scholarly journals Impact of 1-Hour Bundle Achievement in Septic Shock

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byuk Sung Ko ◽  
Sung-Hyuk Choi ◽  
Tae Gun Shin ◽  
Kyuseok Kim ◽  
You Hwan Jo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Group 1 ◽  
Resuscitation Bundle

Abstract Background: Evidence supporting the association between 1-hour bundle achievement and patient outcomes is limited and inconsistent. Hence, this study aimed to address the impact of 1-hour bundle achievement on outcomes in septic shock patients.Methods: A prospective multicentre observational study of septic shock patients with a protocolised resuscitation bundle therapy at emergency departments was conducted from October 2015 to December 2018. In-hospital mortality according to 1-hour bundle achievement from shock recognition were compared using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients were also divided into six groups according to the time of bundle achievement and outcomes were compared to examine the difference in outcome for each group over time: group 1 (≤1 h; reference), 2 (1–2 h), 3 (2–3 h), 4 (3–4 h), 5 (4–5 h), and 6 (5–6 h). Results: In total, 1,612 patients with septic shock were included and in-hospital mortality was 18.2%. The 1-hour bundle was achieved in 461 (28.6%) patients. In multivariate analysis, the group achieving 1-hour bundle did not show a significant difference in in-hospital mortality compared to those who did not achieve 1-hour bundle (odds ratio = 0.74, confidence interval: 0.522–1.049, p = 0.091). However, groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 showed significantly lower odds ratios of in-hospital mortality compared to those who did not achieve the bundle elements (odds ratio = 0.733, 0.604, 0.541, 0.532, and 0.458, respectively; p = 0.042, 0.001, < 0.001, 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality over time for each group compared to that of group 1 used as a reference.Conclusion: One-hour bundle achievement was not associated with improved outcomes in septic shock patients with protocolised resuscitation bundle therapy. However, groups achieving 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-hour bundle were associated more with improved outcome than those who did not. Further clinical trials are needed to clarify the clinical implications of 1-hour bundle achievement.

scholarly journals Impact of 1-Hour Bundle Achievement in Septic Shock

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 527
Author(s):  
Byuk Sung Ko ◽  
Sung-Hyuk Choi ◽  
Tae Gun Shin ◽  
Kyuseok Kim ◽  
You Hwan Jo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Group 1

This study aimed to address the impact of 1-hr bundle achievement on outcomes in septic shock patients. Secondary analysis of multicenter prospectively collected data on septic shock patients who had undergone protocolized resuscitation bundle therapy at emergency departments was conducted. In-hospital mortality according to 1-h bundle achievement was compared using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients were also divided into 3 groups according to the time of bundle achievement and outcomes were compared to examine the difference in outcome for each group over time: group 1 (≤1 h reference), group 2 (1–3 h) and group 3 (3–6 h). In total, 1612 patients with septic shock were included. The 1-h bundle was achieved in 461 (28.6%) patients. The group that achieved the 1-h bundle did not show a significant difference in in-hospital mortality compared to the group that did not achieve the 1-h bundle on multivariable logistic regression analysis (<1 vs. >1 h) (odds ratio = 0.74, p = 0.091). However, 3- and 6- h bundle achievements showed significantly lower odds ratios of in-hospital mortality compared to the group that did not achieve the bundle (<3 vs. >3 h, <6 vs. >6 h, odds ratio = 0.604 and 0.458, respectively). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality over time for group 2 and 3 compared to that of group 1. One-hour bundle achievement was not associated with improved outcomes in septic shock patients. These data suggest that further investigation into the clinical implications of 1-h bundle achievement in patients with septic shock is warranted.

scholarly journals Early Infectious Disease Consultation Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Who Complete the 3-Hour Sepsis Treatment Bundle

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Madaline ◽  
Francis Wadskier Montagne ◽  
Ruth Eisenberg ◽  
Wenzhu Mowrey ◽  
Jaskiran Kaur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Subdistribution Hazard ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective Severe sepsis and septic shock (SS/SS) treatment bundles reduce mortality, and early infectious diseases (ID) consultation also improves patient outcomes. We retrospectively examined whether early ID consultation further improves outcomes in Emergency Department (ED) patients with SS/SS who complete the sepsis bundle. Method We included 248 adult ED patients with SS/SS who completed the 3-hour bundle. Patients with ID consultation within 12 hours of ED triage (n = 111; early ID) were compared with patients who received standard care (n = 137) for in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, length of hospital stay (LOS), and antibiotic management. A competing risk survival analysis model compared risks of in-hospital mortality and discharge alive between groups. Results In-hospital mortality was lower in the early ID group unadjusted (24.3% vs 38.0%, P = .02) and adjusted for covariates (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.25–0.89; P = .02). There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission (22.6% vs 23.5%, P = .89) or median LOS (10.2 vs 12.1 days, P = .15) among patients who survived. A trend toward shorter time to antibiotic de-escalation in the early ID group (log-rank test P = .07) was observed. Early ID consultation was protective of in-hospital mortality (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (asHR), 0.60; 95% CI 0.36–1.00, P = .0497) and predictive of discharge alive (asHR 1.58, 95% CI, 1.11–2.23; P-value .01) after adjustment. Conclusions Among patients receiving the SS/SS bundle, early ID consultation was associated with a 40% risk reduction for in-hospital mortality. The impact of team-based care and de-escalation on SS/SS outcomes warrants further study.

Introduction of Combined Chemotherapies Plus Rituximab (R) Has Improved Outcome of Previously Untreated and Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Patients (pts).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4703-4703
Author(s):  
Stefano Sacchi ◽  
Samantha Pozzi ◽  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
Alessia Bari ◽  
Stefano Luminari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Some data suggest that there are been no improvement in survival of FL Pts in the last three decades of the 20th century. However that review ended in 1992, before the introduction of R treatment. Most recently reported data, show that evolving chemotherapies, including the incorporation of R has led to outcome improvement. Between 1994 and 2004, 344 Pts with FL were enrolled in different GISL Trials. For the purpose of this study we considered 270 Pts with similar characteristics enrolled in trials including or not R. The first group accounts for 176 naive Pts treated with Antracycline plus Fludarabine containing regimens (Cohort #1: 125 Pts) or plus R (Cohort #2: 51Pts). The second group accounts for 99 relapsed Pts treated with Antracycline plus Fludarabine containing regimens (Cohort #3: 40 Pts) or plus R (Cohort #4: 59 Pts). To evaluate the impact of the incorporation of R in front line and salvage therapies we assessed the patients OS, FFS, TTF, SAR in these different Cohorts of Pts. Descriptive analysis of prognostic features showed differences in the distribution among groups. To compensate for these variations we also performed Cox regression analysis. Previously Untreated patients. Regarding group #1 and #2 that enrolled Pts with clinical stage IIB, III and IV, FFS and OS according to treatment did not show any statistical differences. The univariate analysis of baseline clinical features showed an impact on OS and FFS for clinical stage, LDH level, involvement of more than 4 nodal sites and presence of extranodal involvement. The prevalence of this characteristics were higher in group #2 than group #1. Thus the FFS from group #2 vs. group #1 was adjusted for variation in prognostic features by Cox regression analysis, that shows a failure Hazard Radio reduction (HR) of 40 % in Pts who received R. Because of difference in follow up (FU) (49 months in Cohort #1 vs 21 months in Cohort #2), to evaluate differences in OS we utilized exact Log Rank test for unequal FU. So far, a trend exists for better OS in R treated patients, although the difference is not statistically significant. Relapsed Patients. Clinical characteristics were similar in the two Cohorts of pts. TTF was better in R treated Pts and the difference was statistically significant (66% vs. 53% at 3 yrs, p=0.023) The analysis of SAR demonstrated a better result for R Cohort with a statistically significant difference (88% vs. 68% at 3 yrs, p=0.022). OS according to treatment protocol, showed advantage for patients in R Cohort and the difference was statistically significant (92% vs. 70% at 5 yrs, p=0.004). Conclusion. In naïve patients our retrospective analysis showed a reduction of HR for FFS and a trend toward better OS in R treated Pts. In relapsed Pts all outcome parameters as OS, TTF and SAR had significant improvement in the Cohort treated with R. Although any conclusions between nonrandomized groups maybe subject to differences in observed and unobserved prognostic features, we believe that improvement have occurred in the management of FL Pts with the introduction of combined chemotherapy with R.

Association of Testosterone Replacement Therapy and the Incidence of a Composite of Postoperative In-hospital Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in Men Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged Y. Argalious ◽  
Jing You ◽  
Guangmei Mao ◽  
Daniel Ramos ◽  
Sandeep Khanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Noncardiac Surgery ◽  
Testosterone Replacement ◽  
Testosterone Replacement Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Whether patients on testosterone replacement therapy undergoing noncardiac surgery have an increased risk of postoperative in-hospital mortality and cardiovascular events remains unknown. We therefore sought to identify the impact of testosterone replacement on the incidence of a composite of postoperative in-hospital mortality and cardiovascular events in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. Methods Data from male American Society of Anesthesiologists I through IV patients 40 yr or older who underwent noncardiac surgery between May 2005 and December 2015 at the Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, Ohio) main campus were included. The primary exposure was preoperative testosterone use. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative in-hospital mortality and cardiovascular events. We compared patients who received testosterone and those who did not using propensity score matching within surgical procedure matches. Results Among 49,273 patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria, 947 patients on testosterone were matched to 4,598 nontestosterone patients. The incidence of in-hospital mortality was 1.3% in the testosterone group and 1.1% in the nontestosterone group, giving an odds ratio of 1.17 (99% CI, 0.51 to 2.68; P = 0.63). The incidence of myocardial infarction was 0.2% in the testosterone group and 0.6% in the nontestosterone group (odds ratio = 0.34; 99% CI, 0.05 to 2.28; P = 0.15). Similarly, no significant difference was found in stroke (testosterone vs. nontestosterone: 2.0% vs. 2.1%), pulmonary embolism (0.5% vs. 0.7%), or deep venous thrombosis (2.0% vs. 1.7%). Conclusions Preoperative testosterone is not associated with an increased incidence of a composite of postoperative in-hospital mortality and cardiovascular events.

scholarly journals 152. Applying A Difference-in-Difference Analysis to Assess Effect of Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies on Changes in Antimicrobial Use

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S86-S86
Author(s):  
Ann F Chou ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Makoto M Jones ◽  
Christopher J Graber ◽  
Matthew B Goetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Pharmacist ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Time Points ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background About 30–50% of inpatient antimicrobial therapy is sub-optimal. Health care facilities have utilized various antimicrobial stewardship (AS) strategies to optimize appropriate antimicrobial use, improve health outcomes, and promote patient safety. However, little evidence exists to assess relationships between AS strategies and antimicrobial use. This study examined the impact of changes in AS strategies on antimicrobial use over time. Methods This study used data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare Analysis & Informatics Group (HAIG) AS survey, administered at 130 VA facilities in 2012 and 2015, and antimicrobial utilization from VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Four AS strategies were examined: having an AS team, feedback mechanism on antimicrobial use, infectious diseases (ID) attending physicians, and clinical pharmacist on wards. Change in AS strategies were computed by taking the difference in the presence of a given strategy in a facility between 2012–2015. The outcome was the difference between antimicrobial use per 1000 patient days in 2012–2013 and 2015–2016. Employing multiple regression analysis, changes in antimicrobial use was estimated as a function of changes in AS strategies, controlling for ID human resources in and organizational complexity. Results Of the 4 strategies, only change in availability of AS teams had an impact on antimicrobial use. Compared to facilities with no AS teams at both time points, antibiotic use decreased by 63.9 uses per 1000 patient days in facilities that did not have a AS team in 2012 but implemented one in 2015 (p=0.0183). Facilities that had an AS team at both time points decreased use by 62.2 per 1000 patient days (p=0.0324). Conclusion The findings showed that AS teams reduced inpatient antibiotic use over time. While changes in having feedback on antimicrobial use and clinical pharmacist on wards showed reduced antimicrobial use between 2012–2015, the differences were not statistically significant. These strategies may already be a part of a comprehensive AS program and employed by AS teams. In further development of stewardship programs within healthcare organizations, the association between AS teams and antibiotic use should inform program design and implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Quality of life assessments in clinical practice using either the EORTC-QLQ-C30 or the SEIOQL-DW: a randomized study

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsa Kettis ◽  
Hanna Fagerlind ◽  
Jan-Erik Frödin ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Lena Ring
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Health Related Qol ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Effective patient-physician communication can improve patient understanding, agreement on treatment and adherence. This may, in turn, impact on clinical outcomes and patient quality of life (QoL). One way to improve communication is by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Heretofore, studies of the impact of using PROMs in clinical practice have mostly evaluated the use of standardized PROMs. However, there is reason to believe that individualized instruments may be more appropriate for this purpose. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the standardized QoL-instrument, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30 (EORTC-QOL-C30) and the individualized QoL instrument, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW), in clinical practice. Methods In a prospective, open-label, controlled intervention study at two hospital out-patient clinics, 390 patients with gastrointestinal cancer were randomly assigned either to complete the EORTC-QOL-C30 or the SEIQoL-DW immediately before the consultation, with their responses being shared with their physician. This was repeated in 3–5 consultations over a period of 4–6 months. The primary outcome measure was patients’ health-related QoL, as measured by FACIT-G. Patients’ satisfaction with the consultation and survival were secondary outcomes. Results There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to study outcomes. Neither intervention instrument resulted in any significant changes in health-related QoL, or in any of the secondary outcomes, over time. This may reflect either a genuine lack of effect or sub-optimization of the intervention. Since there was no comparison to standard care an effect in terms of lack of deterioration over time cannot be excluded. Conclusions Future studies should focus on the implementation process, including the training of physicians to use the instruments and their motivation for doing so. The effects of situational use of standardized or individualized instruments should also be explored. The effectiveness of the different approaches may depend on contextual factors including physician and patient preferences.

Speech Methodologies in Cleft Palate Assessment: A Pilot Project to Compare Two Phonetically Different Sentence Sets

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-72
Author(s):  
Jennie Smith ◽  
Tim Pring ◽  
Debbie Sell
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Audio Video ◽  
Age Range ◽  
The Impact

Objective: To investigate the impact of the phonetic content of two sentence sets on speech outcomes, specifically the effects of nasal phonemes. Method: Audio-video recordings of a consecutive series of 15 participants (age range 4–22 years), with cleft palate (syndromic or non-syndromic), with and without velopharyngeal dysfunction were taken. Participants repeated Sentence Set 1 (with nasals across sentences) and Sentence Set 2 (without nasals except the three nasal target sentences) during a routine speech recording. Two experienced Specialist Speech and Language Therapists, blinded to the study’s purpose, analyzed participants’ speech using the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented (CAPS-A). On day 1, recordings included Sentence Set 1. On day 2, 23 days later, recordings included Sentence Set 2. Main results: The difference between Sentence Set 1 and Sentence Set 2 ‘total scores’ (sum of scores on all CAPS-A parameters) was significant. The Pearson Product Moment showed high correlation. A Wilcoxon test revealed a significant difference between Sets 1 and 2 on the hypernasality parameter, and this alone accounted for the significant difference in total scores. Conclusion: The inclusion or exclusion of nasal consonants in the sentence set significantly affected perceptual ratings of hypernasality but none of the other CAPS-A parameters, highlighting the need for further investigation into perceptual nasality ratings.

Patients Who Attend Alone at a First Memory Consultation: Are They a Specific Population,or Is It an Instance of Confounding Bias?

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Pierre Koskas ◽  
Mouna Romdhani ◽  
Olivier Drunat
Keyword(s):  
Selection Bias ◽  
Confounding Bias ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Comparison Groups ◽  
Methodological Problems ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Time ◽  
State Examination ◽  
Group 1

As commonly happens in epidemiological research, none of the reported studies were totally free of methodological problems. Studies have considered the influence of social relationships on dementia, but the mechanisms underlying these associations are not perfectly understood. We look at the possible impact of selection bias. For their first memory consultation, patients may come alone or accompanied by a relative. Our objective is to better understand the impact of this factor by retrospective follow-up of geriatric memory outpatients over several years. All patients over 70 who were referred to Bretonneau Memory Clinic for the first time, between January 2006 and 2018, were included in the study. The patients who came alone formed group 1, the others, whatever type of relative accompanied them, formed group 2. We compared the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores of patients; and for all patients who came twice for consultation with at least a 60-day interval, we compared their first MMSE with the MMSE performed at the second consultation. In total, 2,935 patients were included, aged 79.7 ± 8.4 years. Six hundred and twenty-five formed group 1 and 2,310 group 2. We found a significant difference in MMSE scores between the 2 groups of patients; and upon second consultation in group 2, but that difference was minor in group 1. Our finding of a possible confounding factor underlines the complexity of choosing comparison groups in order to minimize selection bias while maintaining clinical relevance.

scholarly journals 1476. Impact of an Educational Campaign on Rates of Sputum Culture Acquisition as an Opportunity for Antibiotic De-escalation

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S739-S739
Author(s):  
Jessica Snawerdt ◽  
Derek N Bremmer ◽  
Dustin R Carr ◽  
Thomas L Walsh ◽  
Tamara Trienski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Sputum Culture ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Educational Campaign ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Culture Acquisition

Abstract Background The 2019 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines recommend obtaining a sputum culture in patients who are empirically treated for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa to assist clinicians in optimizing antimicrobial therapy. A previous study at our institution found respiratory cultures were rarely obtained in patients with CAP. As a result of these findings, an educational campaign was implemented to promote the use of an induced sputum protocol. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study that included patients who were ≥18 years of age, had a diagnosis of CAP, and received ≥48 hours of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics. Patients were excluded if mechanically ventilated within 48 hours of admission or diagnosed with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia. Patients were grouped into pre- and post-intervention time periods. The intervention involved education on obtaining respiratory cultures including technique on induced sputums and updates to CAP order sets. The primary outcome was the rate of sputum culture acquisition. Secondary outcomes included duration of anti-pseudomonal and anti-MRSA therapy, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Results A total of 143 patients met inclusion criteria, 72 in the pre-implementation group and 71 in the post-implementation group. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. More patients in the post-implementation group had a sputum culture obtained but the difference was not statistically significant (38.9% vs 53.5%; p=0.08). Anti-pseudomonal therapy was continued for an average of 5.6 days pre-implementation and 5.2 days post-implementation (p=0.499). There was also not a significant difference in anti-MRSA duration between the two groups (3.4 days vs 3.2 days; p=0.606). In-hospital mortality and length of stay were similar between the two groups. Conclusion An educational campaign focusing on the acquisition of induced sputums led to an increase in rates of sputum cultures collected. However, this did not correlate with a decrease in duration of anti-MRSA or anti-pseudomonal therapy. Further interventions should be made to optimize de-escalation of broad spectrum antibiotics based on sputum culture results. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

A volumetric three-dimensional evaluation of invasiveness of an endoscopic and microscopic approach for transmeatal visualisation of the middle ear

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
A H A Baazil ◽  
J G G Dobbe ◽  
E van Spronsen ◽  
F A Ebbens ◽  
F G Dikkers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Middle Ear ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Endoscopic Approach ◽  
Microscopic Approach ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Objective This study aimed to compare the necessary scutum defect for transmeatal visualisation of middle-ear landmarks between an endoscopic and microscopic approach. Method Human cadaveric heads were used. In group 1, middle-ear landmarks were visualised by endoscope (group 1 endoscopic approach) and subsequently by microscope (group 1 microscopic approach following endoscopy). In group 2, landmarks were visualised solely microscopically (group 2 microscopic approach). The amount of resected bone was evaluated via computed tomography scans. Results In the group 1 endoscopic approach, a median of 6.84 mm3 bone was resected. No statistically significant difference (Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.163, U = 49.000) was found between the group 1 microscopic approach following endoscopy (median 17.84 mm3) and the group 2 microscopic approach (median 20.08 mm3), so these were combined. The difference between the group 1 endoscopic approach and the group 1 microscopic approach following endoscopy plus group 2 microscopic approach (median 18.16 mm3) was statistically significant (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001, U = 18.000). Conclusion This study showed that endoscopic transmeatal visualisation of middle-ear landmarks preserves more of the bony scutum than a microscopic transmeatal approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document