IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS INTUISI  TERHADAP KREATIFITAS SISWA

IMPLEMENTATION OF INTUITION BASED LEARNING MODEL ON STUDENT CREATIVITY. The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of intuitive learning models for the creativity of class X students. The population of this study was class X students of SMAN 2 Sragen. The sample of this study was taken by cluster random sampling and selected class X. MIA 4 as an experimental class that uses expository learning, and class X.Mia 5 as a class that uses intuitive learning. Analysis of the data in this study were students in the class who used expository learning models, on average meeting the level of fluency thinking by 71.9% and still not meeting the level of other creative thinking. Then, students in the class who use the intuitive learning model obtained students who meet the level of thinking Flexibility and fluency thinking level of 82.14%. So it can be said that the creativity of students who get an intuitive-based learning model is better than students who get an expository learning model

Download Full-text

Keefektifan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Pair And Share Melalui Pendekatan Inquiry Ditinjau dari Kemandiriran Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika

Jurnal Sekolah Dasar ◽

10.36805/jurnalsekolahdasar.v3i1.413 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽

Paridjo . ◽

Eleonora Dwi W

Keyword(s):

Random Sampling ◽

Mathematics Learning ◽

Learning Model ◽

T Test ◽

Learning Models ◽

High Learning ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Inquiry Approach ◽

Cluster Random Sampling ◽

Better Than

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.

Download Full-text

The Experimentation of Contextual and Realistic Learning Models in terms of Interpersonal Intelligence

JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) ◽

10.25273/jipm.v8i1.3952 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 9

Author(s):

Utin Desy Susiaty ◽

Hodiyanto Hodiyanto

Keyword(s):

Data Analysis ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Contextual Learning ◽

Learning Models ◽

Analysis Technique ◽

Cluster Random Sampling ◽

Better Than

The aims of this study is to find out: (1) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional; (2) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence on each learning model; (4) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional at each level of interpersonal intelligence. This research is using the experimental method. The sampling technique is cluster random sampling. Data collection tools used were questionnaires and tests. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of three-way variance with unequal cells. The results showed that: (1) contextual learning models are better than realistic but provide the same learning outcomes as conventional, while realistic and conventional learning outcomes are equally good; (2) students who have high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (3) In each learning model, students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (4) At each level of interpersonal intelligence, the contextual learning model is better than realistic and conventional.

Download Full-text

PERBEDAAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA ANTARA SISWA YANG BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN KONVENSIONAL

Aksioma ◽

10.22487/aksioma.v8i2.213 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 171-178

Author(s):

Siti Hadijah ◽

Sutji Rochaminah ◽

Maxinus Jaeng

Keyword(s):

Standard Deviation ◽

Cooperative Learning ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Hypothesis Test ◽

Control Design ◽

Learning Model ◽

Average Score ◽

Concept Understanding ◽

Cluster Random Sampling ◽

Better Than

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di Kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Desain penelitian ini adalah pre-post test control design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu dengan teknik pengambilan sampel cluster random sampling. Nilai rata-rata siswa kelas eksperimen 47 dan standar deviasi 17,04 sedangkan nilai rata-rata siswa kelas kontrol 40 dan standar deviasi 13,40. Data yang diperoleh berdistribusi normal dan homogen, maka pengujian hipotesis menggunakan teknis statistik parametris yaitu uji t. Hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh bahwa nilai ????tabel = 1,67 dan ????hitung = 2,96 sehingga H1 diterima dan H0 ditolak. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di kelas IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Kata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw, Model Pembelajaran Konvensional, dan Pemahaman Konsep Abstract: This research purposed to determine is mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. The hypothesis is that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model. The type of research is a quasi experiment. Design of research is pre-post control design. The population of this research is all students of class IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu with samples taken by cluster random sampling technique. The average score of the experiment class students is 47 and standard deviation is 17.04 and the average score of the control class students is 40 and standard deviation is 13.40. The data is normal distribution and homogen, hypothesis test using t test. Results of hypothesis test obtained value ????table = 1.67 and ????count = 2.96 it means H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. This indicated that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model have better than mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Keywords: Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model, Conventional Learning Model, and Concept Understanding

Download Full-text

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan (JTP) ◽

10.24114/jtp.v12i1.14505 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 88

Author(s):

Mendarissan Aritonang ◽

Abdul Hamid K ◽

Julaga Situmorang

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Style ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Business Students ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Models ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

Download Full-text

DISCOVERY AND CORE LEARNING MODEL TOWARD CREATIVE THINKING VIEWED FROM LOGICAL MATHEMATICAL INTELLIGENCE

AKSIOMA Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika ◽

10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3429 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. 308

Author(s):

Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika ◽

Riyadi Riyadi ◽

Siswanto Siswanto

Keyword(s):

Random Sampling ◽

Creative Thinking ◽

Control Design ◽

Eighth Graders ◽

Learning Model ◽

Discovery Learning ◽

Thinking Ability ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Creative Thinking Ability ◽

Cluster Random Sampling

This research aims to 1) which learning model that supports students’ creative thinking ability whether discovery, CORE, or conventional learning model, 2) which model that supports creative thinking ability the most to high, moderate, and low level students, 3) know if there is interaction between learning model and students’ logical mathematical intelligence, and creative thinking ability. This is a quasi-experimental research with the population of eighth graders of junior high schools in Madiun Regency. The research design used a group pretest-posttest control design. The sample was determined using stratified cluster random sampling. This research uses two-way unequal ANOVA. This research concluded that 1) students’ creative thinking skill is developed better using Discovery than CORE and conventional learning model, 2) students with high logical mathematical intelligence have higher creative thinking ability than those with moderate and low logical mathematical intelligence,3) there is no interaction between learning model and logical mathematical intelligence with creative thinking ability.Keywords: Creative Thinking; Learning Model; Logical Mathematical Intelligence. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitan ini untuk mengetahui 1) model pembelajaran manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih antara model pembelajaran discovery learning, CORE atau konvensional, 2) manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih baik siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi, sedang, atau rendah, 3) apakah terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan keceredasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian adalah eksperimen semu, dengan populasi siswa kelas VIII SMP N Se-Kabupaten Madiun. Desain penelitian menggunakan group pretest-posttest control design Pemilihan sampel dengan menggunakan stratified cluster random sampling. Teknik analisis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Kesimpulan pada penelitian ini 1) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang kenai model discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran CORE dan konvensional, 2) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis sedang dan rendah, , 3) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif.Kata kunci: Berpikir kreatif; kecerdasan logis matematis; model pembelajaran.

Download Full-text

EFFECT OF INQUIRY TRAINING LEARNING MODEL DAN CREATIVITY ON SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika ◽

10.22611/jpf.v5i1.3706 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 44 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Purnama Silitonga ◽

Mara Bangun Harahap ◽

Derlina .

Keyword(s):

Interaction Model ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Process Skills ◽

Learning Models ◽

Science Process Skills ◽

The Difference ◽

Model Training ◽

Cluster Random Sampling ◽

Better Than

This study aims: 1) to determine differences in science process skills of students with learning model inquiry training and conventional learning models, 2) to determine the difference science process skills of students who have high creativity and creativity is low, 3) to determine the interaction model of learning inquiry trainingwith creativity of the science process skills. The sampling technique conducted cluster random sampling two classes, where first class as a class experiment with the number of students 32 people applied learning model inquiry training (X-1) and the second class as a class control the number of students 32 people who applied conventional learning model ( X-2). Instruments in this study is the science process skills test and a test of creativity in the form of a description. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) science process skills of students that learned with a learning model inquiry training is better than the students that learned with conventional learning models, 2)science process skills of students with high creativity better than students with creativity is low, 3) there is interaction between inquirylearning model training and creativity in influencing the science process skills of students.

Download Full-text

PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SITUATION-BASED LEARNING TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS X SMA

Journal of Didactic Mathematics ◽

10.34007/jdm.v1i1.159 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 47-52

Author(s):

Beni Junedi ◽

Ade Susanti

Keyword(s):

Experimental Design ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Design Research ◽

Hypothesis Test ◽

Learning Model ◽

Mathematical Understanding ◽

Test Results ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Cluster Random Sampling ◽

Better Than

The research aims to find out the students' mathematical understanding using situation-based learning model students of class X IPA, the type of research used is quasi-experimental design research, taking class X IPA 3 as an experimental class and class X IPA 2 as a control class. The technique used in this sampling is cluster random sampling. Research instruments in the form of tests to determine the level of mathematical understanding of students. The data obtained will be analyzed with the hypothesis test t-test. Hypothesis test results obtained a significant value <0.05 which is 0.049 <0.05. Based on these results it was concluded to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means the average student's mathematical understanding ability using the Situation-Based Learning model is better than the average student's mathematical understanding ability using conventional learning.

Download Full-text

Studi perbedaan antara model pembelajaran think talk write dan example non example terhadap keterampilan menulis narasi ditinjau dari motivasi belajar pada peserta didik kelas iv sekolah dasar

Didaktika Dwija Indria ◽

10.20961/ddi.v7i8.34991 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (8) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Annisa' Nur Latifah

Keyword(s):

Factorial Design ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Writing Skills ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Motivation ◽

Narrative Writing ◽

Learning Models ◽

High Learning ◽

Significance Level ◽

Cluster Random Sampling

The goals of this research to find out: (1) the different of narrative writing skills between students that teached using Think Talk Write learning model with Example Non Example learning model; (2) differences in narrative writing skills between students who hashigh learning motivation and low learning motivation; (3) the interaction between learning models and learning motivation trough narrative writing skills. This research is quantitative experimental with 2x2 factorial design. The technique to got sample using cluster random sampling. Two WaysAnava was used to analys the data with a significance level of 0.05.The results of thisresearch were (1) there was a different in narrative writing skills between students who teached by Think Talk Write learning model with Example Non Example learning model with FA = 6.259; (2) there was a different in narrative writing skills between the high learning motivation and low learning motivation with FB = 35,688; (3) there is no interaction between the learning model and learning motivation towards narrative writing skills as indicated by FAB = 0.628. Keyword: think talk write, example non example, narrative writing skills, elementary school

Download Full-text

EFEKTIFITAS PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA PEMBELAJARAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR

Premiere Educandum Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran ◽

10.25273/pe.v5i01.327 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 5 (01) ◽

Author(s):

Lingga Nico Pradana

Keyword(s):

Data Collection ◽

Direct Instruction ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Models ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Class Viii ◽

Cluster Random Sampling ◽

Collection Methods

The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models to student achievement. Learning models compared between NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. Method of research used quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x1. Population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation and test.Hypothesis testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testwere concluded that NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement.

Download Full-text

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NHT DAN SNOWBALL THROWING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR KELAS VIII SMP AL-NUR CIBINONG

Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA ◽

10.26418/jpmipa.v10i1.29663 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. 52

Author(s):

Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽

Irma Susanty

Keyword(s):

Mathematics Achievement ◽

Junior High School ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Learning Model ◽

Grade Student ◽

Learning Models ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Academic Year ◽

Experimental Group ◽

Cluster Random Sampling

AbstractThe aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement. The learning model compared were NHT(Numbered Head Together), snowball throwing and convensional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 3×1 factorial design. The population was the eight grade student of junior high school in Cibinong district on academic year 2017/2018. The sampling tecnique was cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 103 students consisted of 36 students in the first experimental group, 34 students in the second experimental group and 33 students in third experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced one-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research was NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than Snowball Throwing and convensional learning model, and snowball throwing learning model give better mathematics achievement than convensional learning model.Keywords: NHT, Snowball throwing, mathematics achievement

Download Full-text