scholarly journals Interpretation of the teaching of cultural disciplines in the recent period of historical development

2021 ◽  
pp. 287-295
Author(s):  
Т.С. Карандаева
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Studies ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Historical Anthropology ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Subject Field ◽  
Internet Resources ◽  
History Of Art ◽  
History Of ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Educated Person

В России периодически появляются публикации, посвященные определению предметного поля культурологии, ее междисциплинарным связям, нерешенным проблемам научного становления культурологии. Новые способы интерпретации истории, которые предложили французские исследователи, сначала вызвали почти паническое утверждение о том, что как наука «история исчезает», но впоследствии пришли к переходу от «истории-события» к «истории-проблеме», к появлению и успешному развитию истории ментальности, микроистории, исторической антропологии, истории повседневной жизни и др. История мировой художественной культуры, история искусств, история художественной культуры, история мировых религий как учебные дисциплины сегодня в России сохраняются только на узкоспециализированных факультетах. На протяжении нескольких десятилетий кардинально изменился сам характер общекультурной эрудиции более или менее образованного человека. Традиционная устоявшаяся совокупность знаний, которая была обязательной для гуманитария или негуманитария, существенно трансформировалась за счет сокращения собственно гуманитарной, художественной сферы. Хотя ради справедливости стоит заметить, что современные технологии значительно упростили доступ к культурным достижениям. Каждый раз увеличивается и количество, и качество интернет-ресурсов мировых музеев, библиотек, архивов. В последнее время начали проводить конференции и публиковать итоговые коллективные монографии, цель которых – практически продемонстрировать современный профессиональный уровень культурологических исследований. Одним из последних примеров является коллективная монография (скорее сборник статей) 2019 г. «Наука о культуре: культурология, культуроведение, Cultural Studies, culturology». Безусловно, в сборнике есть хорошие, профессиональные научные публикации, которые заслуживают отдельного обстоятельного рецензирования. In Russia, there are periodically published publications devoted to the definition of the subject field of cultural studies, its interdisciplinary connections, and unresolved problems of the scientific formation of cultural studies. The new ways of interpreting history proposed by the French researchers first caused an almost panicked statement that as a science "history disappears", but later came to the transition from "history-event" to "history-problem", to the emergence and successful development of the history of mentality, microhistory, historical anthropology, the history of everyday life, etc. The history of world art culture, the history of art, the history of art culture, the history of world religions as academic disciplines today in Russia are preserved only in highly specialized faculties. Over the course of several decades, the very nature of the general cultural erudition of a more or less educated person has changed dramatically. The traditional, well-established body of knowledge, which was mandatory for the humanities or non-humanitarians, was significantly transformed by reducing the actual humanitarian, artistic sphere. Although for the sake of justice, it is worth noting that modern technologies have greatly simplified access to cultural achievements. Each time, the number and quality of Internet resources of world museums, libraries, and archives increases. Recently, we have started to hold conferences and publish final collective monographs, the purpose of which is to practically demonstrate the modern professional level of cultural studies. One recent example is a collective monograph (rather a collection of articles) two thousand nineteen "The science of culture: cultural Studies, cultural Studies, cultural Studies". Of course, there are good, professional scientific publications in the collection that deserve a separate thorough review.

Cheshire Cat and Mickey Mouse: analysis, interpretation and the art of the La Tène Iron Age

1970 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 261-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. V. S. Megaw
Keyword(s):  
Iron Age ◽  
Art History ◽  
Mickey Mouse ◽  
Classical Archaeology ◽  
Italian Physician ◽  
History Of Art ◽  
Prehistoric Art ◽  
History Of ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Wilhelm Worringer

Nearly seventy years ago Wilhelm Worringer first wrote that ‘ultimately all our definitions of art are definitions of classical art’ (Worringer, 1953, 132). Today, the study of Western European art history, old or modern, the products of peasant craft-centres or urban ‘schools’, has in the course of time developed its own methodology and, almost, mystique. In contrast, the study of many branches of prehistoric art in Europe and elsewhere is all too often seen as a mere extension of the skilled but subjective approaches of classical archaeology without considering the suitability of the latter's application. The use of the classical art-historian's intuitive methods built up not just from visual exprience but a detailed background of literary, historical and philosophical studies must in fact be almost entirely denied the student of prehistoric or primitive art. It is perhaps only natural that principles of classical art history should be applied to later European prehistory, though it is often difficult to arrive at a precise definition of these principles. It was Johann Joachim Winckelmann who made the first systematic application of categories of style to the history of art (Gombrich, 1968, 319). Sir John Beazley, the greatest of all modern classical art historians followed in this tradition basing attributions ‘on the grounds of tell-tale traits of individual mannerisms’ (Carpenter, 1963, 115 ff.) a scheme first applied to painting less than a century ago by the Italian physician Giovanni Morelli (Gombrich, 1968, 309 ff.) and followed at the turn of the nineteenth century in the study of Italian painting (Lermolieff, 1892–3). With Beazley it is, however, difficult to follow step by step his methods of work.

scholarly journals Russian Neo-Kantianism and Philosophy in Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Pavel Vladimirov
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Discourse ◽  
History Of Philosophy ◽  
Russian Philosophy ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Philosophical Literature ◽  
Global Context ◽  
History Of ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Related Theme

Russian neo-Kantianismʼs status in the history of the development of Russian philosophy is an important, but poorly presented in scientific publications, issue is revealed in the article. With some exceptions, which are represented by a number of few, but informative and informative articles and a monograph, the problem remains without proper reception in the scientific discourse of our time. Russian neo-Kantianism, however, leaving aside the question of what is the phenomenon of Russian neo-Kantianism, it is impossible to productively and consistently actualize the content of Russian neo-Kantians and, moreover, to show their significance in the history of Russian philosophical and socio-humanitarian thought in general. Three key difficulties stand out: 1) the question of originality and the related theme of the independence of the philosophical direction (originality, independence and originality – differ from each other, but are united in their immanent orientation); 2) Russian neo-Kantianism, which in many ways seems to be the most difficult task for researchers engaged in historical and philosophical reconstruction; 3) the question remains ambiguous as to whether Russian neo-Kantianism is a continuation of the German tradition or whether it is a direction of Russian philosophy of thought. Russian neo-Kantianism, the three difficulties identified in the reception of the phenomenon of Russian neo-Kantianism taken as a whole, are consistently revealed in the content of the proposed article, supplemented by a brief overview of the most systemic positions of Russian philosophers, ranked among Russian neo-Kantianism. Overcoming the indicated difficulties, which undoubtedly affect the objective disclosure of the creativity of each representative of Russian neo-Kantianism or thinkers related to them, seems appropriate not only from the standpoint of the history of philosophy, but also for actualizing the heritage of philosophers in the conditions of modern socio-humanitarian pragmatics. Russian neo-Kantianism The author of the article suggests that one of the ways to overcome the ambiguity of the definition of Russian neo-Kantianism in the history of Russian thought may be, firstly, a more detailed consecration of the activities of Russian neo-Kantians in the historical and philosophical literature, and secondly, a comprehensive representation of this direction, including studies of individual personalities and their works. Despite the controversial and polemical nature of the task, its formulation is necessary for the objectivity of the meaning of Russian thought in the global context.

scholarly journals Expanding or limiting the boundaries of the “allowable”: to the problem of outlining the concept of “religious art”

2020 ◽  
pp. 76-88
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Aleksandrovich Golovushkin ◽  
Irina Ravkatovna Gumarova
Keyword(s):  
Broad Sense ◽  
Religious Art ◽  
Narrow Sense ◽  
Religious Worldview ◽  
History Of Art ◽  
History Of ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Historical Periods ◽  
Terminological Confusion

Religious art is one of the most complex and controversial phenomena in the history of art. The attempts to conceptualize this phenomenon are relatively recent, and are carried out mostly in the context of the existence of confessional, ecclesiastical/nonecclesiastical, cult/atheistic art. Therefore, religious art within the Russian humanities traditionally receives ambivalent interpretation. In a narrow sense, religious art implies a combination of artworks with dogmatic, doctrinal, and liturgical meaning. In a broad sense, religious art represents a set artworks that reveal religious themes from ideological and figurative perspectives, reflect religious worldview, faith and experience, but do not carry sacred statues, nor intended for reverence, worship, liturgical practices.  The author concludes that neither definition describes the distinctness and novelty of the religious art. The appropriate interpretation describes religious art as d both, ecclesiastical/non-ecclesiastical and cult / atheistic art. This leads to a terminological confusion, and doubts the need for introducing the concept of “religious art” and the phenomenon itself. The key towards understanding this phenomenon and a new definition of the concept of “religious art” can be their context – the European and Russian secularization. It is not coincidental that the first was addressed, and the second was deliberately formulated at the turn of the XIX – XX centuries. Religious art mainstreams during the historical periods when the boundaries of secularization/religion become flexible, initiating struggle for them.

scholarly journals CONTEMPORARY ART IN THE CONTEXT OF TEACHING PRACTICES: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

2019 ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
N.V. Shmeleva ◽  
A.K. Saimiddinov
Keyword(s):  
Contemporary Art ◽  
University Education ◽  
Pedagogical Practice ◽  
Art Teaching ◽  
History Of Art ◽  
The Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Or History ◽  
Selection Of

The article considers the status of contemporary art in the system of university education, addresses the need for determine the boundaries of art in the framework of pedagogical practice, offers methods of analysis of contemporary art, because such university courses as "World Art Studies" (WAS) and "History of Art" have a number of specific features. Firstly, a work of art is often presented as a cultural text with significant axiological meaning and considered as a history of the development of art, but not as art itself. Secondly, the logic of teaching requires the definition of clearer tools for the selection of studied works of art. Also, the teaching methods such disciplines as "WAS" or "History of Art" are closely intertwined with methods of analyzing the existing empirical base in the field of contemporary (or near modern) art. Teaching of artistic culture of the twentieth century, as a rule, rests in an insufficient understanding of the specifics of creative practices of the Modern and Postmodern eras (if you use some kind of common periodicals), therefore, often, extrapolating an established didactic platform relating exclusively to classical art is clearly not enough.

Essence of Color and Its Value in the Fine Art

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 87-93
Author(s):  
Юматова ◽  
T. Yumatova
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Fine Art ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
History Of Art ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Culture

A paper "Essence of color" in an integrated manner, not only in cultural synthesis, but also in scientific one, reveals problems of the color: its physical properties and aesthetics in the perspective of modern educational process. The points raised in this paper can serve as a new integrated approach to the phenomenon of color, as well as the basis for the development of learning and teaching programs on a range of academic disciplines: "History of art", "History of culture", "Chromatics", "Painting".

Pedagogy of leisure as a direction in modern socio-cultural education and upbringing

2020 ◽  
pp. 132-138
Author(s):  
Ivan A. Chernikov
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Studies ◽  
Cultural Education ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Leisure Studies ◽  
Cultural Activities ◽  
Self Development ◽  
Scientific Status ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Scientific Pedagogical

We make attempt to understand the scientific status of leisure pedagogy and its relationship with other scientific and pedagogical directions, primarily with the theory, methods and organization of socio-cultural activities. It is shown that the source for identifying the specifics of leisure pedagogy are leisure studies conducted by domestic and foreign scientists from the positions of sociology and cultural studies of leisure. Based on the analysis of recent scientific publications (N.I. Bocharova, A.F. Volovik, V.P. Krestyanov, G.A. Oparin, O.G. Tikhonova, N.V. Sharkovskaya et al.) we give the author’s definition of leisure pedagogy as an integral and systemically organized scientific-pedagogical and practice-oriented direction in modern socio-cultural education and upbringing, revealing the regularities of the pedagogical process in the field of leisure. The special mission of leisure pedagogy is to provide conditions for the formation of an individual’s ability to self-development in the field of leisure, to increase their own leisure competence.

Memory and Remembering in Oral History

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alistair Thomson
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Studies ◽  
Oral History ◽  
Social Relationships ◽  
Narrative Theory ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Active Process ◽  
Memory Research ◽  
History Of

Memory is not a passive depository of facts, but an active process of creation of meanings. This article focuses on the importance of memory and remembering in oral history. The literature about memory ranges across several academic disciplines and is daunting in size and scope. This article also considers approaches to memory and remembering, which can enhance oral historians' understanding of the interview and its interpretation. It begins by charting the history of oral historians' approaches to memory and then distills current research about memory and remembering—from cultural studies, and narrative theory. It explores the idea of memory research by arguing that remembering is not like playing back a tape or looking at a picture; more like telling a story. The consistency and accuracy of memories is therefore an achievement, not a mechanical production. It also explains ideas of narrative theory, memory paradox and social relationships against the backdrop of oral history.

scholarly journals Study of Khanty folklore in Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Yugra in the first decades of the XXI century

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 760-773
Author(s):  
T. V. Voldina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Folk Art ◽  
Current Situation ◽  
Special Study ◽  
Field Of Study ◽  
Internet Resources ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

Introduction: the history of collection, publication, and scientific functioning of Khanty folklore is the subject of special study. The period from the middle of the XIX to the end of the XX century found its coverage in the author’s special works. The article is devoted to modern research on Khanty folklore, covering the first decades of the XXI century, the main trends in the study of oral folk art of the Khanty people in this period. Objective: to identify the main trends in the study of the first two decades of the XXI century in the field of study of Khanty folklore on the territory of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Yugra with the definition of key directions, results, current problems and tasks. Research materials: collections on Khanty folklore, as well as data in Internet resources containing Khanty folklore texts. Results and novelty of the research: the work is a continuation of the author’s research on the history of the study of Khanty folklore. It presents new – the 7th stage, reflecting the current situation in this area. It includes the publication of materials, publications in literary processing, the formation of Internet resources, and research. The author touches upon the problems related to the change of conditions of Khanty folklore existence at the beginning of the XXI century and determination of the prospects for its further study.

Towards the digital land reclamation

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Sergey Vasil'ev ◽  
Vyacheslav Schedrin ◽  
Aleksandra Slabunova ◽  
Vladimir Slabunov
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Land Reclamation ◽  
Practical Experience ◽  
Maximum Effect ◽  
Optimal Management ◽  
Scientific Potential ◽  
History Of ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Full Cooperation

The aim of the research is a retrospective analysis of the history and stages of development of digital land reclamation in Russia, the definition of «Digital land reclamation» and trends in its further development. In the framework of the retrospective analysis the main stages of melioration formation are determined. To achieve the maximum effect of the «digital reclamation» requires full cooperation of practical experience and scientific potential accumulated throughout the history of the reclamation complex, and the latest achievements of science and technology, which is currently possible only through the full digitalization of reclamation activities. The introduction of «digital reclamation» will achieve greater potential and effect in the modernization of the reclamation industry in the «hightech industry», through the use of innovative developments and optimal management decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document