice.

1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
CB Payne ◽  
AR Bird

Uncertainty in the theories that provide the underpinnings of the clinical practice of podiatric biomechanics creates a dilemma: How should educators prepare students to make clinical decisions in the context of this uncertainty? Students need to be exposed to all approaches and be given the tools to make their own clinical decisions. Critical thinking involves the ability to weigh evidence, examine arguments, and construct rational bases for decisions and beliefs. Perry's model of cognitive development provides educators with one model for fostering critical thinking skills in students to guide them through the uncertainty in clinical biomechanics. This article presents the teaching philosophy that is used to teach undergraduate clinical biomechanics in the Department of Podiatry at La Trobe University, Australia.


BMUS Bulletin ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Fernando

Cognitive ability as well as psychomotor ability distinguishes the professional sonographer. The process of critical thinking is an essential component of sonography. However, the concept of critical thinking requires more explicit acknowledgement from the profession in order to promote change in educational strategies leading to better clinical practice. This article represents the rationale for developing critical thinking skills in student sonographers and discusses possible barriers to thinking critically. Strategies for promoting critical thinking skills in both the classroom and the clinical situation will be explored.


10.18060/3160 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shauna P. Acquavita ◽  
Carolyn J. Tice

Peer review is a tool that provides students with a sense of how their work is perceived by others. Built on refection and feedback, peer review assesses the quality of academic processes and products based on well-understood criteria. Peer review was implemented in a baccalaureate social work policy course to enhance writing and critical thinking skills. Students were surveyed on their experiences and indicated that peer review activities provided beneficial learning exercises. The information gathered suggests methods for future implementation of peer review in social work education.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Louise Pretoruis ◽  
Agenes Van Dyk ◽  
Luis Small ◽  
Hans Justus Amukugo

The purpose of this article is to present the conceptualise empirical findings arrived at from the needs assessment (phase 1), which reflected the application of critical thinking skills by the respondents. The ultimate aim was to develop an educational programme to facilitate critical thinking in nursing practice. Conceptualization as the definition of key concepts in a study with a view to integrating one’s research into conceptual frameworks.The findings revealed six main concepts and their related sub-concepts. These concepts included interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation and self-regulation. These concepts were inferred from the deduction by the researcher. These concepts were the results of the concept analysis of critical thinking by 46 experts directed by Facione together with the related dispositions. These six main concepts constituted the framework within which the educational programme was developed. The following steps were followed during the conceptualization namely concepts synthesis, clarification of the concepts, interpretation of the concepts, analysis of the concepts, evaluation of the concepts, interference/ conclusion, explanation, self – regulation and critical approaches.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1246
Author(s):  
Endah Mardewanti

This study aims to accustome the ability of critical thinking skills of students who managed CTL approach using model Group Investigation. This study was conducted in two phases, the preparation phase which aims to develop learning package and the second phases of the trail of the device. Learning package  developed in the form of lesson plan (RPP), Students worksheet (LKS), text books (BAS),  and critical thingking skills test (TBK). Critical thinking skills are trained include formulating the problem, provide argument, analize and conclude. The device was developed with the development step of Borg and Gall, then proceed with the trial in the classroom by using pretest-posttest design. Data collected by expert judgement, observation, testing, and legibility BAS were collected using techniques close procedure. The collected data were then analized using descriptive analysis. Results of data analysis obtained as follows the quality of learning package developed by expert declared valid by validator. extremely high level of legibility and easy to understand, RPP achieve excellent, student activity that stand out is formulating a problem; student activity that stands out is formulating a problem; obstades that occur in the learning process is that students are not familiar investigations, thus requiring a briefing before hand. Critical thinking skills of students in the high category. Students' response to the lessons learned, so of data analysis can be concluded that the learning package by using CTL approach GI type cooperative model in the static fluid material can be used to train students' critical thinking skill Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran yang dapat digunakan melatihkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa yang dikelola dengan pendekatan CTL menggunakan model Group Investigation. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dalam dua tahap, yaitu tahap persiapan yang bertujuan mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran dan tahap kedua tahap uji coba perangkat. Perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan berupa Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP), Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS), Buku Ajar Siswa (BAS), dan tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis (KBK). Keterampilan berpikir kritis yang dilatihkan meliputi merumuskan masalah, memberikan argumen, menganalisis, dan menyimpulkan. Perangkat dikembangkan dengan langkah-langkah pengembangan dari Borg and Gall, kemudian dilanjutkan dengan uji coba di SMA Plus Sabilur Rosyad di kelas X-IPA1 dan X-IPA2 dengan menggunakan rancangan pretest-postest design. Data dikumpul berdasarkan penilaian validator, observasi, tes, dan  keterbacaan BAS yang dikumpul dengan menggunakan teknik close procedure. Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis menggunakan analisis data secara deskriptif. Hasil analisis data diperoleh sebagai berikut: kualitas perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan dinyatakan valid oleh pakar/validator; tingkat keterbacaan BAS sangat tinggi dan mudah dipahami; RPP mencapai keterlaksanaan yang sangat baik; aktivitas siswa yang menonjol adalah merumuskan masalah; kendala yang terjadi dalam proses pembelajaran adalah siswa belum terbiasa melakukan penyelidikan, sehingga membutuhkan pengarahan terlebih dahulu. Keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa masuk dalam kategori tinggi. Respon siswa terhadap pembelajaran baik, sehingga dari hasil analisis data, dapat disimpulkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran dengan pendekatan CTL menggunakan model kooperatif Group Investigation pada materi fluida statis dapat digunakan untuk melatihkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Hopkins ◽  
Mary Anne Raymond ◽  
Les Carlson

With an increasingly competitive job market, this study focuses on what marketing educators can do to help students develop a sustainable competitive advantage. The authors conducted a survey of students, faculty, and recruiters to develop a better understanding of what skills and characteristics might be of value to each group of respondents and to ascertain where differences might exist across respondent groups. Although the basic skills (i.e., critical thinking, communication) recruiters seek have not changed much from previous studies, recruiters rated critical thinking skills, such as problem solving, much higher than either faculty or students. Graduates must be accountable and show the impact and rationale behind decisions. In other words, educators must continue to stress reading, writing, and “arith-metrics.” The lessons learned herein include ways to engage students, strengthen communication skills, incorporate skill development workshops, use professional speakers in marketing organizations, and promote services available outside the classroom as well as help students develop multiple skill sets in class. Educators should also encourage students to be open-minded, creative, and explore opportunities including internships and positions that may not be their current career choice. Finally, educators should discuss pros and cons of going straight through school or working before attending graduate school.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
St Fatimah Azzahra

ABSTRACTThis research is aimed to know the differences increase critical thinking skills through learning group and individual problem solving in thermochemical material. This research uses a quasi-experimental design with nonequivalent control group design and study sample consisted of 103 students, divided into the first experimental (group problem solving) (35 students), the two group experimental (individual problem solving) (34 students). The collected through pretest-posttest. The analyzed with the Kruskal Wallis test, the results showed that the learning problem solving as a group or individually can improve students’ critical thinking skills. Statistical test there are significant differences in the students critical thinking skills thermochemical material between students who received group and individual problem solving. Critical thinking skills improvement with problem solving individual learning higher compared with group learning problem solving.Keywords: problem solving learning, critical thinking skillsABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa melalui pembelajaran group dan individual problem solving pada materi termokimia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi experimen dengan desain Nonequivalent Control Group Design dan sampel penelitian ini terdiri dari 103 siswa yang terbagi ke dalam kelompok eksperimen pertama (pembelajaran group problem solving) (35 siswa), kelompok eksperimen kedua (pembelajaran individual problem solving) (34 siswa).Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui pretest-posttest. Data dianalisis dengan uji Kruskal Wallis Test, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran problem solving secara group maupun secara individual dapat meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Data uji statistik, terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi termokimia antara siswa yang mendapat pembelajaran group problem solving dan individual problem solving. Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan pembelajaran individual problem solving lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran group problem solving.Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran Problem Solving, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 772
Author(s):  
Leni Suryani

This research is motivated by the competence of teachers in preparing poor learning outcomes tests and has not been able to measure high-level thinking skills, especially critical thinking skills. Therefore the researcher seeks to improve teacher competence in compiling tests on student learning outcomes based on critical thinking skills through academic supervision. This study uses a school action research design that has stages of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. This research was conducted for 2 months starting April 9 to May 17, 2019 for Physics teachers in the 7 target schools. Data is sourced from interviews with teachers and test documents prepared by the teacher. Data collection techniques include observation, interviews and documentation. Data analysis through the stages of data collection, data simplification, data presentation, conclusion drawing. Data were analyzed using assessment rubrics adjusted to indicators of critical thinking skills. The results of this study conclude that teacher competence in preparing tests of learning outcomes based on critical thinking skills has increased from the first cycle with a percentage of 61% with sufficient categories to 76% with good categories in cycle II.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maifalinda Fatra ◽  
A Rizki ◽  
Tita Khalis Maryati

Mathematical Critical thinking is one of  mathematical abilities that must be obtained by students. Critical thinking is one of the high order thinking processes that can make concepts in student knowledge.  Students with critical thinking in mathematics learning mostly do rational activities such as interpreting information based on a particular theoretical framework, linking theory with practice, making claims and justifying it, utilizing data in support of argumentation, making relations or relationships between various ideas, asking questions, evaluating knowledge, predict, describe something, analyze, synthesize, and categorize. This study aims to analyze the effect of the Concept-Based Learning Model on the critical thingking mathematical abilities.The purpose of this research is to analyze the effect of Concept-Based Learning Model toward mathematics critical thinking ability. The method used in this research is quasi experiment by Randomize Control Group Post Test Only Design with cluster random sampling technique. Indicators of mathematics critical thinking skills measured in this study include providing simple explanations, building basic skills, concluding, making more explanations, and deciding an action. The results showed that the mathematics critical thinking ability of students in the experimental class for the five indicators that being analyze was higher than the ability of students in the control class. A fairly high difference in the indicator showed in give a simple explanation and concluding. and it means that the application of Concept-Based Learning Model significantly influences the  abilities  of students' mathematics critical thinking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document