scholarly journals Analisa Yuridis Implementasi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pekerjaan Umum

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-99
Author(s):  
◽  
Triana Dewi Seroja ◽  
Mukhtirili Mukhtirili ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Public Works ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Director General ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Location Determination ◽  
Preparation Stage ◽  
The Government ◽  
Forest Status

This thesis discusses the Implementation of Land Procurement for Development in the Public Interest in the Construction of the Kawal Reservoir Infrastructure, which was built by the Ministry of Public Works of the Director General of Water Resources. The background used is the issuance of regulations regarding land acquisition in the form of Law No. 2. In 2012, which is quite comprehensive regulates and facilitates the process of land acquisition for development in the public interest. This law has been revised 4 times in the form of a Perpres from the Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012 to the latest Presidential Regulation No. 88 of 2017 as a refinement and consistency of the government in the policy of accelerating infrastructure development. But the fact is that national land acquisition is still the second biggest inhibiting factor, 30%. Kawal Reservoir is an infrastructure development in the field of public works has become a polemic, starting from the systems and procedures for land acquisition, the policies issued by the parties, the substance of the problem, as well as the apparatus' view of the land acquisition itself. The implementation of land acquisition for development in the public interest is in accordance with Law No. 2 of 2012 on the construction of the guarding reservoir infrastructure, which at present is still continuing to stop its physical development at the preparation stage. Problems in the form of forest status functions, overlapping ownership, and the existence of the Governor of Riau Islands Province Decree regarding Location Determination are obstacles that are passed through the Spatial Planning and Land Affairs apparatus in carrying out their main duties and functions. The phenomena that exist in the background of the problem will be integrated with the literature, conceptual and frame of mind developed. Research using Empirical / Sociological Legal Research methods.

Normative Juridical Review Comparison of Land Acquisition Regulations for Railway Infrastructure between Indonesia and Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhina Setyo Oktaria ◽  
Agustinus Prasetyo Edi Wibowo
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Influencing Factor ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
The People ◽  
Railway Infrastructure ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government

Land acquisition for public purposes, including for the construction of railroad infrastructure, is a matter that is proposed by all countries in the world. The Indonesian government or the Malaysian royal government needs land for railroad infrastructure development. To realize this, a regulation was made that became the legal umbrella for the government or royal government. The people must agree to regulations that require it. Land acquisition for public use in Malaysia can be completed quickly in Indonesia. The influencing factor is the different perceptions of the understanding of what are in the public interest, history and legal systems of the two countries as well as the people's reaction from the two countries

scholarly journals Implementation of Compensation for Land Acquisition in the Construction of 150kv SUTT Tower for Public Interest

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Lalu Caesar Nebula ◽  
Lalu Husni ◽  
Arba Arba
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Empirical Method ◽  
Public Consultation ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Channel Networks ◽  
The Public ◽  
Location Determination ◽  
Air Channel ◽  
The Government

Electricity development really needs land. The government of the share permit holder seeks to improve service to the community by building large-scale power plant centers and transmission or High Voltage Air Channel networks (abbreviated in Indonesian as 150 kV SUTT) as a medium to deliver electricity to load centers or to customers. This article describes how to carry out compensation for land acquisition in the construction of the 150 kV SUTT tower for public interest. This study uses juridical empirical method as well as statute and conceptual approaches. The results of the study indicated that the process of communication or discussion between interested parties is carried out to achieve understanding and agreement in determining the location of land acquisition activities in the construction for the public interest. After an agreement in the public consultation for location determination occurs, the assessment of compensation is carried out by an assessment team formed by the governor through the local National Land Agency. Furthermore, a new assessment is carried out through discussion to determine the value of compensation in fulfilling the rights of the community whose land is affected by land acquisition for the construction of a 150kV SUTT tower.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TERHADAP MASALAH PENETAPAN NILAI GANTI RUGI DALAM RANGKA PEMBEBASAN TANAH UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TOL KUNCIRAN-SERPONG (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI TANGERANG NOMOR 333/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Tng. Jo. PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 3049 K/Pdt/2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Raymond Aristyo ◽  
Hasni Hasni
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Community Change ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Toll Road ◽  
High Population Growth ◽  
The Government

Infrastructure development for the public interest is indeed very urgent to be held immediately given that some infrastructure development facilities are still very alarming so that it becomes a priority in the development program. In addition, land acquisition for public interest development is supported by high population growth and increased community aspirations and improved development for the public interest which continues to increase. Filling land for development in the public interest, valuation of compensation by appraisers is carried out per field, parcels of land and underground land, buildings, plants, objects related to land, or other losses that can be shared. In carrying out activities, the appraiser is guided by standards, while in carrying out his duties the appraiser approves the code of ethics. In the evaluation of community change, weak decisions that cannot be refused by the government asking for land, like it or not, like it or not the community requires land to the government, the community must accept and leave the environment where they were raised, returned and memories of their homes. Related to the writer interested in doing an analysis of the problem of determining the value of compensation in the framework of land acquisition for the construction of the Kunciran-Serpong toll road. This analysis is carried out using normative research methods with the aim of appealing to the principles of law and searching for theoretical scientific truths of the problems discussed.

scholarly journals Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum dalam Perspektif Penentuan Ijin Lokasi, Besaran Ganti Kerugian dan Penyelesaian Sengketa yang Ditimbulkan

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-182
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hoiru Nail
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Basic Material ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
The Government

Abstrak Pemerintah sebagai organisasi tertinggi dalam sebuah negara memiliki kewajiban untuk mewujudkan tujuan negara sebagaimana termaktub dalam alinea ke IV UUD NRI Tahun 1945, salah satu cara yang digunakan untuk mewujudkan hal tersebut ialah pembangunan-pembangunan infrastruktur yang membutuhkan tanah sebagai bahan dasar pemenuhannya. Dalam konteks hukum agraria, tiap-tiap tanah yang ada di wilayah negara kesatuan RI memiliki hak sosial, sehingga dalam keadaan tertentu apabila negara (pemerintah) membutuhkan tanah tersebut maka selayaknya tanah tersebut wajib dilepaskan dengan persprektif pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum. Berbagai macam proses pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum yang tidak terlepaskan ialah penentuan ijin lokasi, besaran ganti rugi dan  persoalan hukum yang timbul akibat pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum, sehingga diperlukan metode penyesaian baik secara non litigasi dan litigasi. Kata Kunci: Pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum, musyawarah, ganti kerugian.   Abstract The government as the highest organization in a country has the obligation to realize the goals of the state as stated in paragraph 4 of the indonesia constitution, one of the ways used to achive this is infrastructure development which requires lands as te basic material for its fulfillment. In the context agrarian law, land in the territory of Indonesia has social rigts, so that certain circumstances, if the goverment needs the land, it is appropriate that the land must be released for public purposed. Various kinds of land acquisition processed for the public interest that are not realesed are the determination of location permits, the amount of compensation and legal issues arising from land acquisition for the public interest, so that both non-litigation and litigation methods are needed. Keywords: land acquisition for the public interest, discussion, compensation

scholarly journals Analisis Risiko Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Eksplorasi dan Eksploitasi Minyak dan Gas Bumi (Studi Kasus : PT.Pertamina EP- Paku Gajah Development Project)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (I) ◽  
pp. 93-126
Author(s):  
Presetyo Firgianto ◽  
Prof. Dr. S. Pantja Djati, M.Si., MA
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Government Programs ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

Upstream oil and gas activities both searching up to oil and gas production are government programs where activities are regulated in legislation. Before drilling, to obtain oil and gas reserves, the need for land for drilling activities is a step that must be passed. Since the upstream oil and gas activities are government programs, the government guarantees the availability of land for such activities that can be classified into the public interest and set forth in Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for Development for the Public Interest.               The formulation of the problem in this research is : How the stages of activities Land acquisition for the public interest PT.Pertamina EP - Paku Gajah Development Project?, What are the opportunities and impacts at each stage of the activity ? Land acquisition for public interest PT.Pertamina EP - Paku Gajah Development Project ?, and How is the mitigation effect of each stage of Land Acquisition activities for This research uses semi-quantitative descriptive method. The data collection tool used is questionnaire with liekert scale (1-5). The results of this study indicate that the stages of land acquisition for the public interest consists of planning, preparation, implementation, and delivery of results.

scholarly journals PENGADAAN TANAH DENGAN CARA JUAL BELI OLEH INSTANSI PEMERINTAH MENURUT PASAL 33 AYAT (3) UUD 1945

LITIGASI ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dedy Hernawan
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
The Public ◽  
Land Owners ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Government ◽  
Government Institution

The Development of physical infrastructure always requires  the availability of land, it  is not limited to the State land but also to the land rights. Small-scale land acquisition in the area of less than five (5) acre, can be bought or sold  between government agencies with land owners,  then the land belongs to the government or local government. This provision is problematic because according to Indonesian laws, the  land is controlled  by the State instead of owned. The writer will conduct the research with the aim of knowing the Judicial consequences of the implementation of land for development in the public interest by sale and purchase as stipulated in the laws. Knowing supposed to be done by government institution in order to land acquisition for public development. From the research  it can be concluded that: Knowing the Judicial consequences of the implementation of land for development in the public interest by sale and purchase as stipulated in the law number 2 year 2012 on procurement land for development for public interest, presidential decree number 40 year 2014 which resulted in the land of inheritance of government, is contrary to the provision set forth in article 33 paragraph 3 of the constitution 1945 and the provision of the basic law of agrarian number 5 year 1960. The supposed to be done by government institution in order to land acquisition for public development is trough waiver process/or extraction right by compensation, the amount of compesation itself supposed to be based on the price not based on the tax value of the land. Keywords: land; buying and selling; waiverPembangunan sarana prasarana fisik memerlukan ketersediaan tanah, baik tanah negara dan tanah hak. Pengadaan tanah dalam skala kecil yang luasnya kurang dari 5 (lima) hektar, dapat dilakukan dengan  jual beli antara instansi pemerintah dengan pemilik tanah, tanahnya kemudian menjadi milik pemerintah atau pemerintah daerah. Penelitian ini membahas konsekuensi yuridis pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum dengan cara jual beli oleh instansi pemerintah dengan pemilik tanah menurut perundang-undangan, membahas cara yang seharusnya dilakukan oleh instansi pemerintah dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Hasil penelitian mengenai konsekuensi yuridis pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum dengan cara jual beli sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum, Perpres No. 40 tahun 2014 yang mengakibatkan tanah tersebut menjadi tanah milik pemerintah/pemerintah daerah adalah bertentangan dengan ketentuan yang diatur dalam Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945 dan ketentuan UUPA No. 5 Tahun 1960. Cara yang seharusnya bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum yang sesuai dengan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945 adalah melalui proses pelepasan hak dan/atau pencabutan hak dengan pemberian ganti rugi, seyogyanya besaran ganti rugi tersebut didasarkan pada nilai harga jual beli bukan berdasarkan nilai jual objek pajak.Kata kunci : tanah; jual beli; pelepasan hak

Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Bagi Kepentingan Umum di Muara Rupit Sumatera Selatan

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-100
Author(s):  
Farhan Nayoan ◽  
Priyo Katon Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
The Public ◽  
Urban Village ◽  
People Participation ◽  
Implementation Stages ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Government

Abstract: The phenomenon of people rejection that became one of the obstacles in the land acquisition for development of the public interest, was not happening in Muara Rupit Urban Village, Rupit Sub-district, North Musi Rawas Regency (Muratara), South Sumatera Province. In 2017, the land acquisition for the construction of office buildings and other supporting facilities could be done well and smoothly without any rejection from the local people whose land was exposed to the project. This research aims to know the strategy of Muratara Regency Government and people participation of Muara Rupit Urban Village to the implementation of land acquisition. This research was qualitative research with descriptive approach. The results showed that the Muara Rupit community was actively  participated in the preparation and implementation stages of land acquisition. The Government strategy were using 2 (two) approach model, top down and bottom up planning.Keywords: land acquisition, people participation, government strategy. Intisari: Fenomena penolakan masyarakat yang menjadi salah satu hambatan dalam proses pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan bagi kepentingan umum, ternyata tidak terjadi di Kelurahan Muara Rupit, Kecamatan Rupit, Kabupaten Musi Rawas Utara (Muratara), Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Pada tahun 2017, pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan gedung perkantoran dan sarana pendukung lainnya justru dapat terlaksana dengan baik dan lancar tanpa adanya penolakan dari masyarakat setempat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui strategi Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Muratara dan partisipasi masyarakat Kelurahan Muara Rupit sehingga pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah dapat berjalan dengan lancar. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa bentuk partisipasi masyarakat yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat Muara Rupit adalah berpartisipasi aktif dalam tahapan persiapan dan pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah. Strategi yang digunakan oleh Pemerintah mengunakan 2 (dua) model pendekatan yaitu  top down planning dan bottom up planning.Kata Kunci: pengadaan tanah, partisipasi masyarakat, strategi pemerintah.

Fiduciary responsibilities to whom? federal grant recipients' perceptions of the public interest

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith F. Hundley ◽  
Emily S. Brock ◽  
Laura S. Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Public Works ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Federally Funded ◽  
Federal Grant ◽  
The Public ◽  
Reporting Requirements ◽  
Fiduciary Responsibility ◽  
Nuanced Understanding

This article explores the implementation of infrastructure development projects funded by the Recovery Act’s Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) in a southeastern state to provide high-quality Internet connectivity in un- or under-served areas to alleviate the conditions contributing to rural areas’ fiscal crises. This context affords a unique opportunity to view fiscal federalism’s operational dynamics in times of economic crisis and explore how various grant administrators in charge of similar federally funded public works projects define fiduciary responsibility. We find that these administrators comprehend “fiduciary responsibility“ narrowly in terms of complying with the accounting and reporting requirements of the federal grant. However, they have a broader and more nuanced understanding of their overall responsibility that includes working on behalf of their respective communities’ interests to meet local and regional needs.

scholarly journals Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah Ulayat Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda Nissa Hilal Liani ◽  
Atik Winanti
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
The Government

AbstractLand is a natural wealth that is very important for humans and has an important function in development. In carrying out activities carried out by the government, namely land acquisition for the public interest, which has the aim of building public facilities for the benefit of the community. In carrying out land acquisition, ulayat land is often the target for alleged land acquisition. However, using ulayat land for land acquisition often creates problems. The purpose of this paper is to determine the control of indigenous peoples' rights in land acquisition and to determine the role of the state in providing compensation for land acquisition for development in the public interest. The research method used is juridical normative using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The result of this research is that the rights of customary law communities have been regulated constitutionally by the State, and the role of indigenous peoples is regulated in Law no. 71/2012. However, the fact is that during the land acquisition process, customary law communities are often not involved, the government should provide legal certainty and protection to the customary law community so that these problems do not harm the customary law community.Keyword: Land Procurement, Customary Law Communities, Customary Land. AbstrakTanah merupakan kekayaan alam yang sangat penting bagi manusia dan memiliki fungsi yang penting dalam pembangunan. Dalam melakukan kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah yaitu pengadaan tanah bagi kepentingan umum, yang mana memiliki tujuan untuk membangun fasilittas umum agar bermanfaat bagi masyarakat. Dalam melakukan pengadaan tanah, seringkali tanah ulayat dijadikan sasaran untuk diduganakan pengadaan tanah. Namun, dalam menggunakan tanah ulayat untuk pengadaan tanah tersebut seringkali menimbulkan masalah. Tujuan dari penulisan ini untuk mengetahui pengantutan mengenai hak-hak masyarakat adat dalam pengadaan tanah dan untuk mengetahui peran negara dalam pemberian ganti kerugian pada pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normative dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa hak masyarakat hukum adat telah diatur secara konstitutional oleh Negara, serta peran masyarakat hukum adat diatur didalam UU No. 71/2012. Namun pada faktanya saat proses pengadaan tanah, masyarakat hukum adat seringkali tidak dilibatkan, seharusnya pemerintah dalam pengadaan tanah memberikan kepastian serta perlindnungan hukum kepada masyarakat hukum adat agar permasalahan-permasalahan tersebut tidak merugikan masyarakat hukum adat.Kata Kunci: Pengadaan Tanah, Masyarakat adat, Tanah Ulayat

scholarly journals Pengadaan Tanah Jalur Kereta Api Bandara Adi Soemarmo-Solo Balapan: Kebijakan Konservasi Vs Pembangunan Infrastruktur

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-180
Author(s):  
Tri Idawijayanti ◽  
Retno Widodo Dwi Pramono
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Sustainable Food ◽  
The Public ◽  
Case Study Design ◽  
Policy Conflicts

Abstract: Dilemmas and conflicts frequently arise during public policy-making. For instance, those occurring between the Policy for the Protection of Sustainable Food Agricultural Land (PLP2B) and land acquisition for development in the public interest (PTPKU). The former aims to preserve agricultural land, whereas the latter ensures absolute land provision for infrastructure and facility development in the public interest. The purpose of this study is to describe the policy conflicts that exist between the PLP2B policy and the PTPKU policy. A qualitative approach is used to conduct this research with a case study design using content analysis. Apart from documents, data triangulation is also conducted through interviews with multiple parties involved in decision-making and through observation and documentation of field conditions. Although both are in the public interest, the study's findings indicate that conservation is inferior to infrastructure development. The process of nullifying conservation implementation goes through a series of steps that emerge at each stage of land acquisition justification. Key words: Boyolali-Indonesia, LP2B, Land Acquisition, Policy Conflicts, Spatial Planning   Intisari: Dilema dan konflik sering terjadi dalam pengambilan kebijakan publik. Sebagai contoh yaitu antara kebijakan Perlindungan Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan (PLP2B) dan kebijakan Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum (PTPKU). Kebjiakan PLP2B bertujuan untuk mempertahankan tanah pertanian, sedangkan kebijakan PTPKU menjamin penyediaan lahan secara mutlak bagi pembangunan infrastruktur atau fasilitas bagi kepentingan publik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan konflik pada dua contoh kebijakan di atas. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, dengan desain studi kasus menggunakan konten analisis (content analysis). Selain berdasar dokumen, dilakukan juga trianggulasi dalam penggunaan data, yaitu dengan wawancara terhadap beberapa pihak yang terlibat dalam pengambilan keputusan, serta observasi dan dokumentasi kondisi lapangan. Dari hasil penelitian tergambar bahwa meski sama-sama sebagai kepentingan umum, kebijakan pelestarian pertanian kalah dengan kepentingan umum pembangunan infrastruktur. Proses pembatalan ketetapan pelestarian terjadi melalui berbagai tahap yang ada pada setiap tahap justifikasi pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah. Kata Kunci: Konflik kebijakan, Tata Ruang, LP2B, Pengadaan Tanah, Boyolali-Indonesia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document