scholarly journals The World: A Brief Introduction (by Richard N. Haass)

2021 ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Korney Kozlov
Keyword(s):  
World Order ◽  
Information Space ◽  
Basic Knowledge ◽  
Global Era ◽  
The World ◽  
Political Economic

The new book by Richard Haas written in the form of a brief but clear overview is a real guide in the modern political, economic and information space. The global era has become a reality, and any events in any region of the planet can impact significantly on the whole world. So the book provides the readers with a basic knowledge about past three century, geopolitical prospects of all parts of the world and as well as the recent world order and its future.   

scholarly journals The Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) and its Aftermath in Contemporary World Affairs

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sanjmyatav Bazar
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
World Order ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Contemporary World ◽  
Norms And Values ◽  
The World ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
New Phase ◽  
Economic And Social Impacts

As the conception of security consolidates our prosperity to evolve on this planet that revolutionises our social norms and values from time-to-time, it also encounters threats and challenges that could potentially deliver a massive impact to the world. For instance, such security dilemmas would result in transforming the world order, international relations or even the lives of billions. This is the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic of 2019 (COVID-19) and it has changed the world for an indefinite period. Thus, it has forced us into a new phase, new norms and a new world. This paper will examine how this coronavirus outbreak has political, economic and social impacts on the world order through the lens of international relations.

scholarly journals LEADERSHIP AND HEGEMONY IN GEOSTRATEGY OF INFORMAL NEO-EMPIRES

2017 ◽  
pp. 39-49
Author(s):  
A. Goltsov
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Cultural Values ◽  
Soft Power ◽  
World Order ◽  
Controversial Issues ◽  
The World ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Common Goals ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
The Relationship

The article analyzes the controversial issues of the relationship between leadership and hegemony in international relations, especially in the context of geostrategy of the informal neo-empires. Ideally, leadership of the certain actor means that other actors voluntarily accept its proposed values, norms and rules, recognize its authority to implement a policy for the realization of common goals. Hegemony is the dominance of a particular actor (hegemon) over other actors, establishing his controls over them, imposing its political, economic and cultural values. Hegemony in international relations is carried out usually covertly and often presented as a leadership. Leadership and hegemony are possible at various levels of the geopolitical organization in the world. We treat leadership and hegemony as mechanisms of implementation of a geostrategy of powerful actors of international relations, particularly of informal neo-empires. Each of the contemporary informal neo-empires develops and implements geostrategy, aimed at ensuring its hegemony, usually covert, within a certain geospace and realizes it as a means of a both “hard” and “soft” power. The USA, which is the main “center” of the Western macro-empire, trys to maintain its world leadership, and at the same time secure a covert hegemony over the strategically important regions of the world. The EU is a neo-imperial alliance and has geostrategy of “soft” hegemony. Russia opposes the hegemony of the West and advocates the formation of a multipolar world order with the “balance of power”. The RF carries in the international arena neo-imperial geostrategy in the international arena directed to increase its role in the world and ensure its hegemony in the post-Soviet space.

scholarly journals INTERNATIONAL SPACE INFORMATION: CONFRONTATIONAL REALITY OR POSSIBILITY OF DIALOGUE?

2018 ◽  
pp. 38-50
Author(s):  
Volodymyr Grubov ◽  
Mykola Sanakuiev
Keyword(s):  
Private Information ◽  
Soft Power ◽  
Hybrid Methods ◽  
World Order ◽  
World Politics ◽  
Information Policy ◽  
Information Space ◽  
The Political ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
The World

The article is an attempt to find the key problems of political and legal settlement of the international information space through a combination of methodology for its determination and the interests of the leading players interacting on the site of the UN. Tectonics changes that brought the global politics of information considered in the contest birth of a new objective reality and causes that produce it — is the existence of «axial» principles of organization of information being human (D.Bell), the struggle between the «national and international society» and national conflicts security strategies of the leaders of world politics. This policy is based within the familiar concept of «real politic» (G. Morgenthau), which is in first place in international relations was not the principle of law and the principle of power «struggle for power levers» that demonstrated the willingness of the strongest members of the world order to apply hybrid methods of struggle. It is emphasized that this trend raises a number of negative consequences both social and political, legal and humanitarian aspects in the life of individual societies, as entire countries. It has been suggested that the level of severity of the political and legal conflicts in a more equitable manner in the functioning of the information-mesh postoru depend on how consistently the main players in world politics will follow conventions already achieved, and not worry about persecution own benefit and interest. It is emphasized that the language of political practice, this means that democratic slogans proclaimed human rights objective information and privacy began to sink in organized public and private information violence, and it was just part of the language semantics television, texts newspapers and magazines, daily communication. It is proved that a similar situation shows the existence of a conflict between the constant declarations of priority of rights and freedoms and the growth opportunities of interested residents to control the information space «information man». This conflict is present in the information policy of virtually all world leaders. In the context of identified internal contradictions and the increasing severity of humanitarian problems analyzed complex problems of political and legal nature that need to be addressed to the international community both within the political and legal relations that exist in the UN system for information policy and within the established concept of «soft security» (soft power), which now attracted the leading countries of the world.

scholarly journals Tantangan Pengembangan Pendidikan Keguruan di Era Global

Nadwa ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Fitri Oviyanti
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Teachers ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
World Order ◽  
Public Confidence ◽  
Cultural Changes ◽  
Global Era ◽  
Excellent Service ◽  
The World ◽  
Qualified Teacher ◽  
Moral Crisis

<p>Globalization barrage pass major changes to the world order as a whole. This era is characterized by the process of life worldwide, the advancement of science and technology, especially in the field of communication as well as the transformation and cross-cultural. Changes brought about by globalization are also experienced by the world of education with teachers as practitioners. Challenges faced by teachers in the global era, such as the development of science and technology are so rapid and fundamental; moral crisis that swept the nation and the<br />state, social crisis and a crisis of identity as a nation. All that obviously requires prospective teachers and qualified professionals. Teacher education programs must be able to provide excellent service to the students so that they can esta-<br />blish qualified teacher. Improving the quality of education will foster public confidence that still exist in the future? </p><p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p><strong></strong><br />Globalisasi mewariskan rentetan perubahan besar pada tatanan dunia secara menyeluruh. Era ini ditandai dengan proses kehidupan mendunia, kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan dan  teknologi, terutama dalam bidang transformasi dan komunikasi<br />serta terjadinya lintas budaya. Perubahan yang dibawa oleh globalisasi ini juga dialami oleh dunia pendidikan dengan guru sebagai praktisinya. Tantangan yang dihadapi guru di era global, seperti perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan tekno-<br />logi yang begitu cepat dan mendasar; krisis moral yang melanda bangsa dan negara, krisis sosial dan krisis identitas sebagai bangsa. Semua itu jelas menuntut calon guru yang profesional dan bermutu. Program pendidikan guru harus<br />mampu memberikan pelayanan prima kepada mahasiswa sehingga mampu mencetak guru yang berkualitas. Peningkatan mutu pendidikan ini akan menumbuhkan kepercayaan masyarakat sehingga tetap eksis di masa datang.<br /><br /></p>

scholarly journals Against National Sovereignty: The Postcolonial New World Order and the Containment of Decolonization

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-409
Author(s):  
Nandita Sharma
Keyword(s):  
New World ◽  
World Order ◽  
New World Order ◽  
Discursive Practices ◽  
Material Force ◽  
National Sovereignty ◽  
Nation States ◽  
The World ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
National Membership

In this paper, I examine the growing reliance on discourses of autochthony in nationalisms throughout the world. Native-ness (or indigeneity) is increasingly being made a key criterion for claiming national sovereignty over territory, as well as the more amorphous – but no less consequential – claim to national membership. By examining the crucial colonial genealogy of autochthonous discursive practices, I argue that claims to autochthony are metaphysical and, as such, deeply depoliticizing of the exclusions they produce. Drawing upon historical studies showing how imperial-states deployed autocthonous discourses to divide those they categorized as Natives and Migrants from one another in an effort to maintain their imperial rule, I show the continuities of such practices in the Postcolonial New World Order of nation-states. Despite their rhetoric, I argue that contemporary, nationalist discourses of autochthonies have not – and cannot – succeed in realizing decolonization, precisely because of their reliance on modes of political, economic, and social exclusion based on the separation of people categorized as either Native-Nationals or as Migrants. The material force of ideas of Native-Nationalism(s), because they are premised on territorial sovereignty and not on the end of practices of expropriation and exploitation across the planet, are part of the worldwide relations of ruling and not threats to it.

scholarly journals Russia's hybrid aggression as an instrument of geopolitical influence on African countries: conclusions for Ukraine

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (28-29) ◽  
pp. 212-223
Author(s):  
Olena Karchevska ◽  
Keyword(s):  
World Order ◽  
International Conflicts ◽  
New World Order ◽  
African Region ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Continental Scale ◽  
The World ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Crimean Crisis

Experts in the field of international conflicts focus on a threatening trend - increasing levels of aggression in Europe. Russia has been involved in all the high-intensity conflicts that have taken place in the region since the 2000s – the wars in Ukraine and Georgia, the limited wars in Dagestan, Ingushetia and Chechnya, and the content of the conflict in Moldova. The Crimean crisis and aggression in Donbas have become a painful reaction to Russia's inability to lead the world leadership and structure a new world order. Modern foreign policy of the Russian Federation is based on the Soviet understanding of the geopolitical structure of the world in general and the European region in particular. Russia is making every effort to consolidate itself as a center of power on a continental scale and dreams of regaining the geopolitical weight of the Soviet era. The article analyzes the causes and consequences of the use of hybrid aggression, identifies the complexity of using military-political, economic, informational and international tools to influence the formation of the world order. The example of Russian aggression in the African region is considered and the ways of counteracting Russian aggression are offered to Ukraine.

scholarly journals A New Calculation of Global Leadership: Post Corona World Order

2020 ◽  
Vol V (I) ◽  
pp. 112-118
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Health Management ◽  
World Order ◽  
Global Leadership ◽  
Management Capability ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Technological Cooperation ◽  
The World ◽  
Core Components ◽  
Global Threat ◽  
Political Economic

Global pandemic has largely impacted the world political, economic and cultural phenomena, . breeding many new components. The leadership has also been in a new face, influenced by new indicators along with existing others. This article found the health management capability, environmental viability, HDI index and intelligence capacities as the new components of determining of global leadership along with existing political, economic, cultural and military might. The security paradigm has also been shaped in new face by admitting health threat as the global concern. Collective coordination with an aim to deal global threat like epidemic has been immensely needed. Information sharing, scientific and technological cooperation are newly articulated as the core components of global cooperation. The sign of nationalism, racism, xenophobia has been also rescheduled across the world.

scholarly journals Syrian Crisis in the Context of Emerging Multipolar International Order

2015 ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
M. S. Khodynskaya-Golenischeva
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
World Order ◽  
Community Control ◽  
Dimensional System ◽  
Syrian Crisis ◽  
The Us ◽  
The World ◽  
Divide And Rule ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Political Realities

The article looks into the Syria crisis in the context of emerging multipolar, polycentric system of international relations. The author focuses on Washington's attempts to maintain its dominance in world affairs by any means, by consciously destabilizing political situations in certain countries to weaken them and then act according to the "divide and rule" principle. Syria is no exception. In this context, the author lists methods implied before in a number of specific regions aimed at destabilizing situations in different countries and describes specific objectives that the US and its allies are seeking to achieve thereby. The author also shows how these methods have been used in Syria. At the same the article says that objective trends in the world system, including emergence of new centers of political and economic power and, as a consequence, formation of a democratic multi-dimensional system of international relations, lead to a situation when the methods used by Washington to destabilize internal political situations, cease to work properly. The most powerful levers of political, economic, financial and informational pressure lose their effectiveness. In the case of Syria, the new political realities literally "squeezed" Washington into political and legal sphere, and instead of US bombardment of Syria the world saw an agreement on the destruction of Syrian chemical weapons which was carried out under international community control. It is emphasized that these trends will only be strengthened, and multipolar world order will gradually neutralize new Western attempts to destabilize regions for gaining geopolitical advantage. This in turn gives a chance to create an atmosphere for a process of finding a comprehensive political solution to the crisis in Syria, which Russia is currently making efforts to launch.

1. Introducing Global Politics

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-25
Author(s):  
Stephanie Lawson
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
World Order ◽  
Cultural Dimensions ◽  
Global Politics ◽  
Current State ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
Political Economic

This introductory chapter provides an overview of global politics, starting with an account of the global political sphere as a specialized area of study—more conventionally known as the discipline of International Relations (IR)—and including an explanation of the distinction between the ‘global’ and the ‘international’. It also addresses the extent to which the world is ‘globalized’, even as some pundits herald a halt to globalization and a return to the closed politics of nationalism. The chapter then explores the history of globalization, which provides an essential backdrop to the understanding of the phenomenon in the present, and the challenges to it. This includes attention to the interweaving of globalization’s political, economic, social, and cultural dimensions and some of the implications for the current state-based world order. Finally, the chapter considers the role of theory and method, including concerns raised by the notion of a ‘post-truth’ world.

The role of summit diplomacy in the peaceful settlement of disputes

2019 ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Younes Talaat Abdul Razzaq Al Dabbagh
Keyword(s):  
World Order ◽  
Prominent Feature ◽  
Distinctive Character ◽  
Global System ◽  
The People ◽  
Peaceful Settlement ◽  
The World ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Political Economic

The summit diplomacy, which takes place at the level of the kings and presidents of the world, and at the level of the people who hold the highest political post in the state, is today a prominent feature of contemporary diplomacy. It is the distinctive character of a new and different world order based on interdependence, interdependence, integration and intertwining. The world became like a small cosmopolitan village, and because of this interdependence and diplomacy, the summit diplomacy flourished and expanded its scope of work, in a way that contributed effectively to the containment of crises and to the alleviation of conflicts between the units of the global system. Whatever dispute, by opening diplomatic horizons targeted at all levels, whether political, economic or scientific or military.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document