Simulation of Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatments in a Polymer Flooded Reservoir

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Beteta ◽  
Oscar Vazquez ◽  
Munther Mohammed Al Kalbani ◽  
Faith Eze
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Reservoir Simulation ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Scale Inhibitor ◽  
Polymer Flood ◽  
Water Rate ◽  
The Impact

Abstract This study aims to demonstrate the changes to scale inhibitor squeeze lifetimes in a polymer flooded reservoir versus a water flooded reservoir. A squeeze campaign was designed for the base water flood system, then injection was switched to polymer flooding at early and late field life. The squeeze design strategy was adapted to maintain full scale protection under the new system. During the field life, the production of water is a constant challenge. Both in terms of water handling, but also the associated risk of mineral scale deposition. Squeeze treatment is a common technique, where a scale inhibitor is injected to prevent the formation of scale. The squeeze lifetime is dictated by the adsorption/desorption properties of the inhibitor chemical, along with the water rate at the production well. The impact on the adsorption properties and changes to water rate on squeeze lifetime during polymer flooding are studied using reservoir simulation. A two-dimensional 5-spot model was used in this study, considered a reasonable representation of a field scenario, where it was observed that when applying polymer (HPAM) flooding, with either a constant viscosity or with polymer degradation, the number of squeeze treatments was significantly reduced as compared to the water flood case. This is due to the significant delay in water production induced by the polymer flood. When the polymer flood was initiated later in field life, 0.5PV (reservoir pore volumes) of water injection, water cut approximately 70%, the number of squeeze treatments required was still lower than the water flood base case. However, it was also observed that in all cases, at later stages of field life the positive impacts of polymer flooding on squeeze lifetime begin to diminish, due in part to the high viscosity fluid now present in the production near-wellbore region. This study represents the first coupled reservoir simulation/squeeze treatment design for a polymer flooded reservoir. It has been demonstrated that in over the course of a field lifetime, polymer flooding will in fact reduce the number of squeeze treatments required even with a potential reduction in inhibitor adsorption. This highlights an opportunity for further optimization and a key benefit of polymer flooding in terms of scale management, aside from the enhanced oil recovery.

scholarly journals Study on the Impact of Polymer Retention in Porous Media on Further Surfactant-Polymer Flood

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjian Li ◽  
Hanqiao Jiang ◽  
Qun Yu ◽  
Fan Liu ◽  
Hongxia Liu
Keyword(s):  
Porous Media ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Underground Water ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
Polymer Flood ◽  
Good Potential ◽  
Enhance Oil Recovery ◽  
Polymer Application ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Polymer Retention

Polymer flood gains expansive popularity as a promising EOR method in various oilfields worldwide. However, there are still substantial amount of resources underground after polymer application. To further enhance oil recovery, secondary chemicals are sometimes utilized to sweep the remaining hydrocarbons to maintain the consistent development of oilfields. In this paper, a series of experiments are established and conducted to explore the feasibility of surfactant/ polymer flooding applied to a polymer flooded reservoir, and also the influence of polymer retention in porous media to enhance the oil recovery performance of subsequent chemical drive. The data of the experiments suggest that surfactant/polymer flooding owns a very good potential as a subsequent EOR technique, and that polymer retention in pores helps block underground water channels, improving greatly the sweeping efficiency of secondary chemical flood.

scholarly journals The Key Parameter Effect Analysis Of Polymer Flooding On Oil Recovery Using Reservoir Simulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Tomi Erfando ◽  
Novia Rita ◽  
Romal Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Reservoir Simulation ◽  
Polymer Concentration ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Driving Mechanism ◽  
Geological Condition ◽  
Recovery Method

As time goes by, there will be decreasing of production rates of a field along with decreasing pressure. This led to the necessity for further efforts to increase oil production. Therefore, pressure support is required to improve the recovery factor. Supportable pressure that can be used can be either water flooding and polymer flooding. This study aims to compare recovery factor to scenarios carried out, such as polymer flooding with different concentrations modeled in the same reservoir model to see the most favorable scenario. The method used in this research is reservoir simulation method with Computer Modeling Group (CMG) STARS simulator. The study was carried out by observing at the pressure, injection rate, and polymer concentration on increasing field recovery factor. This study used cartesian grid with the assumption of homogeneous reservoir, there are no faults or other geological condition in the reservoir, and driving mechanism is only solution gas drive. This reservoir, oil type is light oil with API gravity 40.3˚API and layer of conglomerate rock. The simulation result performed with various scenarios provides a good result. Where the conditions case base case field recovery factor of 6.7%, and after water flooding produced 25.5% of oil, whereas with tertiary recovery method is polymer flooding was carried out with four concentrations of 640 ppm, 1,500 ppm, 3,000 ppm, and 4,000 ppm obtained optimum values at 4,000 ppm polymer concentration with recovery factor 28.9%, SOR reduction final value 0,5255, polymer adsorption of 818,700 ppm, reservoir final pressure 1,707 psi, and an increase in water viscosity to 0.94 cP.

History Matching and Performance Prediction of a Polymer Flood Pilot in Heavy Oil Reservoir on Alaska North Slope

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xindan Wang ◽  
Cody Keith ◽  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Abhijit Dandekar ◽  
Samson Ning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Simulation Model ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Reservoir Simulation ◽  
Heavy Oil ◽  
History Matching ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
North Slope ◽  
Polymer Flood ◽  
Reservoir Simulation Model ◽  
Water Cut

Abstract The first-ever polymer flood pilot to enhance heavy oil recovery on Alaska North Slope (ANS) is ongoing. After more than 2.5 years of polymer injection, significant benefit has been observed from the decrease in water cut from 65% to less than 15% in the project producers. The primary objective of this study is to develop a robust history-matched reservoir simulation model capable of predicting future polymer flood performance. In this work, the reservoir simulation model has been developed based on the geological model and available reservoir and fluid data. In particular, four high transmissibility strips were introduced to connect the injector-producer well pairs, simulating short-circuiting flow behavior that can be explained by viscous fingering and reproducing the water cut history. The strip transmissibilities were manually tuned to improve the history matching results during the waterflooding and polymer flooding periods, respectively. It has been found that higher strip transmissibilities match the sharp water cut increase very well in the waterflooding period. Then the strip transmissibilities need to be reduced with time to match the significant water cut reduction. The viscous fingering effect in the reservoir during waterflooding and the restoration of injection conformance during polymer flooding have been effectively represented. Based on the validated simulation model, numerical simulation tests have been conducted to investigate the oil recovery performance under different development strategies, with consideration for sensitivity to polymer parameter uncertainties. The oil recovery factor with polymer flooding can reach about 39% in 30 years, twice as much as forecasted with continued waterflooding. Besides, the updated reservoir model has been successfully employed to forecast polymer utilization, a valuable parameter to evaluate the pilot test’s economic efficiency. All the investigated development strategies indicate polymer utilization lower than 3.5 lbs/bbl in 30 years, which is economically attractive.

scholarly journals Experimental investigation of the displacement flow mechanism and oil recovery in primary polymer flood operations

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruissein Mahon ◽  
Gbenga Oluyemi ◽  
Babs Oyeneyin ◽  
Yakubu Balogun
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
Mobility Control ◽  
List Type ◽  
Motor Oil ◽  
Flow Mechanism ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Polymer Flood

Abstract Polymer flooding is a mature chemical enhanced oil recovery method employed in oilfields at pilot testing and field scales. Although results from these applications empirically demonstrate the higher displacement efficiency of polymer flooding over waterflooding operations, the fact remains that not all the oil will be recovered. Thus, continued research attention is needed to further understand the displacement flow mechanism of the immiscible process and the rock–fluid interaction propagated by the multiphase flow during polymer flooding operations. In this study, displacement sequence experiments were conducted to investigate the viscosifying effect of polymer solutions on oil recovery in sandpack systems. The history matching technique was employed to estimate relative permeability, fractional flow and saturation profile through the implementation of a Corey-type function. Experimental results showed that in the case of the motor oil being the displaced fluid, the XG 2500 ppm polymer achieved a 47.0% increase in oil recovery compared with the waterflood case, while the XG 1000 ppm polymer achieved a 38.6% increase in oil recovery compared with the waterflood case. Testing with the motor oil being the displaced fluid, the viscosity ratio was 136 for the waterflood case, 18 for the polymer flood case with XG 1000 ppm polymer and 9 for the polymer flood case with XG 2500 ppm polymer. Findings also revealed that for the waterflood cases, the porous media exhibited oil-wet characteristics, while the polymer flood cases demonstrated water-wet characteristics. This paper provides theoretical support for the application of polymer to improve oil recovery by providing insights into the mechanism behind oil displacement. Graphic abstract Highlights The difference in shape of relative permeability curves are indicative of the effect of mobility control of each polymer concentration. The water-oil systems exhibited oil-wet characteristics, while the polymer-oil systems demonstrated water-wet characteristics. A large contrast in displacing and displaced fluid viscosities led to viscous fingering and early water breakthrough.

Cyclical Gel-Polymer Flooding Technology is an Effective Method of Enhanced Oil Recovery in High-Viscosity Oil Fields

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Yur’evna Lobanova ◽  
Berdibek Ulanovich Yelubaev ◽  
Nikolay Evgen’evich Talamanov ◽  
Zhijian Sun ◽  
Chunxi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
Oil Fields ◽  
High Viscosity Oil

Assessment of Radiological Source Term Releases for Potential Severe Accident Scenarios in a PWR SFP

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Il Ahn ◽  
Jae-Uk Shin
Keyword(s):  
Water Injection ◽  
Severe Accident ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Source Terms ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Fukushima Accident ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Makeup Water ◽  
Accident Scenarios ◽  
The Impact

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the release of source terms into the environment for representative spent fuel pool (SFP) severe accident scenarios in a reference pressurized water reactor (PWR). For this, two typical accident scenarios (loss-of-cooling and loss-of-pool-inventory accidents) and two different reactor operating modes (normal and refueling modes) are considered in the analysis. The secondary purpose of this study is to assess the impact of an emergency makeup water injection strategy, which is one of representative SFP severe accident mitigation (SAM) strategies being employed after the Fukushima accident, upon the release of the radiological source terms. A total of 16 cases, consisting of four base cases and three injection cases for each base case were simulated using the MELCOR1.8.6 SFP version. The, analysis results are given in terms of (a) the key thermal-hydraulic behaviors during an accident progression and (b) releases of radiological fission products (such as Cesium and Iodine) into the environment. In terms of a release of Cesium and Iodine into the environment, the present study show that the two cases subject to a loss of pool inventory (i.e., LOPI-N-03 and LOPI-R-00) lead to the worst results with the respective release fractions of 77.5% and 59.4%.

scholarly journals Coupling Microfluidics Data with Core Flooding Experiments to Understand Sulfonated/Polymer Water Injection

Polymers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Tahir ◽  
Rafael E. Hincapie ◽  
Nils Langanke ◽  
Leonhard Ganzer ◽  
Philip Jaeger
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Rheological Characterization ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Key Recovery ◽  
Low Salt ◽  
Polymer Flood ◽  
Recovery Mechanisms

The injection of sulfonated-modified water could be an attractive application as it results in the formation of a mechanically rigid oil-water interface, and hence, possible higher oil recovery in combination with polymer. Therefore, detailed experimental investigation and fluid-flow analysis into porous media are required to understand the possible recovery mechanisms taking place. This paper evaluates the potential influence of low-salt/sulfate-modified water injection in oil recovery using a cross-analyzed approach of coupled microfluidics data and core flooding experiments. Fluid characterization was achieved by detailed rheological characterization focusing on steady shear and in-situ viscosity. Moreover, single and two-phase micromodels and core floods experiments helped to define the behavior of different fluids. Overall, coupling microfluidics, with core flooding experiments, confirmed that fluid-fluid interfacial interaction and wettability alteration are both the key recovery mechanisms for modified-water/low-salt. Finally, a combination of sulfate-modified/low-salinity water, with polymer flood can lead to ~6% extra oil, compared to the combination of polymer flood with synthetic seawater (SSW). The results present an excellent way to make use of micromodels and core experiments as a supporting tool for EOR processes evaluations, assessing fluid-fluid and rock-fluid interactions.

scholarly journals Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Water and Polymer Flooding on Geometric and Multifractal Characteristics of Pore Structures

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5288
Author(s):  
Xianguo Zhang ◽  
Chengyan Lin ◽  
Yuqi Wu ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Hongwei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Total Porosity ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Reservoir Quality ◽  
Thin Sections ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Pore Structures

During water and polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery, pore structures may vary because of the fluid–rock interactions, which can lead to variations in petrophysical properties and affect oil field production. To investigate the effects of fluid flooding on pore structures, six samples were subjected to brine water, dual-system, and alkaline–surfactant–polymer (ASP) polymer displacement experiments. Before and after experiments, samples were scanned by X-ray CT. Thin sections, X-ray diffraction, and high pressure mercury injection tests were also carried out to characterize mineralogy and fractal dimension of pore systems before experiments. Experiment results show that water flooding with low injection pore volume ratio (IPVR) can improve reservoir quality since total porosity and connected porosity of samples rise after the flooding and the proportion of large pores also increases and heterogeneity of pore structure decreases. However, water flooding with high IPVR has reverse effects on pore structures. Polymer flooding reduces the total porosity, connected porosity, the percentage of small pores and enhances the heterogeneity of pore structures. It can be found that pore structures will change in fluid flooding and appropriate water injection can improve reservoir quality while excessive water injection may destroy the reservoir. Meanwhile, injected polymer may block throats and destroy reservoirs. The experimental results can be used as the basis for oil field development.

scholarly journals Hydrodynamic modeling of field development using enhanced oil recovery methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 317 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-22
Author(s):  
G.Zh. Moldabayeva ◽  
◽  
A.Kh. Agzamov ◽  
R.T. Suleimenova ◽  
D.K. Elefteriadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Steam Injection ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Oil Fields ◽  
Borehole Data ◽  
Field Development ◽  
High Viscosity Oil ◽  
Cyclic Injection

This article discusses a digital geological model, the transfer of borehole data to the geological grid, and the modeling of the technology of alternating steam and water injection. Alternating injection involves the cyclic injection of steam and water into an injection well in high-viscosity oil fields. The essence of this technology is that during the steam injection for 2-4 months, the formation warms up, leading to a decrease in viscosity and an increase in oil mobility. Then comes the period of water injection, during which the production of already warmed oil continues and the formation pressure is maintained. For digital geological modeling, the following data were collected, processed and prepared: a list of wells that open the object of modeling, coordinates of wellheads, well altitudinal data, inclinometry of well trajectories, GМS data on wells, analysis of wells drilled with core sampling, and digitized seismic data (structural surfaces on the roof of stratigraphic horizons, parameter maps, contact surfaces, faults, structural maps on the roof of target horizons with faults, isochron maps, velocity maps).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document