scholarly journals Transparency Principle on Land Acquisition for Agrarian Justice

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-101
Author(s):  
Rosmidah Rosmidah ◽  
Dony Yusra Pebrianto
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Acquisition Process ◽  
Land Owners ◽  
Land Acquisitions ◽  
Empirical Level ◽  
Implementation Stages ◽  
The Government

The purpose of this article is to study the state’s efforts to guarantee the principle of transparency and implement it into land acquisition process for the sake of public interest. With normative method, this article found that the land, despite of being an object of private ownership, has a social function. Therefore, the state has an authority to regulate the utilisation and use of land for the sake of public interests through a land acquisition. In recent years, disputes due to land acquisition between the government and the land owners has always increased, resulting in the use of violence and public distrust against the government. It is believed that such the condition was triggered by  the lack of transparency as long as the land acquisitions are concerned. In order to realize agrarian justice, which is the state’s obligation, it is necessary to guarantee the principle of transparency in the land acquisition process which are the basic rights of land owners / holders and the general public. Because the principles of openness and transparency in the Land Acquisition Law are obscure in norms, it is necessary to interpret the law. The principles of openness and transparency are carried out from the planning, preparation, implementation stages to the stage of submitting the results of land acquisition. At the empirical level, it must be implemented without causing various encapsulation resulting in land acquisition disputes. The principles of openness and transparency are needed to facilitate the flow of community participation in development

scholarly journals PENGADAAN TANAH DENGAN CARA JUAL BELI OLEH INSTANSI PEMERINTAH MENURUT PASAL 33 AYAT (3) UUD 1945

LITIGASI ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dedy Hernawan
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
The Public ◽  
Land Owners ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Government ◽  
Government Institution

The Development of physical infrastructure always requires  the availability of land, it  is not limited to the State land but also to the land rights. Small-scale land acquisition in the area of less than five (5) acre, can be bought or sold  between government agencies with land owners,  then the land belongs to the government or local government. This provision is problematic because according to Indonesian laws, the  land is controlled  by the State instead of owned. The writer will conduct the research with the aim of knowing the Judicial consequences of the implementation of land for development in the public interest by sale and purchase as stipulated in the laws. Knowing supposed to be done by government institution in order to land acquisition for public development. From the research  it can be concluded that: Knowing the Judicial consequences of the implementation of land for development in the public interest by sale and purchase as stipulated in the law number 2 year 2012 on procurement land for development for public interest, presidential decree number 40 year 2014 which resulted in the land of inheritance of government, is contrary to the provision set forth in article 33 paragraph 3 of the constitution 1945 and the provision of the basic law of agrarian number 5 year 1960. The supposed to be done by government institution in order to land acquisition for public development is trough waiver process/or extraction right by compensation, the amount of compesation itself supposed to be based on the price not based on the tax value of the land. Keywords: land; buying and selling; waiverPembangunan sarana prasarana fisik memerlukan ketersediaan tanah, baik tanah negara dan tanah hak. Pengadaan tanah dalam skala kecil yang luasnya kurang dari 5 (lima) hektar, dapat dilakukan dengan  jual beli antara instansi pemerintah dengan pemilik tanah, tanahnya kemudian menjadi milik pemerintah atau pemerintah daerah. Penelitian ini membahas konsekuensi yuridis pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum dengan cara jual beli oleh instansi pemerintah dengan pemilik tanah menurut perundang-undangan, membahas cara yang seharusnya dilakukan oleh instansi pemerintah dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Hasil penelitian mengenai konsekuensi yuridis pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum dengan cara jual beli sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum, Perpres No. 40 tahun 2014 yang mengakibatkan tanah tersebut menjadi tanah milik pemerintah/pemerintah daerah adalah bertentangan dengan ketentuan yang diatur dalam Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945 dan ketentuan UUPA No. 5 Tahun 1960. Cara yang seharusnya bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum yang sesuai dengan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945 adalah melalui proses pelepasan hak dan/atau pencabutan hak dengan pemberian ganti rugi, seyogyanya besaran ganti rugi tersebut didasarkan pada nilai harga jual beli bukan berdasarkan nilai jual objek pajak.Kata kunci : tanah; jual beli; pelepasan hak

Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Bagi Kepentingan Umum di Muara Rupit Sumatera Selatan

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-100
Author(s):  
Farhan Nayoan ◽  
Priyo Katon Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
The Public ◽  
Urban Village ◽  
People Participation ◽  
Implementation Stages ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Government

Abstract: The phenomenon of people rejection that became one of the obstacles in the land acquisition for development of the public interest, was not happening in Muara Rupit Urban Village, Rupit Sub-district, North Musi Rawas Regency (Muratara), South Sumatera Province. In 2017, the land acquisition for the construction of office buildings and other supporting facilities could be done well and smoothly without any rejection from the local people whose land was exposed to the project. This research aims to know the strategy of Muratara Regency Government and people participation of Muara Rupit Urban Village to the implementation of land acquisition. This research was qualitative research with descriptive approach. The results showed that the Muara Rupit community was actively  participated in the preparation and implementation stages of land acquisition. The Government strategy were using 2 (two) approach model, top down and bottom up planning.Keywords: land acquisition, people participation, government strategy. Intisari: Fenomena penolakan masyarakat yang menjadi salah satu hambatan dalam proses pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan bagi kepentingan umum, ternyata tidak terjadi di Kelurahan Muara Rupit, Kecamatan Rupit, Kabupaten Musi Rawas Utara (Muratara), Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Pada tahun 2017, pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan gedung perkantoran dan sarana pendukung lainnya justru dapat terlaksana dengan baik dan lancar tanpa adanya penolakan dari masyarakat setempat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui strategi Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Muratara dan partisipasi masyarakat Kelurahan Muara Rupit sehingga pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah dapat berjalan dengan lancar. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa bentuk partisipasi masyarakat yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat Muara Rupit adalah berpartisipasi aktif dalam tahapan persiapan dan pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah. Strategi yang digunakan oleh Pemerintah mengunakan 2 (dua) model pendekatan yaitu  top down planning dan bottom up planning.Kata Kunci: pengadaan tanah, partisipasi masyarakat, strategi pemerintah.

Normative Juridical Review Comparison of Land Acquisition Regulations for Railway Infrastructure between Indonesia and Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhina Setyo Oktaria ◽  
Agustinus Prasetyo Edi Wibowo
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Influencing Factor ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
The People ◽  
Railway Infrastructure ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government

Land acquisition for public purposes, including for the construction of railroad infrastructure, is a matter that is proposed by all countries in the world. The Indonesian government or the Malaysian royal government needs land for railroad infrastructure development. To realize this, a regulation was made that became the legal umbrella for the government or royal government. The people must agree to regulations that require it. Land acquisition for public use in Malaysia can be completed quickly in Indonesia. The influencing factor is the different perceptions of the understanding of what are in the public interest, history and legal systems of the two countries as well as the people's reaction from the two countries

Mekanisme Penilaian Tanah dan Konsinyasi dalam Kegiatan Pengadaan Tanah (Studi Kasus Terhadap Bidang Tanah yang Mengalami Penolakan dari Pihak yang Berhak pada Pembangunan Bandara Baru Yogyakarta)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-82
Author(s):  
Setyabella Prima Putri ◽  
Senthot Sudirman ◽  
Rofiq Laksamana
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
District Court ◽  
Acquisition Process ◽  
Payment Mechanism ◽  
Valuation Process ◽  
Land Valuation ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Land Assessment

Abstract: Land Acquisition for public interest in Kulon Progo Regency is a procedure that must be implemented before initializing the new airport, which will replace the function of Adisutjipto airport. It facing much rejection during the process, so that it takes long time in completion. That also causing the identification and inventory process to be inhibited so that the land valuation process can’t be done perfectly. Their compensation won’t be given directly to the land owner, but through the consignment procedure that deposited at the District Court. This research is conducted by descriptive qualitative method. The results show that the assessment of the land is done well, although there is a discretionary decision, so that re-assessment is conducted in different time. The payment mechanism of compensation through consignment also done according to procedures, although the requirement of rejection letter from the party who is not eligible can’t be fulfilled, because it can be suspended due to the large interest for the land acquisition process of the new airport. Keywords: land assessment, consignment, land acquisition Intisari: Pembangunan bandara udara baru yang dapat menggantikan fungsi bandara udara Adisutjipto sudah tidak dapat dielakkan lagi. Pembangunan bandara udara baru dilaksanakan melalui prosedur Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum. Penolakan terhadap pembangunan bandara udara terjadi dalam kegiatan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mekanisme penilaian dan mekanisme konsinyasi terhadap bidang tanah yang mengalami penolakan oleh pihak yang berhak pada kegiatan pengadaan tanah tersebut. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi kasus dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam pelaksanaan penilaian bidang tanah secara keseluruhan sudah sesuai prosedur yang ada, akan tetapi terdapat putusan diskresi terhadap bidang tanah yang sebelumnya tidak dapat dilakukan penilaian secara keseluruhan kemudian dilakukan penilaian ulang di luar waktu yang telah ditentukan. Mekanisme pembayaran ganti kerugian melalui konsinyasi sudah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, hanya dalam proses permohonan registrasi konsinyasi terdapat satu syarat terkait dengan surat penolakan dari pihak yang berhak yang tidak dapat dilampirkan, hal tersebut dapat ditangguhkan mengingat besarnya kepentingan kelancaran proses pengadaan tanah pembangunan bandara udara baru ini. Kata Kunci: penilaian bidang, konsinyasi, pengadaan tanah

scholarly journals Analisis Risiko Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Eksplorasi dan Eksploitasi Minyak dan Gas Bumi (Studi Kasus : PT.Pertamina EP- Paku Gajah Development Project)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (I) ◽  
pp. 93-126
Author(s):  
Presetyo Firgianto ◽  
Prof. Dr. S. Pantja Djati, M.Si., MA
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Government Programs ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

Upstream oil and gas activities both searching up to oil and gas production are government programs where activities are regulated in legislation. Before drilling, to obtain oil and gas reserves, the need for land for drilling activities is a step that must be passed. Since the upstream oil and gas activities are government programs, the government guarantees the availability of land for such activities that can be classified into the public interest and set forth in Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for Development for the Public Interest.               The formulation of the problem in this research is : How the stages of activities Land acquisition for the public interest PT.Pertamina EP - Paku Gajah Development Project?, What are the opportunities and impacts at each stage of the activity ? Land acquisition for public interest PT.Pertamina EP - Paku Gajah Development Project ?, and How is the mitigation effect of each stage of Land Acquisition activities for This research uses semi-quantitative descriptive method. The data collection tool used is questionnaire with liekert scale (1-5). The results of this study indicate that the stages of land acquisition for the public interest consists of planning, preparation, implementation, and delivery of results.

scholarly journals Analisa Yuridis Implementasi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pekerjaan Umum

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-99
Author(s):  
◽  
Triana Dewi Seroja ◽  
Mukhtirili Mukhtirili ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Public Works ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Director General ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Location Determination ◽  
Preparation Stage ◽  
The Government ◽  
Forest Status

This thesis discusses the Implementation of Land Procurement for Development in the Public Interest in the Construction of the Kawal Reservoir Infrastructure, which was built by the Ministry of Public Works of the Director General of Water Resources. The background used is the issuance of regulations regarding land acquisition in the form of Law No. 2. In 2012, which is quite comprehensive regulates and facilitates the process of land acquisition for development in the public interest. This law has been revised 4 times in the form of a Perpres from the Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012 to the latest Presidential Regulation No. 88 of 2017 as a refinement and consistency of the government in the policy of accelerating infrastructure development. But the fact is that national land acquisition is still the second biggest inhibiting factor, 30%. Kawal Reservoir is an infrastructure development in the field of public works has become a polemic, starting from the systems and procedures for land acquisition, the policies issued by the parties, the substance of the problem, as well as the apparatus' view of the land acquisition itself. The implementation of land acquisition for development in the public interest is in accordance with Law No. 2 of 2012 on the construction of the guarding reservoir infrastructure, which at present is still continuing to stop its physical development at the preparation stage. Problems in the form of forest status functions, overlapping ownership, and the existence of the Governor of Riau Islands Province Decree regarding Location Determination are obstacles that are passed through the Spatial Planning and Land Affairs apparatus in carrying out their main duties and functions. The phenomena that exist in the background of the problem will be integrated with the literature, conceptual and frame of mind developed. Research using Empirical / Sociological Legal Research methods.

Land Acquisition, Markets and Political Networks: Evidence from the Indian Sundarbans

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-219
Author(s):  
Prasenjit Sarkhel ◽  
Anirban Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Reservation Price ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Price Response ◽  
Indian Sundarbans ◽  
Land Owners ◽  
Self Help ◽  
Political Networks ◽  
The Government ◽  
Self Help Groups

In recent times, land acquisitions in India for both public and private projects are facing stiff political resistance. Existing studies on land acquisition mostly focus on optimal compensation that would secure the consent of land owners. In this article, we argue that besides compensation, membership in different types of networks such as political parties and self-help groups might influence landowner consent. This could occur either because of pro-social concerns or access to better investment opportunities for the compensation amount. Using survey data from flood prone Indian Sundarbans, where the government sought to acquire land to construct embankments, we find evidence supportive of our hypothesis. The survey elicited reservation price response from land owners for a hypothetical land acquisition program. Our estimates show that land owners with self-help group members are more likely to have a higher ask price for agreeing to land sales. In contrast, controlling for length of party association, members of political networks are more likely to sell their land and have a lower reservation price than their non-political counterparts. Our results suggest that, rather than only increasing the compensation package, which is a stock of wealth, it is equally important to enhance the flow of income to ensure consensual land sales.

scholarly journals PUBLIC INTEREST IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1039-1062
Author(s):  
Vitaly V. Kikavets
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Political Regime ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Interests ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
The Government

The basis of legal relations in public procurement are private and public interests. The purpose of the study is a substantive assessment of the authors hypothesis that the purpose of legal regulation and financial support of public procurement is to satisfy the public interest expressed in the form of a public need for goods, works, and services. The methodological basis of the study rests on historical and systematic approach, analysis, synthesis and comparative-legal methods. The results of the analysis of normative legal acts regulating public procurement, doctrinal literature and practice showed that public interest denounced in the form of public need is realized through public procurement. Public and private interests can be realized exclusively jointly since these needs cannot objectively be met individually. In general, ensuring public as well as private interests boils down to defining and legally securing the rights and obligations of the customer and their officials, which safeguards them in the process of meeting public needs through public procurement. The study revealed the dependence of the essence of public interest on the political regime, which determines the ratio of public and private interests. Public interest in public procurement is suggested to understand as the value-significant selective position of an official or another person authorized by the government, which is expressed in the form of the public need for the necessary benefit; gaining such benefit involves both legal regulation and financial security. The purpose of legal regulation of public procurement is to satisfy public interest. These concepts should be legally enshrined in Law No. 44-FZ.

scholarly journals ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM DENGAN PEMBERIAN GANTI UNTUNG

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Heri Suherman ◽  
Martin Roestamy
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Development Program ◽  
The State ◽  
Standard Of Living ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Land Law ◽  
Balance Principle ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Development for public interest requires the land for which the procurement is carried out by promoting the principles contained in the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia and national land law, including humanitarian principles, justice, benefit, certainty, openness, agreement, participation, welfare, sustainability , and alignment in accordance with the values of nation and state. Land acquisition for Ciawi and Sukamahi Dam Projects implemented by the Government, in fact resulted in compulsion, where the Government was forced to buy the land due to the program and so the landowner had to relinquish the land for the program's interest. However, in principle, the procurement of the land must continue to benefit the community as the owner of the land affected by the development program of public interest by applying the balance principle in the provision of compensation that is economically and socially more profitable to realize a sense of justice, improve the standard of living and welfare of affected people Ciawi and Sukamahi dam in Bogor Regency.

The Constitutionality of Compulsory Land Acquisition in Vietnam: Issues and Recommendations

2022 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hien Trung Phan ◽  
Hugh D. Spitzer
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
The United States ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
National Defense ◽  
Land Law ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Political Ideologies ◽  
Socio Economic Development

Abstract This article identifies and analyzes the theoretical, constitutional, and practical bases for governmental land acquisition in Vietnam from a comparative perspective. The authors contrast political ideologies of private ownership and public interests to elucidate the grounds for compulsory acquisition of property for public uses. By reviewing constitutional provisions on compulsory land acquisition in several countries (Singapore, Korea, Australia, India, and the United States), and exploring Vietnam’s constitutional provisions on land acquisition for national defense, security and socio-economic development, this article analyzes some key themes of purposes, procedure, and compensation. The paper then suggests specific changes to Vietnam’s Land Law to increase transparency and to provide more legal safeguards for private users of property when government entities recover privately-used land for public purposes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document