scholarly journals ARTISTIC EDUCATION IN INTERDISCIPLINARY DIMENSION: THEORETICAL ASPECT OF AN ISSUE

2018 ◽  
pp. 161-167
Author(s):  
Olga Oleksiuk
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Theoretical Aspect ◽  
The Other ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Communicative Practices ◽  
Scientific Paradigm ◽  
Strategic Direction ◽  
Innovative Model ◽  
Subject Areas ◽  
The One

The interdisciplinarity of artistic education lies in the versatility of the influence of art on all cognitive processes of man and the ability of artistic-figurative embodiment of any topic and plot that concerns the person - the artist and the recipient. The origins of interdisciplinarity as a scientific paradigm lie in the theory of communication. The basis of interdisciplinarity lies in the scientific semantics: interdisciplinarity performs a syntactic role, on the one hand, and on the other, contributes to the growth of semantic connections in schemes and transitions between different subject areas. A promising strategic direction is to increase the cultural intensity of all academic disciplines. Simplified-practical use of art as an illustration, «figurative confirmation» of life's phenomena ignores its high purpose. Keywords: strategy, benchmarks, development, post-classical paradigm, artistic education, interdisciplinary discourse, innovative model, communicative practices.

scholarly journals INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF POST-CLASSICAL ART EDUCATION

2019 ◽  
pp. 4-9
Author(s):  
Olha Oleksiuk
Keyword(s):  
Art Education ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
The Other ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Scientific Paradigm ◽  
Strategic Direction ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Subject Areas ◽  
The One

The interdisciplinarity of art education is the universality of the art influence upon all the people’s cognitive processes and an artistically imaginative embodiment ability of any topic and plot that relates to the person — the artist and the recipient. The origins of interdisciplinarity as a scientific paradigm are in the theory of communication. The basis of interdisciplinarity lies in scientific semantics: interdisciplinarity plays a syntactic role, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, promotes the growth of semantic links in schemes and transitions between different subject areas. The promising strategic direction is to increase the cultural intensity of all academic disciplines. Simplified-practical use of art as an illustration, “figurative confirmation” of life’s phenomena ignores its high purpose

Strategic guidelines for development of arts education in interdisciplinary discourse

2018 ◽  
pp. 4-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Oleksiuk
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Interactive Teaching ◽  
Project Method ◽  
Strategic Direction ◽  
Subject Areas ◽  
The One ◽  
Interdisciplinary Integration

The interdisciplinarity of artistic education lies in the versatility of the influence of art on all cognitive processes of man and the ability of artistic-figurative embodiment of any topic and plot that concerns the person — the artist and the recipient.The origins of interdisciplinarity as a scientific paradigm lie in the theory of communication. The basis of interdisciplinarity lies in the scientific semantics: interdisciplinarity performs a syntactic role, on the one hand, and on the other, contributes to the growth of semantic connections in schemes and transitions between different subject areas. A promising strategic direction is to increase the cultural intensity of all academic disciplines. Simplified-practical use of art as an illustration, «figurative confirmation» of life’s phenomena ignores its high purpose.Practices pay attention to the use of interactive teaching methods: discussion, round table, project method, synectics, inversions, etc. In the implementation of research projects students apply a phenomenologicaldialogue / polygon. The use of this method creates conditions for the analysis, reflection and self-assessment of students in the organization of their educational activities. The transition from interdisciplinary integration to lessons to interdisciplinary integration with project forms of learning is a prerequisite for building an innovative model for the development of post-classical artistic education.

Interdisciplinarity as form of fundamentalisation of higher art education: faceted approach

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleksiuk Olga
Keyword(s):  
Art Education ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Strategic Direction ◽  
Subject Areas ◽  
Life Phenomena ◽  
The One ◽  
The University ◽  
Interdisciplinary Integration

The interdisciplinarity of art education lies in the universality of the influence of art on all human cognitive processes and the ability to embody artistically any theme and plot that excites a person — an artist and a recipient. The origins of interdisciplinarity as a scientific paradigm are involved in the theory of communication. Interdisciplinarity is based on scientific semantics: interdisciplinarity plays a syntactic role, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, it helps to build semantic connections in schemes and transitions between different subject areas. A promising strategic direction is to increase the cultural intensity of all disciplines. Simplified practical use of art as an illustration, “figurative confirmation” of life phenomena ignores its high purpose. Practitioners pay attention to the use of interactive teaching methods: discussion, round table, method of projects, synectics, inversion, etc. In the implementation of research projects of students, we use phenomenological dialogue / polylogue. The use of this method creates conditions for analysis, reflection and self-assessment of students in the organization of their educational activities. The facet approach is an important area of modernization of the university and corresponds to the innovative nature of science. The transition from interdisciplinary integration in the classroom to interdisciplinary integration with project forms of education is the main condition for building an innovative model for the development of art education.

Hedgehog and Fox: Anderson as Historian and Philologist

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-382
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Sommer
Keyword(s):  
Early Modern ◽  
New Testament ◽  
The Other ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Constructive Theology ◽  
Biblical Scholarship ◽  
Religious Dialogue ◽  
Positive Sense ◽  
The New Testament ◽  
The One

To sin or transgress, according to one dictionary definition, is to go beyond a limit, to cross what is supposed to be a clear border. In this sense, one can say that Gary Anderson has succeeded in writing a very sinful book. Like Sennacherib as the rabbis describe him, Anderson is (he “erases boundaries between nations”)—only I use this phrase to describe Anderson in rather a more positive sense than the rabbis intended it when they applied it to the Assyrian emperor.2 Throughout this book we are discussing, Anderson crosses boundaries between academic disciplines: biblical criticisms that study the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, Qumranic scholarship, rabbinics, patristics, the study of both medieval Catholic and early Protestant theology. He crosses boundaries within some of these fields, as well: for example, by attending to modern Israeli biblical scholarship in a way that is, alas, all too rare among non-Jewish scholars in North America and Europe; or by showing scholars of rabbinics what they can learn from the study of the New Testament, especially when that study is conscious of its roots in medieval and early modern theology. Most importantly, Anderson tears down artificial barriers that separate historical, philological, descriptive scholarship on the one side from constructive theology and inter-religious dialogue on the other.

Sartre's Social Theory

Dialogue ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25
Author(s):  
Werner Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Social Theory ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Human Subject ◽  
The Other ◽  
Thing In Itself ◽  
Dialectical Reason ◽  
The One ◽  
Historical Developments ◽  
Determining Factor ◽  
Individual Human

The title of Sartre's Critique de la raison dialectique evokes, quite intentionally, memories of Kant's critiques of reason. Let us compare the two undertakings. Kant circumscribed the knowledge claimed by the natural sciences of his time. He pointed out that science never grasps more than the appearance of things as conditioned by our cognitive processes; it cannot know the thing-in-itself. Sartre, for his part, circumscribes the knowledge claimed by orthodox Marxism. He agrees that Marxist economic theory understands the general course of contemporary historical developments, but not the dynamics of those developments. Both authors concede no more than a limited validity in deterministic ontology, in the one case to the exact sciences, in the other to Marxism. Nevertheless, both recognize fully the content of the knowledge they are criticizing, but explain it at the result or product respectively of deeper causes. A transcendental investigation is supposed to bring these causes to light. Kant's critique of scientific reason was directed at the interplay between the presumed thing in itself and the viewing, thinking self—the interplay that yeilds objectively-cognizable Nature. Sartre's critique of dialectical reason tries to show that the interaction between individual human activity and an always scarce supply of material things is the source of all social and cultural forms and events. In both works, then, the human subject is a determining factor in what appears to be objectively factual.

scholarly journals Rekonstruksi Metodologi Pengembangan Sains Berbasis Agama

KALAM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Mohammad Muslih
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Research ◽  
The Other ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Scientific Paradigm ◽  
Scientific Reason ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Scientific Project ◽  
The One ◽  
Islamic Values

The development of an integrative scientific paradigm is certainly a very large scientific project, however, it must be admitted that the success of reconstructing the new paradigm is still insufficient, as it must be supported by the availability of a functional and effective methodology. This article is a study aimed at offering a methodology for integrative paradigm-based science development, which is not only functional and effective, but also ensures productivity, as well as secure from the pseudo-scientific of abusive practices and the excessive practice of ideological science. The reconstruction of a methodology of religious-based science development urged to do, on the one hand, to provide an answer to the doubt about its compatibility with the Islamic sciences, and on the other hand deny the fear of the disappearance of Islamic values, precisely with the continued execution of scientific research, or the development of scientific reason, in general.Pembangunan paradigma ilmiah integratif sudah tentu merupakan proyek keilmuan yang sangat besar, meski demikian, harus diakui, keberhasilan melakukan rekonstruksi paradigma baru itu masih belum cukup, sebab masih harus didukung oleh tersedianya metodologi yang fungsional dan efektif. Artikel ini merupakan kajian bermaksud menawarkan metodologi pengembangan sains berbasis paradigma integratif, yang tidak hanya fungsional dan efektif, tetapi juga menjamin produktivitas, sekaligus aman dari jeratan praktek kasar pseudosaintifik dan praktek berlebihan sains ideologis. Rekonstruksi metodologi pengembangan ilmu berbasis agama mendesak untuk dilakukan, di satu sisi untuk memberi jawaban atas keraguan akan kompetabilitasnya dengan ilmu-ilmu keislaman, dan pada sisi yang lain membantah kekhawatiran akan hilangnya atau terkikisnya nilai-nilai keislaman, justru dengan semakin dijalankannya riset-riset ilmiah, atau dikembangkannya nalar ilmiah secara umum

scholarly journals Danske intellektuelle på Facebook - eksemplificeret ved Svend Brinkmann og Carsten Jensen

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (65) ◽  
pp. 54-75
Author(s):  
Erik Svendsen
Keyword(s):  
Public Intellectual ◽  
The Other ◽  
Direct Access ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Communicative Practices ◽  
The Public ◽  
Short Forms ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The One

The article analyses how two unique Danish intellectual voices, Professor Svend Brinkmann and writer Carsten Jensen, use Facebook as a platform. It argues, on the one hand, that Facebook offers direct access to the two intellectuals’ followers and readers but on the other hand also creates communicative challenges. The article asks in particular whether the Brinkmann and Jensen follow or depart form the communicative practices afforded by the platform. After an initial review of the literature about the public intellectual, the analysis of Brinkmann’s and Jensen’s use of Facebook shows how Brinkman manages to invent new short forms which grant him extended public impact, whereas Jensen uses Facebook to extend his work as a polemist. Moreover, the analysis argues that both intellectuals perform a private self and position themselves vertically and authoritatively in relation to their followers. In addition, like most other Facebook users, they also promote themselves and their activities. Habermas once pointed to social media’s ambivalences vis à vis the intellectual. The article’s analysis substantiates this claim.  

scholarly journals The theoretical aspect of transhumanism within the framework of historiosophical discourse

2021 ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
V. V. Okorokova
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Approach ◽  
Theoretical Aspect ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
The Other ◽  
Transitional Stage ◽  
Human Race ◽  
Innovative Biotechnologies ◽  
The Future ◽  
The One ◽  
Physical Type

The article is devoted to the consideration of theoretical aspects of transhumanism in the course of historiosophical discourse. Emphasis is placed on the digitalization of society, which feeds the main issues of transhumanism, especially in the anthropological sphere. In this sense, transhumanism is the theoretical approach that proposes a futurological digression into the future of man, so to speak, from the man of the present physical type to the posthuman. Man is understood here as an object of experimentation to apply to him innovative biotechnologies aimed at artificially improving his physical capabilities. It is about solving one of the main problems – immortalism (immortality). The article presents the opinions of scientists from two poles of transhumanism research – positive and debatable. In particular, based on the works of wellknown ideologues of this scientific trend (N. Bostrom, R. Kurzweil, J. Huxley) points to a pronounced projective feature of transhumanism, which in turn contributed to the debate among scientists about the impossibility or danger of implementing a transhumanist program of transformation. The article reveals the origins of transhumanism, and most importantly the views of scholars on this issue.There was some bipolarity in the study of transhumanism in relation to humanism and postmodernism. On the one hand, transhumanism is seen as the embodiment of some humanistic and postmodernist elements. On the other hand, there are fundamental differences, such as the understanding of the human race is not the end of our evolution, but its beginning. Hence such concepts as “transhuman” and “posthuman”, where the first type is understood as a transitional stage to the decisive stage – post-human. Anthropotechnological factor permeates transhumanism, creating a futurological program of transformation of all spheres of life, taking into account the cosmic level. The article notes that these theoretical characteristics of transhumanism lead some scholars (A. Shcherbina) to the idea of its propensity for utopia, and a utopia of global scale.

scholarly journals Linguistic form between system and use

Linguistica ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-21
Author(s):  
Olga Kunst Gnamuš
Keyword(s):  
Surface Structure ◽  
Deep Structure ◽  
The Other ◽  
Underlying Structure ◽  
Semantic Roles ◽  
Scientific Paradigm ◽  
Structure Description ◽  
Basic Concepts ◽  
The One

"The goal of theoretical linguistics is the discovery of facts that are crucial for determing the underlying structure of language and hidden abstract principles and laws" (Shaumyan, 1984: 239). There is a twofold relationship between facts and theory: on the one hand, a theory makes it possible to identify facts and to classify them into categories, but on the other hand there exist so-called symptomatic facts, which cannot be incorporated within the framework of an obsolete scientific para­ digm, but have a constructive value with respect to a new theory, since in the ways in which these facts appear they disclose abstract principles and laws which would ot­ herwise have remained hidden. In the development of science, the discovery of such facts is of exceptional importance. A new scientific paradigm originates from the contradiction which occurs between the discovery of a symptomatic fact (the latter presenting a previously hidden aspect of the phenomenon concerned) and the use of the explanatory methods of the old paradigm. The paradox lies in the fact that the symptomatic fact is opposed to these very, obsolete explanatory procedures, and, by its existence, reduces their validity. For this reason, such symptomatic facts are usually  reduced  to  "an  execption  which proves  the  rule".  Thus,  for  instance, Chomsky discovered the existence of deep structure by studying pairs of sentences such as John is easy to please, John is eager to please. But he described them in terms of the surface structure. It was only later that Fillmore (1968) introduced the basic concepts of deep-structure description by proving that, through the role of the surface structure subject, various semantic roles can be expressed, such as agent, pa­ tient and instrument.

scholarly journals The Value of Constitutional Values: An Exploratory Study of the Constitutions of India and Bavaria

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-30
Author(s):  
Christian Alexander Bauer ◽  
Harald J Bolsinger
Keyword(s):  
Exploratory Study ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Political ◽  
Pragmatic Approach ◽  
Political Reality ◽  
Norms And Values ◽  
Innovative Model ◽  
The One ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Globalized World

This article is an attempt to understand “Bounds of Ethics in a Globalized World”, the hiatus between principles, norms and values and how they are codified on the one hand and the risks that follow when the actualisations of regulative principles fail in political reality on the other hand. Considering the political, economic and social reality, it is frequently diagnosed that reality is lagging far behind the potential of constitutionally guaranteed rights and duties. A variety of constitutionally guaranteed values suffers from devaluation. Taking examples from Bavaria in Germany, questions concerning whether the Bavarian society is at the borders of ethical capacities, or whether the limits of possible ethical regulation have been reached are dealt with. Important parallels in the genesis of the Bavarian and the Indian constitution are highlighted in this context. Through an understanding of the ideas of Ludwig Erhard, a pragmatic approach and an innovative model is proposed for cultivating values in a sustainable way. The importance of values of virtues is discussed and an emphasis is put on the importance of practiced virtues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document