scholarly journals Kekuatan Keterangan Saksi Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Perkara Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga

JURNAL BELO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-203
Author(s):  
Elias Zadrack Leasa
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Criminal Incident

A witness is someone who hears, sees and experiences on something that happens. This witness has an important role in disclosing a problem that occurs including legal issues. The description of this witness is very useful for the sake of investigation, prosecution and justice on a matter heard by the witness himself, witness to see himself and his own natural witness. The information of a witness alone is not sufficient to prove a criminal incident in accordance with the principle of Unus Testis Nulus Testis (Article 185 paragraph (2) KUHAP), then the statements of witnesses having blood relation under Article 168 Criminal Procedure Code can not be accepted as valid evidence . Witnesses in domestic violence are very difficult because the cases that occur within the household are very small and the witness has a blood relation, but in abolition of domestic violance act in Article 55 provides an opportunity if only one witness is provided with another legal evidence, concerning the witness who incest abolition of domestic violence act is a lex specialist from KUHAP.

scholarly journals Keterangan Saksi dengan Gangguan Jiwa Sebagai Alat Bukti di Pengadilan

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1937
Author(s):  
Put Fui Syafira Basuki
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Memory Loss ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Witness Testimony ◽  
Legal Requirement ◽  
Legal Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Valid Evidence

AbstractWitness testimony is evidence tool in the first sequence in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) so it can be said there is no criminal case which escapes from the proof of witness testimony. The legal requirement for a witness's statement is when a witness takes an oath. However, in article 171 letter b of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) states that a person may give testimony without swearing, that is, a person who has memory loss or mental illness, although sometimes his memory is back. In psychology is referred to psychopaat, but the information given cannot be justified perfectly and his information is only used as a guide or additional legal evidence tool as long as it is compatible with legal evidence tool. This study uses the typology of doctrinal research with a legislation approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Witness testimony given without the oath is considered not a valid evidence but is used as an adjunct to perfect the strength of legal evidence tool because it can strengthen the judge's conviction.Keywords: Evidence Tool; Witnesses; Mental Disorder; Responsibility.AbstrakKeterangan saksi merupakan alat bukti pada urutan pertama dalam KUHAP sehingga dapat dikatakan bahwa tiada suatu perkara pidana yang luput dari pembuktian keterangan saksi. Syarat sah keterangan saksi adalah ketika seorang saksi mengucapkan sumpah. Namun pada pasal 171 huruf b KUHAP menyatakan bahwa seseorang boleh memberikan keterangan tanpa sumpah yaitu orang yang mengalami sakit ingatan atau sakit jiwa meskipun kadang-kadang ingatannya kembali dalam ilmu penyakit jiwa disebut dengan psychopaat, tetapi keterangan yang diberikan tidak dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara sempurna dan keterangannya hanya dipakai sebagai petunjuk atau tambahan alat bukti sah asalkan berkesuaian dengan alat bukti sah. Penelitian ini menggunakan tipologi penelitian doktrinal dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Keterangan saksi yang diberikan tanpa sumpah dinilai bukan merupakan alat bukti yang sah namun digunakan sebagai tambahan untuk menyempurnakan kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti yang sah karena dapat menguatkan keyakinan hakim.Kata Kunci: Alat Bukti; Saksi; Gangguan Jiwa; Tanggungjawab.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Alat Bukti Website dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Terorisme (Studi Putusan Nomor 140/PID.SUS/2018/PN.JKT.SEL)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-134
Author(s):  
Gemaya Wangsa ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya
Keyword(s):  
Digital Media ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Device Classification ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Case Number

The development of information technology and correspondence resulted in a shift in the format of print media to digital media, so that this growth was followed by the continuation of the development of a new criminal class that rode digital media in criminal acts of terrorism. This study aims to determine the regulations for the use of website evidence and the position of using website evidence in handling terrorism crimes in case number 140 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN.Jkt.Sel. This research uses a normative legal exploration method whose data comes from the determination related to the use of website evidence in Article 184 of the Criminal Code. The results of the research show that the determination of the exploitation of website evidence, which when based on Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means that electronic material is not classified as an abash instructional device classification, but if it is based on statutory regulations in a special crime, the electronic evidence media has resistance as a valid evidence, this can be seen in the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law which are reaffirmed in the provisions of Article 44 of the ITE Law. Utilization of electronic evidence in the process of evidence in court is sourced from website evidence in law enforcement for criminal acts of terrorism in the Case Number 140 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN.Jkt.Sel scandal. Criminal Procedure, especially Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but has a judicial guideline that the judge cannot refuse to explore and decide the matters brought against him, provided that the law is unclear or non-existent, then the judges' rules should expose the meaning of continued and continuous law in the consortium, up to the provisions as contained in the ITE Law which regulates electronic instruction instruments as valid instruction devices.

The Admissibility of Statements Provided by an Accused Person in the Russian Criminal Procedure

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1684
Author(s):  
Roman KOSTENKO ◽  
Georgii YURIEV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Sources ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Special Significance ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Evidence ◽  
General Characterization ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Admissible Evidence

This article substantiates that compliance with the requirement of admissible evidence acquires special significance for a criminal proceedings, which is proved by the analysis of various sources, including the current edition of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Therefore, the article aims to determine the nature of admissible statements of the accused in the Russian criminal procedure as one of the most important types of legal evidence. The authors of the article have obtained crucial results for the study of criminal proceedings, defined the basic requirements that should be met by admissible statements of an accused person, analyzed rules for admitting statements of the accused, performed their general characterization and formulated the main provisions defining the essence of statements provided by the accused in criminal proceedings. The main conclusion reached in this article is that the admissibility of statements provided by the accused should comply with the following basic rules: (1) the rule of appropriate subjects authorized by virtue of the existing Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to carry out procedural actions for collecting (obtaining, recording) evidence; (2) the rule of proper information sources on the facts provided for by the current Criminal Procedure Code; (3) the rule of proper proceedings stipulated by the current Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation for collecting (receiving, recording) evidence; (4) the rule of the proper procedure provided for by the current Criminal Procedure Code for collecting (receiving, recording) evidence from the viewpoint of its proper obtaining is considered as the need to comply with requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Tes Urine Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Narkotika

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1953
Author(s):  
Rachmad Firmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Urine Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Illicit Trafficking ◽  
Test Result

AbstractIn the context of carrying out the task of eradicating illicit abuse and illicit trafficking of Narcotics and Narcotics Precursors, the investigator has the authority to conduct urine tests on a person suspected of being an abuser, as stipulated in Article 75 letter l of Law Number 35 Year 2009 concerning Narcotics. The urine sample that has been taken will then be tested based on the development of science and technology in the narcotics testing laboratory which is then poured in the minutes of the test results. The minutes of the test results are valid evidence as determined by Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Someone who has a positive urine test result can be arrested and named as a suspect of narcotics abuse based on sufficient preliminary evidence. Suspects of abuse of Narcotics can be convicted in accordance with Article 127 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Act. Thus the legal issues in this study is the Urine Test Results Are Used as the Basis for Assigning a Person to Be a Narcotics Abuse and Classification of Urine Test Results as Evidence As a Provision for Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code.Keywords: Urine Test; Preliminary Evidence; Determination of Suspect; Valid Evidence.AbstrakDalam rangka melaksanakan tugas pemberantasan penyalahgunaan dan peredaran gelap Narkotika dan Prekursor Narkotika penyidik berwenang melakukan tes urine terhadap seseorang yang diduga sebagai penyalah guna, sebagaimana diatur pada Pasal 75 huruf l Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Sampel urine yang telah diambil selanjutnya akan diuji berdasarkan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi di laboratorium uji narkotika yang kemudian dituangkan dalam berita acara hasil pengujian. Berita acara hasil pengujian merupakan alat bukti yang sah sebagaimana ditentukan Pasal 184 KUHAP. Terhadap seseorang yang hasil tes urinenya positif dapat ditangkap dan ditetapkan sebagai tersangka penyalahgunaan Narkotika berdasarkan bukti permulaan yang cukup. Tersangka penyalahgunaan Narkotika dapat dipidana sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 127 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Narkotika. Dengan demikian rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah Hasil Tes Urine Dijadikan Dasar Untuk Menetapkan Seseorang Sebagai Tersangka Penyalahguna Narkotika dan Klasifikasi Hasil Tes Urine Sebagai Alat Bukti Sebagaimana Ketentuan Pasal 184 KUHAP. Kata Kunci: Tes Urine; Bukti Permulaan; Penetapan Tersangka; Alat Bukti Yang Sah.

scholarly journals Data Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-46
Author(s):  
Pandoe Pramoe Kartika
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Legal Evidence ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Legal Proof

The writing of this scientific work is motivated by the difficulty of legal institutions such as the court in carrying out the verification of criminal cases related to Electronic Data. Evidence is fundamental in every criminal case. Therefore, evidence becomes a very decisive thing whether or not a person is convicted. However, the Criminal Procedure Code as a formal law in Indonesia, has not regulated electronic evidence as a legal evidence. The research method used is normative research using a statutory and analytical approach, while data collection through literature studies and interviews and qualitative descriptive data analysis. The results of the study indicate that proof of the ITE Law is lex specialis, because the ITE Law regulates everything that is more specific in the evidentiary law contained in the Criminal Procedure Code. The legal proof of electronic aspect as a legitimate evidence in the case of money laundering is regulated in Article 73 and with the enactment of the ITE Law, it is increasingly emphasized that electronic documentary evidence is a legitimate and recognized evidence in Indonesian procedural law. Penulisan karya ilmiah ini dilatar belakangi oleh sulitnya lembaga hukum seperti pengadilan dalam hal melaksanakan pembuktian perkara pidana yang berhubungan dengan Data Elektronik. Bukti merupakan hal mendasar dalam setiap perkara pidana. Oleh karena itu, alat bukti menjadi hal yang sangat menentukan dapat tidaknya seseorang dipidana. Namun, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana sebagai hukum formil di Indonesia, belum mengatur mengenai alat bukti elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan analitis, sedangkan pengumpulan data melalui studi pustaka dan wawancara serta analisis data secara deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pembuktian pada UU ITE bersifat lex specialis, dikarenakan UU ITE mengatur segala sesuatu yang lebih spesifik dalam hukum pembuktian yang terdapat di dalam KUHAP. Aspek hukum pembuktian elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah dalam kasus tindak pidana pencucian uang diatur dalam Pasal 73 dan dengan diberlakukannya UU ITE semakin dipertegas bahwa alat bukti dokumen elektronik merupakan alat bukti yang sah dan diakui dalam hukum acara Indonesia.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP ALAT BUKTI VISUM ET REPERTUM PSIKIATRIKUM DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINGGI BANJARMASIN NOMOR 42/PID/2017/PT BJM)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 882
Author(s):  
Yitro Daniel ◽  
Dian Adriawan Dg Tawang
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
District Court ◽  
Post Mortem ◽  
High Court ◽  
Legal Evidence ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Expert Interview ◽  
Valid Evidence

Based on Decision Number 20 / Pid.B / 2017 PN.Mrh has reported rape issued by the wife of Suwito Budi Santoso while the wife of Suwito Budi Santoso is named Sumaryati. However, Decision Number 42 / PID / 2017 / PT.BJM, the Banjarmasin High Court Judge Council acquitted 7 defendants who were not proven in rape cases. However, in the court's ruling, the Banjarmasin High Court contained anomalies that differed from the Verdict of the Marbahan District Court, namely from the expert's statement and the results of the post mortem psychiatric review. The problem is how is the juridical analysis of the evidence evidence and psychiatric repertum in the case of rape (case study of the Decision of the High Court in banjaran 42 / PID / 2017 / PT BJM)? The author approves this problem using normative research methods supported by expert interview data. The author creates in Article 184 the Criminal Procedure Code valid evidence is divided into 5 (five), which consists of legal evidence categorized Letters which are translated Article 187 and in Perma No 3 of 2017 in Article 4 to be discussed by the Judge. The author asks that for Law Enforcement, to pay more attention to what matters are the contents of the legislation. Investigators, Public Prosecutors, Judges, and government institutions that are involved in the tools of the post mortem and psychiatric repertum in the crime of rape, must really realize the contents of the agreement. So that the legal certainty given by the State to the community can be fully accepted

scholarly journals Legal Remedies for Judicial Review for Investigators of Pretrial Decisions Regarding the Invalidity of the Order to Terminate the Investigation in the Perspective of Law Enforcement with Certainty

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Eko Wiyono ◽  
I Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Prija Djatmika ◽  
Bambang Sugiri
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Future

Arrangements regarding legal remedies that can be submitted by investigators against the judge's decision regarding investigative actions in the form of terminating the investigation with the issuance of an Investigation Termination Order (SP3) in pretrial cases. Law No. 8/1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code was not expressly enforced. This article aims to identify legal remedies against pretrial decisions regarding the invalidity of the Termination of Investigation Order (SP3) in the future. This paper is normative legal research, namely the process of finding legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines to address legal issues at hand. The result of this study is the arrangements regarding extraordinary legal remedies in the form of a judicial review of criminal decisions that have permanent legal force and are not acquitted or released from all previous legal claims before the entry into force of the Criminal Procedure Code that have been regulated can also be submitted by interested parties. Necessary to reconstruct the regulation of legal remedies against pretrial decisions, especially extraordinary legal remedies in the form of reconsideration, especially by investigators as parties who are very interested in the action.

scholarly journals Pre-Trial Authority after the Decisions of the Constitutional Court No.21-PUU-XII-2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 357
Author(s):  
Deddi Diliyanto ◽  
Zainal Asikin ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Past ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Subjects

The pre-trial scope has actually been limited by Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, the development of the law for the past 5 (five) years has broken through the boundary and preceded the discussion of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code. The expansion of the pre-trial scope, especially regarding the determination of suspects, was started before the Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 was issued. This research is normative legal research. It utilizes statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Based on the statement that the category of legal issues is a vague norm, the analytical instrument used is historical legal interpretation. The results of this study are to expand the pre-trial authority to examine and decide: 1) whether the determination of the suspect is valid; 2) whether the search is valid; dan 3) whether the seizure is valid. In addition, the pre-trial authority in judicial practice is extended to the inability of investigators to conduct investigations to the suspects (the legal subjects).

scholarly journals Legalitas Rekaman Circuit Closed Television (CCTV) Dalam Proses Pembuktian di Persidangan

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Gede Angga Juniarta
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The Other ◽  
Electronic Records ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Valid Evidence

One part of the judicial process is verifying evidence for searching the material truth of case to assist judges in making decisions. One aid that can be used in verification the evidence during the trial is the Information Technology in the form of Circuit Closed Television (CCTV) footage because it is not regulated in the positive Law in Indonesia. Because of that, in this research are used a normative method to answer the problem with the approach of legislation and approach to the concept. The legal arrangement of CCTV footage as evidence in Act No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code is not exist, because the Criminal Procedure Code are setting a limited valid evidence under the Act, but for the interest of seeking the material truth, then there makes Act No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transaction which govern the other evidence in the form of Electronic Information and/or Electronic Records. The strength of evidence from CCTV footage has not been expressly provided in Act No. 11 of 2008 on ITE, so that the strength of evidence is still exempt, which means that the strength of evidence is still based on the judge’s conviction. Salah satu bagian dalam proses peradilan yakni adanya proses pembuktian guna mencari kebenaran materiil dari suatu perkara guna membantu hakim dalam mengambil keputusan. Salah satu bantuan yang dapat digunakan dalam pembuktian di persidangan adalah teknologi informasi yang berbentuk rekaman CCTV, tetapi dalam persidangan dipertanyakan akan kekuatan pembuktian dari rekaman CCTV tersebut, karena tidak diatur dalam hukum positif di Indonesia. Penelitian ini mempergunakan metode penelitian normatif untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Pengaturan rekaman CCTV sebagai alat bukti ini dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (selanjutnya disebut KUHAP) tidak ditemukan pengaturannya, karena KUHAP mengatur secara limitatif alat bukti yang sah menurut Undang-Undang. Demi kepentingan mencari kebenaran materiil maka dibentuklah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yang mengatur tentang alat bukti lain berupa informasi elektronik dan/atau dokumen elektronik. Kekuatan pembuktian dari rekaman CCTV belum diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE, sehingga pembuktiannya masih bersifat bebas, yang artinya kekuatan pembuktian dari alat bukti tersebut masih berdasarkan atas keyakinan hakim.

scholarly journals BUKTI ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI YANG SAH DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 463
Author(s):  
Ramiyanto Ramiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Independent Evidence ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Functional Equivalent ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Admissible Evidence

The Criminal Procedure Code as a general criminal procedure does not recognize electronic evidence as one of the admissible types of evidence. In practice, electronic evidence is also used as an admissible evidence to prove the criminal offenses in court. From the results of the discussion it can be concluded that electronic evidence in criminal procedure law is a dependent evidence and an independent evidence (substitution of letter proof if it meets the principle of functional equivalent approach and expansion of evidence) as specified in several special laws and instruments issued by the Supreme Court. The electronic evidence is not regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code as a lex generalis, however, to achieve material truth it can also be used as a valid evidence for the provision of all types of criminal offenses in court. It is based on recognition in the practice of criminal justice, some special laws, and instruments issued by the Supreme Court.Keywords: electronic evidence, admissible evidence, criminal procedure code, proof

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document