scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Notaris Akibat Batalnya Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Karena Cacat Hukum

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Deby Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Codes Of Conduct ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Binding Agreement ◽  
Land Sale

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 Year 2004 concerning Notary Position (UUJN) gives authority to notaries to make an agreement. According to that regulation, of course the notary has an important role in the making of the land sale and purchase agreement. A land sale and purchase agreement must meet the subjective requirements and objective requirements as contained in Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). The problems that occur are: (1) How is the position of the deed of binding agreement on the sale and purchase of land containing legal defects? and (2) How is the notary's responsibility related to the cancellation of the binding contract of sale and purchase agreement due to a legal defect in its manufacture? The type of this research is legal research. The results of this research indicate that the position of the deed of binding agreement on sale and purchase of land that contains legal defects is not as a deed that has perfect proof power, so that the law can be canceled or null and void by law. This is related to subjective requirements and objective conditions in the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code. The responsibility of the notary is related to the cancellation of the binding agreement on the sale and purchase of land due to a legal defect in the form of notary public, criminal, administrative, and notary codes of conduct. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) memberikan kewenangan kepada notaris untuk membuat suatu perjanjian. Terkait dengan hal tersebut tentunya notaris memiliki peran penting dalam pembuatan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) tanah. Suatu perjanjian jual beli tanah harus memenuhi syarat subjektif dan syarat objektif sebagaimana terkadung dalam Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata). Permasalahan yang terjadi yaitu: (1) Bagaimanakah kedudukan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah yang mengandung cacat hukum? dan (2) Bagaimanakah pertanggungjawaban notaris terkait dengan batalnya akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah diakibatkan adanya cacat hukum dalam pembuatannya?. Penelitian ini beranjak dari penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa kedudukan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah yang mengandung cacat hukum yaitu tidak sebagai akta yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna, sehingga berakibat hukum akta dapat dibatalkan atau batal demi hukum. Hal ini berkaitan dengan syarat subjektif dan syarat objektif dalam ketentuan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata. Pertanggungjawaban notaris terkait dengan batalnya akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah diakibatkan adanya cacat hukum dalam pembuatannya yaitu notaris dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata, pidana, administrasi, dan terhadap kode etik notaris.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS KONSENSUALISME DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI ONLINE

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1138
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Bunga Sasmita ◽  
I Wayan Novy Purwanto
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Online Trading ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Penelitian ini bertujuan untukemahami bagaimanakah pengaturan jual beli online dalam hukum di Indonesia dan bagaimanakah aspek hukum jual beli secara online dalam perjanjian.  Penelitian ini, menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Sedangkan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah menggunakan pendekatan fakta dan statute approach. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pengaturan mengenai jual beli secara online diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 18 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, yang mana sebagai penerapan pasal 1313 KUHPerdata. Para pihak yang mengadakan perjanjian bisa menerapkan KUHPerdata yang jadi dasar diakui sahnya perjanjian dimana keabsahannya tercantum syarat 1320 KUHPerdata yakni:   kecakapan, kesepakatan, suatu sebab yang halal dan suatu hal tertentu.Sedangkan penerapan asas Konsensualisme dalam perjanjian online yang didasarkan oleh ketentuan dalam Pasal 1313 KUHPerdata yang menegaskan bahwa adanya suatu perjanjian berarti pihak satu dengan pihak lainnya setuju untuk mengikatkan dirinya.   This study aims to understand how the online arrangement in the sale and purchase agreement and how the legal aspects of buying and selling online in the agreement. This research uses normative legal research methods. While the approach used is to use the fact approach and statute approach. The results of this study indicate that the regulation regarding online trading is regulated in the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, which is the legal basis for applying article 1313 of the Civil Code. The parties who entered into the agreement can apply the KUHPer which is the basis for the validity of the agreement where the validity is stated in the terms of the 1320 KUHPer, namely: skill, agreement, a halal cause and a certain thing. While the application of the principle of consensualism in an online agreement based on the provisions in Article 1313 of the KUHPer which confirms that an agreement means that one party with another party agrees to bind themselves.

scholarly journals Penomoran dan Penanggalan Akta Notaris Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan (Analisis Putusan PN Denpasar Nomor 530/Pdt. G/2016/PN. Dps.)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Istadevi Utami Rahardika ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Binding Agreement

The Denpasar District Court (PN) in its decision Number 530 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Dps stated that it has punished the Notary to immediately give the number and date to the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement Deed and the Power of Attorney. This is interesting and important to examine in this research in relation to the basis of authority and the method of assigning the number and date of the deed signed by the parties before the notary after the Denpasar District Court decision. This normative legal research aims to examine the contents of a positive legal level, concerning the Numbering and Dating of Notary Deeds, using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, while the analysis method uses grammatical and systematic interpretation. The results showed that the basic authority of the Denpasar District Court to decide disputes regarding the numbering and dating of notary deeds, namely Article 130 HIR / 154 Rbg, Article 1851 of the Civil Code, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 of 2009, Perma RI Number 1 of 2016, and the principle of ius curia novit. In connection with the numbering and dating of the Notary deed, it can be done based on the provisions of the UUJNP and refers to the Denpasar District Court decision.

scholarly journals Pengesahan Akta Notaris Bagi Penghadap Yang Mengalami Cacat Fisik

Acta Comitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Putu Swandewi
Keyword(s):  
Physical Disability ◽  
Physical Disabilities ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Made In

The article 44 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 on the Amendment of the Law on the Position of Notary Public (hereinafter referred UUJN-P) provision a duty for the appearer to sign the notarial deed after having been read by the notary public, with the exception when the appearer is unable to put his or her signature then the appearer should mention the reason and it will be stated explicitly at the end part of the notarial deed. On the other hand, there is a difference in the arrangement of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the UUJN-P namely the existence of an obligation that the notary public must affix the letters and documents as well as the fingerprint of the appearer on the minutes of the deed. The problem that arises is what if the appearer is illiterate, having handicapped or paralyzed hand so that he or she could not put his or her signature on the notarial deed, whether he or she is required to put his or her fingerprints on the minutes of the notarial deed as a form of his/her personal authentication on the notarial deed or as a form of his/her approval, weather the fingerprint can replace a signature, whereas what is meant by the fingerprint here also raises different interpretations. The study is a normative legal research, it is as a result of a vacuum of norm about the signing of notarial deed when the appearer have physical disabilities that he or she cannot sign a notarial deed and to perform validation on an authentic notarial deed that he/she made. In addition, there is a duty of the notary to affix the fingerprint of the appearer on the minutes of the notarial deed, whether this provision also applies to the appearer who cannot sign the notarial deed because of his/her disability. The materials used are the primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the legal arrangements for the legalization of the notarial deed for the appearer who has a physical disability, especially in his or her hands, as well as the obligation to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the notarial deed has not been expressly stipulated in the Law Number 30 of 2004 (UUJN) and the UUJN-P. In particular to Article 44 paragraph (1), (2) and Article 16 Paragraph (1) c. that stipulate the appearer who has a physical disability condition can authenticate the notary deed, on condition that, the deed is eligible and conforms to the rules in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, Article 1868 of the Civil Code of the authentic deed and the Law Number 30 of 2004 of the Law on Notary Position in conjunction with the Law Number 2 of 2014 on the Amendment of the Law on the Position of Notary Public.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap Oleh Notaris Pada Minuta Akta

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi ◽  
Ibrahim R
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The People ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Legal Consequences

The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.

scholarly journals DISPUTES SETTLEMENT OF BALI TRADITIONAL INHERITANCE THROUGH PEACE AGREEMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Peace Agreement ◽  
Peace Agreements ◽  
The Law ◽  
Made In

The inheritance and the division of inheritance that is felt to be unfair is often a source of dispute. The disputes that occur can sometimes be resolved by making a peace agreement between the disputing parties. The peace desired by the parties is, of course, expected to end disputes/conflict and to provide legal certainty among those in dispute. However, sometimes peace agreements that have been made between those in dispute are disputed again in court. This study aims to examine the settlement of Balinese traditional inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement between the parties make it. The method used in this study is a normative legal research, using a statute approach and a case approach. The result of this study showed that the settlement of Balinese indigenous inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement of the parties that make it if the peace agreement is made based on the validity of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code, based on good faith as the principles in the law of the agreement, and must be made in the form of a notary deed is in accordance with the provisions for conciliation in book III of the Civil Code.  

scholarly journals Imunitas Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Rita Permanasari ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law Regulation

ABSTRAKKetentuan Pasal 4 dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris mewajibkan notaris untuk menjaga kerahasiaan segala sesuatu mengenai akta yang dibuatnya dan segala keterangan yang diperoleh guna pembuatan akta sesuai dengan sumpah janji jabatan kecuali undang-undang menentukan lain. Kemungkinan terhadap pelanggaran kewajiban tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (11) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, seorang notaris dapat dikenai sanksi berupa teguran lisan sampai dengan pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Terlebih lagi dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dengan Nomor: 49/PUU–X/2012 memutuskan telah meniadakan atau mengakhiri kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) yang tercantum dalam Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN membuat notaris seakan-akan tidak ada perlindungan hukum bagi notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya. Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI) harus berusaha menjalankan peranan pembinaan dan perlindungan meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan keterampilan para notaris. Demikian juga menjalin hubungan dengan para penegak hukum lainnya, agar penegak hukum lainnya yang ada hubungan dengan notaris dapat memahami kedudukan notaris sesuai UUJN.Berangkat dari pemikiran inilah kewajiban ingkar notaris masih tetap dipertahankan oleh pembuat undang-undang dalam revisi Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Tahun 2014 yang merupakan konfigurasi kekuatan perlindungan terhadap profesi dan jabatan notaris dari sisi politik.Kata Kunci : Jabatan Notaris, Hak Ingkar, Perlindungan Hukum.ABSTRACTThe provisions of Article 4 and Article 16 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph f of the Notary's Office Law require a notary to maintain the confidentiality of all matters concerning the deeds it has made and all the information obtained for the deed in accordance with the oath of pledge of office except the law otherwise. The possibility of breach of such obligation under Article 16 paragraph (11) of Notary Law Regulation, a notary public may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral reprimands until dismissal with disrespect. Moreover, with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia with the number : 49 /PUU-X/2012 deciding to have canceled or terminated the authority of the Regional Supervisory Board (MPD) listed in Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN made a notary as if there was no legal protection for a notary in performing duties. The Indonesian Notary Bond (INI) should endeavor to undertake the role of guidance and protection to increase the knowledge, abilities and skills of the notaries. Likewise establish relationships with other law enforcers, so that other law enforcement who has relationship with the notary can understand the position of notary under the UUJN.Departing from this thought the obligation of notarization is still maintained by the lawmakers in the revision of the Law Regulation of Position Notary on Year 2014 which is the configuration of the strength of the protection of the profession and the notary's position from the political side.Keyword : Position of Notary, Right of Remedy, Legal Protection.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pekerja Dengan Perjanjian Kerja Tidak Tertulis pada Perusahaan Pemberi Kerja

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-162
Author(s):  
Robertus Berli Puryanto ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Work Relations ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Labor is something that is needed by an employing company in carrying out its economic activities. This can be seen in the constitutional arrangements of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 27 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In the implementation of the working relationship between workers and the employing company, there are several rights and obligations that must be fulfilled between the two parties. Because there are provisions regarding work agreements that are differentiated based on the form of the agreement, each worker has different rights where these rights must be guaranteed by the company based on law. From this, the problems that will be examined are legal protection for workers with an unwritten work agreement at the employing company, as well as legal remedies that can be taken by workers with an unwritten agreement in the event of a violation of rights by the company. The research method used is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by examining existing library materials. By examining problems by looking at existing regulations, and describing problems that occur in practice or in everyday life in society. From the research conducted, it was found that legal protection for workers with an unwritten work agreement at the employing company is regulated based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower where the basis is that the applicable work agreement is an indefinite work agreement so that the rights obtained under the provisions of the law. Then efforts that can be made if there is a violation of the law in work relations is based on Law Number 20 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, namely in the form of Bipartite, Tripartite (Mediation, Consoliation and Arbitration) negotiations, as well as through Trials at the Industrial Relations Court.

scholarly journals Islamic Justice Perspective On Notary The Perpetrators Criminal Action

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Ira Alia Maerani
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Islamic Perspective ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

This study aims to find out to know the form of violations and witnesses to the notary position based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary and the perspective of Islamic justice in viewing a notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in connection with an authentic deed he made.            This research uses normative law research or dogmatic law research using the doctrinal method. Normative legal research includes research on legal principles, research on legal systematics, research on vertical and horizontal synchronization stages, comparison of law and legal history.            This research concludes that the notary public is a public official who makes an authentic deed and has the authority as regulated in Article 15,16, 17 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public. The notary is obliged to act on trust; honest; independent; objective and safeguard the interests of parties involved in legal actions. Notaries in carrying out their duties and positions if convicted of violations, may be subject to sanctions or sanctions in the form of civil, administrative, and notary code of ethics in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. Even so, the Notary Position Law does not regulate criminal sanctions against Notaries. Whereas in practice there is an opportunity for a legal action or violation by a notary related to an authentic deed he made that can be qualified as a criminal offense. A notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in carrying out his authority as a Public Official, of course, must be a concern of the government and law enforcement because the law must be upheld against anyone who commits indiscriminate violations. This rule is a manifestation of the principle of "equality before the law" (equality before the law) which is a fundamental element in the concept of the rule of law. Honesty values; keep the mandate; fair; and this objective is synergistic with the values of justice in an Islamic perspective that promotes justice and problems. Described in the Qur'an An-Nisa verses 58 and 135 and QS. Al Ma'idah verse 8. Islamic law also regulates justice in recording a deed, for example just in recording accounts receivable debts (Q.S. Al Baqoroh: 282)Keywords: Islamic Perspective; Justice; Notary Public; Perpetrators; Criminal Act

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM MENANGANI SENGKETA ANTARA PT. SINAR MENARA DELI DENGAN SARI ALAMSYAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.

scholarly journals PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI DALAM PRAKTIK PRE PROJECT SELLING

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-229
Author(s):  
Diah Ayu Saraswita
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Special Technique ◽  
The Public ◽  
Language Form ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public

According to the law notarial deed has specific or special technique, language, form and section. Notarial deed is also one of the written evidence as stated in the Civil Code Article 1866. Indonesia Notary Community utilizes barcode technology advancements to checking the authenticity of a deed namely by storing and reading information digitally about deed made by the Notary Public regarding the deed’s title and deed’s number. This research shows that the use of a barcode system with the aim of securing a notarial deed must be mandated and used for good purposes namely for interested parties and this is a form of Notary services to the public so that the notarial deed is kept safe and cannot be misused by those who want to abuse

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document