scholarly journals STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE SKILLS IN CREATIVE MATHEMATICAL REASONING

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heris Hendriana ◽  
Rully Charitas Indra Prahmana ◽  
Wahyu Hidayat

This study aims to examine mathematics teacher-candidate students’ mathematical creative reasoning ability based on the level of Adversity Quotient (AQ). This study uses a mixed method of sequential type by combining quantitative and qualitative methods in order. Population in this study is all students attending the course of Calculus in Mathematics Education of Master Program at STKIP Siliwangi that consist of 270 students divided into six classes. The results are AQ gives effect to the achievement of students’ mathematical creative reasoning abilities based on the whole and the type of AQ climber, champer, and quitter. The achievement of students’ mathematical creative reasoning abilities and based on AQ, the champer and climber fall into the medium category, while on the quitter type, it falls into the category of low. On the other hands, the achievement of students’ mathematical creative reasoning abilities is yet to be achieved well at the indicator of novelty.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Septian Woro Drupadi ◽  
Jeinne Mumu

This research was conducted to analyze the mathematical Inductive reasoning abilities of students’ mathematics education UNIPA. Research on inductive mathematical reasoning skills using qualitative methods using observation techniques, tests and interviews. The results showed that the mathematical inductive reasoning abilities of mathematics education students UNIPA were mostly in the moderate category. Students' inductive reasoning ability on each indicator is the ability to present mathematical statements in writing or drawings of 66.66%, the ability to submit suspicions by 26.66%, mathematical manipulation ability of 29.44%, ability to compile evidence, provide reasons or evidence for some solutions of 5.82%, finding patterns or traits of mathematical symptoms to generalize of 30.27%, examining validity of arguments 11.32% and drawing conclusions from statements of 5.27%.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-152
Author(s):  
Fitriani Fitriani ◽  
Yulia Anita Siregar

Abstract. This research was conducted at University of Muhammadiyah South Tapanuli in semester VI student of mathematics education program that follow Real Analytical course. This study aims to determine students' mathematical reasoning ability after using constructivism approach and also want to know the effectiveness of constructivism approach to mathematical reasoning ability, as well as expected to give benefit to lecturer of Real Analysis course lecturer. The method used to achieve the goal is by experimental method with pre-experimental design research design. This research produces: A very effective constructivism approach is used to teach real analysis courses. There is an increase in students' mathematical reasoning abilities after using constructivism approach.Keywords: Constructivism, Mathematical Reasoning, Real Analysis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Saddam Al Aziz ◽  
Ali Azmar ◽  
Defri Ahmad ◽  
Fridgo Tasman ◽  
Ronal Rifandi

This study aims to analyze the mathematical reasoning abilities of students in the mathematics education study program in the secondary school mathematics curriculum review course. This research was conducted by giving quiz questions in the form of descriptions to a class of students who were then analyzed the answers. The results of the student's answer analysis show that the students' mathematical reasoning ability is still low. The low level of students' mathematical reasoning skills in general lies in the ability of students to analyze problems, make conjectures, determine relationships between variables, and identify links between processes or concepts in a given case. So that many answers from students are not logical and wrong in concluding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Aan Putra ◽  
Hendra Syarifuddin ◽  
Zulfah Zulfah

Abstract. Learning equipment is important things that determine the quality of the learning process and output. We need a study about validity, practicality, and effectiveness of the learning equipment to ensure teaching and learning quality. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the validity of the learning equipment based on guided discovery, especially the students’ worksheets. This research was a descriptive qualitative research that provides the result of students’ worksheets and experts recommendation. The experts who validated these student’s worksheets were three experts on mathematics education. The instruments used in this study was the validation sheets for LKPD. The result of validation sheets analysis for LKPD showed that in general, the students’ worksheets were valid. The validity of the didactical aspect and contents aspect sequently were 0,667 dan 0,704. Keywords: students’ worksheets, guided discovery, mathematical concepts understanding, mathematical reasoning abilities Abstrak. Perangkat pembelajaran merupakan kelengkapan pelaksanaan proses pembelajaran yang sangat penting dan menentukan capaian proses dan hasil pembelajaran. Untuk menjamin kualitas perangkat pembelajaran, dibutuhkan kajian khusus untuk menilai validitas, praktikalitas dan efektifitas perangkat pembelajaran yang digunakan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai aspek validitas perangkat pembelajaran, khususnya Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) berbasis penemuan terbimbing yang digunakan dengan tujuan meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep dan penalaran matematis siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif yang menyajikan data hasil validasi dan saran validator terhadap validitas LKPD berbasis penemuan terbimbing. Validator terdiri dari tiga orang pakar pendidikan Matematika. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah lembar validasi LKPD. Hasil analisis terhadap lembar validasi menunjukkan bahwa secara umum LKPD memenuhi kriteria valid. Validitas aspek didaktik dan aspek isi berturut-turut adalah 0,667 dan 0,704. Kata Kunci: validitas lembar kerja peserta didik,  penemuan terbimbing, pemahaman konsep matematis, kemampuan penalaran matematis


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Widya Rizkha Sandy ◽  
Siti Inganah ◽  
Anis Farida Jamil

This study aimed to describe the level of students' reasoning ability to solve the problems on flat sides of Geometry with the level of mathematical reasoning ability of high, moderate and low. The types and the research approaches used were descriptive qualitative and quantitative research design. The research subjectswere 6 students from class VIIIF. The form of data collection included 4 items ofwritten questions test and interview on the subject selected. Based on the analysis, the average value of the entire instrument about the mathematical reasoning abilities gained 71.5% for the indicators that carried out the calculations based on mathematical formulas or rules applicable. While 73.33% and 71.5% for the indicator of conclusions and 66.67% for the indicator ofestimation, that ifsummedup and averaged the percentage was 69%. The ability of class VIIIF students’ mathematical reasoning was fair.


Author(s):  
Ibnu Raash Aleslami ◽  
Ani Minarni ◽  
KMS. M. Amin Fauzi

This study aims to analyze the validity and effectiveness of teaching materials developed based on a realistic mathematical approach in improving students 'mathematical reasoning and representation abilities, to analyze the increase in students' reasoning skills and mathematical representation abilities taught using teaching materials based on realistic mathematical approaches. The data were obtained through the validation sheet of teaching materials, observation sheets, student response questionnaires, mathematical reasoning ability test instruments and mathematical representation ability tests. This study uses a 4-D development model Thiagarajan, Semmel and Semmel by developing teaching materials with a realistic mathematical approach. Based on the results of the validation, the total average value of the RPP validity was 4.81, the student books were 4.83 and the LKPD was 4.85, the students' mathematical reasoning ability tests and the mathematical representation ability tests were in the valid category. Classical mastery of learning reaches 90.62% which has met the completeness criteria, namely ≥85% of students have reached the KKM. The increase in students' mathematical reasoning abilities using teaching materials based on a realistic mathematical approach on fraction material seen from N-Gain in the first trial and second trial has increased from 0.36 to 0.50 meaning that it is in the medium category. As well as an increase in the ability of students' mathematical representation using teaching materials based on a realistic mathematical approach on fraction material seen from N-Gain in the first trial and second trial, it increased from 0.43 to 0.50, meaning that it was in the medium category.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-352
Author(s):  
Asurya Octaviyunas ◽  
Arta Ekayanti

AbstrakPenelitian ini didasari atas permasalahan pentingnya kemampuan penalaran matematis dan pencapaiannya yang masih rendah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran Giving Question Getting Answer dan Think Pair Share terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa, dan efektifitasnya dalam meningkatkan kemampuan tersebut. Populasi Penelitian eksperimen semu ini mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VII SMPN 1 Balong. Kelas VIIA diberi pembelajaran dengan model TPS sedangkan kelas VIIB dengan model GQGA. Instrumen pengumpulan data berbentuk tes, meliputi soal pretest dan posttest. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran GQGA berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan penalaran siswa kelas VIIB dengan peningkatan yang terjadi dari nilai pretest ke posttest. Begitu juga dengan model pembelajaran TPS berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa kelas VIIA dengan peningkatan nilai pretest ke posttest. Model pembelajaran GQGA tidak lebih efektif daripada model pembelajaran TPS dalam meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa. The Effect of Learning Model Giving Question Getting Answer and Think Pair Share Toward Reasoning Mathematics Ability Student’s Grade VII AbstractThis research is based on the problem of the importance of mathematical reasoning abilities and their low achievement. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Giving Question Getting Answer and Think Pair Share learning models on students' mathematical reasoning abilities and their effectiveness in enhancing these abilities. Population This quasi-experimental study included all seventh-grade students of Balong 1 Junior High School. The VIIA class is given learning with the TPS model while the VIIB class is with the GQGA model. The instruments of data collection are in the form of tests, including the questions of the pretest and posttest. The results showed that the GQGA learning model had an effect on the reasoning ability of students in class VIIB with an increase that occurred from the pretest to the posttest. Likewise, the TPS learning model influences the mathematical reasoning abilities of VIIA students with an increase in the value of the pretest to posttest. The GQGA learning model is no more effective than the TPS learning model in improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities.


Khazanah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikodemus Cahyo Saputro ◽  
◽  
Krisdianto Hadi Prasetyo ◽  
Andhika Ayu Wulandari ◽  
◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to determine how the students' mathematical reasoning abilities towards the matrix material. The data in this study were obtained from the results of filling out questionnaires and also interviews. Sources of data in this study were the subjects from which the data were obtained, namely students of class XI-MIPA 3 SMA N 1 Tawangsari. The data analysis technique used was data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing. The results of the data analysis from the questionnaire showed that the average percentage of student responses to mathematical reasoning abilities on the matrix material was 60.75% and was in the medium category. With the percentage on each indicator, namely on indicator 1 (students do calculations with the applicable mathematical formula / rules) of 55.63% so that it is included in the moderate category, students with the moderate category have aspects of the ability to understand question commands and are only weak at calculation operations. In indicator 2 (students draw general conclusions based on mathematical processes / concepts) the percentage is 61.25% so it is included in the medium category. In indicator 3 (students make estimates) the percentage is 81.25% so that it is included in the high category, students with high categories have aspects of the ability to understand question commands, question logic and can complete counting operations. While the percentage on indicator 4 (students draw conclusions based on the similarity of mathematical processes / concepts that are seen) is 54.5% so it is included in the low category, students with low categories have aspects of the question's melogical ability and are only weak in counting operations. The average percentage of the four indicators is 63.16% so that student responses can be said to be in the medium category. In this study, checking the validity of the data used triangulation techniques, namely by comparing the results of the study with the results of interviews. From the comparison of data analysis with questionnaires and interviews, it can be concluded that students with mathematical reasoning on the matrix material are in the medium category.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-132
Author(s):  
Hafiziani Eka Putri ◽  
Erna Suwangsih ◽  
Puji Rahayu ◽  
Gia Nikawanti ◽  
Elfriyani Enzelina ◽  
...  

This research is motivated by the importance of mathematical reasoning abilities for primary school students. This research aims at looking at the effect of the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) approach on the enhancement of mathematical reasoning abilities of primary school students. This research method is a quasi-experiment with pre-test and post-test control group design in Mathematics subjects with the theme of data presentation. The research sample consisted of 121 fifth grade students in two primary schools in Bekasi Regency. The test and non-test instruments were involved in this research. The results revealed that there wasthe influence between the CPA approach and students' mathematical reasoning abilities, and the achievement and enhancement of mathematical reasoning abilities of students who got learning with the CPA approach werebetter than students who got conventional learning based on all student review and a category of Prior Mathematical Ability (PMA) high, moderate and low. In conclusion, the mathematical reasoning ability of primary school students can be improved by applying the CPA approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 268
Author(s):  
Ana Siti Rosyidah ◽  
Erry Hidayanto ◽  
Makbul Muksar

<p><strong>Abstrak: </strong>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal <em>HOTS</em> geometri. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif. Penelitian dilaksanakan di SMPN 1 Madiun pada 32 siswa kelas IX H tahun ajaran 2020/2021. Selanjutnya, dipilih satu subjek pada masing-masing kategori yaitu kemampuan penalaran matematis tinggi, kemampuan penalaran matematis sedang, dan kemampuan penalaran matematis rendah untuk dilakukan analisis data dengan melihat kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa berdasarkan indikator; mengajukan dugaan, melakukan manipulasi matematika, memberikan alasan atau bukti dan menarik kesimpulan. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan tes dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang mempunyai kemampuan penalaran kategori rendahmenuliskan jawaban dengan tidak tepat dan hanya memenuhi indikator penalaran matematis pertama yakni mengajukan dugaan. Siswa yang memiliki kemampuan penalaran matematis kategori sedang menjawab soal kurang lengkap dan memenuhi dua indikator penalaran matematis; mengajukan dugaan dan menarik kesimpulan. Siswa yang memiliki kemampuan penalaran matematis kategori tinggi menuliskan jawaban dengan tepat, lengkap dan memenuhi semua indikator penalaran matematis: mengajukan dugaan, melakukan manipulasi matematika, memberikan alasan atau bukti dan menarik kesimpulan.</p><p><strong>Kata kunci:</strong> Penalaran matematis; Soal <em>HOTS</em>, Geometri</p><p><strong>Abstract</strong>: This study aims to describe students' mathematical reasoning abilities in solving geometric HOTS problem. The method used is descriptive qualitative. The research was conducted at SMPN 1 Madiun on 32 students of class IX H for the 2020/2021 school year. Furthermore, one subject was selected in each category, namely high mathematical reasoning ability, medium mathematical reasoning ability, and low mathematical reasoning ability for data analysis by looking at students' mathematical reasoning abilities based on indicators; making conjectures, performing mathematical manipulations, providing reasons or evidence and drawing conclusions. Data collection techniques in this study used tests and interviews. The results of this study indicate that students who have low category reasoning abilities write answers incorrectly and only satisfy the first mathematical reasoning indicator, namely making conjectures. Students who have the medium category of mathematical reasoning write answer incomplete and satisfy two indicators of mathematical reasoning; making conjectures and drawing conclusions. Students who have high category mathematical reasoning abilities write answers accurately, completely and satisfy all indicators of mathematical reasoning: making conjectures, performing mathematical manipulations, providing reasons or evidence and drawing conclusions.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Mathematical reasoning; HOTS Problem, Geometry<strong></strong></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document