scholarly journals KARAKTERISTIK AKTA OTENTIK PADA AKTA RISALAH LELANG

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Erik ◽  
Triyanto Triyanto ◽  
Rusdiyanto Sesung

Notary Public Officer has the duty to make an authentic deed and dare to make the deed of minutes of auction. One of the hallmark of the Auction of Minutes of Deed is made by the Auction Officer appointed by the Minister of Finance. The strength of the proof consists of the power of proof of birth, formal and material relationships has been regulated in Article 1868 of the Civil Code. Is the Deed of Minutes auction referred to the Authentic Deed. Make the form of the deed determined by law. The result of this thesis research is the status of the Auction of Minutes of the Auction referred to as the authentication deed because (1) the form of the authentic deed is the drafting of the law (Articles 37, 38 and 39 Vendu Reglement, (2) the original deed must be made by or against the general officials The auction is made by the auction official (3) of what authority, when and where the deed was made. (Articles 3 and 7 Vendu Reglement) is determined by the Minister of Finance. The Power of Evidence On The Deed of Auction Minutes As an authentic deed, In Article 35 of the Vendu Reglement from which "From every public sale by the Auction Officer or his proxy, during the sale, for each day of auction or sale shall be made separate news event". Here it is clear that the Auction Risks must be made by an authentic deed, as the auction treatise has a perfect proof of power on what is contained therein.

THE BULLETIN ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (390) ◽  
pp. 250-255
Author(s):  
K. S. Zhylkichieva ◽  
A. A. Kalybaeva ◽  
G. Zh. Koshokova

The article analyzes using the normative and systematic methods, as well as analysis and synthesis, the content of the statements of Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic, Civil Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, Criminal Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Law of the Kyrgyz Republic «About Normative Legal Acts of the Kyrgyz Republic», the Law of the Kyrgyz Republic «On the Regulations of the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic» and the works of the legal scholars. It examined the provisions of laws adopted for general regulation and concludes they are serious problems, because of them there is a "blurring" of the contour of the legislation on legal entities in the article. The publication supports the opinion of the authors of the Concept for Development, according to which the regulation of the status of legal entities in the civil legal field can be characterized by a set of the laws and regula-tions in force in the Kyrgyz Republic, which do not always correspond to each other, as well as to the Civil Code. The low legal and technical level and ineffectiveness in practice are also shown by some adopted laws. It noted the Civil Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, adopted on May 8, 1996, created the new foundation for the regulation of legal entities, which was supplemented by many new laws over the next decades in the article. The authors come to the conclusion the fairly honest assessment can be applied to the established regulation – that with the main vector of development of the Concept of Civil Legislation in Kyrgyzstan, in general, there is an economic, social and well-grounded the logic and generally justifiable modern civil law in relation to legal entities. But at the same time, for many problems, correct solutions have not yet been found and no efficiency ratings have been given.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-105
Author(s):  
Indah Parmitasari

This article seeks to discuss the authentication of financing contracts in Islamic banking in the use of lafadz basmallah. The problem discussed is how to authenticate the financing contract deed in Islamic banking in the use of lafadz basmallah. Every financing activity in Islamic banking is made in a contract, to get certainty and strength of perfect proof, the bank wants the contract to be made in an authentic deed. An authentic deed is a deed made by or in the presence of an authorized official for that purpose is made according to the provisions of the law. Notary as the official in charge of making the deed is guided by Article 38 of the Notary Position Law. A deed must fulfill the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code, which is made by and or before an authorized official, and made a public official who has the authority. The notary is authorized as long as the certificate, person, place and time of the deed are made. This article concludes that the financing contract deed in Islamic banking that contains lafadz basmallah at the beginning of the deed does not meet the requirements of Article 1868 of the Civil Code, because it violates the provisions of Article 38 of the Notary Position Law so that the status of the act is degraded into a deed under the hand. Abstrak Artikel ini membahas tentang autentikasi akad pembiayaan pada perbankan syariah dalam penggunaan lafadz basmallah. Permasalahan yang dibahas adalah bagaimana keautentikan akta akad pembiayaan pada perbankan syariah dalam penggunaan lafadz basmallah. Setiap kegiatan pembiayaan dalam perbankan syariah dibuat dalam suatu akad, guna mendapatkan kepastian dan kekuatan pembuktian yang kuat, bank menghendaki akad dibuat dalam bentuk akta autentik. Akta autentik adalah akta yang dibuat oleh atau di hadapan pejabat yang berwenang untuk itu sesuai dengan ketentuan undang-undang. Notaris sebagai pejabat yang berwenang dalam membuat akta berpedoman pada Pasal 38 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris tentang bentuk akta. Suatu akta harus memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 1868 KUH Perdata, yaitu dibuat oleh dan atau di hadapan pejabat yang berwenang, dibuat menurut ketentuan undang-undang. Notaris berwenang sepanjang mengenai aktanya, orangnya, tempat dan waktunya akta dibuat. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa akta akad pembiayaan pada perbankan syariah yang memuat lafadz basmallah pada awal akta kedudukannya bukan lagi sebagai akta autentik tetapi terdegradasi menjadi akta di bawah tangan, karena syarat otentisitas Pasal 1868 KUH Perdata tidak terpenuhi, yaitu syarat formalitas sesuai Pasal 38 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Perubahan.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-229
Author(s):  
Diah Ayu Saraswita

According to the law notarial deed has specific or special technique, language, form and section. Notarial deed is also one of the written evidence as stated in the Civil Code Article 1866. Indonesia Notary Community utilizes barcode technology advancements to checking the authenticity of a deed namely by storing and reading information digitally about deed made by the Notary Public regarding the deed’s title and deed’s number. This research shows that the use of a barcode system with the aim of securing a notarial deed must be mandated and used for good purposes namely for interested parties and this is a form of Notary services to the public so that the notarial deed is kept safe and cannot be misused by those who want to abuse


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alur Anzarwati Sekoningtias ◽  
Nynda Fatmawati Octarina

Land is an important thing in the life of the Indonesian nation. One way to obtain land is through buying and selling. Sale and purchase of land rights as set forth in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. the fulfillment of all requirements relating to the sale and purchase in the presence of a notary then found a legal breakthrough and up to now still be done in the practice of buying and selling land that is made with the deed of binding sale and purchase agreement (PPJB) although the contents have been set about the sale and purchase of land but the new format limited binding of sale and purchase is a form of agreement which is or can be regarded as preliminary agreement. This study is a type of normative legal research ie research where in which researchers review the study documents that use various secondary data such as judicial decision legislation, legal theory. Based on the results of research First Characteristics of land sale and purchase agreement with the status of petok D following the general provisions of the law of agreement as set forth in Article 1457 of the Civil Code. It's just that the object of sale and purchase of land with the status of petok D, then apply the procedure agreement by using provisions that are more specific that is based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on land registration. Second The effect of the law on the parties if one party has defaulted in the binding of the land sale and purchase agreement with the status of petok D according to the Civil Code is canceled so that it is made based on Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 due to the seller can not fulfill its obligation.  Keywords : Sale and purchase land of petok D, binding sale and purchase agreement.          ABSTRAK Tanah adalah hal yang penting dalam kehidupan bangsa Indonesia. Salah  satu cara memperoleh tanah adalah melalui jual beli. Jual beli hak atas tanah seperti yang telah diatur dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.pemenuhan terhadap semua persyaratan yang berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan jual beli di hadapan notaris maka ditemukan suatu terobosan hukum dan hingga kini masih dilakukan dalam praktek jual beli tanah yaitu dengan dibuatnya akta pengikatan perjanjian jual beli (PPJB) meskipun isinya sudah mengatur tentang jual beli tanah namun formatnya baru sebatas pengikatan jual beli yaitu suatu bentuk perjanjian yang merupakan atau dapat dikatakan sebagai perjanjian pendahuluan. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif yakni penelitian dimana didalamnya peneliti mengkaji studi dokumen yakni menggunakan berbagai data sekunder seperti perundang-undangan keputusan pengadilan, teori hukum. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian PertamaKarakteristik perjanjian jual beli tanah yang berstatus petok D mengikuti ketentuan umum hukum perjanjian sebagaimana yang telah diatur didalam Pasal 1457 KUHPerdata. Hanya saja obyek jual beli tanah berstatus petok D maka diberlakukan tata cara perjanjian dengan menggunakan ketentuan yang sifatnya lebih khusus yaitu berpedoman pada Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 tahun 1997 tentang pendaftaran tanah.Kedua Akibat hukum terhadap para pihak apabila salah satu pihak melakukan wanprestasi dalam pengikatan perjanjian jual beli tanah yang berstatus petok D menurut KUHPerdata dibatalkan sehingga yang dibuat berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 tahun 1997 akibat penjual tidak dapat memenuhi kewajibannya.Kata Kunci : Jual beli tanah petok D, Perjanjian Pengikatan jual beli.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Tomasz Pałdyna

INTERPRETATION OF TESTAMENTS MADE BEFORE A NOTARYSummary The article deals with problems connected with interpretation of testaments made before a notary. Following a brief introduction describing the notion of a testament as well as characteristics of this legal transaction and general remarks on a testament form, including a notary act form, the article focuses on interpretation of a testators declaration pointing at basic rules which should govern interpretation of a last will included in a notary act.Testament’s interpretation aim is to establish testator’s actual will recorded in the testament. Real life experience shows that many a time testamentary dispositions are very imprecise not to say unclear. Interpretation problems occur more often with personally written testaments than with testaments made before a notary thanks to professional knowledge of a person participating in preparation of a „last will” statement. A notary who takes down in writing bequeather’s will is working with him / her on the wording of the declaration of will. However, it happens that formulation of notarial will also raises doubts about bequeather’s actual will.For notarial wills, the rules stated in Article 948 of the Civil Code are binding, with the assumption of the testament „co-author’s” professionalism.Participation of a notary in drawing up a testament implies that law or legal terms included in the document carry the meaning used by legislators (Acc. to: E. Skowrońska, comments on SN law of 16 September 1993, III CZP 122/93, published in OSP in 1994 year, no. 10, item 177) and lawyers in their register. In case of contradictory content of a notarial will, by using the above mentioned interpretation principle, the interpretation results established for such a declaration of will could be very different from those established, if testator’s last will was expressed in a personally written testament. Thus, apparently, not only the testament’s content but also its form may influence interpretation result.Sometimes, a testament made before a notary uses plain language inappropriately. Testament’s content may include records understandable only to the testator and people from his/her surroundings. A testator may, even unintentionally, mislead a notary about his/her actual will.For notarial wills, the problem of ignorance of law is ruled out. This applies particularly to a rule of law concerning succession, but also to different ones (for example, to a rule concerning property regulations). It is assumed that a bequeather realizes consequences of his/her dispositions. He should be instructed about the consequences by a notary (Art. 80 § 3 of the Law on Notary Public). Therefore, in case of ambiguity (art. 948, paragraph 2 of the Civil Code) the interpretation which is rational not only from life but also from legal perspective, should be given precedence. For testaments prepared by a testator personally, presumption of knowledge of law is not valid.Beginning interpretation of declaration of will included in a notary act we assume that bequeather’s disposition is lawful and consistent with the rules of social intercourse, and that it does not aim to evade the law (article 58 of the Civil Code). A notary is obliged to refuse performance of transaction which is against the law (Art. 81 of the Law on Notary Public).As for testaments made before a notary, it may well be assumed that a document tendered in court is the testament of the person concerned (actually, it is an extract from the document) (Contradictory thesis requires refutation of presumption according to art. 247 of the Civil Proceeding’s Code), and also, that at the moment of drawing up the testament the testator had ability to bequeath and that his/her declaration of will is not defective. It should also be assumed that for testaments made before a notary a plea of lack of will to testate may be raised in very exceptional situations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-222
Author(s):  
Rr. Dwini Imananda Noegroho

According to the law notarial deed has specific or special technique, language, form and section. Notarial deed is also one of the written evidence as stated in the Civil Code Article 1866. Indonesia Notary Community utilizes barcode technology advancements to checking the authenticity of a deed namely by storing and reading information digitally about deed made by the Notary Public regarding the deed’s title and deed’s number. This research shows that the use of a barcode system with the aim of securing a notarial deed must be mandated and used for good purposes namely for interested parties and this is a form of Notary services to the public so that the notarial deed is kept safe and cannot be misused by those who want to abuse


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-99
Author(s):  
Agus Kurniawan

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan perlindungan hukum hak-hak tenaga kerja yang perusahaannya diputus Pailit. Permasalahan penelitian, Pertama, Bagaimanakah Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Pegawai Dalam Kepailitan Perusahaan; Kedua, Bagaimanakah Upaya Hukum Yang Dapat Dilakukan Pekerja Jika Tidak Memperoleh Hak Sebagai Kreditor Istimewa/Preference. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yang bersifat kualitatif. Hasil penelitian bahwa Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak-hak karyawan dalam kepailitan perseroan adalah melindungi hak-hak dan kepentingan dari para karyawan selaku stakeholders perusahaan. Kewenangan pengadilan niaga dalam tuntutan karyawan atas upah atau uang pesangon yang tidak dibayar oleh perseroan dalam memindahkan kewenangan mutlak (absolut) dari pengadilan umum untuk memeriksa permohonan pailit. upah pekerja dalam pemenuhan adalah utang harta pailit, sebelum didistribusikan kepada kreditor biaya kepailitan harus dibayar didahulukan, termasuk kreditor separatis. This study aims to analyze the authority of the police investigation and investigation process of notaries. Research problems, First. what is the authority of the police in the process of investigating and investigating notaries. Second, how does the legal protection of notaries in the process of investigation and investigation ?. The results showed that the authority of the Police in the process of investigating and investigating Notaries after the issuance of the Law of Notary Position Number 2 of 2014 was that between the Police and Notary Public must understand about their respective authorities that have been regulated by the Law, namely if the Notary Public has a problem with the deed he made then the Police / Investigator can call the Notary public directly as a witness / suspect but on the other hand the Notary in assuming his position has the right to deny the confidentiality of his act in accordance with Article 4 Jo Article 16 Jo Article 54 Jo Law No. 2 of 2014, then based on Article 170 paragraph 1 KUHAP and Article 1909 paragraph 2 number 3e of the Civil Code in this case the Police must also understand the principle of legal presumption (Vermoedanvan Rechtmatigheid) or Presumptio lustae Causa


Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Deby Wulandari

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 Year 2004 concerning Notary Position (UUJN) gives authority to notaries to make an agreement. According to that regulation, of course the notary has an important role in the making of the land sale and purchase agreement. A land sale and purchase agreement must meet the subjective requirements and objective requirements as contained in Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). The problems that occur are: (1) How is the position of the deed of binding agreement on the sale and purchase of land containing legal defects? and (2) How is the notary's responsibility related to the cancellation of the binding contract of sale and purchase agreement due to a legal defect in its manufacture? The type of this research is legal research. The results of this research indicate that the position of the deed of binding agreement on sale and purchase of land that contains legal defects is not as a deed that has perfect proof power, so that the law can be canceled or null and void by law. This is related to subjective requirements and objective conditions in the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code. The responsibility of the notary is related to the cancellation of the binding agreement on the sale and purchase of land due to a legal defect in the form of notary public, criminal, administrative, and notary codes of conduct. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) memberikan kewenangan kepada notaris untuk membuat suatu perjanjian. Terkait dengan hal tersebut tentunya notaris memiliki peran penting dalam pembuatan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) tanah. Suatu perjanjian jual beli tanah harus memenuhi syarat subjektif dan syarat objektif sebagaimana terkadung dalam Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata). Permasalahan yang terjadi yaitu: (1) Bagaimanakah kedudukan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah yang mengandung cacat hukum? dan (2) Bagaimanakah pertanggungjawaban notaris terkait dengan batalnya akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah diakibatkan adanya cacat hukum dalam pembuatannya?. Penelitian ini beranjak dari penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa kedudukan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah yang mengandung cacat hukum yaitu tidak sebagai akta yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna, sehingga berakibat hukum akta dapat dibatalkan atau batal demi hukum. Hal ini berkaitan dengan syarat subjektif dan syarat objektif dalam ketentuan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata. Pertanggungjawaban notaris terkait dengan batalnya akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah diakibatkan adanya cacat hukum dalam pembuatannya yaitu notaris dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata, pidana, administrasi, dan terhadap kode etik notaris.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document