Analysis of motor vehicle fl eet structure and tendencies of its change

Innotrans ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 67-69
Author(s):  
Vasiliy N. Kuznetsov ◽  

Motor vehicle transport is one of the leading elements of social and economic development of the country and regions. The article shows results of assessment of the country’s motor fleet within the period of 2015-2019. The motor fleet structure by categories of transport vehicles , age profile and ownership were chosen as the main indicators. On the basis of the obtained data conclusions were drawn. This paper may be a baseline for determination of regional peculiarities through comparison with all-Russia tendencies.

2021 ◽  
pp. 37-46
Author(s):  
Alona Poltoratska ◽  
Tetiana Stovba ◽  
Alona Hrebennikova

Introduction. Introduction. Innovation is an integral factor of social and economic development, which accompanied mankind from the beginning of civilization. Over the past decade, you can observe a significant increase in expenditures for innovation activity and growing interest in the topic of innovation, since technological changes and innovations are often perceived as an influential process that opens opportunities for the benefits of society, as well as social security. Particular attention is paid to the commercialization of innovation, since they are a fundamental condition for the development of both micro-and macroeconomic aspects in the context of their impact on the creation of competitive advantages and economic development. Moreover, the commercialization of innovation is, apparently, the most important challenge faced by all companies. innovations go beyond science or technology; this is what can create value through the commercialization process. The theme of commercialization of innovation apparently paid increased attention Recently, but this subject of research is quite fragmented and distributed between various fields of research and disciplines. As a result, it is necessary to investigate, arrange and aggregate various theoretical and empirical conclusions, the purpose of the article is to determine theoretical principles of commercialization of the results of innovation activity in order to formulate the relevant mechanism. Method (methodology). The study used a number of general scientific and specially scientific methods: analysis and synthesis to find out the essence of the mechanism of commercialization of the results of innovation activity; systematization – determination of the main levels of the mechanism of commercialization; Gnoseology – outlining the main contradictions for understanding commercialization. The results. The main purpose of the article is to form a model of the mechanism of commercialization of the results of innovation activity. The existing connection between phenomena is taken into account: commercialization of innovation and internationalization. A conceptual approach to the formation of a mechanism for commercialization of innovation results depending on management levels is proposed. The toolkit for implementing the proposed mechanism is determined.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-44
Author(s):  
Boratay Uysal

AbstractEntrepreneurship has emerged as an essential instrument for social and economic development in both industrialized and developing countries. However, while the phenomenon spreads all over the world, the intention of young generations to become self-employed differs according to country context. In this regard, the paper investigates the differences in the levels of entrepreneurial intentions and their antecedents of university students from Turkey and Kosovo. With the purpose of measuring such differences, structured questionnaires based on Shapero’s model were distributed within the main universities in Ankara and Prishtina. The findings indicate that there is a statistically significant difference between Turkey and Kosovo in determination of entrepreneurial intentions.


Author(s):  
Aleksei Valentinovich Kurakin

Despite the fact that the questions of administrative enforcement are classic for the theory of administrative law, they retain their relevance. New challenges and threats, as well as the paradigm of social and economic development, substantiate the need for revising the traditional points of view regarding such phenomenon as “administrative enforcement”. The key question on the agenda is the problem of determination of balance between private and public components in application of administrative enforcement measures, as well as the criteria that prevent excessive enforcement. Attention is turned to the functionality of such enforcement. The author describes its procedural and administrative aspects, as well as analyzes the effectiveness of implementation of this type of public enforcement. The questions of administrative enforcement do not cease to be relevant in the time of political and social instability; therefore, in order for the administrative enforcement to discharge its functions, the legislation should take into account the emerging processes and realities. The author notes that for preventing excessive administrative enforcement, the individual rights and freedoms should not be unduly restricted; only this guarantees fair public enforcement. It is also underlined that the administrative enforcement is of procedural nature, which justifies introduction of the category “procedural enforcement” into the formal legal discourse.


Author(s):  
Tamara Klebanova ◽  
Olha Rudachenko ◽  
Oksana Panasenko

Today, a serious problem is the formation of crisis situations in the economic development of the country (region), which are determined by a set of the various indicators. The main causes of the crisis are both external factors, that is, factors of economic globalization, and internal factors that are associated with serious imbalances in social and economic development. Each group of these factors can lead to an increase in the tension of crises, therefore, a timely assessment and analysis of the formation of crisis situations is very important. The assessment is carried out on the basis of indicators that characterize the socio-economic development of the country (regions). Changes in these indicators allow us to calculate the intensity of economic development. The aim of the work is to form and substantiate a system of indicators that characterize the economic and social development of the country based on the analysis of the current statistical indicators of socio-economic development of the country (region) and build a comprehensive integrated indicator of tension. The paper proposes a methodology for calculating the integral indicator of socio-economic tension in the country, which includes 9 main stages: collection of the indicators of socio-economic development; formation of a matrix of input data of indicators; standardization of the information space; differentiation of signs into stimulants and de-stimulants; building a standard; determination of the distances between the object and the standard; construction of an integral indicator of the tension of socio-economic development; interpretation of the integral indicator of the tension of socio-economic development. Thus, the work has formed and substantiated a system of the indicators characterizing the economic and social development of the country on the basis of an analysis of the aggregate of indicators of the socio-economic development of the country (region) in the statistical reporting and determined the integral indicators of tension separately for the social and economic spheres.


2020 ◽  
Vol 186 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 112-123
Author(s):  
Vladimir Kovarda ◽  

This paper reviews the results obtained by Russian and foreign researchers of the importance of balanced development of a region as an autonomous system. The author proposes an algorithm for generation of balanced regional development indicators as well as determination of «regional vitality index», provides an example of graphic representation of the results for the proposed method. Additionally, the paper contains the set of assumed indicators based on a social nature of the state. Regions, as used herein, are classified into balanced, socially oriented, and economically oriented, and strategic directions are defined on the basis of existing vector of development and regional vitality index, i. e. type of the region. Key takeaways and recommendations are listed in the conclusion. In particular, the results of determining the «region vitality factor» make it possible to estimate the level of regional social and economic development with the possibility of quantitatively calculating functional imbalances, determining (if any) the vector and magnitude of deformation. The consistency of the approach to the formation of blocks of indicators allows considering the key aspects of social and economic development of the region.


2008 ◽  
pp. 70-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bukhvald

Transformations in the sphere of federal relations concern the most important directions of the reforming processes in the country. However, not all proposed and actually developing components of the federal reform seem well-argued and corresponding to long-term, strategic interests of the Russian statehood. The basic course of reform should meet the objective requirements of further decentralization of governing economic and social processes and the need to ensure strengthening the responsibility of RF subjects’ executive bodies and local self-management for steady social and economic development of their territories. The solution of these problems calls for a new model of federal policy of regional development, specification of some important components of the municipal reform as well as inserting certain amendments into the system of intergovernmental fiscal relations in order to stir up their stimulating function.


2014 ◽  
pp. 4-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Mau

The paper deals with Russian social and economic development in 2013 and prospects for the next year or two. The author discusses the logic and trends of the global crisis started in 2008. This is the basis for further analysis of current Russian economic performance with special emphasis on the problem of growth rates deceleration. Special attention is paid to economic risks and priorities of economic policy.


2008 ◽  
pp. 71-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shastitko ◽  
S. Afontsev ◽  
S. Plaksin

The article contains a general comparative study of four strategies of social and economic development: "Inertia", "Renter", "Mobilization", and "Modernization". The context for comparison is explanation of correlation between adaptive features of Russia’s contemporary economic system and particularities of the mentioned strategies with corresponding ways of managing economic development problems. The comparison is based on description of strategies essence, ways and tools to achieve results. Perspectives of achieving strategic purposes as well as expected results of implementation of each strategy are shown. Special comparative study of four strategies on the base of development of competitive markets as one of strategic aims of the Russian government is presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document