The Role of HO2− in SC-1 Cleaning Solutions

1997 ◽  
Vol 477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Verhaverbeke ◽  
Jennifer W. Parker ◽  
Chris F. McConnell

The RCA Standard Clean, developed by W. Kern and D. Puotinen in 1965 and disclosed in 1970 [1] is extremely effective at removing contamination from silicon surfaces and is the defacto industry standard.[2]. The RCA clean consists of two sequential steps: the Standard Clean 1 (SC-1) followed by the Standard Clean 2 (SC-2). The SC-1 solution, consisting of a mixture of ammonium-hydroxide, hydrogen-peroxide, and water, is the most efficient particle removing agent found to date. This mixture is also referred to as the Ammonium- Hydroxide/Hydrogen-Peroxide Mixture (APM). In the past, SC-1 solutions had the tendency to deposit metals on the surface of the wafers, and consequently treatment with the SC-2 mixture was necessary to remove metals. Ultra-clean chemicals minimize the need for SC-2 processing. SC-I solutions facilitate particle removal by etching the wafer underneath the particles; thereby loosening the particles, so that mechanical forces can readily remove the particles from the wafer surface. The ammonium hydroxide in the solution steadily etches silicon dioxide at the boundary between the oxide and the aqueous solution (i.e., the wafer surface). The hydrogen peroxide in SC-I serves to protect the surface from attack by OH" by re-growing a protective oxide directly on the silicon surface (i.e., at the silicon/oxide interface). If sufficient hydrogen peroxide is not present in the solution, the silicon will be aniostropically etched and surface roughening will quickly occur. On the other hand, hydrogen peroxide readily dissociates and forms water and oxygen. If the concentration of the resulting oxygen is too high, bubbles will appear in the solution. The gas liquid interfaces that result from the bubble formation act as a “getter” for particles that can re-deposit on the wafer surface if a bubble comes in contact with the wafer.

2009 ◽  
Vol 145-146 ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Tomita ◽  
Minako Inukai ◽  
Kaori Umezawa ◽  
Li Nan Ji

It is well known that the physical force cleaning such as megasonic (MS) and ultrasonic (US) cleaning are used in FEOL (front-end-of-line) and BEOL (back-end-of-line). Recently, with scaling down below 43 nm, the influence of pattern damage by physical force methods such as MS and US irradiation has been reported. Hence, for the 2x and 3x nm node devices, it will be very difficult to apply MS cleaning for particle removal process without understanding the cavitation force. Cavitation is a complex phenomena based on bubble formation and explosion in the liquid. To control “MS cleaning” and “cavitation” induced pattern damage, many studies using “Sonoluminescence” have been reported. This method is able to demonstrate the existence of high energy fields such as cavitation throughout the megasonic field. The damage clustering distribution was investigated for the damage size and damage length in batch MS conditions using gate structure patterned [1]. In this method, it is difficult to discuss the cavitation force, quantitatively. And this method can not obtain the quantitative physical force on the wafer surface, directly. To understand “cavitation force” induced pattern damage, the observation of “cavitation force” is highlighted with “imaging films” such as blanket aluminum film and resist film, directly.


1992 ◽  
Vol 259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances M. Ross ◽  
J. Murray Gibson

ABSTRACTWe discuss the measurement of the morphology of exposed surfaces and buried interfaces using plan view transmission electron microscopy techniques. We have observed the evolution of the silicon/oxide interface during both oxidation and oxygen etching of the Si (111) surface. We describe the interface morphology, the mechanisms of these oxidation reactions and the implications of these results for the processing of silicon surfaces.


2021 ◽  
Vol 314 ◽  
pp. 54-59
Author(s):  
Adam P. Hinckley ◽  
Anthony J. Muscat

Thin organic self-assembled monolayer films are used to promote adhesion and seal the pores of metal oxides as well as direct the deposition of layers on patterned surfaces. Defects occur as the self-assembled monolayer forms, and the number and type of defects depend on surface preparation, deposition solvent, temperature, time and other parameters. Particles commonly deposit during organosilane self-assembly on metal oxide surfaces. The particles are defects because they are prone to react in subsequent processing, which may not be desirable if the organosilane serves as a pore sealant or passivation layer. Cleaning the organosilane by solvent extraction to remove non-polar agglomerates followed by an aqueous mixture of ammonium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide, which is Standard Clean 1, a common particle removal step for silicon surfaces, produced monolayers with few agglomerates based on atomic force microscopy without etching the layer. The combined cleaning sequence contained fewer particles than separate cleaning steps, showing that the cleans removed particles with different compositions. The thickness and contact angle of cleaned monolayers was comparable to those made using a costlier solvent.


1997 ◽  
Vol 477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Verhaverbeke ◽  
Jennifer W. Parker

ABSTRACTThe Standard Clean 1 (SC-1), developed by W. Kern and D. Puotinen in 1965 and disclosed in 1970 [1], consists of a mixture of ammonium-hydroxide, hydrogen-peroxide, and water. (SC-1 is also called the Airfmonium-Hydroxide Peroxide Mixture or APM). Originally, this chemical mixture was developed for cleaning silicon wafers and it has proven to be the most efficient particle removing agent found to date. SC-1 can, however, also be used for etching. SC-1 will etch the following materials: SiO2, Si3N4, Si, Ti and TiN. On top of this, SC-1 will grow an oxide on several materials (i.e., bare silicon).In this paper, a quantitative model for the SC-1 solution is presented. The etching of Ti and TiN is shown to be fundamentally different from the etching of SiO2. The mixture of Ammonium-hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide must be optimized differently for Ti and TiN etching than for the particle removal from Silicon wafers.


Author(s):  
P. Singh ◽  
V. Cozzolino ◽  
G. Galyon ◽  
R. Logan ◽  
K. Troccia ◽  
...  

Abstract The time delayed failure of a mesa diode is explained on the basis of dendritic growth on the oxide passivated diode side walls. Lead dendrites nucleated at the p+ side Pb-Sn solder metallization and grew towards the n side metallization. The infinitesimal cross section area of the dendrites was not sufficient to allow them to directly affect the electrical behavior of the high voltage power diodes. However, the electric fields associated with the dendrites caused sharp band bending near the silicon-oxide interface leading to electron tunneling across the band gap at velocities high enough to cause impact ionization and ultimately the avalanche breakdown of the diode. Damage was confined to a narrow path on the diode side wall because of the limited influence of the electric field associated with the dendrite. The paper presents experimental details that led to the discovery of the dendrites. The observed failures are explained in the context of classical semiconductor physics and electrochemistry.


1999 ◽  
Vol 568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lahir Shaik Adam ◽  
Mark E. Law ◽  
Omer Dokumaci ◽  
Yaser Haddara ◽  
Cheruvu Murthy ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTNitrogen implantation can be used to control gate oxide thicknesses [1,2]. This study aims at studying the fundamental behavior of nitrogen diffusion in silicon. Nitrogen at sub-amorphizing doses has been implanted as N2+ at 40 keV and 200 keV into Czochralski silicon wafers. Furnace anneals have been performed at a range of temperatures from 650°C through 1050°C. The resulting annealed profiles show anomalous diffusion behavior. For the 40 keV implants, nitrogen diffuses very rapidly and segregates at the silicon/ silicon-oxide interface. Modeling of this behavior is based on the theory that the diffusion is limited by the time to create a mobile nitrogen interstitial.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 01A116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Oudot ◽  
Mickael Gros-Jean ◽  
Kristell Courouble ◽  
Francois Bertin ◽  
Romain Duru ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (Part 1, No. 3B) ◽  
pp. 1622-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Z. Zhang ◽  
Leah M. Meeuwenberg ◽  
Mark M. Banaszak Holl ◽  
F. R. McFeely

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document