scholarly journals LEGAL REGULATION OF THE FINANCIAL SUPPLY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Ian Bernaziuk ◽  
Nataliia Kovalenko
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Financial Support ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Financial Independence ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Political Transformations ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Constitutional Justice

The aim of the article is to study the history and modernity, the doctrine and practice of legal regulation of financial support of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. The subject of the study is the legal regulation of the financial support of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Methodology. Scientific research is based on the use of philosophical, general scientific and special scientific methods and techniques of scientific knowledge. The dialectical method allowed considering the legal regulation of the financial support of the functioning of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in development and interaction with other social and legal phenomena. The historical method is aimed at reconstructing the genesis of legal regulation of the financial support of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine at various stages of its formation. The formal legal method enabled to characterize the specificities of the legal regulation of financial support of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine by legal constructions and legal terminology. Comparative legal method contributed to the study of the specifics of the legal regulation of financial guarantees of the independence of constitutional justice bodies in certain countries of the world. The results of the study revealed that the characteristic feature of socio-political transformations in modern Ukrainian society is ongoing reformation of constitutional justice, one task of which is to strengthen the financial independence of the CCU as potentially the most effective institution for the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms, establishment of legal, constitutional Ukraine. Practical implications. In the study, firstly, the views of experts on the legal regulation and practice of financing the Constitutional Court of Ukraine as a body of constitutional jurisdiction were considered; secondly, the specificities of legal regulation of financing of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine before the reform of constitutional justice in 2016–2017 were studied; thirdly, the current state and prospects of improving the financial support of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine were analysed. Relevance/originality. On the basis of a comprehensive study of the constitutional doctrine, domestic and foreign legislation and practice of its implementation, directions of strengthening the financial independence of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine are proposed.

scholarly journals PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF CITIZENS BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 134-139
Author(s):  
Mykola Inshyn ◽  
Yurii Міroshnychenko ◽  
Yurii Paida
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Compliance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Cultural Rights ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Constitutional Justice ◽  
Legal Concepts

The aim of the article is to explore the place and role of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the mechanism of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms protection within the context of Ukrainian constitutional justice reforming. The subject of research is the protection of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Methodology. Scientific research is based on the use of philosophical, general, and special scientific methods and techniques of scientific cognition. The dialectic method allows examining the phenomenon of protection of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine within the dynamics of its evolution and interaction with other legal concepts. The systemic method made it possible to present the mechanism of protection of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens as a combination of interrelated elements. The formal-legal method was used to analyse the regulatory framework of protection of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine along with relevant decisions of this judicial body. Results obtained upon completion of the research give an opportunity to claim that the protection of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine may be performed on the basis of both direct and indirect access of persons to the constitutional jurisdiction body through the regulatory compliance assessment (constitutional recourse and initiation of legal action by certain state power bodies and its officials through constitutional claim filing). Practical outcomes. Research provides: examination of doctrinal and applicable aspects of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine activity on the protection of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens; characteristics of general theoretical essence of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens with distinguished types; analysis of peculiarities of protection of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the course of its powers exercising. Value/originality. On the basis of a comprehensive study of constitutional doctrine, Ukrainian legislation and implementation practices certain proposals are elaborated regarding the improvement of the effectiveness of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine activity in the area of protection of constitutional cultural rights and freedoms of citizens.

scholarly journals The nature of fee charged for provision of public services

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-85
Author(s):  
M. Khoroshaylova
Keyword(s):  
State Power ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Government

The subject. This paper is devoted to the study of the legal nature of fees charged by the public authorities for the provision of public services.The main aim of the paper is to substantiate the answer on the question is this fee a price or a fiscal charge?The methodology of the study includes general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, description) as well as particular academic methods (formal-legal method, interpretation of legal acts). The decisions of Russian Constitutional Court are also analyzed.The main results and scope of their application. The article focuses on analysis of the features and functions of the government, ratio of functions of the government and functions of the public authorities, their powers. State power is exercised by bodies of state power or specially authorized entities on behalf of the state and in the public interest. It excludes the exchange nature of the relations when these bodies and entities implement state power. The nature of the establishment and collection of the fee excludes the equivalence between the size of fee and the size of collection costs of the authorized entity. Therefore, there is no equivalence in the relations on payment of the fee, and therefore the fee has no compensatory character. In turn, the nature of the actions performed by the authorized entity on behalf of and in the interests of the public legal entity, excludes their absolute determi-nation by actions of the payer of the fee. The results of research may become a crucial point for future research of legal regulation of fees.Conclusions. If a public authority carries out activities related to implementation of governmental and authoritative powers, the fee is based on public law. If an activity can not be associated with implementation of governmental and authoritative powers, the fee can be subject to civil law regulation.

scholarly journals Property turnover digitalisation: Interdisciplinary problems of post-classical jurisprudence

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 04001
Author(s):  
Liudmila Yurievna Vasilevskaya ◽  
Vladimir Sergeyevich Belykh ◽  
Tatiana Klavdievna Primak ◽  
Ekaterina Borisovna Poduzova ◽  
Philipp Artemievich Tasalov
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Digital Environment ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Interdisciplinary Problems

The purpose of the research is to consider the key interdisciplinary research and practice problems of the property turnover digitalisation and propose ways to solve them. Elements, phenomena and processes of the digital environment first appeared in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family. By determining the constitutive features of them, the authors turned to classical domestic and foreign legal statutory concepts and policy management. The research was carried out by the comparative-legal method and modelling method. The identification of interdisciplinary research and practice problems as well as methods for solving them was based on the methods for ascent from the abstract to the concrete, induction and deduction. As a result of the implementation of the research objectives through the general scientific and private scientific methods described above, the authors identified the constitutive features of the key elements of property turnover in the digital environment, such as digital currency, smart contract, electronic trading. Identified were both doctrinal and practical problems associated with the essence and features of those elements, as well as the legal regulation of the associated relations. Those elements are considered in two dimensions, in the information system and legal field. In addition, significant gaps in the regulatory framework of the associated relations were identified; the impossibility of applying the classical regime of objects of civil rights and the rules of documentary circulation to digital objects and processes was substantiated. The novelty of the work consists in proposing ways to solve interdisciplinary theoretical and practical problems of the property turnover digitalisation, which are important for a wide range of academic researchers and practitioners in the legal field.

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN IN THE PRACTICE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-187
Author(s):  
Evgeniya V. GERASIMOVA
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Right To Be Forgotten ◽  
Federal Constitutional ◽  
Constitutional Justice ◽  
The Right

The development of digital technologies affects the legal status of an individual. The task of constitutional justice is the constitutional interpretation of new legal phenomena such as the right to be forgotten. This article aims to analyze the right to be forgotten in the decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court and German Constitutional Court in a comparative aspect. The research methodology is primarily a dialectical method. This method helps the author to identify the content of the right to be forgotten, as well as to determine its role in relation to other constitutionally significant values. The comparative legal method is of particular importance for achieving the objectives of the research and helps to highlight the general and specific in the approaches of the courts to the concept of this right. This approach distinguishes the novelty of this research in comparison with other papers. The use of the dialectical and comparative legal research methods allows drawing the following conclusions. The distinctive feature of the right to be forgotten is its dualistic nature. On the one hand, this is a civil right associated with the right to privacy; on the other, it acts as a way to protect other constitutional rights (for example, the dignity of the individual). This right is not absolute. Some information may be of public interest. To resolve the issue of the prevailing constitutionally significant value in a particular case, the Russian Constitutional Court suggests using the method of finding a balance. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany emphasized that the right to free personal development and dignity sometimes prevails over freedom of information, especially considering the time factor in the case, as well as the degree of harm caused to a person by links to information posted on the Internet. The German Federal Constitutional Court, characterizing the legal relationship regarding the exercise of the right to be forgotten, highlights that this is a relationship between private subjects with fundamental rights, and refers to the concept of the horizontal effect of fundamental rights (“mittelbare Drittwirkung”) developed in German constitutional law. This article concludes that the decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany on the right to be forgotten are the guidelines for other courts, as well as the legislator for further improving legal regulation. Taking into account the development of information technologies, the author believes that the constitutional courts will more than once turn to the digital aspects of the legal status of an individual and, in particular, the concept of the right to be forgotten.

Features of the legal status of subjects of Civil Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188
Author(s):  
Iryna I. Banasevych ◽  
Ruslana M. Heints ◽  
Mariia V. Lohvinova ◽  
Oksana S. Oliinyk
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Entities

Theoretical and applied research of the features of the legal status of the subjects of civil law remains debatable today. Doctrinal and legislative analysis of this subject points to unresolved issues in this area. In particular, the provision on defining the state as a party to civil law remains controversial. There is no consensus on the definition of individuals and legal entities as subjects of civil law among scholars. Furthermore, the legal regulation of certain types of entities is somewhat unsystematic and chaotic. This is largely due to the insufficient development of theoretical issues related to the subjects of civil law. The above issues determine the relevance of the study of the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law. The purpose of the study is to investigate the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law based on doctrinal and legislative analysis. The study is based on a systematic approach, which lies in studying a complex system of relationships between subjects of civil law. Furthermore, the study is based on the laws and principles of dialectics, which contribute to the study of the legal status of the subjects of civil law. Systemic and structural-functional analysis was used to comprehensively describe the legal status of subjects of civil law. The historical method contributed to the study of the evolution of research on the subjects of civil law. The formal legal method helped identify the special features of the provisions of regulations concerning the subjects of civil law. With the help of the comparative legal method, the study analysed the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine in terms of regulation of subjects of civil law and such regulation was compared with other countries. The study defined the concepts and types of subjects of civil law and considered the features of the legal status of individuals, legal entities, as well as the state as a special participant of civil law. Special attention was paid to the historical analysis of the development of approaches to the definition of subjects of law, starting with Roman law

scholarly journals Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirill Andreevich Pisenko ◽  
Stanislav Lvovich Botvinnik
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Philosophical Perspective ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Dominant Party ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
General Logic ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Antitrust Regulation

Legal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party raise a number of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the article try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this violation in order to ensure the balance of convenience. From the philosophical perspective and a certain worldview, the study is based on the balance of convenience regarded as the objective foundation of legal regulation. The main philosophical and scientific methods used in this article include the dialectic method, the formal-legal method, the method of legal hermeneutics, as well as the comparative-legal and empirical methods. The theoretical basis is represented by scientific works in the field of civil, administrative, entrepreneurial and procedural branches of law. The legal nature of imposition as a type of violation should be determined with due regard to the general logic of antitrust regulation. The parallel use of both public and private law necessitates the development of procedural legal means ensuring uniform law enforcement and the balance of convenience. First of all, the unity of approaches regarding legal tools of public and civil law should be concerned with the definition of features and the essence of elements compiling the imposition itself. The authors also propose approaches to the formation of an appropriate procedural model.

scholarly journals Correlation between the principle of justice and legal axioms

2020 ◽  
pp. 64-78
Author(s):  
Anton Nikolaevich Rundkvist
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Original Definition ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Primary Reference ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
New Perspective

The objects of this research are the principle of justice as a universal fundamental, cornerstone and key cohesive general legal superprinciple and the legal axioms as transmitters of most objectified legal justice reflected in simple and clear formulations. The subject of this research is correlation between the aforementioned concepts, which allows looking at the problem of indeterminacy of the content of the principle of justice from a new perspective, namely through indicating the violation of legal axioms as one of criterions of ultimate injustice. Methodological framework is comprised of the general scientific methods of deduction, induction, analysis and synthesis, as well as sociological method of content analysis used examination of the materials of law enforcement practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The work yielded the following results: 1) substantiation is made on the key role of the principle of justice in law as a whole; 2) an original definition is given to the legal axioms ; 3) demarcation is drawn between legal axioms and legal principles in accordance with the criteria of external manifestation, evidence of conformity or nonconformity, nature of action, and depending on the presence or absence of systemic links, which is important from theoretical and practical perspectives, 4) a direct correlation is established between noncompliance with legal axioms and the loss of baseline claim to justice by legal regulation. The theoretical novelty of this work consists in the fact that legal axioms that establish the generally accepted imperative rules are viewed as a primary reference point for resolving the issue on possible violation of the principle of justice

scholarly journals Principle of Equality in Decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine

2020 ◽  
pp. 45-58
Author(s):  
Мariana АNDRYTS
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Public Space ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Substantive Content ◽  
The Right

The article analyzes the implementation of the principle of equality in the constitutional legal proceedings of Ukraine nowadays. It has been established that this principle is reflected in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine: 1) equality of citizens before the law, which does not exclude differentiation of legal regulation, is guaranteed by the prohibition of «negative discrimination» and is not absolute in scope; 2) equality of everyone (i.e. citizens of Ukraine, foreigners, stateless persons) before the court, including equality of all participants of the judicial process; 3) equality of citizens in duties, which means their equal subordination to the laws of Ukraine; 4) equality (equal significance) of rights and freedoms, the manifestation of which is the equality of material and procedural rights, the equality of positive and negative rights. On the basis of the analysis of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, a number of «ontological factors» that determine the principle of equality and are considered methodologically important for legal characterization, have been identified. The first of the proposed factors is the sphere of social life, i.e. the part of the public space that has become «discriminatorily vulnerable», and in light of this the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in respect of the principle of equality in the sphere of realization of electoral rights, labor rights, property rights etc. have been systematized. The second factor can be considered the peculiarities (nature) of legal rights that are «in the area of discriminatory risk», which affects the functions of certain legal means of ensuring equality, in particular, the functions of the so-called legislative qualifications. A third reviewed factor is the relationship between human and civil rights. The dependence of the content and scope of the principle of equality on the joint realization of the right to education and the right to free development of one’s personality; the right to housing and freedom of movement and free choice of place of residence. The fourth factor of the substantive content of the principle of equality is the criteria of differentiation of legal regulation, namely, «appropriateness» (economic, political, social), «justifiability in a democratic society» and «relevance». The fifth factor is associated with the specificity of guarantees of ensuring the principle under consideration, among which — «accessibility», «free-of-charge» basis of education and health care. As the sixth factor, the correlation of the principle of equality with other principles of law, in particular, with the principles of justice, freedom, presumption of innocence and inadmissibility to hold a person responsible for refusing to testify against him/her, has been substantiated. Keywords: rule of law, legal principles, human rights and freedoms, The Constitutional Court of Ukraine, principle of equality.

scholarly journals To the Peculiarities of Legal and Non-Legal Regulation of Social Relations in the Field of Sport

Retos ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 131-137
Author(s):  
Evgen Kharytonov ◽  
Olena Kharytonova ◽  
Anatoliy Kostruba ◽  
Maxym Tkalych ◽  
Yuliia Tolmachevska
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Scientific Cognition ◽  
Sports Organizations ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
Special Area ◽  
Sports Officials

Sport is a unique area of social relations, which is officially autonomous and ruled not only and not so much by national law, but to a greater extent – by the rules of sports organizations. Due to the fact that sport has an autonomous character, which, in particular, is characterized by the presence of various regulatory sources that comprehensively affect the relevant social relations, the concept of a unique "sports legal order" is now beginning to take shape. The study aims to analyze social relations in the field of sport and the peculiarities of their regulation. Moreover, the research methodology includes a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which are the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, formal-logical method, historical method and comparative legal method. Regulation of relations in the field of sports is significantly different from the regulation of other social relations. The presence of such features gives grounds for sports officials to declare the special status of the field of sports and the need to remove it from the general legal order. As a result of the study, the authors of the article came to the conclusion that modern sport has an autonomous status and is a special area of legal and non-legal regulation, which has the characteristics of an independent legal order. At the same time, it is too early to claim the existence of a full-fledged “sports legal order”. Resumen. El deporte es un área única de las relaciones sociales, que es oficialmente autónoma y se rige no solo y no tanto por la legislación nacional, sino en mayor medida, por las reglas de las organizaciones deportivas. Debido a que el deporte tiene un carácter autónomo, que, en particular, se caracteriza por la presencia de diversas fuentes regulatorias que inciden de manera integral en las relaciones sociales relevantes, comienza a tomar forma el concepto de un “orden jurídico deportivo” único. El estudio tiene como objetivo analizar las relaciones sociales en el ámbito del deporte y las peculiaridades de su regulación. Además, la metodología de investigación incluye un conjunto de métodos de cognición científica, entre los que se encuentran los métodos de análisis, síntesis, inducción, deducción, método lógico-formal, método histórico y método jurídico comparado. La regulación de las relaciones en el campo del deporte es significativamente diferente de la regulación de otras relaciones sociales. La presencia de tales características da motivos para que los oficiales deportivos declaren el estatus especial del campo de los deportes y la necesidad de eliminarlo del orden legal general. Como resultado del estudio, los autores del artículo llegaron a la conclusión de que el deporte moderno tiene un estatus autónomo y es un área especial de regulación legal y no legal, que tiene las características de un orden legal independiente. Al mismo tiempo, es demasiado pronto para afirmar la existencia de un “orden jurídico deportivo” en toda regla.

scholarly journals PROCEDURE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

2016 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Екатерина Ганичева ◽  
Ekaterina Ganicheva
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Former Soviet Union ◽  
Practical Interest ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Constitutional Justice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic

The article is devoted to the problems of development of legislation which determines the procedure of the constitutional proceedings, the procedural status and terms of participants’ activity in the Russian Federation and in the Republic of Belarus. Constitutional justice is a relatively new Institute in a legal system of Russia and other former Soviet republics. Conditions for its formation in the former Soviet Union have common as well as specific features. The comparison of the place and role of the constitutional court in system of public authorities and the procedural legal regulation of the constitutional justice is of obvious scientific and practical interest now because a clear, systematic regulation is very important for creating the conditions to allow objectively and comprehensively examine and resolve the constitutional conflict. Highlighting the characteristic features of the Federal constitutional law «On the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation» and the Law of the Republic of Belarus «On constitutional proceedings», the author comes to the conclusion about the necessity of development and specifying of the activity of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation by improving the using of traditional procedural-legal institutions taking into account the unique status of the highest judicial body of the constitutional control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document