scholarly journals The Implementation of E-Learning Web-based Model Centric Course (Edmodo) toward The Mathematics’ Interest and Learning Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Bettri Yustinaningrum

The aim of this research is to know the effect of application of E-Learning model based on Web-Centric Course with Edmodo application media to increase: (1) the interesting of learning mathematics, (2) The mathematics student learning outcomes. The research method is used in quantitative research with the quasi-type experimental design, as well as research design using the pre-test and post-test control group. The Instrument has used the test of mathematics learning outcomes and questionnaire interest in learning mathematics students. The data hypothesis test uses the t-test involving pre-requisite tests (normality and homogeneity) beforehand. The result of this research is the application of E-Learning model based on Web-Centric Course with Edmodo application media has an effect on: (1) the student learning outcomes of mathematics; (2) the interesting of learning mathematics students. 

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Marlifia Berhitu ◽  
Semuel Unwakoly ◽  
Y Manoppo

The purpose of this research is to know thestudent learningoutcomes of grade X SMA KARTIKA XIII-1 AMBON as well as knowing there is a difference whether or not the results of student learning using cooperative type Team Games Tournament(TGT) with type Make a Match as the learning model.This research is the comparison research which the sample consists of two classes, the class was given further study of chemistry at the consept of moles materials, first classexperiment (X-1) using the cooperative type Team Games Tournament(TGT) and in secondclass experiment (X-2) using the cooperative type Make a Match as the learning model. Based on the results of the study gained note that both models of learning that can enhance the learning outcomes of students, it can be seen from the success of the qualifications obtained from both the class when there has same qualification of 75% of students are on completed qualifying, 25% of students are on failed qualifying, with average from X-1 class used Type TGT is 66.125 and X-2 class used Type Make a Match is 57.3125. Hypothesis test data derived from posttest both class indicates the value significance of 0.25 (> 0.05) this a value of H0received and value of H1 rejected so it can be concluded there is no difference in student learning outcomes are either the cooperative type Team Games Tournament (TGT)and type Make a Match as the learning model.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Yoko Masna Rivan_M ◽  
Yeffi Masnarivan

This research is based on the low level of mathematics lecture result, which is caused by the learning that is still dominated by the lecturers so that the students are less motivated and bored with the learning activities in the lectures. Lecturers have not been able to encourage students to develop the talents and skills of individual students, and still many students who have not been able to formulate their own hypothesis. learning that is not optimal yet it is necessary efforts to improve learning outcomes math lectures. This study aims to reveal the effect of ROPES learning model and initial knowledge on mathematics learning outcomes in STIKes Prima Nusantara. The research design used was Randomized Group Only Design. The population of this study is all students STIKes Prima Nusantara level I of the academic year 2017-2018. Data were collected through initial knowledge tests and and learning result tests. The results revealed that the results of lectures of students who were taught with ROPES learning model higher than the results of student learning taught by conventional learning model, student learning outcomes that have a high initial knowledge with ROPES learning model higher than the results of learning mathematics students who have a high initial knowledge with conventional learning model, student learning outcomes that have low initial knowledge with ROPES learning model higher than the results of mathematics learning students who have low initial knowledge with conventional learning model and there is no interaction between learning models and knowledge early in influencing the results of college mathematics students STIKes Prima Nusantara.


Author(s):  
Pita H.D Silitonga ◽  
Theodora Sinaga ◽  
Noralisa Noralisa

This study aims to determine the effect of learning model SAVI (Somatic Audiotori, Visual, Intellectual Property) to the learning outcomes of students class VII SMP Parulian 2 Medan.This study is based on a theoretical foundation to explain the learning model SAVI, learning outcomes, and Song local area, along with the hypothesis. The research method in this study using an experimental research. This type of research is True Experimental Design with pretest design -Posttest Control Group Design. The population in the study were all students of class VII SMP Parulian 2 field consisting of 4 classes. Sampling was done by random sampling by taking two classes, namely the class VII4 as an experimental class that numbered 30 people and VII2 class as the control class that numbered 30 people. The instrument used to determine student learning outcomes is the achievement test in the form of multiple choice numbered 30 and 20 items that have been declared valid for the experimental class and control class that has been tested on VII1 class in junior Parulian 2 Medan.The second class are given a pretest to determine the ability of the student before the beginning of the treatment given in each grade, with an average value of 38.83 experimental class and control class 35.83. then given a different treatment, the experimental class learning model SAVI, and grade control with conventional learning (direct). After learning is completed given postes, obtained postes with an average value of 76.83 experimental class and control class 66.87. Hypothesis test results using a different test (t-test) obtained t> t table so Ha is received, so that the results showed that there was a 15.67% influence learning model SAVI the learning outcomes of students of class VII in Learning Locally in the Junior songs Parulian 2 Medan


Author(s):  
Eduward Situmorang ◽  
Saidun Hutasuhut ◽  
Indra Maipita

This study aims to determine students taught by E-Learning and SFAE models obtain higher economic learning outcomes compared to SFAE models without E-Learning. The study is conducted in odd semester of Academic Year 2019/2020 in class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan. The sampling technique of this study uses a cluster random sampling technique to establish an experimental group and a control group. The research approach is quantitative research with a quasi-experimental research design with non-equivalent (Pre Test and Post Test Design). The research design is pretest and posttest control design  and the research design can be presented with a 2 x 2 factorial design with the Two Path Analysis of Variance (ANAVA) technique. The results shows that there is a difference between student learning outcomes in the E-Learning class + SFAE Learning Model, and student learning outcomes applied by the SFAE Learning Model model and students who gained the greatest influence from E-Learning + SFAE Learning Model on student economic learning outcomes, namely 0 , 0929. It means that E-Learning + SFAE Learning Model can explain 9.29% the effect of variations in the score of student learning outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Ravinia Sasindua ◽  
Meytij Rampe ◽  
Marlina Karundeng

This research is an experimental study using the Anchored Instruction learning model. This study aims to determine the effect of the Anchored Instruction learning model on student learning outcomes on the mole concept subject. This research was conducted in class X SMA Negeri 2 Siau Timur with a sample of 40 people. The research design used was a pre-test and randomized two group design. The experimental class uses the Anchored Instruction learning model and the control class uses the conventional learning model. Analysis of the hypothesis test using t-test with a significant level α = 0.05. The test results obtained indicate that the results of tcount> ttable or 2.112> 2.024, thus H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, this shows that there is a significant difference between the average value of the initial test (posttest) of the experimental group and the control group. So it can be concluded that there is a difference between student learning outcomes using the Anchored Instruction learning model and student learning outcomes using conventional learning models on mole concept subject.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Dian Puspita Sari

The purpose of this study is to know the significant differences of motivation and learning outcomes of science students are learned through the implementation of guided Inquiry learning model with a group of students who were taught through conventional learning in class V SDN 02 Cupak Tangah Padang City. Based on the normality and homogeneity test on the data obtained from the experimental group and the control group is normal and homogenous distribution. The hypothesis test is then tested with t-test and shows thitung = 3.027 and ttable = 2,000 with db = 63 (n1 + n2 - 2 = 32 + 31-2 = 63) and 5% significant level. Based on the test tcount> ttable (3.027> 2,000) then H0 rejected and Ha accepted with the conclusion, "student learning outcomes that apply Inquiry learning model is better than student learning outcomes that apply the conventional learning model in class V SDN 2 Cupak Tangah Padang 2016/2017 ".


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Agus Maramba Meha ◽  
Yusni W Mbau ◽  
Yonatan Foeh

The problem in this study is the low learning outcomes of class VII students of SMP Negeri 20 Kupang. This study aims to determine the effect of the Make A Match type of cooperative learning model on learning outcomes. The experimental research method used is the Posttest-Only Control Group Design. The population of class VII students was 253 students and the sample of class VIID and class VIIH was 54 students. Data collection using learning outcomes tests. Analyzed using t-test, assisted by SPSS For Windows version 23. Hypothesis test results obtained tcount 8,194> 2,00665 ttable at 0,000 significance or less than 0.05, indicating that there are differences in student learning outcomes between the control and experimental classes. It is shown by increasing students' understanding of the digestive system material, students look very enthusiastic in learning, have curiosity, and dare to express opinions during the learning process. Therefore, the Make A Match learning model has great potential in developing students' ideas on problem-solving in learning, as evidenced by the high percentage of student learning outcomes, namely C1 93.055%, C2 75.462%, and C3 73.765%.


LaGeografia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Humairah Nurjannah ◽  
Alief Saputro ◽  
Maddatuang Maddatuang ◽  
Muh Jibran Nidhal Fikri

This study aims to determine whether the application of the Treffinger learning model can improve student learning outcomes in geography learning in class X SMA 7 Sinjai.  This research method uses pretest posttest control group design experimental research.  The subjects in this study were two classes of IPS X in SMA Negeri 7 Sinjai namely X IPS 1 and X IPS 2. The data analysis technique in the study used SPSS 22 for windows.  For the hypothesis test the t-test (independent samples t test) is used.  The results showed that the Treffinger model affected the learning outcomes in learning geography of class X IPS students of SMA Negeri 7 Sinjai.  This shows Ho was rejected and Hi was accepted.  The gain score of students' learning outcomes using the Treffinger model is better (8.97) than students who do not use the model (1.41).  Suggestions for teachers, the use of this learning model can be done as an alternative model to improve student learning outcomes.  Further research is also recommended to: a) test the effect of applying the Treffinger learning model to other variables and to locations, levels of education, or other material;  and b) integrate or compare with other learning models to be used as alternative learning models in schools.  Quasi (Quasi Experiment) with design.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
S. Supratman ◽  
Sri Wulandari Muhlis

The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t <t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rusnida Rusnida

This research is motivated by teacher-centered learning so that the lack of student activity in solving problems and finding answers together. This study aims to improve mathematical collaborative skills and student learning outcomes through the application of a magic ball-assisted group investigation learning model. This study is a classroom action research study on third grade students at SDN 008 Talang Perigi. The instrument used was the observation sheet and learning outcomes test. The results showed in the first cycle of collaborative mathematical skills students obtained an average of 55.77% with a high category and in the second cycle increased to 73.44% with a very high category. Student learning outcomes in the first cycle had an average of 67.83 with a percentage of classical completeness of 53%, increasing in the second cycle to 75.67 with a percentage of classical completeness of 83%. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the application of the learning model of investigation ball assisted by magic ball can improve the collaborative skills of mathematics and learning outcomes of third grade students of SDN 008 Talang Perigi.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document