scholarly journals PUBLIC SERVICES ANALYSIS IN THE BORDER AREAS OF WEST KALIMANTAN AND MALAYSIA: A CASE STUDY OF SAMBAS DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, WEST KALIMANTAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
Muhammad Eko Atmojo ◽  
Helen Dian Fridayani

Public service delivery is an effort to meet the basic needs and civil rights of every citizen of the goods, services and administrative services provided by public service providers which are a government. West Kalimantan is bordered on land with by the Malaysian state of Sarawak. Although a small part of West Kalimantan is marine, West Kalimantan has dozens of large and small islands (some uninhabited) scattered along the Karimata and Natuna Straits bordering the Riau Islands Province. Public service in West Kalimantan, especially in Sambas district, is very important to note because it is the face of Indonesia that can be assessed by our neighbours which is Malaysia, whether the public service provided is feasible or not. The method used in this research is secondary research with qualitative description. Secondary research involves the summary, collation and/or synthesis of existing research. Secondary research is contrasted with primary research in that primary research involves the generation of data, whereas secondary research uses primary research sources as a source of data for analysis. The result of this study concludes that the good public services were still very far from the expectations on the border area experienced by Sambas District. The problem of public services can be seen in terms of education, health and also infrastructure services. Although currently, the government has tried to solve these problems, in reality, there is still a service gap in the border area. Local governments must be able to improve these problems to provide better services. One of them is by improving human resources in the bureaucracy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-212
Author(s):  
Qiang Yi ◽  
Xiaohong Zhu ◽  
Xianghui Liu

In the Guidelines of the State Council General Office on Government Procurement of Services from the Private and Non-governmental Sectors, “public service provider for the government” is broadly defined; it is stated that npos, businesses, and industry organizations have equal opportunity to be public service providers. A comparison of local eligibility requirements on npos serving as public service providers shows that the eligibility requirements focus on such aspects as service provider qualifications, time of establishment, organizational management, human resources, financial management, professional qualifications, annual inspection, evaluation, and honors. On the whole, the requirements are not demanding; the quality of public services is also secured through institutional design and innovation. The lax eligibility requirements imposed by local governments on npos as public service providers indicate that the social governance system will feature diversity, and reflect the government’s intention to support and develop npos. However, there are also some problems in local policies, such as 1) too much is at the discretion of the government; 2) the eligibility requirements are not good for the development of grassroots organizations; 3) no standards have been defined on eligibility for public service provider; and 4) related laws and regulations lack authority. Therefore, it is necessary to make government procurement of public services law-based and provide continued theoretical and institutional support for the implementation of the most authoritative policy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-78
Author(s):  
Efraim Kambu

Special Autonomy assigns its rights and obligations to local governments to regulate and manage their own affairs and interests of the society so that people increasingly can be served well. But in fact, public services provided is not maximized. This study used qualitative methods, data sources are divided into two types of data sources, namely primary and secondary data sources. The results of this study indicate that there is still lack of public services the Government of Papua Province visible from the weak aspects of responsiveness, which local governments less responsive to some of the problems in the field of education, economy and industry growth and physical development as well as non-physical. From the aspect of responsibility is also still found their weaknesses, which the Government of Papua Province is still not fully overcome the problems of corruption and poverty. Meanwhile, from the aspect of accountability, it is known that the performance of governance in Papua in providing public services are not running optimally, one reason is the lack of competence and capability of local government officials.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu KETUT KARYANI ◽  
I Wayan PARSA

This study examined the supervision of public services as stipulated in Law 25 of 2009, namely regarding public services and Law 23 of 2014 concerning regional government. Supervision carried out in the law is to give authority to each of the existing institutions or institutions, causing overlapping existing authority. Giving authority to officials will give birth to the rights and obligations to achieve the goals and intentions specified in the legislation. The rise of corruption cases occurs because of the weakness of existing supervision of government administration, especially in public services. In this case corruption will foster public distrust of public services. The form of maladministration carried out by public service providers is always associated with behavior in services performed by public officials and the norms of behavior of officials in public services. In addition, these problems are also caused by the opportunities and authority given to be abused and the low quality of public services in various service sectors. Supervision of public services can provide certainty about the public services provided by the government whether it has been running according to targets and objectives and is a way to find out as early as possible maladministration that might occur so that effective and accountable government can be realized.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-38
Author(s):  
Ricky Noor Permadi ◽  
Wildan Lutfie Arieyasmieta ◽  
Rustan Amarullah

This study aims to analyze to what extent the provision of the rights of special needs groups has been implemented and provide recommendations related to the additional infrastructure outside the regulation of the Ministry of State Apparatus Utilization and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB) Number 17 of 2017. This study is vital since the government institutions still lack attention to fulfilling the rights of persons with disabilities. In accordance with the mandate of Law Number. 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services, public service providers are obliged to provide special facilities and infrastructure for special needs groups without any additional charge. The research method used in this research is descriptive qualitative by analyzing the existing literature (library research). Then data collection through field observations (observations), interviews, and other library sources. This study tries to look at the completeness of special facilities and infrastructure for people with special needs that are provided by recommending twenty-two standards for infrastructure intended for “people with special needs”. Some public service providers relatively have almost met the standards. However, there are also public service providers which still need to be encouraged to meet these standards. It is necessary to have the political will of regional leaders to prioritize the provision of facilities and infrastructure to support public services for people with special needs. Amid limited regional resources, prioritizing the stages of fulfilment (road map) of these special facilities needs to be prepared, and partnerships also collaborations with other strategic partners can be developed to help meet these special service standards. There are limitations in this research: only three public service providers are the locus of the study, including hospitals, the Department of Population and Civil Registration, and the Department of Investment and the One-Stop Service, so that it does not represent the condition of public services in a city.   Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis sejauh mana pemenuhan hak-hak kelompok berkebutuhan khusus telah diimplementasikan dan memberikan rekomendasi terkait dengan sarana-prasarana tambahan di luar peraturan Kementerian PANRB Nomor 17 Tahun 2017. Penelitian ini penting untuk dilakukan karena masih kurangnya perhatian lembaga pemerintah dalam hal pemenuhan hak-hak penyandang disabilitas. Sesuai pasal 29 UU No. 25 Tahun 2009 bahwa penyelenggara pelayanan publik berkewajiban menyediakan sarana dan prasarana khusus bagi masyarakat berkebutuhan khusus tanpa pembebanan biaya tambahan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui pengamatan lapangan, wawancara, dan sumber pustaka. Hasil penelitian menggambarkan kondisi sarana dan prasarana khusus bagi masyarakat berkebutuhan khusus yang disediakan dengan merekomendasikan dua puluh dua standar sarana prasarana bagi masyarakat berkebutuhan khusus. Beberapa penyedia pelayanan publik relatif sudah memenuhi sarana prasarana tersebut. Namun, juga terdapat penyedia layanan publik yang perlu didorong untuk memenuhi standar pelayanan khusus tersebut. Untuk memenuhi standar pelayanan bagi kelompok rentan, diperlukan political will pemimpin daerah untuk turut memprioritaskan penyediaan sarana dan prasarana penunjang pelayanan publik bagi masyarakat berkebutuhan khusus. Di tengah keterbatasan sumberdaya daerah, maka pengutamaan tahapan pemenuhan (road map) fasilitas khusus tersebut perlu disiapkan, serta pola-pola kemitraan dan kolaborasi dengan mitra strategis lainnya dapat dikembangkan untuk membantu memenuhi standar pelayanan khusus tersebut. Keterbatasan penelitian ini yaitu hanya mencakup tiga penyelenggara pelayanan publik, yang meliputi RSUD, Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil dan Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu sehingga tidak menggambarkan kondisi pelayanan publik suatu daerah. Kata Kunci: pelayanan publik, aksesibilitas, berkebutuhan khusus, fasilitas, infrastruktur


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-118
Author(s):  
Intan Meitasari ◽  
Shinta Hadiyantina ◽  
Indah Dwi Qurbani

ABSTRAKPemerintah pada hakekatnya menyelenggarakan fungsi pelayanan publik kepada masyarakat. Karena itu pemerintah berkewajiban dan bertanggungjawab untuk memberikan pelayanan publik yang baik dan professional, namun pelayanan publik yang diberikan oleh penyelenggara pelayanan publik di rasa masih belum maksimal, hal ini di tandai dengan masih banyaknya praktik-praktik Maladministrasi dan pengaduan dari masyarakat. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia yang dibentuk dan disahkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 Tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia, yang memiliki tugas dan fungsi untuk mengawal proses pelayanan publik yang efisien, efektif, dan terlepas dari kolusi, korupsi, dan nepotisme (KKN). Selain itu Ombudsman juga memiliki wewenang dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pelayanan publik dengan cara mediasi, konsiliasi dan ajudikasi khusus atau ganti rugi yang dapat di putus oleh Ombudsman. Kenyataannya Ombudsman hanya mampu memberikan rekomendasi kepada terlapor, untuk tindakan selanjutnya tergantung dari itikad baik terlapor, karna rekomendasi yang di berikan oleh Ombudsman tidak bersifat mengikat. Selain itu terdapat ketidak relevasian antara Undang-Undang Pelayanan Publik dan Undang-Undang Ombudsman sehingga perlu adanya pembaharuan dalam kedua Undang-Undang tersebut, dan perlu di atur lebih lanjut terkait Peraturan Presiden Tentang mekanisme dan tata cara pembayaran ganti rugi ajudikasi khusus.Kata kunci: ajudikasi khusus; ombudsman; pelayanan publik; urgensi. ABSTRACTThe government is essentially carrying out the function of public services to the community. Therefore the government is obliged and responsible to provide good and professional public services. However, the public services provided by the public service providers are felt still not optimal, this is marked by the many practices of maladministration and complaints from the community. The Ombudsman of the Republic Indonesia which was formed and approved in UUD (Indonesian constitution) Number 37 of 2008 concerning of the Ombudsman of the Republic Indonesia, which has the duty and function to oversee the process of public services that is efficient, effective, and free from collusion, corruption and nepotism. In addition, the Ombudsman also has the authority to resolve public service disputes by means of mediation, conciliation and special adjudication or compensation that can be decided by the Ombudsman. In reality the Ombudsman is only able to provide recommendations to the reported, for further action depends on the reported good faith, because the recommendations given by the Ombudsman are not binding. In addition, there is an irrelevance between the Public Service Act and the Ombudsman Law, so there is a need for reforms in both of these Laws, and it needs a renewal to the both of the Act, and also needs to be regulated further related to the Presidential Regulation concerning the mechanism and procedures for paying special adjudication compensation.Keywords: ombudsman; public services; special adjudication; urgency.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-62
Author(s):  
Zuchri Abdussamad ◽  
Arifin Tahir ◽  
I Kadek Satria Arsana

Abstrak: Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Masyarakat Dalam Pelayanan Publik Studi Kasus: Di Gorontalo Utara. Pelayanan publik yang dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah daerah perlu dilakukan penilaian secara berkala. Hal ini berfungsi sebagai proses pembenahan layanan birokrasi pemerintahan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah sebagai proses penilaian tingkat kepatuhan layanan yang diberikan oleh Organisasi Perangkat Daerah di Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara. Metode yang digunakan adalah mix metode yakni gabungan metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Untuk mendapat data yang valid maka terlebih dahulu dilakukan survei. Kesimpulannya hasil analisis survei pemerintah daerah Gorontalo Utara berkategori “Baik” dengan indeks sebesar 79.13. Bila dibandingkan dengan hasil indeks nilai kepatuhan pelayanan yang dipublikasikan oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara memperoleh nilai sebesar 71.51. Berdasarkan hasil analisis tersebut menunjukkan bahwa ada peningkatan nilai indeks kepuasan pemerintah daerah Gorontalo Utara dari Tahun 2019 ke Tahun 2020 sebesar 7.62, nilai ini cukup signifikan. Artinya, Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara telah melakukan perbaikan-perbaikan dalam menunjang pelayanan publik pada setiap instansi di lingkungan pemerintahan. Kata Kunci: Survei Kepuasan Masyarakat; Pelayanan Publik; Gorontalo Utara; Pemerintah Daerah; Nilai Kepatuhan. Abstract: Analysis of Public Satisfaction Level in Public Service Case Study: In North Gorontalo. Public services implemented by local governments need to be assessed periodically. This serves as a process of improving government bureaucratic services. The purpose of this research is as a process of assessing the level of compliance of services provided by the Regional Device Organization in North Gorontalo Regency. The method used is a mix of methods that are a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. To get valid data, a survey is first conducted. In conclusion, the results of the survey analysis of the North Gorontalo regional government are categorized as "Good" with an index of 79.13. When compared with the results of the service compliance value index published by the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia in 2019, North Gorontalo District obtained a value of 71.51. Based on the results of the analysis shows that there is an increase in the satisfaction index value of the North Gorontalo regional government from 2019 to 2020 of 7.62, this value is quite significant. That is, the Regional Government of North Gorontalo Regency has made improvements in supporting public services in every agency in the government environment. Keywords: Public Satisfaction Survey; Public Service; North Gorontalo; Local Government; Compliance Value.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
SRI ULINA MARGARETH

Preeprint: ABSTRAKPelayanan publik pada dasarnya menyangkut aspek kehidupan yang sangat luas. Dalam kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara, maka pemerintah memiliki fungsi memberikan berbagai pelayanan publik yang diperlukan oleh masyarakat, mulai dari pelayanan dalam bentuk pengaturan ataupun pelayanan-pelayanan lain dalam rangka memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat dalam bidang pendidikan, kesehatan, utilitas, dan lainnya. Berbagai gerakan reformasi publik yang dialami oleh negara-negara maju pada awal tahun 1990-an banyak diilhami oleh tekanan masyarakat akan perlunya peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik yang diberikan oleh pemerintah. Peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik mutlak diperlukan mengingat kondisi sosial masyarakat yang semakin baik sehingga mampu merespon setiap penyimpangan dalam pelayanan publik melalui gerakan maupun tuntutan dalam media cetak dan elektronik. Apalagi dengan adanya persaingan terutama untuk pelayanan publik yang disediakan swasta membuat sedikit saja pelanggan merasakan ketidakpuasan maka akan segera beralih pada penyedia pelayanan publik yang lain.Hal ini membuat penyedia pelayanan publik swasta harus berlomba-lomba memberikan pelayanan publik yang terbaik. Ini yang seharusnya ditiru oleh penyedia pelayanan publik pemerintah sehingga masyarakat merasa puas menikmati pelayanan publik tersebut.Kata kunci : pelayanan publik di provinsi riauABSTRACTPublic service is basically about a vast aspect of life. In the life of nation and state, the government has a function to provide various public services needed by the community, ranging from services in the form of arrangements or other services in order to meet the needs of the community in the field of education, health, utilities, and others. The various public reform movements experienced by developed countries in the early 1990s were much inspired by public pressure on the need to improve the quality of public services provided by the government. Improving the quality of public services is absolutely necessary given the improved social conditions of the community so as to respond to any deviations in public services through the movement or demand in print and electronic media. Especially with the competition especially for public services provided by the private makes little customers feel dissatisfaction it will soon switch to other public service providers.This makes private providers of public services must compete to provide the best public service. This should be imitated by government public service providers so that people feel satisfied to enjoy the public service.Keywords: public service in riau province


Author(s):  
Vadym Stolar

Based on the study of foreign experience in improving the system of public services, the author proposes mechanisms for improving the system of public services in Ukraine. It is argued that the experience of foreign countries in the application of such mechanisms as regulation, standardization, optimization, reengineering, can be effectively applied in Ukraine. It is revealed that an important condition for effective public administration is the regulation and standardization of its main processes and results. It is argued that these mechanisms will contribute to the efficiency of the public service system in Ukraine. In this regard, the author highlighted the main goals of optimization and automation of public services. The main goals are such as eliminating redundant administrative procedures and, accordingly, the structural units that conduct them, simplifying paperwork, reducing the time of public services, setting up information and communication support for all elements of the public service system. It is shown that in Ukraine it is important to organize information communication between central executive bodies and the government, as well as between central and local authorities through official websites, online, expanding the network of public access to information about laws, regulations, reports, news through the Internet search engine on relevant sites. It was emphasized that the mechanism of transactional presence, which provides for interactive interaction between citizens and the government, needs to be improved. The author argued that foreign experience in optimizing the activities of public authorities and local governments through the introduction of modern information and communication technologies provides an example of several effective areas: electronic document management, e-government, the “single window” system. These tools are prospects for further, deeper, and more relevant research on this topic. Keywords: service, public service, public service, municipal service, administrative service, social service, regulation, standardization, reengineering.


Publika ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 227-238
Author(s):  
Yazid Dwi Kurniawan ◽  
Indah Prabawati

Pelayanan publik di Indonesia menjadi hal penting yang harus diberikan oleh pemerintahan pusat maupun daerah kepada masyarakat yang dituangkan dalam kebijakan khususnya pelayanan perizinan. Di tengah berkembangnya era reformasi banyak masyarakat yang semakin cerdas dan kebutuhan yang diperlukan semakin meningkat, mendorong pemerintah harus banyak mengeluarkan sebuah kebijakan terkait inovasi di dalam pelayanan publik. Hal tersebut telah menjadi tugas pemerintah daerah dalam pemenuhan terkait pelayanan publik. Salah satunya Kota Surabaya yang mengeluarkan kebijakan e-Government yaitu inovasi pelayanan publik yang dilaksanakan oleh Unit Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Atap (UPTSA) Kota Surabaya, inovasi tersebut adalah Surabaya Single Window (SSW). SSW ini merupakan sistem pelayanan dalam bidang perizinan. Tujuan dari sistem ini adalah untuk mempersingkat waktu pelayanan dan pengecekan data serta persyaratan di Kota Surabaya. Setelah dilaksanakan dan berjalan beberapa tahun, maka perlu dilakukan perbaikan dengan mempertimbangkan evaluasi yang telah didapatkan baik dari masyarakat atau organisasi pemerintah yang lainnya. Jenis penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan penelitian deskriptif dengan metode penelitian yaitu metode studi pustaka. Fokus penelitian menggunakan enam kriteria evaluasi yaitu 1) Efektivitas, 2) Efisiensi, 3) Kecukupan, 4) Perataan, 5) Responsivitas, dan 6) Ketepatan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pelaksanaan SSW ini sudah sangat baik namun masih terdapat kelemahan dan kekurangan yang muncul di setiap tahun pelaksanaan seperti tidak semua pelayanan perizinan dapat di akses melalui website SSW. Maka dari itu peneliti menyarankan agar tetap memperbaiki kekurangan program SSW ini dengan alternatif penyempurnaan untuk program SSW. Selain itu unit pelaksana pelayanan SSW juga harus meningkatkan kinerja program SSW guna meminimalisir kesalahan yang akan muncul. Kata Kunci : Evaluasi, Surabaya Single Window (SSW), Pelayanan Perizinan     Services in Indonesia important things that must provided by central and regional governments to community as outlined in policies especially licensing services. In midst the development of reform era many people are getting smarter and needs are increasing, encouraging the government to issue a lot policies related to innovation in public services. This has become duty of local governments in fulfilling public services. One of them is city of Surabaya which issued an e-Government policy, namely public service innovation implemented by UPTSA of City Surabaya, this innovation is Surabaya Single Window (SSW). SSW is a service system in licensing sector. Purpose of system to shorten service time and check data and requirements in city of Surabaya. After being implemented and running for several years, it necessary to make improvements by considering the evaluations that have been obtained either from community or other government organizations. This research was conducted using descriptive research with research method, namely literature study method. Focus of study used 6 evaluation criteria, namely 1)Effectiveness, 2)Efficiency, 3)Adequacy, 4)Smoothness, 5)Responsiveness, and 6)Accuracy. Results of study conclude the implementation of SSW has been very good but there are still weaknesses and shortcomings that arise in each year of implementation such as not all licensing services can be accessed through SSW website. Therefore, the researcher suggests that we continue to improve shortcomings of SSW with alternative improvements to SSW program. In addition, SSW service implementation unit must also improve the performance SSW program in order to minimize errors that will arise. Keywords: Evaluation, Surabaya Single Window (SSW), licensing services.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Rahman ◽  
Riani Bakri

State Civil Apparatus Management (SCAM) is an activity to obtain quality, professional and clean ASN in realizing the implementation of public service tasks and the implementation of development for community welfare. To date, many experts have considered that the growing bureaucracy in Indonesia is a complicated, slow, inefficient and swollen bureaucracy. Dynamic governance can be used as a solution by: First, the government can explore the values and traditions that are local wisdoms. Second, the government can also learn from best practices in other countries, which can be learned and copied, to be developed in the bureaucracy in Indonesia. Likewise, the regional government can also learn from experiences and successes that have been carried out by other local governments, to be used as references to be adopted and developed in the areas where we are located. Third, change the paradigm and the wrong mindset of public service providers, which encourages a slow bureaucracy in Indonesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document