scholarly journals CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF BASIC RESEARCH: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

Author(s):  
L. E. Mindeli ◽  
S. I. Chernykh

The paper addresses a number of issues related to the functioning of the Russian sector of basic research and the need to implement a balanced public policy in this area. It contains an estimation of the managerial an organisational reform currently underway in the government academies of sciences and puts forward proposals for the establishment of mechanisms to overcome crisis phenomena in the Russian science sector, including basic research, which are impeding innovative development of the Russian economy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 88-95
Author(s):  
Vladimir Rakin

There is no alternative to Russian science in the innovative development of the Russian economy. Without discussing the obvious role of science in the development of defense technologies to protect the country’s borders, under the conditions of sanctions, which inevitably hamper the development of the Russian economy, the reform of science is necessary. The main direction seems to be the creation of a full-fledged applied branch of science with a variety of organizational and legal forms. On this path, the role of education is high. A cardinal mistake in the reform of education was made with the adoption of the Western model of combining education and science. It should be taken into account that fundamental science and education represent different spheres of intellectual activity. But applied science and education are closely linked, if only for the reason that students’ interests in attractive specialties are dictated by the real prospects of the future profession used in Russian industry. The personnel policy of the Government is closely connected with the innovative development of Russia. The bureaucratic power vertical created in the country is not conducive to the entry of professionals in this or that field of knowledge into the circle of top managers. Therefore, the executive energy of managers responsible for scientific innovations is aimed exclusively at achieving the goals of formal competition with other powers, contributing little to the real scientific and technological progress in our country.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-273
Author(s):  
Elena S. Kravtsova

Introduction. The development of industry and agriculture as a result of the industrial revolution of the 1830s – 1850s led the government to the idea of unification and control over the system of measurement. However, the process of establishing of a special service that could deal with the issue was very slow both due to the lack of competent specialists and the underdeveloped legislative base. And only in the early 20th century special institutions started to be founded in the provincial centers of the Russian Empire – Verification Chambers, the function of which was to check and seal up all measuring devices which were in use, purchased or manufactured. Verifications procedures were carried out both locally and extensively, in addition, unscheduled revisions were also possible. From the list of work areas it is clear that initially the chambers were founded in large commerce and industry centers, and with the flow of time the practice started spreading throughout the state. Methods. The solution of research problems was provided by a complex of complementary theoretical (analysis of scientific literature, comparative analysis, comparison, generalization, systematization) and empirical (study and generalization of published and archival sources, hermeneutical) methods. Results. The created verification chambers used to perform important functions targeted at the development of metrology and as a result the Russian Economy: accuracy of the readings of various measuring devices, control over the sealing marks, withdrawal of the fake ones, quality of measuring tools, educational activities. Conclusion. The importance of the work of this institution is confirmed by the fact that the events of 1917 which led to the collapse of the state preserved the chambers even under the new government.


2004 ◽  
pp. 51-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Sharipova ◽  
I. Tcherkashin

Federal tax revenues from the main sectors of the Russian economy after the 1998 crisis are examined in the article. Authors present the structure of revenues from these sectors by main taxes for 1999-2003 and prospects for 2004. Emphasis is given to an increasing dependence of budget on revenues from oil and gas industries. The share of proceeds from these sectors has reached 1/3 of total federal revenues. To explain this fact world oil prices dynamics and changes in tax legislation in Russia are considered. Empirical results show strong dependence of budget revenues on oil prices. The analysis of changes in tax legislation in oil and gas industry shows that the government has managed to redistribute resource rent in favor of the state.


2015 ◽  
pp. 20-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Afontsev

Economic sanctions against Russia form a completely new context for public and private efforts to cope with crisis trends in Russian economy. With limited access to global goods, capital, and technology markets, it can at best minimize costs of the crisis but not come back to the normal growth path. Strategies to find new trade partners and sources of capital outside the group of countries that have introduced economic sanctions against Russia are welcome, but their potential is rather limited. Under these circumstances, crisis management should be centered neither on the alleged ‘Russia’s pivot to the East’ nor on the wide-scale import substitution but on normalization of economic relations with key country partners, regaining currency stability, and structural reforms aimed at moving national economy away from commodity specialization.


2011 ◽  
pp. 39-50
Author(s):  
V. Lushin

The author analyzes factors that led to a deeper fall in output and profitability in the real sector of the Russian economy in comparison with other segments during the acute phase of the financial crisis. It is argued that some contradictions in the government anti-recession policy, activities of the financial sector and natural monopolies lead to pumping out added value created in manufacturing and agriculture, increase symptoms of the «Dutch disease», etc. It is shown that it may threaten the balanced development of the Russian economy, and a set of measures is suggested to minimize these tendencies and create a basis for the state modernization policy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1496-1521
Author(s):  
N.I. Kulikov ◽  
M.A. Kulikova ◽  
A.A.S.R. Mobio

Subject. This article assesses the reasons why the economic policy of the Government and Central Bank of Russia does not cause the economic advance. The article tries to find out why the two strategic programmes adopted over the past ten years have not been implemented in most indicators. Objectives. The article aims to analyze the results of financial and monetary policies in Russia over the past ten years, and establish why the Russian economy has been growing within one percent yearly average all these years, and its share in the world economy has not grown, but got reduced even. Methods. For the study, we used the methods of analysis and synthesis. Results. The article proposes certain measures and activities to move to soft financial and monetary policies of the State and corresponding changes in the structure of the Russian economy. This will help ensure six to seven percent GDP growth annually. Conclusions. High loan rates have become the main obstacle to GDP growth in Russia. It is necessary to accept concrete actions and decisions concerning the Bank of Russia key rate, expansion of the functions of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, industrial policy, support of consumer demand, long-term government contracts for the real sector enterprises, etc.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 2643-2657
Author(s):  
K.A. Trubinova ◽  
◽  
V.P. Postnikov ◽  
M.M. Gulyaeva ◽  
◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-85
Author(s):  
L. D. Kapranova ◽  
T. V. Pogodina

The subject of the research is the current state of the fuel and energy complex (FEC) that ensures generation of a significant part of the budget and the innovative development of the economy.The purpose of the research was to establish priority directions for the development of the FEC sectors based on a comprehensive analysis of their innovative and investment activities. The dynamics of investment in the fuel and energy sector are considered. It is noted that large-scale modernization of the fuel and energy complex requires substantial investment and support from the government. The results of the government programs of corporate innovative development are analyzed. The results of the research identified innovative development priorities in the power, oil, gas and coal sectors of the fuel and energy complex. The most promising areas of innovative development in the oil and gas sector are the technologies of enhanced oil recovery; the development of hard-to-recover oil reserves; the production of liquefied natural gas and its transportation. In the power sector, the prospective areas are activities aimed at improving the performance reliability of the national energy systems and the introduction of digital technologies. Based on the research findings, it is concluded that the innovation activities in the fuel and energy complex primarily include the development of new technologies, modernization of the FEC technical base; adoption of state-of-the-art methods of coal mining and oil recovery; creating favorable economic conditions for industrial extraction of hard-to-recover reserves; transition to carbon-free fuel sources and energy carriers that can reduce energy consumption and cost as well as reducing the negative FEC impact on the environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document