scholarly journals DEMOCRATIZAÇÃO DO DIREITO À EDUCAÇÃO BÁSICA NO BRASIL: algumas ponderações

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Cristiane Machado ◽  
Edson Francisco de Andrade

O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar as injunções da legislação educacional no movimento de democratização do direito à educação no Brasil. À luz da literatura da área, concebe-se a democracia e a ação colaborativa como fundamentos basilares tanto à garantia de direitos aos cidadãos, quanto à efetivação de incumbências por parte do Poder Público. Aborda-se, inicialmente, o advento da educação básica como nova configuração organizativa das etapas e modalidades de ensino obrigatórias no país. Em seguida, analisa-se os dispositivos legais que modificam, especificamente, o Título III da Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional – LDBEN, nº 9.394/1996, Do Direito à Educação e Do Dever de Educar. Os resultados do estudo reconhecem a expansão e diversificação da oferta da educação básica como construto favorável à garantia do direito à educação. Foi possível também inferir que a delimitação da obrigatoriedade e da gratuidade do ensino, ao período dos 04 aos 17 anos de idade, conforme consta na letra da lei, ao mesmo tempo em que estabelece o interstício ideal para a efetivação Do Direito à Educação, também oferece margem interpretativa para eventual flexibilização Do Dever de Educar por parte do Poder Público. Com efeito, a defesa da educação como direito humano fundamental, além de demandar o cumprimento da incumbência Estatal, constitui, sobremaneira, corresponsabilidade a ser protagonizada pela sociedade civil organizada.Palavras-chave: LDBEN/1996; Direito à educação; Dever de educar; Democratização do ensinoDEMOCRATIZATION OF THE RIGHT TO BASIC EDUCATION IN BRAZIL: some considerationsAbstractThis article aims to analyze the injunctions of educational legislation in the movement to democratize the right to education in Brazil. In the light of the literature in the area, democracy and collaborative action are conceived as basic foundations both in guaranteeing citizens' rights and in carrying out tasks on the part of the government. Initially, the advent of basic education is approached as a new organizational configuration of the stages and modalities of compulsory education in the country. Then, the legal provisions that specifically modify Title III of the Law of Directives and Bases of Education are analyzed National - LDBEN, nº 9.394 / 1996, From the Right to Education and the Duty to Educate. The results of the study recognize the expansion and diversification of the offer of basic education as a construct favorable to guaranteeing the right to education. It was also possible to infer that the delimitation of mandatory and free education, from 4 to 17 years of age, as stated in the letter of the law, while establishing the ideal interstice for the realization of the Right to Education, also it offers an interpretive margin for eventual flexibility of the Duty to Educate by the Public Power. Indeed, the defense of education as a fundamental human right, in addition to demanding compliance with the State's mandate, is, above all, co-responsibility to be played by organized civil society.Keywords: LDBEN / 1996; Right to education; Duty to educate; Democratization of educationDEMOCRATIZACIÓN DEL DERECHO A LA EDUCACIÓN BÁSICA EN BRASIL: algunas consideracionesResumen Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar los mandatos de la legislación educativa en el movimiento para democratizar el derecho a la educación en Brasil. A la luz de la literatura en el área, la democracia y la acción colaborativa se conciben como pilares básicos tanto en la garantía de los derechos ciudadanos como en el desempeño de las tareas de gobierno. Inicialmente se aborda el advenimiento de la educación básica como una nueva configuración organizativa de las etapas y modalidades de la educación obligatoria en el país, luego se analizan las disposiciones legales que modifican específicamente el Título III de la Ley de Directrices y Bases de la Educación. Nacional - LDBEN, nº 9.394 / 1996, Del derecho a la educación y el deber de educar. Los resultados del estudio reconocen la expansión y diversificación de la oferta de educación básica como un constructo favorable para garantizar el derecho a la educación. También se pudo inferir que la delimitación de la educación obligatoria y gratuita, de los 4 a los 17 años, como se establece en la letra de la ley, al tiempo que se establece el intersticio ideal para la realización del Derecho a la Educación, también ofrece un margen interpretativo para una eventual flexibilización del Deber de Educar por parte del Poder Público. En efecto, la defensa de la educación como derecho humano fundamental, además de exigir el cumplimiento del mandato del Estado, es, ante todo, una corresponsabilidad de la sociedad civil organizada.Palabras clave: LDBEN / 1996; Derecho a la educación; Deber de educar; Democratización de la educación

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-53
Author(s):  
Neha Chowdhary

Importance of education realised by the whole world after it declared as a fundamental human right by UDHR in 1948 which is the rst international legal instrument to give such recognition and paved the way for many positive changes to attain the goals set by various international organizations like UNESCO and ILO. With the strong efforts of various social reformers and various initiatives of government India has tried to reform its education policies time to time. The 86th amendment Act 2002, which came into effect on 1st April, 2010, has made changes in the Constitution of India by inserting Article 21A, amending Article 45 and by inserting Article 51A(k) and nally the Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act of 2009. With the enactment of the Act of 2009 popularly known as RTE, a strong initiative taken by the government successfully bring hope in hearts and minds of many Indian citizens. Today education is not limited to those having stronger economic background but after the introduction of Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 it became the right of every child. In this research article an effort has been made to cover the journey of “education in India” and to see how successfully it can make a difference in many lives to realise them its importance


SASI ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata ◽  
Welly Angela Riry

Fulfilling of the Right to Education is a part of Human Rights. The right to education has become important in line with government policies to work from home during the Covid 19 pandemic. During the Covid-19 pandemic the learning process uses two learning methods, namely the online method and the offline method. Two learning methods are used for learning but the process has not been implemented optimally by both teachers and students, there are always obstacles faced. The purpose of this study was to determine and study the fulfillment of the right to basic education during the Covid 19 pandemic. The authors conducted research at the Department of Education and Culture of Elementary Schools and Junior High Schools in Ambon City using empirical research methods, data collection techniques through interviews and observations to students. Based on the results of the research conducted, the authors found that the distance learning system in schools in Ambon City was not optimal due to facilities and infrastructure and mastery of technology. which is still low. Fulfilling the right to education requires the involvement of all parties, namely the government, educators, students and parents to work together in the teaching and learning process during the Covid-19 pandemic. The government, educators, students and educational administering institutions at a practical level must strive to develop learning methods with good digital literacy skills so that they need to be improved through trainings using media for online learning for both educators, students and parents


Author(s):  
Franciscus Xaverius Wartoyo ,

<p>Abstract<br />Government has the legal responsibilities in the implementation of national education system to carry out the mandate set out in Section 31 of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 related to the intellectual life of the nation. This is confirmed and applied by The Indonesian Government Regulation 47/2008 regarding compulsory education and Indonesian Government Regulations 48/2008 related to the funding education of elementary school (SD) to high school (SMP) free made by the government through the School Operational Assistance (BOS) to make the education system based on the national human values and justice according to Pancasila ad realize the human rights set out in the Constitution Indonesian 1945 Article28 c paragraph(1) and Article 28d paragraph (3) stated that every citizen has the right to obtain equal opportunities in government. The free primary education can not be realized in a fair and equitable for the presence of education autonomy, every area is not the same policies and management education in many schools that are not transparent even still many schools to collect funds for the reason given by the government budget for operational costs is not enough.In addition, the9-year basic education which should be free up to secondary education (high school) born by either the state of infrastructure, teachers’ salaries, electricity, telephone, computer, books, stationery without distinguishing between public and private schools.<br /><em>Keywords: national education, justice, humanity,Indonesian contitution 1945</em></p><p>Abstrak<br />Pemerintah memiliki tanggung jawab hukum dalam implementasi sistem pendidikan nasional sebagai amanah (mandat) dari Pasal 31 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 yakni hak mendapatkan pendidikan yang layak. Mandat tersebut diturunkan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 47 Tahun 2008 tentang wajib belajar dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 48/2008 tentang Pendanaan Pendidikan dari Sekolah Dasar ( SD ) hingga Sekolah Menengah ( SMP ) yang gratis ditanggung oleh pemerintah melalui Bantuan Operasional Sekolah ( BOS ) dalam rangka untuk menciptakan sistem pendidikan berdasarkan pada nilai-nilai kemanusiaan nasional dan keadilan dalam Pancasila, serta dalam rangka penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia berdasar Pasal 28C ayat (1) dan Pasal 28D ayat (3) dimana setiap warga negara memiliki kesempatan yang sama dalam pemerintahan. Pendidikan dasar gratis tidak dapat dicapai secara adil dan merata karena setiap daerah miliki kebijakan dan manajemen pendidikan yang berbeda, adanya ketidaktransparanan sekolah dalam mengelola dana, dan faktor alasan ketidakcukupan dana yang diberikan oleh pemerintah kepada sekolah. Pendidikan Dasar 9 (sembilan tahun) seharusnya gratis sampai pada Pendidikan Menengah Pertama (SMP) baik dalam hal infrastruktur pendidikan, honor guru, biaya listrik, telepon, pengadaan komputer, buku-buku tanpa ada pembedaan sekolah publik dan sekolah swasta.<br /><em>Kata kunci: Pendidikan Nasional, Keadilan, Kemanusiaan, UUD 1945</em></p>


Author(s):  
Barbara Preložnjak

The right to education is regulated by norms of many international and regional documents. It includes many rights and plays an important role in the "all-round development of man" and its scope: physical, emotional, ethical, aesthetic, intellectual, professional, civic and international. The right to education is not the exclusive right of children. It is first and foremost the right of children and is essential for children's development. Therefore, it is generally accepted that educational opportunities should be equal for children. Unfortunately, the right to education has been severely curtailed in a short period of time due to the COVID -19 pandemic. According to UNESCO, 191 countries have temporarily closed national or local schools to contain the spread of COVID -19. This has resulted in school-age children being unable to receive basic education. This situation is particularly difficult for children from dysfunctional or disadvantaged families. Some families do not have internet, computers or books. Some parents cannot help them with homework because of educational or language limitations. All these unequal educational opportunities limit schooling. On the way to eliminate inequality in access to education and protect children from rights violations, the author will discuss whether Rawls' principle of fairness provides a good basis for the government to take action to eliminate unequal opportunities for education.


Author(s):  
Abdul Qader Nael

Childhood is an important stage of human life that has been valued in different forms by different societies and nations of the world. According to Muslim jurists, this stage of life begins from birth and continues until puberty. Afghan modern laws and many related international legal documents consider the age of 18 to be the end of childhood. Human beings at this important stage of life, called "children", have a lot of rights because of their weakness, inability to live independently, and because they need to be assisted to pass this important stage of life well and become effective persons in the society. One of the most important rights of a child is having access to a sound and effective education. Caring for this right of children is the responsibility of their parents, relatives, and the government, respectively. In view of this, Islamic Sharia and modern laws, both national and international, recognize the right to education as one of the most important rights of a child, and have enacted many legal provisions in this field and obliged the parties involved to implement them.


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tenang Haryanto ◽  
Johannes Suhardjana ◽  
A. Komari A. Komari ◽  
Muhammad Fauzan ◽  
Manunggal Kusuma Wardaya

The end of the government of Orde Baru that tends to be more authoritharian has emerged the transformation almost in all government hierarchy. The most important transformation is in the material contains or substantive of 1945 constitution, whether material that has been erased, revised or new material. Material contain of the 1945 constitution is the result of the amendment such as the Human Right.  The regulation about human right before amendment 1945 constitution regulated as right and duty of the republic citizen in Indonesia that contains the values of human right and regulated in the article 27 to article 34. The regulation of human right after amendment of 1945 constitution regulated in article 28A to 28J.  The regulation about the human right based on the Law Number 39 Year 1999 concerning the Human Right. It explain there is no right in Indonesia that has the absolute power and unlimited. Human Right is not the right that has the absolute characteristic. In the implementation, its limited by the right, morale, security and order of other people. Because of that,  in the human right also known the existence of human right duty. Moreover, the implementation of the human right has been regulated in the 1945 Constitution. Kata Kunci : Hak Asasi manusia, Amandemen UUD 1945


Author(s):  
A. Wayne MacKay ◽  
Gordon Krinke

“Special Education and theCharter: The Right to Equal Benefit of the Law” is an excellent article on the provincial statutory regimes and their relationship to s. 15 of theCharter. It surveys the legislatures' attempts at delivering education to students and highlights the shortcomings in these attempts, focussing on the inability or unwillingness of the legislatures to provide an appropriate education to mentally disabled individuals. The article then takes a prospective approach, illustrating how a generous interpretation of s. 15 of theChartermight be used to correct deficiencies in educational statutes. Both the survey of statute law and the commentary on its relationship to the equality provisions of theCharterprovide a valuable addition to scholarly writing on the provision of appropriate education to the mentally disabled.However, there is some danger in assuming that the right to education derives solely from statute. Statutes are creations of legislatures. If the right to education exists only in these statutes, education may be viewed not as the right of every child, but as a privilege bestowed by the legislature, to be determined by administrators, and to be overseen only as a last resort by the courts.


Author(s):  
فايزة سعيداني

The right to education at the international and domestic levels has become the interest of several parties who are responsible and obliged to achieve and respect this right, by recruiting all relevant parties and the means available for this. Like other countries, Algeria has recognized this right since the date of independence and is enshrined in all successive constitutions. Where the constitutional founder recognizes the principle of free education, the principle of compulsory basic education, and the state is responsible for regulating the educational system and ensuring equal access to education, but these constitutional principles can only be effective if supported by the legal provisions governing and specifying the applicable provisions in order to achieve the exercise of this right, which has long been considered a fundamental requirement at the international and domestic level. Through this presentation, we have tried to ask how the legal text of the right to education is addressed and whether it was sufficient to meet the basic demands of the educational system in the light of globalization, technological development and digitization. In this context, it was necessary to address the various legal texts and various conventions that addressed the dedication and strengthening of the right to education at the international level and its results at the internal level, which is what we will address through this intervention, by addressing the analysis of the various Algerian legal texts related to the subject through the division of work into two main axes. The descriptive and analytical approaches have been relied upon to reach different results and solutions for improving the curriculum and the educational system in general.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 385
Author(s):  
La Sina

The 1945 Constitution of Indonesia provides for rights to life and to remain free from torture that are fundamental human rights that shall not be curtailed under any circumstance. Since 1945, Indonesia does not regulate the protection of the right of life to the citizens. Until 1946, enacted Law No. 1 of 1946 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code which in several provisions concerning the death penalty. Death sentences and executions in Indonesia is always debatable. However, it is still implemented and can not be avoided, unless the change of its legal provisions. This study was a normative research or doctrinal research. The results of the study shows that the provisions of death penalty in Indonesia is still enforced because have been regulated in the Criminal Code and several organic laws such as the law of terrorism, narcotics, corruption, and human rights justice. The death penalty is contrary to Article 28I of the 1945 Constitution. It has set the rights to life, so that no one may violate human rights, including the government and the country is not granted the right to revoke rights for every citizen. The Indonesian government should not impose the death penalty contained in the draft new Code, and abolish the death penalty in its organic law that had been imposed on the offenders. Preferably, the death penalty may be replaced by alternative punishment with life imprisonment, a prison within a specified time or according to the judge’s decision.


Law Review ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Cynthia Phillo ◽  
Hessa Arteja ◽  
M Faiz Rizqi

<p><em>Children as the forerunners of the successor to the future Indonesia nation make children individuals who become priorities in holding the right to education. The law itself has governed the rights that a child must have, including the right to get a proper education. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the government finds it difficult in providing legal protection for a proper education rights of children. By using normative legal method, this paper will explain how the legal protection of children’s rights  over education during the COVID-19 Pandemic that’s happening and how the government’s role is in fulfilling childern’s rights in getitng an education.</em></p><p><strong>Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: </strong>Anak sebagai cikal bakal penerus bangsa Indonesia menjadikan anak sebagai individu yang menjadi prioritas dalam memegang hak pendidikan. Undang-undang sendiri telah mengatur tentang hak-hak yang harus diteirma oleh anak, termasuk hak dalam pendidikan. Karena Pandemi COVID-19 yang terjadi, menambah kesulitan bagi pemerintah untuk memberikan perilundungan hukum bagi hak anak atas pendidikan. Dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, tulisan ini akan menjelaskan bagaimana perlindungan hukum hak anak atas pendidikan pada masa Pandemi COVID-19 yang sedang tejadi dan bagaimana peran negara dalam memenuhi hak anak dalam mendapat pendidikan.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document