scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY UNTUK MENGETAHUI KETERAMPILAN DASAR BEKERJA ILMIAH MAHASISWA IAIN PALU

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
Mirnawati Mirnawati
Keyword(s):  
Design Research ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Work Skills ◽  
Significant Difference

This study aims to determine the differences in knowledge of basic scientific work skills in students in the classroom. This research uses the Quasi Experiment method with The Non Equivalent, Pretest-Postest Design research design. The research sample consisted of 30 PGMI IAIN Palu students. The sampling technique used is Simple Random Sampling. Data collection techniques are using observation sheets. Data analysis techniques using the Normality test, Homogeneity test, and t test using the IBM SPSS Statistics 22 and Microsoft Excel programs. The results showed the significance value of Sig (2-Tailed) was 0.00 <0.05 which means that H0 was rejected and H1 was accepted. Obtained from data on differences in knowledge of basic scientific work skills for students who use the conventional learning model and for students who use the Discovery Learning learning model. It can be concluded that there is a significant difference in knowledge between students who use conventional learning models and students who use Discovery Learning learning models in the Science Concept Basic courses.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY UNTUK MENGEMBANGKAN KETERAMPILAN DASAR BEKERJA ILMIAH PADA MATERI INDERA PENGLIHATAN DAN ALAT OPTIK

EDUSAINS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-144
Author(s):  
Mirnawati Mirnawati ◽  
Dadi Rusdiana
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Optical Devices ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Basic Ability

Abstract This study aimed to reveal the difference of the basic ability of scientific work development between students who are teached using discovery learning and conventional learning. This study used quasy experiment with The Non Equivalent Pretest-Posttest Design. The subyek which are 58 VIII grade students in one of junior high school in Palu City are chosen with simple random sampling. Data were collected by observation sheets (check list) and were analyzed by normality, homogenity, and t-test using IBM SPSS Statistic 22 program. The result shows that the significance of Sig (2-tailed) is 0.00 < 0.005, which means that H0 is rejected and H1 was accepted. In addition, the data of the basic ability of scientific work development showed that the value for students teached by the discovery learning model is 58.28% and students teached by the conventional learning model is 47.13%, so it can be concluded that there is a significant difference on the basic ability of scientific work development between students who are teached using discovery learning and conventional learning in the material of sight and optical devices. Keywords: discovery learning; basic skills of scientific work; optic Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan perbedaan perkembangan keterampilan dasar bekerja ilmiah pada siswa di kelas yang mendapat model pembelajaran discovery dibandingkan dengan kelas konvensional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi eksperiment dengan desain penelitian the non equivalen, pretest-postest design. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 58 orang siswa kelas VIII dari salah satu SMPN di Kota Palu. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah simple random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu menggunakan lembar observasi penilaian (daftar cek). Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji Normalitas, uji Homogenitas, uji t dengan menggunakan program IBM SPSS Statistics 22. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan nilai signifikansi Sig (2-Tailed) adalah 0.00 < 0,05 yang berarti H0 ditolak dan H1 diterima. Diperoleh dari data perbedaan perkembangan keterampilan dasar bekerja ilmiah untuk siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran discovery sebesar 58.28% dan untuk siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional sebesar 47.13%  Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan perkembangan yang signifikan terhadap keterampilan dasar bekerja ilmiah siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional dengan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran discovery pada materi indera penglihatan dan alat optik. Kata Kunci: discovery learning; keterampilan dasar bekerja ilmiah; optik Permalink/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i2.1817  

scholarly journals MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ELPSA: PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIS DAN KECEMASAN BELAJAR

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-168
Author(s):  
Eka Patmi Seta ◽  
Suherman Suherman ◽  
Farida Farida
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Anova Test ◽  
Learning Anxiety

The purpose of this research was to effect the ELPSA learning model on students' mathematical literacy abilities, determine the effect of student learning anxiety on mathematical literacy skills, and determine the interaction between learning models and anxiety on mathematical literacy skills. This research is a quantitative type of quasi-experimental research. The sampling technique used was simple random sampling. Data were collected through tests and questionnaires. The test uses an essay with comparative material to measure mathematical literacy skills, while a questionnaire was used to determine the categories of student learning anxiety. The pre-requisite test in this study used the normality and homogeneity test. The data analysis technique used the two-way ANOVA test with different cells. Based on the calculation of ANOVA two ways different cells have obtained a test decision that is rejected, is rejected, and is accepted, it is necessary to carry out a further post ANOVA test using the Scheffe method '. The results showed that: there was an effect of the ELPSA learning model on mathematical literacy skills, there was an effect of student learning anxiety on mathematical literacy skills, and there was no interaction between learning models and student learning anxiety on mathematical literacy abilities.

scholarly journals The Effect of Guided Discovery Learning Model with Superitem Test on Students’ Problem-Solving Ability in Mathematics

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
Evi Hulukati ◽  
Siti Zakiyah ◽  
Ali Rustam
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Guided Discovery ◽  
Research Population

This experimental study aims to compare problem-solving abilities between students that are taught with guided discovery learning models and conventional learning models. This study involved all eighth graders as the research population. Furthermore, the sampling technique used is the simple random sampling technique in two classes in Junior High school SMPN 1 Kota Gorontalo by employing Superitem essay test as a data collection tool. This descriptive analysis is described in the frequency distribution and histogram tables, whereas inferential analysis was performed by using ANCOVA test. The results showed that guided discovery learning model is preferable to compare to the conventional learning model in improving mathematics problem-solving ability.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL TOWARD STUDENT HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS IN DYNAMIC ELECTRICITY SUBJECT MATTER AT SMA RAKSANA MEDAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Natalia Tondang ◽  
Sahyar .
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Higher Order Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Thinking Skill ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Academic Year

ABSTRACT Study aimed to analyze the effect of discovery learning model toward student’s higher order thinking skill. The type of this research was quasi experimental, with experiment class used discovery learning and control class used conventional learning. The population was all of the tenth class of SMA Raksana Medan academic year 2014/1015 which consist of seven classes. Sample was taken with a simple random sampling technique. The data in higher order thinking skill was collected by essay tests. Data analyzed with t test. The result of the study showed that there was positive effect of discovery learning model toward student’s higher order thinking skill in experiment class or given by discovery model. It proved from posttest result in experiment class was higher than control class or there was significant difference of post test score, although in higher order thinking level, both of class still in less level, but student who given discovery learning had higher value than control class.   Keyword : Conventional Learning; Discovery Learning Model; Higher Order Thinking Skill

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Berbasis Etnomatematika terhadap Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Suci Nooryanti ◽  
Sri Utaminingsih ◽  
Henry Suryo Bintoro
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Realistic Mathematics Education ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Class V ◽  
Realistic Mathematics ◽  
Communication Ability

The purposive of this study are (1) the average mathematical communication abilities of students who have learned by applying the ethnomatemics-based Realistic Mathematics Education approach, (2) the mastery of learning mathematical communication abilities of students who are taught with the Mathematics-Based Realistic Mathematics approach. This type of research is quantitative with true experimental design research design using the form of Posttest Only Control. The sample uses a simple random sampling technique and is carried out in class V SD 5 Jepang as an experimental class and class V SD 1 Gulang as a control class. Data collection techniques are tests of students' mathematical communication abilities. Data analysis techniques in this study include normality test, homogeneity test, average difference test and learning completeness test. The results showed that (1) the average mathematical communication ability of the experimental class students was higher than the average mathematical communication ability of control class students with expository learning; (2) students' mathematical communication abilities with ethnomatemicsbased Realistic Mathematics Education approach achieve mastery learning.

KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model

scholarly journals The differences in the effectiveness of the participatory model and the discovery learning model on the results of mathematics learning in madrsah

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (01) ◽  
pp. 61-74
Author(s):  
Ayu Ramdhayani ◽  
Habib Husnial Pardi ◽  
Mauliddin Mauliddin
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Posttest Score ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Pretest Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Participatory Model

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in effectiveness between the participatory model and the discovery learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of students at SMPN 21 Mataram on the subject of circles. This research is an experimental research type with the static group pretest-posttest desaign design. The sample in this study were students of class VIII SMPN 21 Mataram. The sampling technique in this research is purposive sampling with circle material. The research data collection process used interview, observation, and test instruments. From the research results, the participatory model of learning outcomes obtained an average pretest score of 58.68 and an average posttest score of 73.32. While the discovery learning model of learning outcomes obtained an average pretest score of 58.86 and an average posttest score of 73.91. The results of the hypothesis test of learning outcomes found that the sig. (2-tailed) 0.821. Because the sig value> 0.05, meaning that H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference in effectiveness between the participatory model and the discovery learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of grade VIII students of SMPN 21 Mataram

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATA KULIAH PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA DAN SUMBER BELAJAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-43
Author(s):  
Muhammad Isnaini ◽  
Nadiroh Nadiroh ◽  
Moch. Sukardjo
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Education Student ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Media Development

This study aimed to determine the differences in learning outcomes of media development courses and learning material between groups of students who are taught using guided inquiry learning models compared to groups of students who are taught using discovery learning models. Research approaches conducted by researchers using quantitative descriptive methods. The object of research conducted on students in the media development and learning material subject in the one of Study Program at UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. Analysis of the data and formulas used to test hypotheses using t-test which first performed an analysis of the normality of the data, a homogeneity. Based on the measurement results of the Islamic Education student learning outcomes, the researcher can conclude that the discovery learning and guided inquiry learning model influences of learning outcomes. The data analysis and formula used were normality test, homogeneity test and then hypothesis testing. Based on the results of the measurement of learning outcomes, the researcher can conclude that there are differences in learning outcomes using the discovery learning model and the inquiry learning model in the course of media development and learning resources. This is shown from the calculation results, namely the significance value which is below 0.05, which is equal to 0.000. It is hoped that other researchers can develop other studies that focus on other thinking skills such as critical thinking.

scholarly journals PEMANFAATAN STRATEGI CRITICAL INCIDENT DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS CERPEN (The Critical Incident Strategy in Learning to Write Short Stories)

Sirok Bastra ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Azis ◽  
Hajrah Hajrah ◽  
Suarni Suarni
Keyword(s):  
Short Stories ◽  
Short Story ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Critical Incident ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
T Test ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Class Viii

AbstrakPenelitian bertujuan membuktikan keefektifan strategi critical incident dalam pembelajaran menulis cerpen. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen, dengan desain penelitian eksperimen murni. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMP Negeri 1 Sinjai Selatan. Populasi penelitian keseluruhan siswa kelas VIII. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara acak sederhana dengan teknik simple random sampling. Sampel yang terpilih, yaitu kelas VIII-F (kelas eksperimen) dan kelas VIII-G (kelas kontrol). Instrumen yang digunakan, yaitu dalam bentuk tes cerita pendek. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferensial. Sebelum diadakan analisis data, dilakukan uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas menggunakan program SPSS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan signifikan kemampuan menulis cerpen siswa kelas kontrol dengan eksperimen yang ditunjukkan oleh hasil uji-t yang dilakukan dengan bantuan program SPSS 20.0. Uji-t data posttest kelas kontrol dan kelas eksperimen menunjukkan nilai P = 0,001 (P < 0,05 = signifikan).Kata kunci: keefektifan, strategi critical incident, menulis, cerpen AbstractThe research aims to prove the effectiveness of the critical incident strategy in learning to write short stories. This type of research is experimental research. The research design used was pure experimentation. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 1 South Sinjai. The entire research population of class VIII students. Sampling is done by simple random sampling with simple random sampling technique. The selected sample, namely class VIII-F (experimental class) and class VIII-G (control class). The instrument used is in the form of short story tests. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. Before the data analysis is carried out, the normality test and homogeneity test are done using the SPSS program. The results showed a significant difference in the ability to write short stories of control class students with experiments shown by the results of the t-test conducted with the help of the SPSS 20.0 program. The t-test posttest data of the control class and the experimental class showed a value of P = 0.001 (P <0.05 = significant).Keywords: effectiveness, critical incident strategy, writing, short stories

scholarly journals THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS BY USING GUIDED-DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL AND COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL JIGSAW TYPE

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Anna Angela Sitinjak ◽  
Herman Mawengkang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Guided Discovery ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Level Of Significance

The type of this study is a quasi-experiment study with its purpose to know any difference of students’ achievement in mathematics which using the model of guided discovery learning with cooperative learning model JIGSAW type.The population of this study is all students in SMA N 3 P. Siantar. The sampling technique applied was cluster random sampling. The experimental class I that chosen is X-1 consisted of 36 students, meanwhile the experimental class II that chosen is X-6 consisted of 36 students. The instrument used to measure the students’ mathematics achievement was a essay test. The normality test used was Lilliefor’s test, gotten that data is normal and the homogeneity test by using Fisher test, gotten that data is homogeny. The data analysis technique was t-test at the level of significance a = 5%. The study result showed that there is the difference of students’ achievement in mathematics which using the guided discovery learning model with cooperative learning model JIGSAW type in grade X SMA N 3 P. Siantar where obtained             14 tcalculation">  = 2.504 at a = 0.05 and 14ttable=">   14t(0.975,70)">  = 1.995, then   14tcalculation&gt;ttable"> ..

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document