Peningkatan Kemampuan Matematika Anak Didik Pemasyarakatan dengan Program Holistik sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan

Kosmik Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Rama Fatahillah Yulianto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Moral Formation ◽  
Math Skills ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Government

Law Number 11 year 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System is a concrete manifestation of Restorative Justice, which regulates diversion, in which Law Enforcement Officials are obliged to seek diversion for children. So far, the education provided by the government for Children in Conflict with the Law is only limited to formal education and moral formation education, no less important than that mathematical ability should also be a concern for the government with a low level of mastery of mathematics in Indonesia. The learning model that emphasizes comfort and pleasure for children is considered to be very effective in teaching math skills to children at LPKA. This study aims to identify a learning model that is in accordance with the characteristics of education in LPKA. So that it is hoped that children after being free can integrate with the community and have the same abilities as children who are outside the institution, as well as improve the self-concept possessed by children. The benefits of this study can provide input in formulating policies regarding the education system in LPKA.Keywords: ABH, Diversion, Education

IMPROVEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL ABILITIES OF PUBLIC STUDENTS WITH HOLISTIC PROGRAMS AS AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL QUALITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-51
Author(s):  
Rama Fatahillah Yulianto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Educational Quality ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Moral Formation ◽  
Math Skills ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Government

Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System is a concrete manifestation of Restorative Justice, which regulates diversion, in which Law Enforcement Officials are obliged to seek diversion for children. So far, the education provided by the government for Children in Conflict with the Law is only limited to formal education and moral formation education, no less important than that mathematical ability should also be a concern for the government with a low level of mastery of mathematics in Indonesia. The learning model that emphasizes comfort and pleasure for children is considered to be very effective in teaching math skills to children at LPKA. This study aims to identify a learning model that is in accordance with the characteristics of education in LPKA. So that it is hoped that children after being free can integrate with the community and have the same abilities as children who are outside the institution, as well as improve the self-concept possessed by children. The benefits of this study can provide input in formulating policies regarding the education system in LPKA.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sistem Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Azharil
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

 Abstract Restorative justice is an approach that focuses on the needs of victims, perpetrators of crime, and also involves community participation, and does not merely fulfill legal provisions or merely impose penalties. In this case victims are also involved in the process, while perpetrators of crimes are also encouraged to be accountable for their actions, namely by correcting the mistakes they have made by apologizing, repaying the losses suffered, or by providing community service. The application of restorative justice in Indonesia has been stated in Law No. 12 of 11 concerning the Juvenile Justice System, which instructs law enforcement officials to undertake diversion efforts, namely bringing together the perpetrator, the victim, and their families to sit together to find a way out. AbstrakRestorative justice  adalah suatu pendekatan yang memfokuskan kepada kebutuhan dari para korban, pelaku kejahatan, dan juga melibatkan peran serta masyarakat, dan tidak semata-mata memenuhi ketentuan hukum atau semata-semata penjatuhan pidana. Dalam hal ini korban juga dilibatkan di dalam proses, sementara pelaku kejahatan juga didorong untuk mempertanggungjawabkan atas tindakannya, yaitu dengan memperbaiki kesalahan-kesalahan yang telah meraka perbuat dengan meminta maaf, mengembalikan kerugian yang diderita, atau dengan melakukan pelayanan masyarakat. Penerapan restorative justice di indonesai telah tertuang dalam Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 11 Tentang Sistem Peradilan anak yang memerintahkan kepada aparat penegak hukum untuk melakukan upaya diversi yakni mempertemukan pelaku, korban, dan keluarganya untuk duduk bersama mencari jalan keluar

scholarly journals Potensi Penanganan Pidana Harta Benda melalui Konsep Diversi

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-58
Author(s):  
Abdurrifai Abdurrifai
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Property Crimes ◽  
Law Enforcement Agency ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

This study aimed at examining how and is it possible the setteling property crimes with the concept of diversion through the principle of restorative justice. This was the normative research, with the concept, historical, philosophy. Data were collected using the documentation studies and interviews. The sources of the data were analyzed by description, comparison, evaluation, and argumentation. The research results incicate that deliberation to reach consensus by involving victims, perpetrators and their families, law enforcement officials and third parties is the spirit of the concept of diversion through the principle of restorative justice. The deliberation proces between the prepetrator and the victim and/or the victim‘s family is carried out freely with the principle of equality and balance, so that the resulting decisions reflect justice, benefit and legal certainty. The concept of diversion through the principle of restorative justice for property crimes, has essentially been practiced customary law communities in Indonesia have long been and are still practiced, however, the Indonesian legal system or the criminal justice system has not been strictly regulated in the from of a law. The use and application and regulation are stillat a discretionary level in each law enforcement agency.

scholarly journals THE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHILDREN'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-198
Author(s):  
Ali Muhammad
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Since the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children in Indonesia needs to be sought immediately for Law Enforcement Officials (APH) who do not understand and know about the obligation to adopt a Restorative justice approach in the implementation of the Child Criminal Justice System. The norm that regulates the obligation to approach restorative justice in the handling of Children dealing with the Law (ABH) contained in article 5 paragraph 1 of the Child Criminal Justice System Law and this Law has also adopted the International instrument of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) ratified by the government of the Republic of Indonesia with a Presidential Decree Number 36 of 1990 concerning Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in addition to other international regulations such as the Beijing Rules, Riyadh Guidelines and Tokyo Rules which are certainly in line with the Constitution 1945 concerning the purpose of the country which was wrong was to realize social justice and promote public welfare. This restorative justice approach certainly has the same spirit as the ideological values ​​of Pancasila, politics, and the Indonesian national socio-culture which prioritizes solutions through deliberation to reach consensus so that this restorative justice approach is also one of legal reforms that elevates the values ​​of local wisdom from the Nation Indonesia. The conceptual approach and the approach to legislation (the statue approach) are the approaches used in this study and maximize the implementation of the implementation of restorative justice in every handling of children facing the law (ABH) at each stage of the investigation, prosecution and trial. research is to provide confirmation to every Law Enforcement Officer of the obligation to take a Restorative Justice approach in every Handling of ABH.  

KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERMOTIF RINGAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KAMPUNG KUALA GASIB DI KECAMATAN KOTO GASIB KABUPATEN SIAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Direct Participation ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Differences Of Opinion ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation

Recommendations of The Ombudsman’s Dilemma: Between Law Enforcement Officials and Protection of Credibility

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Muslim Majority ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The One ◽  
Oversight Body

The Ombudsman as an external oversight body for official performance, in Fikih Siyasah (constitutionality in Islam) is included in the supervision stipulated in legislation (al-musahabah al-qomariyah). Supervision is done so that public service delivery to the community is in accordance with the rights of the community. This is done because in carrying out its duties, officials are very likely to conduct mal administration, which is bad public services that cause harm to the community. The Ombudsman is an institution authorized to resolve the mal administration issue, in which one of its products is by issuing a recommendation. Although Law No. 37 of 2018 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia states that the recommendation is mandatory, theombudsman's recommendations have not been implemented. This is due to differences in point of view, ie on the one hand in the context of law enforcement, but on the other hand the implementation of the recommendation is considered as a means of opening the disgrace of officials. Recommendations are the last alternative of Ombudsman's efforts to resolve the mal administration case, given that a win-win solution is the goal, then mediation becomes the main effort. This is in accordance with the condition of the Muslim majority of Indonesian nation and prioritizes deliberation in resolving dispute. Therefore, it is necessary to educate the community and officials related to the implementation of the Ombudsman's recommendations in order to provide good public services for the community, which is the obligation of the government.

ANALISIS ABORSI DALAM PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO. 61 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ferry Fadzlul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Rape Victims ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Government

Abortion is a social phenomenon that is increasingly alarming. The concern is not without reason, because so far the behavior of abortion many negative effects both for themselves the perpetrators and the wider community. With the passing of the Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health still raises the pros and cons in the middle of the community. The approach used to address the problem that the above problems are normative juridical approach. Based on the results of the study need to decriminalize abortion in Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health which has the goal of creating the legal basis for abortion and the experts who helped him as an indication of a medical emergency or pregnancy due to rape, and factors inhibiting the decriminalization of abortion is legal factors themselves, law enforcement officials factors, factors facilities or infrastructure, community factors, and cultural factors. Suggestion that the author should the government needs to review the Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health in particular Article 31 and Article 34 within the limited evidence of rape victims in just 40 days because of the time limit is not relative to the law enforcement agencies to prove it, as well as regarding the evidentiary aspects of pregnancy due to rape victims in order to avoid an impression of legitimizing the act of abortion in any form. Keywords: Abortion, , Reproductive Health

ANALISIS DEKRIMINALISASI ABORSI DALAM PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO. 61 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Ferry Fadzul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Rape Victims ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Government

Abortion is a social phenomenon that is increasingly alarming. The concern is not without reason, because so far the behavior of abortion many negative effects both for themselves the perpetrators and the wider community. With the passing of the Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health still raises the pros and cons in the middle of the community. The approach used to address the problem that the above problems are normative juridical approach. Based on the results of the study need to decriminalize abortion in Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health which has the goal of creating the legal basis for abortion and the experts who helped him as an indication of a medical emergency or pregnancy due to rape, and factors inhibiting the decriminalization of abortion is legal factors themselves, law enforcement officials factors, factors facilities or infrastructure, community factors, and cultural factors. Suggestion that the author should the government needs to review the Government Regulation No. 61 Year 2014 on Reproductive Health in particular Article 31 and Article 34 within the limited evidence of rape victims in just 40 days because of the time limit is not relative to the law enforcement agencies to prove it, as well as regarding the evidentiary aspects of pregnancy due to rape victims in order to avoid an impression of legitimizing the act of abortion in any form.

scholarly journals ANAK NAKAL: DIVERSI DAN DILEMA PENERAPANNYA

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Eva Achjani Zulfa
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Management Policy ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Discourse Management

AbstrakHandling problems through brat children and children who have problems with the law have occurred again when some kids sticking a gamble being arrested at near Soekarno Hatta Airport areas then processed into the judicial process. Diversion is a form of change the process by which a program can only take place on hold pre-adjudication in the criminal justice system. Forms of transfer or diversion of this case are indeed associated with the authority possessed discretion of law enforcement officers. Giddiness has appeared in the process of implementation of diversion by law enforcement officials, the search for forms of application of the criminal case handlingchild has become a growing discourse management. Policy taken toward the institution of criminal diversion not only becomes demand for law enforcement officers, but also must be institutionalized through plain legal mechanisms. It becomes author's concern to create more certain procedures to brighten solve on deviant children in this way

scholarly journals Peranan Kepolisian dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengeroyokan yang Dilakukan oleh Anak dan Orang Dewasa

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Haryanto Ginting ◽  
Muazzul Muazzul
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
School Students ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Law And Justice

<p class="1judul"><em><span>The Role of the Police in the Application of Restorative Justice to Perpetrators of Criminal Offenses Conducted by Children and Adults</span></em></p><p class="1judul"> </p><h1><span lang="EN-US">The rise of cases of brawl between high school students and even not only between high school students, but also has hit up to campuses, this often happens in big cities such as Jakarta, Surabaya, and Medan. This study aims to determine the role of the Police in implementing Restorative Justice against perpetrators of criminal acts of beating carried out by children and adults that occurred in the District of Namo Rambe District of Deli Serdang. The research method is done by using descriptive qualitative method that is normative. Based on the data obtained in the results of this study, the authors draw conclusions as follows: The criminal justice system must always promote the importance of law and justice. But there is a false view that the measure of the success of law enforcement is only marked by the success of bringing a suspect to court and then being sentenced. The measure of success of law enforcement by law enforcement officers should be characterized by the achievement of values of justice in the community. The police as a state tool that plays a role in enforcing the law is expected to be able to respond to this by implementing a Restorative Justice mechanism.<strong></strong></span></h1>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document