Studi perbedaan antara model pembelajaran think talk write dan example non example terhadap keterampilan menulis narasi ditinjau dari motivasi belajar pada peserta didik kelas iv sekolah dasar

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annisa' Nur Latifah

<p class="Abstract"><em>Th</em><em>e </em><em>goals </em><em>of this research </em><em>to find out: (1) </em><em>the </em><em>different of narrative writing skills between students </em><em>that teached</em><em> using Think Talk Write learning model with Example Non Example learning model; (2) differences in narrative writing skills between students who hashigh learning motivation and low learning motivation; (3) the interaction between learning models and learning motivation trough narrative writing skills. This research is quantitative experimental with 2x2 factorial design. The technique</em><em> to got sample</em><em> us</em><em>ing </em><em>cluster random sampling</em><em>.</em><em> Two</em><em> W</em><em>ay</em><em>sAnava </em><em>was used </em><em>to</em><em> analys</em><em> the</em><em> data with a significance level of 0.05.The results of th</em><em>isresearch were</em><em> (1) there</em><em> was a</em><em> differen</em><em>t</em><em> in narrative writing skills between students who </em><em>teached by</em><em> Think Talk Write learning model with Example Non Example learning model with F<sub>A</sub> = 6.259; (2) there </em><em>was a </em><em>differen</em><em>t</em><em> in narrative writing skills between </em><em>the</em><em> high learning motivation and low learning motivation with F<sub>B</sub> = 35,688; (3) there is no interaction between the learning model and learning motivation towards narrative writing skills as indicated by F<sub>AB</sub> = 0.628.</em><em></em></p><p class="Abstract"><em> </em></p><strong>            <em>Keyword:</em></strong><em> think talk write, example non example, narrative writing skills, elementary school</em>

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yendrawaty Yendrawaty

This research aimed to describe the influence of Problem Based Learning Model and Learning Motivation to Expository Text Writing Skills of Students Grade VII MTsN Bukittinggi. The type of research is quasi experiment and the design used is factorial design 2x2. Sampling is done by purposive sampling. Data analysis and discussion were conducted through descriptive-analysis. The analysis results of data were as follows. First, writing expository text taught using the Problem Based Learning model is better than students taught by conventional learning models. Second, Second, writing the expositional text of students who have high learning motivation taught by using Problem Based Learning model is better than those taught with conventional learning model. Third, writing the expositional text of students who have low learning motivation taught by using Problem Based Learning model is better than those taught with conventional learning model. Fourthly, there is no interaction between learning motivation and the learning model in influencing the ability to write expository text of students. In the next description, PBL is used for Problem Based Learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.


Author(s):  
Astuty Sriwahyuni Tarigan ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Efendi Napitupulu

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial dan model pembelajaran drill and practice. (2) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar KKPI siswa dengan motivasi belajar tinggi dan motivasi belajar rendah. (3) Mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar KKPI. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Hasil analisis data diperoleh; (1) hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan media pembelajaran drill and practice lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 114,59 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1,56). (2) hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar KKPI siswa dengan motivasi belajar rendah. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 167,04 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1.56), dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar siswa dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar KKPI. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 16,82 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1,56). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar KKPI, model pembelajaran drill and practice tepat digunakan bagi siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi. Siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar rendah lebih efektif dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial. Kata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran, Motivasi Belajar, Hasil Belajar KKPI  Abstract: This study aims to: (1) Know the differences in KKPI learning outcomes of students taught with tutorial learning models and drill and practice learning models. (2) Knowing the differences in learning outcomes of KKPI students with high learning motivation and low learning motivation. (3) Determine the interaction between the learning model and student learning motivation towards KKPI learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental research. The results of data analysis are obtained; (1) KKPI learning outcomes of students taught with drill and practice learning media are higher than KKPI learning outcomes of students who are taught with tutorial learning models. This is indicated by Fcount = 114.59 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56). (2) KKPI learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are higher than KKPI learning outcomes of students with low learning motivation. This is indicated by Fcount = 167.04 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56), and (3) there is an interaction between learning models and student motivation in influencing KKPI learning outcomes. This is indicated by Fcount = 16.82 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56). The results showed that to improve KKPI learning outcomes, the drill and practice learning model is appropriate for students who have high learning motivation. Students who have low learning motivation are more effectively taught with a tutorial learning model. Keywords: Learning Model, Learning Motivation, KKPI Learning Outcomes


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.


Author(s):  
Lingga Nico Pradana

<p>The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models to student achievement. Learning models compared between NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. Method of research used quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x1. Population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation and test.Hypothesis testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testwere concluded that NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement. </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Suryani ◽  
Susilawati Susilawati ◽  
Kosim Kosim

Research aimed to find the effect of Conceptual Understanding Procedures learning model on the mastery of physics concepts observed from the scientific attitude of 10th-grade students. Type of research was quasi-experiment with 2x2 factorial design. Population was 10th grade students of MIA in SMAN 1 Gunungsari academic year 2017/2018, and the sampling technique was cluster random sampling. The data of the students’ mastery of concepts were collected by giving essays and the scientific attitude was measured by using questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed by applying 2-way ANOVA, assisted by SPSS 16 with (α) significance level of 5%. The results show that significant value for the effect of learning model consider from scientific attitude in amount 0,01 which its was smaller from (α), and significant value for interaction between Conceptual Understanding Procedures learning model with scientific attitude in amount 0,18 which its value is bigger from (α). According to data, can be conclude: there was an effect of Conceptual Understanding Procedures learning model to the mastery of physics concept in terms of scientific attitude from 10th grade student’; and there was no interaction between Conceptual Understanding Procedures learning model to scientific attitude to the mastery of physics concept from 10th grade student’. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Irma Susanty

AbstractThe aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement. The learning model compared were NHT(Numbered Head Together), snowball throwing and convensional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 3×1 factorial design. The population was the eight grade student of junior high school in Cibinong district on academic year 2017/2018. The sampling tecnique was cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 103 students consisted of 36 students in the first experimental group, 34  students in the second experimental group and 33 students in third experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced one-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research was NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than Snowball Throwing and convensional learning model, and snowball throwing learning model give better mathematics achievement than convensional learning model.Keywords: NHT, Snowball throwing, mathematics achievement


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurbaiti Rindang Utami ◽  
Yayuk Andayani ◽  
Muntari Muntari

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap prestasi belajar kimia siswa kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Narmada Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan post test only control group design. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik cluster random sampling karena anggota populasi sudah homogen berdasarkan data nilai ujian semester ganjil siswa kelas XI IPA. Kelas XI IPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dan kelas XI IPA 3 sebagai kelas kontrol menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Post test digunakan sebagai instrumen utama penelitian, selain itu portofolio juga digunakan sebagai instrumen kedua penelitian ini. Hasil uji beda (uji-t) post test dengan taraf signifikan 5% menunjukkan thitung (4,105) > ttabel (2,000) sehingga H0 ditolak. Uji-t dilakukan juga pada hasil portofolio yang menunjukkan thitung (2,89) > ttabel (2,000). Berdasarkan kedua hasil tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran berbasis proyek memberikan pengaruh yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model konvensional terhadap prestasi belajar kimia siswa kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Narmada Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014.Kata Kunci: Model pembelajaran berbasis proyek, prestasi belajar kimia Abstract: The objective of the research was to know the effect of Project-Based Learning towards the student’s chemistry learning achievement class XI IPA of SMAN 1 Narmada in 2013/2014 academic year. This research used a quasi-experimental research design with the design of post-test only control group design. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling technique because members of populations have homogeneous based on data value semester exams of class XI science students. Class XI IPA 1 as experimental group was threated by project-based learning model and class XI IPA 3 as control group was threated by conventional learning models. Post test is used as an basic instrument. In addition, the portofolio is as a second instrument of this research.. The results of post-test hypothesis test using a different test (t-test) with a significance level of 5% showed tacc (4.105)> ttable (2.000) so that H0 is rejected. Hypothesis testing is also performed on the results of portfolio show tacc (2.89)> ttable (2.000). Based on these results, we can conclude that project-based learning model provides give a better effect than the conventional models of the student’s chemistrylearning achievement class XI IPA of SMAN 1 Narmada in 2013/2014 academic year.Keywords:     project-based learning model, the students’s chemistry achievement learning


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
Diana Kartika ◽  
Yetty Morelent

The objectives of this research are (1) to find out whether the CIRC and TTW learning models significantly influence the students’ ability to write reports at Muhammadiyah Junior High School Padang, (2) to explore whether the CIRC and TTW learning models have a significant influence on the highly motivated students’ ability to write reports, (3) to analyze whether the CIRC and TTW learning models have a significant influence on the ability to write reports of the students with low motivation (4) to identify whether there is influence on the interaction between the use of CIRC type learning model and TTW and learning motivation toward their ability to write the report. This study was conducted within randomized control-group pretest-posttest experimental designs whose participants were Grade 8 students of Muhammadiyah Junior High School Padang. The instruments of data collection were report writing tests, questionnaires and interviews. The findings show that there is a significant influence of the use of CIRC and TTW type learning model with the students’ motivation to learn the skills of writing reports. Secondly, there is a significant influence on the use of CIRC and TTW learning models on the highly motivated students’ report writing skills. Thirdly, there is a significant influence on the use of CIRC and TTW learning models on the lowly motivated students’ report writing skills. Finally, there is the interaction of the use of learning models of CIR and TTE types with their learning motivation on their report writing skills.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Rini Anggraini Pakpahan

This research aimed to determine the effect of STAD cooperative learning model to student learning outcomes in the subject matter of fluid at class XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Padangsidimpuan. This was eksperimental research with One Group Pretest Posttest Design. The population was all class XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Padangsidimpuan (128 students) and sample was taken through cluster random sampling, so the sample was 32 students. The instrument of this research was the achievement test. The result of this study indicated that student learning outcomes using STAD cooperative learning model (74,69) were higher than student learning outcomes using convensional learning model (62,25). Based on the  result of hypothesis testing at significance level 5% with degree of freedom 31, tcount = 9,79 > ttable = 1,698 then the hypothesis can be accepted, it means that there was influence STAD cooperative learning model to student learning outcomes in the subject matter of fluid at class XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Padangsidimpuan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document