scholarly journals Assessment of Surfactant Flooding With Variations of Slug Injection Strategies in Waterflooded Reservoir

Author(s):  
Anan Tantianon ◽  
Falan Srisuriyachai

Injection of surfactant into waterflooded reservoir which has considerably high water saturation may cause a reduction in surfactant efficiency by means of surfactant dilution and adsorption. Therefore, to maintain expected lowest interfacial tension (IFT) condition, large amount of surfactant, which leads to higher cost, is inevitable. Several studies have observed that reduction in surfactant concentration slug at the late time can cause a shift in surface equilibrium, resulting in desorption of retained active surfactant agents and therefore, it is possible to obtain benefit from this phenomenon to achieve longer period of the lowest IFT condition while maintaining the amount of surfactant used. Hence, this study aims to evaluate effects of two-slug surfactant flooding compared to single-slug while maintaining amount of surfactant used constant in waterflooded reservoir. The performance is evaluated based on additional oil recovery using STAR® reservoir simulation program. Simulated results indicated that two-slug surfactant injection yields better oil recovery than conventional single-slug surfactant flooding due to benefit of sacrificial adsorption and desorption process of active surfactant. Selecting type of two-slug surfactant flooding strategy would depend on surfactant concentration of single-slug which is chosen for modification; whereas, the selection of magnitude of concentration contrast between two slugs would depend on placement of surfactant mass ratio.

2021 ◽  
pp. 91-107
Author(s):  
E. A. Turnaeva ◽  
E. A. Sidorovskaya ◽  
D. S. Adakhovskij ◽  
E. V. Kikireva ◽  
N. Yu. Tret'yakov ◽  
...  

Enhanced oil recovery in mature fields can be implemented using chemical flooding with the addition of surfactants using surfactant-polymer (SP) or alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding. Chemical flooding design is implemented taking into account reservoir conditions and composition of reservoir fluids. The surfactant in the oil-displacing formulation allows changing the rock wettability, reducing the interfacial tension, increasing the capillary number, and forming an oil emulsion, which provides a significant increase in the efficiency of oil displacement. The article is devoted with a comprehensive study of the formed emulsion phase as a stage of laboratory selection of surfactant for SP or ASP composition. In this work, the influence of aqueous phase salinity level and the surfactant concentration in the displacing solution on the characteristics of the resulting emulsion was studied. It was shown that, according to the characteristics of the emulsion, it is possible to determine the area of optimal salinity and the range of surfactant concentrations that provide increased oil displacement. The data received show the possibility of predicting the area of effectiveness of ASP and SP formulations based on the characteristics of the resulting emulsion.


SPE Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 1231-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.. Ashoori ◽  
D.. Marchesin ◽  
W.R.. R. Rossen

Summary Creation of low-mobility foam for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is triggered by an increase in superficial velocity; thereafter, injection rate can be reduced to lower values, and strong foam remains at velocities at which weak foam was previously observed. Here, we consider whether strong foam created near an injection well can propagate to large distances from the well where superficial velocity is much smaller. We study strong-foam propagation with finite-difference simulations and Riemann solutions, applying a population-balance foam model that represents the multiple steady states of foam. Our simulations show that strong foam cannot displace directly the initial high-water-saturation bank initially in the reservoir at low superficial velocities; it pushes a weak-foam state with lower velocity that in turn displaces the bank ahead. Our traveling-wave solutions show that strong foam propagates more slowly as superficial velocity decreases and stops propagating at yet lower superficial velocities, in agreement with the experiment. Failure of propagation occurs at superficial velocities greater than that at which the strong-foam state disappears; it raises concerns for long-distance propagation of strong foam created near the injection well. In the context of the model, it is not extraordinary destruction of foam at the front that slows the propagation of strong foam, but failure of foam (re-)generation at the front. Our model also represents for the first time a process where strong foam is created near the exit of a core and then propagates upstream, as seen in some experiments.


2017 ◽  
Vol 890 ◽  
pp. 235-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitipat Chuaicham ◽  
Kreangkrai Maneeintr

To enhance oil recovery, surfactant flooding is one of the techniques used to reduce the interfacial tension (IFT) between displacing and displaced phases in order to maximize productivity. Due to high salinity of crude oil in the North of Thailand, surfactant flooding is a suitable choice to perform enhanced oil recovery. The objective of this work is to measure the IFT and observe the effects of parameters such as pressure, temperature, concentration and salinity on IFT reduction. In this study, sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate is used as surfactant to reduce IFT. The results show that the major factor affecting reduction of IFT is surfactant concentration accounting for 98.1%. IFT reduces with the increase of salinity up to 86.3% and up to 9.6% for temperature. However, pressure has less effect on IFT reduction. The results of this work can apply to increase oil production in the oilfield in the North of Thailand.


2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Barati-Harooni ◽  
Adel Najafi-Marghmaleki ◽  
Seyed Moein Hosseini ◽  
Siyamak Moradi

Surfactants have the potential to reduce the interfacial tension between oil and water and mobilize the residual oil. An important process which makes the surfactant injection to be less effective is loss of surfactant to porous medium during surfactant flooding. This study highlights the results of a laboratory study on dynamic adsorption and desorption of Trigoonella foenum-graceum (TFG) as a new nonionic surfactant. The experiments were carried out at confining pressure of 3000 psi and temperature of 50 °C. Surfactant solutions were continuously injected into the core plug at an injection rate of 0.5 mL/min until the effluent concentration was the same as initial surfactant concentration. The surfactant injection was followed by distilled water injection until the effluent surfactant concentration was reduced to zero. The effluent concentrations of surfactant were measured by conductivity technique. Results showed that the adsorption of surfactant is characterized by a short period of rapid adsorption, followed by a long period of slower adsorption, and also, desorption process is characterized by a short, rapid desorption period followed by a longer, slow desorption period. The experimental adsorption and desorption data were modeled by four well-known models (pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, intraparticle diffusion, and Elovich models). The correlation coefficient of models revealed that the pseudo-second-order model predicted the experimental data with an acceptable accuracy.


1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 350-352
Author(s):  
G.E. Kellerhals

Abstract In surfactant flooding, low interfacial tensions (IFT's) are required for recovery of additional significant quantities of crude oil from a reservoir rock. This paper indicates the usefulness of perspective plots to facilitate comparison of sets of IFT data. Such perspective plots simplify the process of screening various surfactant systems for enhanced oil recovery. Introduction Numerous articles have been written about the effects and/or importance of IFT between oil and aqueous phases in determining ultimate oil recovery during a phases in determining ultimate oil recovery during a secondary (waterflooding) or tertiary oil-recovery process. In the area of micellar/polymer or surfactant process. In the area of micellar/polymer or surfactant flooding, IFT has been studied extensively both by industrial and by academic investigators. A simplistic summary of this work is that low IFT's (generally corresponding to high capillary numbers ( are required for recovery of additional significant quantities of crude oil from a reservoir rock. Method Development Several variables influence between an oil-rich phase and a surfactant-containing aqueous phase. During phase and a surfactant-containing aqueous phase. During a surfactant flood, variations in surfactant concentration and salt concentration will occur as a result of mixing of the chemical slug with the pre flush (or formation brine) and polymer drive (" rear mixing" ). Nelson investigated salt concentrations required during a chemical flood to achieve efficient oil displacement. Since these variables (and others) change during the progress of a flood, it is desirable to determine the impact of these changes on the IFT between the oil- and water-rich phases. To assess the importance of changes in these two key variables (surfactant concentration and salinity) on IFT, an x-y plot may be constructed with values of each variable along the axes. The IFT for a particular surfactant concentration and salinity then is obtained experimentally and the numerical value placed at the corresponding (x, y) point on the plot. The resultant figure/table can be referred to as an IFT map. Points of equal, or about equal, IFT can be connected to produce an IFT contour map. In the investigation of the effect(s) of temperature on a given surfactant system and crude oil, IFT maps might be constructed for each of the pertinent temperatures. IFT's might be determined at six different sodium chloride concentrations (e.g., 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 wt%) and four surfactant concentrations (e.g., 0.085, 0.064, 0.042, and 0.021 meq/mL), resulting in IFT maps (for each temperature) each consisting of 24 IFT values. A comparison of the values of one map to the values of a second map (measurements made at different temperature) then is required to determine the impact of the temperature change. A single value for IFT for a given salinity and surfactant concentration assumes that the system is two-phase, because two IFT's can be measured for a three-phase system consisting of an oil-rich phase, a water-rich phase, and a microemulsion phase. phase. A method to allow easier comparison for the relatively large number of IFT data points that may be obtained during the study/screening of various surfactant systems at various conditions is described in this paper. The technique consists of interpolating between IFT values and then plotting the data with a perspective plotting routine. The method allows comparisons of IFT values for different crude oils, temperatures, cosolvent types, surfactant types, hardness ion concentrations, etc., through visual scanning of a perspective plot ranter than through trying to judge or compare numerical IFT values of an IFT map. SPEJ p. 350


Author(s):  
Arinda Ristawati ◽  
Sugiatmo Kasmungin ◽  
Rini Setiati

<p class="NoSpacing1"><em>Surfactant flooding may increase oil recovery by lowering interfacial tension between oil and water. Bagasse is one of the organic materials which contain fairly high lignin, where lignin is the basic substance of making Natrium Lignosulfonate (NaLS) Surfactant. In this research, bagasse based surfactant was applied for surfactant flooding. The research was divided into two sections, namely: phase behavior test and NaLS Surfactant flooding where the water contained 70,000 ppm NaCl. Two surfactant concentrations which were used were 0.75% and 1.5% NaLS surfactant. Phase behavior tests were carried out to find the middle phase emulsion formation. Based on phase behavior test results, the percentage of emulsion volume for 0.75% and 1.5% NaLS is 13.75% and 8.75%, respectively. NaLS surfactant flooding was performed for to obtain the best recovery factor. FTIR equipment used determine recovery factor. The optimum condition was obtained at 0.75% NaLS surfactant concentration where the recovery factor was 4.4%.</em><em></em></p>


SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (05) ◽  
pp. 2601-2614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junrong Liu ◽  
James J. Sheng

Summary Countercurrent spontaneous imbibition is one of the most significant mechanisms for the mass transfer between fractures and matrixes in tight reservoirs. Adding surfactants and pressurization are two common methods to enhance the imbibition. In this study, we used the low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) instrument to monitor the dynamic imbibition processes with surfactants added and fluid pressure applied. The T2 relaxation distribution and corresponding water saturation profiles during the imbibition process were obtained by analyzing NMR responses. We found that sodium alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS) could improve the oil recoveries of laboratory-scale cores to 22.31 and 29.59% with different concentrations (0.1 and 0.5 wt%). The surfactant addition not only expands the imbibition area, but also reduces the residual oil saturation in the imbibition profile. However, the actual maximum imbibition distances are only approximately a centimeter long (0.9412 and 1.1372 cm), which is insignificant for field scale. Due to the minimal imbibition distance, high-quality hydraulic fracturing is required to generate a large number of fractures for imbibition to ensure considerable oil recovery at the field scale. In addition, surfactant is consumed during spontaneous imbibition of oil-wet rocks and increasing surfactant concentration facilitates the imbibition process. However, arbitrarily increasing the concentration does not achieve the expected oil recovery because of the high adsorption capacity resulting from the high concentration. We need to consider economic efficiency to optimize a reasonable surfactant concentration. It was found that traditional dimensionless scaling models are not applicable in the complicated surfactant-enhanced imbibition. Hence, we proposed a new scaling group for scaling laboratory date to the field in fractured oil-wet formations. Moreover, we compared the imbibition process under different pressure conditions (7.5 and 15 MPa) and found that the effect of fluid pressure on countercurrent imbibition is not obvious.


Author(s):  
Oluwaseun Taiwo ◽  
Kelani Bello ◽  
Ismaila Mohammed ◽  
Olalekan Olafuyi

Surfactant flooding, a chemical IOR technique is one of the viable EOR processes for recovering additional oil after water flooding. This is because it reduces the interfacial tension between the oil and water and allows trapped oil to be released for mobilization by a polymer.In this research, two sets of experiments were performed. First, the optimum surfactant concentration was determined through surfactant polymer flooding using a range of surfactant concentration of 0.1% to 0.6% and 15% of polymer. Secondly, another set of experiments to determine the optimum flow rate for surfactant flooding was carried out using the optimum surfactant concentration obtained. Lauryl Sulphate (Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate, SDS), an anionic surfactant, was used to alter the interfacial tension and reduce capillary pressure while Gum Arabic, an organic adhesive gotten from the hardened sap of the Acacia Senegal and Acacia Seyal trees, having a similar molecular structure and chemical characteristics with Xanthan Gum, was the polymer used to mobilize the oil.The results show that above 0.5%, oil recovery decreases with increase in concentration such that between 0.5 and 0.6%, a decrease of (20% -19%) is recorded. This suggests that it would be uneconomical to exceed surfactant concentration of 0.5%. It is shown in the result of the first set of experiments that a range of oil recovery of 59% to 76% for water flooding and a range of 11.64% to 20.02% additional oil recovery for surfactant Polymer flooding for a range of surfactant flow rate of surfactant concentration of 0.1% to 0.6%. For the second sets of experiments, a range of oil recovery of 64% to 68% for water flooding and a range of 15% to 24% additional oil recovery for surfactant flooding for a range of surfactant flow rate of surfactant flow rate of 1cc/min to 6cc/min. The Optimum surfactant flow rate resulting in the highest oil recovery for the chosen core size is 3cc/min. It's highly encouraged that the critical displacement rate is maintained to prevent the development of slug fingers.In summary, an optimum Surfactant flow rate is required for better performance of a Surfactant flooding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document