PHILOSOPHY AND POETRY: THE UNITY AND DIFFERENCE OF DIMENSIONS (Marginalia to E.K. Sobolevskaja’s article “Yearning – homeland – rowan...”)

The poetic dimension of philosophical thought is the central problem of this paper. Poetry and philosophy have different tasks, but both poetry and philosophy are concerned with the word as an instrument – knowledge (for philosophy) and expression (for poetry). Philosophy uses the word in its semantic constituents, abstracting from its external form. For poetry, the external sound side is inseparable from meaning and its various semantic aspects. In some cases, however, these typological attitudes and tenets are reversed. In philosophy, such cases can be considered as the work with language in its poetic dimension. Heraclitus worked in this way in antiquity, Heidegger works with language and with the word similarly in modern times. In poetry, we can consider the work of M. Tsvetaeva as such a case. Poeticizing, as represented by Tsvetaeva, is a cardinal linguistic shift, determined by the inner experience: distancing from any national language, or cardinal defamiliarization of the language in the constitutive centres of its conventional symbolic coordination, recognizing it every time and, accordingly, recognizing, renaming, defamiliarizing of the world. More than anybody else poets are immersed in the world, in search of the names, in giving meanings to things. When considering the poet’s work from the perspective of poetic dimensions of philosophical thought, the author relies on an article by Elena Sobolevskaya “Yearning – homeland – rowan...”, which uses both philological and philosophical approaches to the analysis and interpretation of Marina Tsvetaeva’s poetic work.