scholarly journals Settlement of Will in Inheritance Dispute Case against the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 485 K/AG/2013

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 576
Author(s):  
Mutiara Rahmadhani ◽  
Yaswirman Yaswirman ◽  
Mardenis Mardenis
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Legal Consequences

Legal events, one of which is the death of a person, will cause legal consequences on how to follow up the management of the rights and obligations of someone who has died. Islam teaches a set of shari’ah laws regarding inheritance and will. The Medan Religious Court had determined the compulsory heir but it was sued by another heir. On the other hand, based on the Decision of the Supreme Court Number: 485K/Ag/2013, the plaintiff was declared as the compulsory heir and decided that the defendants were not. This certainly can lead to legal uncertainty. Regarding to this case, the author discusses the settlement of will in inheritance dispute because it raises several problems regarding the factor of inheritance dispute, settlement of inheritance dispute, and implementation of the will. The research in this thesis applies a normative juridical method which is an approach through legal research by examining the principles of law and law comparison. Based on the research results, the conclusion that can be drawn is that the factor causing inheritance dispute is the determination of inheritance to adopted child. Settlement of inheritance dispute, against the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 485K/Ag/2013, invalidates the determination of heirs and states that the Decision of the Religious Courts has no legal force. In addition, related to the settlement of the testament to the inheritance dispute against the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 485K/Ag/2013, the judge has determined to give a wasiyah waajibah (binding will) to the adopted child a maximum of 1/3 of the testator’s inheritance.

EKONOMI SYARIAH DAN PENYELESAIANNYA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Wildana Arsyad ◽  
Edi Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This study aims to provide information about procedure of dispute settlement of sharia economy in the Religious Courts. This research uses qualitative method with juridical approach. The dispute procedure of sharia economic in religious court runs in accordance with the mandate of the Law contained in article 49 to article 53 Act no. 7 years 1989, Law No. 3 year 2006, Law No. 50 of 2009 about Religious Courts. Sharia economic dispute is basically due to three things, namely because one of the parties to break the promise (wanprestasi), due to unlawful acts against the agreements agreed upon and because of coercive circumstances. Settlement of disputes is held with the aim of enforcing the law which contains the value of legal justice, the value of legal certainty, and the value of legal benefit. The settlement of the sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts is very new, so the Supreme Court up to now still conducts education and training of sharia economic certification for all Religious Court judges.Penelitian ini  bertujuan   untuk memberikan informasi mengenai prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis Prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di pengadilan agama berjalan sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang yang tertera dalam pasal 49 sampai pasal 53 Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 1989 jo. Undang-Undang No. 3 tahun 2006 jo.Undang-Undang No.50 tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Agama.Sengketa ekonomi syariah pada dasarnya disebabkan karena tiga hal, yaitu karena salah satu pihak melakukan ingkar janji (wanprestasi), karena perbuatan melawan hukum terhadap perjanjian yang disepakati dan karena keadaan memaksa. Penyelesaian sengketa diadakan dengan tujuan untuk menegakan hukum yang di dalamnya mengandung nilai keadilan hukum, nilai kepastian hukum, dan nilai kemanfaatan hukum.Penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama merupakan hal yang sangat baru, sehingga Mahkamah Agung sampai saat ini masih melaksanakan pendidikan dan latihan sertifikasi ekonomi syariah bagi seluruh hakim Pengadilan Agama.

scholarly journals GUIDELINES FOR PRESIDENTING WOMEN FACING THE LAW IN DIVORCE WITH JUSTICE BASED IN KEBUMEN RELIGION COURT (IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMA NO. 3 YEAR 2017)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trubus Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Gender Perspective ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

An effort to improve the quality of justice with a gender perspective on July 11, 2017 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued PERMA Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Judging Women Against the Law. In line with this study, researchers assume specifically the implementation of Perma Number 3 of 2017 is related to women dealing with law in divorce cases related to the protection of women's rights (ex-wife) along with children's rights due to divorce based on justice. the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in the field of litigation duties in the Religious Courts. In the end, judges in trying women's cases dealing with the law must reveal factors based on principles: Appreciation for human dignity, Non-discrimination, Gender Equality, Equality before the law, Justice, Utilization, for the sake of legal certainty.

scholarly journals Determination Of Legal Remedies For Civil Cases To Make The Principles Of Justice Simple, Fast And Lighting Cost

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Andrianantenaina Fanirintsoa Aime ◽  
Zulfikar Dori Ad’ha
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principles Of Justice ◽  
The Republic

One of the principles in the justice system is justice that is simple, fast and low cost. In this regard, the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) takes this matter seriously and responds to it by issuing a decree, namely TAP MPR No. VIII/MPR/2000 concerning the Annual Report of High State Institutions at the 2000 Annual Session of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia, which one of its substances recommends that the Supreme Court immediately resolve delinquent cases by increasing the number and quality of decisions and that the Supreme Court makes regulations to limit entry cassation case. With this principle, it is necessary to conduct a study regarding the application of these principles.

scholarly journals The competence of Religious Court in Indonesia and Syahadah Istifadhah (Testimonium De auditu) in Case of Itsbat Waqf

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rifqi Qowiyul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Legal Force

This paper examines how exactly the absolute competence of the Religious Courts and the application of syahadah istifadhah (testimonium de auditu) in the case of waqf determination submitted to the Religious Court as a judicial institution under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. In the discussion, it is explained how the competence of the Religious Court especially in the case of waqf determination as arranged in Law No. 3 Year 2006 About Religious Courts combined with Law Number 41 Year 2004 About Waqf. In addition, this paper also compares between the concept of syahadah istifadhah and testimonium de auditu also its legal force in the case of verification at the court especially in the case of waqf determination. This paper concludes that the assignment of Waqf is the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. In addition, according to Islamic jursiprudence syahadah istifadhah can be used as a means of proof in waqf determination.

scholarly journals Due To Legal Determination Of Religious Courts Demak Decision No. 09 / PDT.P / 2018 / PA DMK About Adoption Realization

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Rodiyah Rodiyah ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Process ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Biological Parents ◽  
The Will ◽  
Religious Courts

Society has long recognized the legal institution of adoption even before the time of the Prophet society has implemented a system of adoption with the motivation or a different purpose, among others, to continue the descent, carry on business and so on. In Indonesian society not many people know about the implementation process since the adoption in court litigation adoption petition, the case investigation in the trial until the stage of determination of the judge. This study uses the approach of law (statute aproach) and approach to the case. Law approach is used to determine the overall legal regulations, especially laws governing adoption in Indonesia. Case approach aims to study the application of norms or rules of law in the determination of adoption. The results of this thesis research in the Stipulation No. 09 / Pdt.P / 2018 / PA.Dmk is the implementation of adoptions carried out aimed at the best interests of children in the welfare and protection of children and the application of law by the judge in legal considerations. As a result of the law of the designation is the association adopted child with the adoptive parents only form of legal relationship in the form of transfer of responsibility of the biological parents and not result in legal consequences inherit each other between himself and his adoptive parents are not entitled to inherit each other to each other, but the adopted child can accept the will, and vice versa.Keywords: Because of Law; Kids Appointment; Religious Courts.

scholarly journals Efektifitas Mediasi Terhadap Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1a Watampone

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Muh Askaruddin ◽  
Dachran Busthami ◽  
Hasan Kadir
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Mediation Training ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Tujuan penelitian mengungkap efektivitas mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone. Berdasarkan hasil analisa efektivitas mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone, menunjukan bahwa mediasi belum efektif. Faktor-faktor penyebabnya adalah: Tingkat kepatuhan masyarakat yang menjalani proses mediasi sangat rendah. Fasilitas dan sarana mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone masih kurang memadai baik dari segi ruang mediasi maupun fasilitas penunjang didalamnya. Selain Ketua Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone, hakim yang ditunjuk menjadi mediator seluruhnya belum mengikuti pelatihan mediasi yang diselenggrakan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Penempatan pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama tidak tepat atau tidak sesuai dengan apa yang telah digariskan oleh Allah swt., dalam QS al-Nisa>’/4: 35, tentang kedudukan dan kewenangan hakam (mediator) dalam menyelesaikan konflik yang terjadi dalam rumah tangga. The purpose of the study revealed the mediation method in divorce cases in the Class 1A Religious Court of Watampone. Based on the results of the analysis of mediation in divorce cases in Watampone Class 1A Religious Courts, it shows that mediation has not been effective. The contributing factors are: The level of community participation that supports the mediation process is very low. Mediation facilities and facilities in the Class 1A Religious Court of Watampone are still inadequate in terms of mediation space and supporting facilities therein. In addition to the Chairperson of Class 1A Religious Court Watampone, the judge appointed to be a mediator had fully received mediation training conducted by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Placement of mediation in the Religious Courts is not right or not in accordance with what has been outlined by God Almighty.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF RELIGIOUS COURT IN ISLAMIC LAW REFORM IN INDONESIA

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Amran Suadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
New Formula ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Legal Opinion

Abstract: Law, including Islamic law, will evolve with the changes of time, place, situation and tradition. New social problems grow gradually and pose challenges to Islamic law. Reconstruction and reform are inevitable for Islamic law to respond to the current issues. The Islamic law reforms in Indonesia performed through legal enactment, legal opinion (fatwa), and the Religious Courts decisions. New formula for Islamic law in addressing contemporary issues can be built through three processes: conservation, innovation process, and creation. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia fully supports the development of Islamic law in Indonesia. The reform of Islamic law by the Supreme Court has been carried out through several instruments, such as the issuance of Perma and SEMA, agreement among justices within the Chamber of the Religious Courts, and creation of jurisprudence.Abstrak: Hukum, termasuk hukum Islam, akan berubah seiring dengan perubahan waktu, tempat, situasi dan tradisi. Masalah sosial baru yang tumbuh secara bertahap tumbuh dan menimbulkan tantangan bagi hukum Islam. Rekonstruksi dan reformasi tidak dapat dihindarkan agar hukum Islam merespons masalah saat ini. Ada tiga tipologi reformasi hukum Islam di Indonesia yang dilakukan melalui pengesahan hukum, pendapat hukum (fatwa), dan keputusan pengadilan dari keputusan Pengadilan Agama. Formula baru untuk hukum Islam dalam menangani masalah kontemporer dapat dibangun berdasarkan tiga proses: proses konservasi, proses inovasi, dan proses penciptaan. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia sepenuhnya mendukung pengem­bangan hukum Islam di Indonesia. Reformasi hukum Islam oleh Mahkamah Agung telah dilakukan melalui beberapa instrumen, seperti penerbitan Perma dan SEMA, kesepakatan di antara para hakim di Kamar Pengadilan Agama, dan penciptaan yurisprudensi yang diambil dari kasasi.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN TUGAS MEDIATOR PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DENGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Mardalena Hanifah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Materials Processing ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Article 3 (2) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures, Case Examining Judges in the consideration of a decision must state that the case has been pursued peace through mediation by mentioning the mediator. The court is not only tasked with examining, trying, and resolving cases it receives but also seeks to reconcile the parties. The court, which has been impressed as a law enforcement and justice institution, now appears as an institution that seeks peaceful solutions for the parties. The implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts can be an eff ort to resolve civil disputes so that the settlement of civil disputes through mediation is the main choice. The research method used is normative legal research which includes research on legal principles which is very basic in guided law. The nature of the research carried out is descriptive, namely research that describes and explains in clear and detailed sentences. The data used are secondary data obtained from literature, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Processing and data analysis used qualitative methods. The defi nition of mediation according to the Religious Courts in Indonesia and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia is the eff ort of the judges and courts to reconcile the parties so that the divorce process does not continue at the next trial. When the mediation process was carried out at the Indonesian Religious Court and the Syari’ah Court in Malaysia, there was a similarity, namely the mediation process was carried out at the fi rst trial and it was an obligation for the disputing parties in a divorce case to take mediation. according to the procedure for the appointment of mediators at the Indonesian Religious Courts and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia and the appointments of these mediators are both made by the judges. 

scholarly journals Iktikat Baik Para Pihak dalam Pelaksanaan Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Amiril Lizuardi ◽  
Sudirman Sudirman ◽  
Ahmad Izzuddin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

<p class="isi">This article aims to describe the principle of good faith in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation in the Court while at the same time describing the implementation of the principle of good faith in the conduct of mediation in the Malang District Religious Court. This research is included in empirical research using a qualitative approach. The results of the discussion of this article indicate that Mediation is an inseparable part of the procedure in the Religious Courts as stipulated in the Indonesian Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Procedure for Mediation in Courts. In the Republic of Indonesia's Supreme Court Regulation Number, 1 of 2016, the provisions of good faith in the implementation of mediation were added. The mediator has the authority to evaluate the intentions of the parties during the mediation.</p>Artikel ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan asas iktikad baik dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Mediasi di Pengadilan sekaligus mendeskripsikan implementasi asas iktikad baik dalam pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitan empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil pembahasan artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa Mediasi merupakan bagian yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dari prosedur beracara di Pengadilan Agama sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 ditambahkan tentang ketentuan iktikad baik dalam pelaksanaan mediasi. Mediator memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan penilaian terhadap iktikad para pihak selama pelaksanaan mediasi.

scholarly journals Mediation in Marriage Disputes and Divorce (Analytical Study on the Application of Mediation in the Gorontalo Religious Court)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Faradila Hasan ◽  
Yasin - ◽  
Fikri Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Divorce Rate ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Marital Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts

Abstract: This article discussed mediation as a way of resolving marital disputes. Divorce was one form of marital dispute in the Religious Courts, and in terms of resolving marital disputes, mediation was required. Although the rules of mediation in the judiciary are very clear, the facts show that the disputing parties and the courts have not optimized their use so that the divorce rate every year does not experience a significant decrease; on the contrary, it increases. The theory regarding mediation procedures in the Religious Courts has clearly been stated in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (No. 1 of 2016). This article aims to analyze the implementation of the mediation process at the Gorontalo Religious Court. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct more in-depth research on the effectiveness of the Gorontalo Religious Court to resolve marital disputes that lead to divorce, which can be avoided, and the litigants can get back together and foster a ‘sakinah mawaddah wa rahmah’ household. This article used a qualitative with an empirical juridical approach. It could be concluded that the mediation had been carried out at the Gorontalo Religious Court under the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (No. 1 of 2016). Four factors affect successful and unsuccessful mediation, namely the litigation party factor, the mediator factor, the advocate or lawyer factor, and the representative mediation room factor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document