scholarly journals To the Peculiarities of Legal and Non-Legal Regulation of Social Relations in the Field of Sport

Retos ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 131-137
Author(s):  
Evgen Kharytonov ◽  
Olena Kharytonova ◽  
Anatoliy Kostruba ◽  
Maxym Tkalych ◽  
Yuliia Tolmachevska
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Scientific Cognition ◽  
Sports Organizations ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
Special Area ◽  
Sports Officials

Sport is a unique area of social relations, which is officially autonomous and ruled not only and not so much by national law, but to a greater extent – by the rules of sports organizations. Due to the fact that sport has an autonomous character, which, in particular, is characterized by the presence of various regulatory sources that comprehensively affect the relevant social relations, the concept of a unique "sports legal order" is now beginning to take shape. The study aims to analyze social relations in the field of sport and the peculiarities of their regulation. Moreover, the research methodology includes a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which are the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, formal-logical method, historical method and comparative legal method. Regulation of relations in the field of sports is significantly different from the regulation of other social relations. The presence of such features gives grounds for sports officials to declare the special status of the field of sports and the need to remove it from the general legal order. As a result of the study, the authors of the article came to the conclusion that modern sport has an autonomous status and is a special area of legal and non-legal regulation, which has the characteristics of an independent legal order. At the same time, it is too early to claim the existence of a full-fledged “sports legal order”. Resumen. El deporte es un área única de las relaciones sociales, que es oficialmente autónoma y se rige no solo y no tanto por la legislación nacional, sino en mayor medida, por las reglas de las organizaciones deportivas. Debido a que el deporte tiene un carácter autónomo, que, en particular, se caracteriza por la presencia de diversas fuentes regulatorias que inciden de manera integral en las relaciones sociales relevantes, comienza a tomar forma el concepto de un “orden jurídico deportivo” único. El estudio tiene como objetivo analizar las relaciones sociales en el ámbito del deporte y las peculiaridades de su regulación. Además, la metodología de investigación incluye un conjunto de métodos de cognición científica, entre los que se encuentran los métodos de análisis, síntesis, inducción, deducción, método lógico-formal, método histórico y método jurídico comparado. La regulación de las relaciones en el campo del deporte es significativamente diferente de la regulación de otras relaciones sociales. La presencia de tales características da motivos para que los oficiales deportivos declaren el estatus especial del campo de los deportes y la necesidad de eliminarlo del orden legal general. Como resultado del estudio, los autores del artículo llegaron a la conclusión de que el deporte moderno tiene un estatus autónomo y es un área especial de regulación legal y no legal, que tiene las características de un orden legal independiente. Al mismo tiempo, es demasiado pronto para afirmar la existencia de un “orden jurídico deportivo” en toda regla.

scholarly journals LEGAL REGULATION OF PUBLIC RELATIONS IN THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SPHERE: TO THE METHODOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC COGNITION

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
L.A. Gumerov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Theoretical Justification ◽  
Scientific Cognition ◽  
Technical Creativity ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Regulatory Model ◽  
Made In

At present, the legal support of a dynamically developing scientific and technological sphere doesn’t have a proper theoretical justification, in connection with which the attempt made in the article to reveal the methodological base of understanding of legal regulation processes in this field seems relevant. Methodology: dialectics, abstraction, analysis, synthesis, systemic method, formal-legal method. As a result of the research, the factors determining the specifics of the legal regulation of public relations in the scientific and technological sphere are identified. Provisions that have fundamental methodological significance for legal research in the form of conceptual ideas that determine the dialectical development of this sphere as a whole and its legal regulation in particular are substantiated. The concept of “freedom of scientific and technical creativity” was introduced as part of legal science as constitutive for the legal regulation of the scientific and technological sphere. The proposed methodology increases the heuristic ability to identify and study the specifics of the legal regulation of social relations in the scientific and technological sphere, and can also be used in the formation of a theoretical legal regulatory model. Results of a research also can be used in law-making activity, in the course of improvement of state policy in the scientific and technological sphere, in the subsequent scientific research.

Some Problem Aspects of Implementation and Protection of Property Rights of Spouses

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-38
Author(s):  
Tetyana V. Bodnar
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Family Law ◽  
General Rule ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Marriage And Family ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Logical Method

The relevance of research on the problems associated with the implementation by spouses of enshrined in family law property rights and their protection in case of non-recognition, contestation or violation due to the fact that the property rights of spouses form the basis of the legal status of spouses and their implementation serves to strengthen the family’s the material well-being of both spouses and children. The purpose of the study is to identify gaps in legislation governing spouses’ property relations and to determine their impact on securing the enjoyment and protection of their property rights. Various methods of scientific knowledge were used in the research. Thus, the historical method was used in the analysis of the provisions of the Code of Laws on Marriage and Family of Ukraine, which regulated the property rights of spouses and determined ways to protect them. The comparative legal method was used to compare the norms of the CC of Ukraine and the FC of Ukraine governing alike or similar relations, in particular regarding shared ownership, invalidation of contracts and the like. Methods of analysis and synthesis were used to identify the shortcomings and gaps in current family law and in the practice of its application. On the basis of the formal-logical method, proposals for improvement of some provisions of the family law of Ukraine were formulated. The paper considers the general rule that a husband, wife disposes of the property, which is the subject of the joint property right of the spouse, by mutual consent. Another aspect of spousal property rights concerns the maintenance and legal regulation of a spouse. No less problematic aspect of the exercise and protection of property rights of spouses, which is considered in the paper, is the issue of property division. In particular, in case law, when considering cases of separation of property of a spouse, difficulties arise in the event of deviation from the principle of equality of spouses in the circumstances of significant importance. Such circumstances, which were analysed in the article, may be the reasons for both a decrease and an increase in the share of one of the spouses, including the former. The results obtained can be used to improve family law and the practice of its application, in further scientific studies concerning the property rights of spouses, as well as in teaching the course of family law in higher education

Features of the legal status of subjects of Civil Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188
Author(s):  
Iryna I. Banasevych ◽  
Ruslana M. Heints ◽  
Mariia V. Lohvinova ◽  
Oksana S. Oliinyk
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Entities

Theoretical and applied research of the features of the legal status of the subjects of civil law remains debatable today. Doctrinal and legislative analysis of this subject points to unresolved issues in this area. In particular, the provision on defining the state as a party to civil law remains controversial. There is no consensus on the definition of individuals and legal entities as subjects of civil law among scholars. Furthermore, the legal regulation of certain types of entities is somewhat unsystematic and chaotic. This is largely due to the insufficient development of theoretical issues related to the subjects of civil law. The above issues determine the relevance of the study of the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law. The purpose of the study is to investigate the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law based on doctrinal and legislative analysis. The study is based on a systematic approach, which lies in studying a complex system of relationships between subjects of civil law. Furthermore, the study is based on the laws and principles of dialectics, which contribute to the study of the legal status of the subjects of civil law. Systemic and structural-functional analysis was used to comprehensively describe the legal status of subjects of civil law. The historical method contributed to the study of the evolution of research on the subjects of civil law. The formal legal method helped identify the special features of the provisions of regulations concerning the subjects of civil law. With the help of the comparative legal method, the study analysed the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine in terms of regulation of subjects of civil law and such regulation was compared with other countries. The study defined the concepts and types of subjects of civil law and considered the features of the legal status of individuals, legal entities, as well as the state as a special participant of civil law. Special attention was paid to the historical analysis of the development of approaches to the definition of subjects of law, starting with Roman law

scholarly journals The positive legal uncertainty as a technical and legal method of exposition of law

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-444
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Yu. Arkhipova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
Market Relations ◽  
Law Making

Introduction. In modern Russian society with high rates of development of market relations, digitalization of the main spheres of life, popularization of the ideas of self-organization and self-regulation, legal uncertainty acts as a bipolar phenomenon, which is not only a consequence of law-making errors, but an effective technical and legal way of presenting regulations. Theoretical analysis. The historical analysis of the formation and development of ideas of certainty and uncertainty in jurisprudence showed that these categories are considered as universal phenomena characteristic of any matter. It was established that absolute certainty is unattainable and not always in demand, while legal uncertainty is inherent in the very nature of law. Еmpirical analysis. It was revealed that the need to ensure mobility and flexibility of legal regulation imposes the task of a reasonable use of legal uncertainty as a technical and legal way of presenting law on the law-making subject, which is reflected in the current legislation. Results. Legal uncertainty is an objective and inevitable phenomenon, and the total regulation of social relations is not always justified. The law is being improved on the basis of the principle of transition from the casuistic to the abstract, which proves its universality.

scholarly journals THE LEGAL FATE OF THE OBJECTS PLACED IN AREAS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF TERRITORIES IN VIOLATION OF ESTABLISHED RESTRICTIONS

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1063-1077
Author(s):  
Marina S. Muravyeva
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Method Analysis ◽  
Legal Grounds

The author considers the problem of placing buildings, structures and other objects in zones with special conditions for the use of territories in violation of the restrictions on the use of land plots established by law. Until August 2018, this issue was not regulated in the legislation, as well as the legal regime of protected zones and other zones with special conditions for the use of territories was not properly regulated. At the same time, the judicial practice on disputes over the demolition of these objects was not uniform. In connection with the adoption (in August 2018) of legislative acts affecting both the legal regulation of unauthorized buildings and regulation of the legal regime of zones with special conditions for the use of territories, the work makes attempts to analyze the current legislation, the main positions of the courts and understand the reasons that caused the adoption of new legislative acts. The author comes to the conclusion that at present the legal fate of objects located in zones with special conditions for the use of territories in violation of the restrictions established for land plots depends on a number of circumstances identified by the judicial authorities when considering disputes and having been enshrined in the norms of law. The methodological basis of the research is made up of general scientific (in particular, logical) and special legal (formal legal) methods of scientific knowledge. The logical method (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, analogy, etc.) made it possible to identify various legal grounds for the demolition of objects built in zones with special conditions for the use of territories in violation of the established restrictions. With the help of the formal legal method, the court practice of the applying the norms of civil legislation on unauthorized constructions in relation to the placement of objects in zones with special conditions for the use of territories was analyzed.

The Principle of Legal Certainty: whether there Can Be Gaps in the Public Law?

2020 ◽  
Vol 2(22) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Maria A. Kapustina
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Social Regulation ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The Moment

Legal regulation is caused by the necessity to provide legal order of social regulation. The legal order of regulation is provided by formal legal certainty of regulatory provisions (legal prescripts) and their legal substance. However, there exist relations, whose content, namely, subjective rights and juridical responsibilities of the parties are not strictly prescribed in the legislative norms. Because a legislator cannot foresee all the variety of social relations that may occur in real life and prescribe their formal and legal substance in corresponding legislative acts. In such cases, we usually talk about gaps in law, about the uncertainty of legal regulation. Gaps are taken for granted, considered as an obligatory element of any legal system. Nonetheless, whether there can be gaps in the public law, if in the public law sphere norms are created purposively? In public law, norms are created purposefully (with a goal in mind), public law institutions are artificially established and rationally modernized. The lack of a norm of a statute can mean the refusal of the legislator to legally regulate the question, at least at the moment. This is so-called in legal literature “qualified silence of the legislator” that should not be considered as a gap in law.

scholarly journals Aspects of legal regulation of the provision of medical services

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (27) ◽  
pp. 357-366
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Shevchuk ◽  
Volodymyr Maryniv ◽  
Yuliia Mekh ◽  
Oleksandra Shovkoplias ◽  
Oksana Saichuk
Keyword(s):  
Medical Care ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
State Organizations

The article focuses on the need to respect human rights in the provision of medical services in Ukraine. It is strictly unacceptable to restrict citizens of Ukraine in receiving free medical services, since such a right is provided for by Art. 49 of the Constitution of Ukraine. It is proposed to consider that a medical service includes all types of medical care and is a special activity in relation to human health. The concept and main signs of medical services are revealed, it is established that the state, local governments, legal entities and individuals, including the patient, can be the customer of medical services. Ukrainian legislation governing the provision of medical services does not meet international standards. The positive experience of the EU countries (France, Denmark, Slovakia) and the world (Australia, Canada) shows that access to medical services is provided within the framework of medical insurance, in most cases free of charge, and is controlled by authorized state organizations. The purpose of the article is to determine the content, signs of medical services, classification criteria for their subjects, disclose the features of their legal regulation, clarify the problems of legalization of medical services and improve legislation taking into account foreign experience. The research methodology is based on a systematic approach, which is determined by the specifics of the topic of the article, and is also associated with the use of general and special research methods. The comparative legal method and the method of legal analysis were used in the study of legislative rules governing the provision of medical services. Using the method of legal analysis, groups of subjects of medical legal relations in the field of medical services are determined and their powers are analyzed. The formal logical method was used to differentiate the criteria for distinguishing between the legal structures “medical care” and “medical service”. The results of the study contributed to the identification of certain legal problems that arise when citizens receive medical services and require immediate resolution. It is also advisable to introduce compulsory state health insurance.

scholarly journals Genesis and progression of obligations, arising from unjust enrichment: comparative law research

2018 ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
A. I. Ivanchak ◽  
A. A. Kupreenkova
Keyword(s):  
Roman Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Unjust Enrichment ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
American Law ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Uk

Introduction. The article presents a comparative legal analysis of the genesis of the institution of obligations arising from unjust enrichment in countries belonging to different legal families. English and American law as vivid examples of the precedent system of law were chosen for comparison. The comparative research revealed the general and special features of the institution under study, as well as the trends in its functioning and development.Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the research consists of the general scientific and special methods of cognition of legal phenomena and processes in the sphere of international private law: the method of the system-structural analysis; the method of synthesis of social and legal phenomena; the comparative legal method; the formal-logical method; the historical method and others.Results of the study. The results of the research revealed that the institution of obligations arising from unfounded enrichment was embodied in the 20th century in the laws of Russia, the UK and the USA, but still remains at the stage of active development. Formation of the unjust enrichment institution was based in the named countries on the sameprinciples borrowed from Roman law. This approach made a basis for uniformity in the definition of the concept and the actual composition of the unjust enrichment institution. A significant difference in functioning of the unjust enrichment institution was revealed in the mechanism of rights protection.Discussion and conclusion. The institution of obligations arising from the unjust enrichment is a unique institute of civil law that provides for the fullest realization of a person’s right to protection. This legal institution continues to develop, to which the study of its genesis and a foreign experience contributes immensely.

scholarly journals Interim measures in the system of guaranteeing the right to a fair trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 251-256
Author(s):  
V.V. Zaborovsky ◽  
V.V. Manzyuk ◽  
A.V. Stoika
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
Precautionary Measures ◽  
The Right

This research is devoted to the disclosure of the institution of precautionary measures, namely - securing the claim, which is one of the procedural mechanisms for ensuring access to justice. Because it is the possibility of execution of the final court decision that will ensure a fair trial for each participant in the process. To ensure the reliability and completeness of the results obtained by the authors in this study used a set of general and special methods that are characteristic primarily of legal science. The integrated use of such methods ensured the achievement of the purpose and objectives of the study, as well as the persuasiveness of the conclusions. In particular, the dialectical method was used to study the legal nature and significance of the institution of precautionary measures in civil and commercial proceedings. Methods of analysis and synthesis were used in the formulation of basic concepts, such as «precautionary measures», «securing the claim» and so on. The historical and legal method allowed us to focus on the process of legal regulation and legislative consolidation of the institution of security measures. The formal-logical method was used in the analysis of the norms of the current legislation and theoretical developments concerning, in particular, the essence of procedural tools of accessibility or restriction of access to justice. The empirical basis of the study was the materials of domestic judicial practice. Based on the study, the authors conclude that securing the claim as a procedural phenomenon cannot remain unchanged, it acquires new features over time, loses archaic elements, but still does not lose, but rather, on the contrary, increases its importance in modern civil process. Now securing the claim is an integral part of the institution of security measures (along with the provision of evidence), which corresponds to the protected function. Thus, the actual enforcement of court decisions is largely intended to guarantee the institution of securing the claim as one of the types of precautionary measures. Participants in civil proceedings apply to this institution in order to guarantee the execution of future court decisions and prevent them from causing significant harm.

scholarly journals Regulation of beekeeping as a vector of green economy’s institutional development

2021 ◽  
Vol 937 (3) ◽  
pp. 032120
Author(s):  
T Skvortsova ◽  
T Epifanova ◽  
T Pasikova ◽  
N Shatveryan
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Green Economy ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
Cis Countries

Abstract The purpose of the article is to study the aspects of beekeeping regulation as a vector as a vector of green economy’s institutional development. To achieve the objectives indicated, the authors analyze the legal status of bees as objects of legal regulation and legal protection; the beekeeping activity and the legal status of beekeepers and their associations; the issues of state regulation of beekeeping activities. In the course of the study the authors applied the systemic and structural-functional methods of scientific knowledge, the comparative legal method, the method of interpreting legal norms, as well as the logical method. As a result of the study, conclusions were drawn about the need to improve the regulation of beekeeping activities both by the norms of the national legislation of Russia and at the level of the CIS countries. A coordinated state policy to support beekeeping activities within the CIS could significantly affect the development of beekeeping in the CIS countries. In this regard, the proposed measures to improve the legal regulation of beekeeping in Russia and to create mechanisms for state support of beekeeping in the CIS countries are proposed as a vector of institutional development of the green economy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document