scholarly journals Drift measurements for conditions of hydrogen cyanamide spraying in kiwifruit

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Robert Connell ◽  
Scott Post ◽  
Mark Ledebuhr ◽  
Brian Moorhead ◽  
Andrew Hewitt
Keyword(s):  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Bud Burst ◽  
Spray Application ◽  
Hydrogen Cyanamide ◽  
Adjuvant System ◽  
Drift Potential ◽  
Downwind Side ◽  
Time Of Year

Kiwifruit are sprayed in late winter with hydrogen cyanamide to enhance with bud burst. The trellis layout of kiwifruit vines in combination with the canopy dormancy at that time of year means that a higher portion of the spray is able to drift away from the canopy. A spray application field study was conducted in a kiwifruit orchard to investigate spray drift potential, with particular focus for conditions relevant to hydrogen cyanamide applications. Spray application with conventional airblast-sprayer hollow-cone nozzles/adjuvant was compared with air-induction (AI) nozzles/drift-reducing adjuvant. Spray was applied every second row in the orchard with spray drift sampling conducted by measuring vertical distribution of spray deposition on both sides of the downwind shelterbelt. The trial showed that airborne drift carried to a height of at least 15 m to the downwind edge of the orchard, which was the height of the vertical sampling towers. The air-induction nozzle/drift-reducing adjuvant system reduced the drift intercepted at 15 m height on the downwind side of the shelterbelt by approximately 78% compared to the standard nozzle/adjuvant system.

scholarly journals Meeting droplet size specifications for aerial herbicide application to control wilding conifers

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 13-23
Author(s):  
Brian Richardson ◽  
Carol Rolando ◽  
Andrew Hewitt ◽  
Mark Kimberley
Keyword(s):  
Droplet Size ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Spray Application ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Water Control ◽  
Drift Potential ◽  
Droplet Sizes ◽  
Air Speed

Large areas of New Zealand are being aerially sprayed with herbicides to manage ‘wilding’ conifer spread. The purpose of the study was to obtain and analyse droplet spectra produced by nozzles commonly used for wilding conifer spraying to determine whether or not operational recommendations for a target droplet size class (~350 µm) are being met. Droplet spectra were measured in a wind tunnel for 27 nozzle x 3 operating condition (nozzle angle, air speed and pressure) combinations tested for each of three spray mixes. AGDISP, an aerial spray application simulation model, was used to quantify the field performance implications of changes to droplet spectra parameters. Only one nozzle, the CP-09, 0.078, 30°, met the target droplet size specification when used at 45° but not at 0°. However, under these conditions, this nozzle produced a large driftable fraction. All but one of the other scenarios tested produced much larger droplet sizes. Operational spray mixes tended to slightly increase the potential for spray drift compared with the water control. The CP-09, 0.078, 30° nozzle used at 45° met the operational droplet size specification but is more sensitive to changes to nozzle angle (0° versus 45°) than the other nozzles tested. None of the three Accu-FloTM nozzles tested met the target droplet size specification. However, the Accu-FloTM nozzles produced very few fine droplets making them good choices for reducing spray drift potential.

Downwind Spray Drift Assessment for Airblast Sprayer Applications in a Modern Apple Orchard System

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 601-613
Author(s):  
Anura P. Rathnayake ◽  
Lav R. Khot ◽  
Gwen A. Hoheisel ◽  
Harold W. Thistle ◽  
Milt E. Teske ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Mechanistic Model ◽  
Apple Orchard ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
List Type ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Dormant Stage ◽  
Drift Potential ◽  
Spray Applications

HighlightsAirblast sprayer drift potential was evaluated up to 183 m (600 ft) downwind from an orchard edge.A central leader apple orchard was sprayed at dormant and full canopy stage.Higher drift at full canopy stage was likely due to higher wind speeds and lower humidity.String and artificial foliage samplers had higher collection efficiencies than Mylar cards.Abstract. Risk assessment of orchard pesticide spraying is currently based on spray drift estimation using a worst-case scenario (dormant stage). However, most spray applications are conducted during non-dormant canopy growth stages. Such overestimation leads to restrictive operational regulations in pest management activities. Therefore, field data were generated and studied for a mechanistic model that will predict spray drift from airblast spray applications in tree fruit orchards. Spray trials were conducted at dormant and full canopy growth stages in a central leader trained apple orchard. An axial-fan airblast sprayer sprayed fluorescent tracer in the third row from the orchard’s downwind edge, with four passes being one run. A total of 20 runs, i.e., 17 spray runs and three blanks, were performed during each of the two crop growth stages. Mylar cards, artificial foliage (AF), and horizontal strings (HS) were used to quantify drifting spray deposition up to 183 m (600 ft) downwind. Within the orchard, the deposition on card samplers 3 m upwind of the sprayed row was 21.94% ±4.63% (mean ± standard deviation) of applied dose (AD) at dormant stage and 16.02% ±2.86% AD at full canopy stage. Deposition downwind and adjacent (-3 m) to the sprayed row was 17.92% ±2.70% AD and 7.15% ±1.78% AD at dormant and full canopy stages, respectively. Spray drift decreased substantially at the orchard edge to 3.18% ±1.30% AD at dormant stage and 2.30% ±1.16% AD at full canopy stage. Spray drift was very low at 183 m (600 ft) downwind of the orchard, with deposition of 0.002% ±0.003% AD at dormant stage and 0.003% ±0.004% AD at full canopy stage. Deposition data collected at common sampler locations showed that HS and AF samplers collected significantly (p < 0.05) more drifting spray than card samplers. Downwind speeds had a strong linear relationship with spray drift at both growth stages (dormant: R2= 0.80, full canopy: R2= 0.86), while the influence of temperature and humidity could not be directly observed from the collected data. Keywords: Airblast spraying, Deposit samplers, Dormant and full canopy, Drift, Modern orchard systems.

Effect of Nozzle Angleson Spray Losses Reduction

2014 ◽  
Vol 564 ◽  
pp. 216-221
Author(s):  
Nasir S. Hassen ◽  
Nor Azwadi Che Sidik ◽  
Jamaluddin Md Sheriff
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
The Other ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Spray Application ◽  
Application Process ◽  
Nozzle Height ◽  
Wind Speeds ◽  
Flat Fan Nozzle

Spray losses are the most important problem that is faced in the spray application process as result of spray drift to non target areas by the action of air flow.This paper investigated the spray drift for banding applicationusing even flat-fan nozzle TPEunder wind tunnel conditions.In addition, this paper also examined the effect of different spray fan angles 65°, 80° and 95° on spray drift particularly where there is need to make the nozzle operate at the optimum heights above the ground or plant level.In addition, three cross wind speeds 1, 2 and 3m/swere produced to determine the effect of wind speed on total spray drift.According to the results from this study, the nozzle anglehas a significant effect on the total spray drift. The nozzle angle 65° gave the highest drift reduction compared to the other nozzle angles. The maximum driftfor all nozzles was found at nozzle height of 60 cm. The minimum mean value of the drift was found at wind speed of 1 m/s. This study supports the use of nozzle angles of less than 95° on heights more than 0.5m and on wind speeds more than 1m/s as a means for minimizing spray drift.

scholarly journals Development of Drift-Reducing Spouts For Vineyard Pneumatic Sprayers: Measurement of Droplet Size Spectra Generated and Their Classification

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 7826
Author(s):  
Marco Grella ◽  
Antonio Miranda-Fuentes ◽  
Paolo Marucco ◽  
Paolo Balsari ◽  
Fabrizio Gioelli
Keyword(s):  
Droplet Size ◽  
Marked Reduction ◽  
Reduction Potential ◽  
Liquid Flow Rate ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Spray Application ◽  
Size Spectra ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Environmental Requirements ◽  
Low Drift

Pneumatic spraying is especially sensitive to spray drift due to the production of small droplets that can be easily blown away from the treated field by the wind. Two prototypes of environmentally friendly pneumatic spouts were developed. The present work aims to check the effect of the spout modifications on the spray quality, to test the convenience of setting the liquid hose out of the spout in cannon-type and hand-type pneumatic nozzles and its effect on the droplet size, homogeneity and driftability in laboratory conditions. Laboratory trials simulating a real sprayer were conducted to test the influence of the hose insertion position (HP), including conventional (CP), alternative (AP), outer (OP) and extreme (XP), as well as the liquid flow rate (LFR) and the airflow speed (AS) on the droplet size (D50, D10 and D90), homogeneity and driftability (V100). Concurrently, the droplet size spectra obtained by the combination of aforementioned parameters (HP × LFR × AS) in both nozzles were also classified according to the ASABE S572.1. Results showed a marked reduction of AS outside the air spout, which led to droplet size increase. This hypothesis was confirmed by the droplet size spectra measured (D50, D10, D90 and V100). A clear influence of HP was found on every dependent variable, including those related with the droplet size. In both nozzles, the longer the distance to CP, the coarser the sprayed drops. Moreover, LFR and AS significantly increased and reduced droplet size, respectively. A higher heterogeneity in the generated drops was obtained in XP. This position yielded V100 values similar to those of the hydraulic low-drift nozzles, showing an effective drift reduction potential. The classification underlines that the variation of HP, alongside AS and LFR, allowed varying the spray quality from very fine to coarse/very coarse, providing farmers with a wide range of options to match the drift-reducing environmental requirements and the treatment specifications for every spray application.

scholarly journals Spray Drift Generated in Vineyard during Under-Row Weed Control and Suckering: Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Drift-Reducing Techniques

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 5068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Grella ◽  
Paolo Marucco ◽  
Athanasios T. Balafoutis ◽  
Paolo Balsari
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Experimental Work ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Buffer Zone ◽  
Optimum Combination ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Spray Application ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Spray Applications

The most widespread method for weed control and suckering in vineyards is under-row band herbicide application. It could be performed for weed control only (WC) or weed control and suckering (WSC) simultaneously. During herbicide application, spray drift is one of the most important environmental issues. The objective of this experimental work was to evaluate the performance of specific Spray Drift Reducing Techniques (SDRTs) used either for WC or WSC spray applications. Furthermore, spray drift reduction achieved by buffer zone adoption was investigated. All spray drift measurements were conducted according to ISO22866:2005 protocol. Sixteen configurations deriving from four nozzle types (two conventional and two air-induction—AI) combined with or without a semi-shielded boom at two different heights (0.25 m for WC and 0.50 m for WSC) were tested. A fully-shielded boom was also tested in combination with conventional nozzles at 0.25 m height for WC. Ground spray drift profiles were obtained, from which corresponding Drift Values (DVs) were calculated. Then, the related drift reduction was calculated based on ISO22369-1:2006. It was revealed that WC spray applications generate lower spray drift than WSC applications. In all cases, using AI nozzles and semi-shielded boom significantly reduced DVs; the optimum combination of SDRTs decreased spray drift by up to 78% and 95% for WC and WSC spray application, respectively. The fully-shielded boom allowed reducing nearly 100% of spray drift generation. Finally, the adoption of a cropped buffer zone that includes the two outermost vineyard rows lowered the total spray drift up to 97%. The first 90th percentile model for the spray drift generated during herbicide application in vineyards was also obtained.

Comparison of Spray Configurations in a Spray Cabin Design for Ornamental Potted Plants: A Proof-of-Concept Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Zwertvaegher ◽  
Dieter Foqué ◽  
Donald Dekeyser ◽  
Stephanie Van Weyenberg ◽  
David Nuyttens
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Plant Protection ◽  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Crop Protection ◽  
Plant Protection Products ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Spray Application ◽  
Concept Study ◽  
Potted Plants

Abstract. With the implementation of integrated pest management in the European Union, growers are obliged to manage pests in a manner that minimizes health and environmental risks due to the use of plant protection products. Among other approaches, this goal can be achieved by optimizing spray application techniques. As an alternative to the predominantly used handheld equipment, such as spray guns, spray boom systems might substantially improve spray application, and thus crop protection management, in greenhouses. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to compare different spray configurations in a spray cabin designed to spray ornamental potted plants that are moving on a conveyor belt. Seven different spray configurations were examined for optimal spray deposition in two crops (azalea and ivy) using mineral chelate tracers. The deposition tests showed that the presented prototype can satisfactorily spray potted plants up to a height of 25 cm including the pot height. The best spray deposition was found with two flat-fan nozzles oriented 35° upward, spraying at 1.0 bar and an application rate of 1047 L ha-1. This configuration increased deposition on the underside of the leaves and at the middle foliage layer compared to the other configurations that were evaluated. The spray cabin with a band spray setting has potential to mitigate the use of plant protection products and achieve a more efficient spray application compared to traditional handheld techniques and broadcast spray boom techniques. Keywords: Crop protection, Integrated pest management, Nozzle type, Spray deposition.

Herbicide Formulation, Spray Nozzle Design, and Operating Pressure Affects the Droplet Size Spectra of Agricultural Sprays

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua A. McGinty ◽  
Gaylon D. Morgan ◽  
Peter A. Dotray ◽  
Paul A. Baumann
Keyword(s):  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
The United States ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Operating Pressure ◽  
Spray Nozzle ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Size Spectra ◽  
Drift Potential ◽  
Spray Droplets

Aims: Determine the droplet size spectra of agricultural sprays as affected by herbicide formulations, spray nozzle designs, and operating pressures. Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted in April 2014 at the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Aerial Application Technology Research Unit Facility in College Station, Texas. Methodology: The spray droplet size spectra of six herbicide formulations as well as water alone and water with nonionic surfactant were evaluated in a low-speed wind tunnel. These spray solutions were conducted with five different flat-fan spray nozzle designs, producing a wide range of spray droplet sizes. The wind tunnel was equipped with a laser diffraction sensor to analyze spray droplet size. All combinations of spray solution and nozzle were operated at 207 and 414 kPa and replicated three times. Results: Many differences in droplet size spectra were detected among the spray solutions, nozzle designs, and pressures tested. Solutions of Liberty 280 SL exhibited the smallest median droplet size and the greatest proportion of spray volume contained in droplets 100 µm or less in size.  Solutions of Enlist Duo resulted in smaller median droplet size than many of the solutions tested, but also exhibited some of the smallest production of fine spray droplets. Median droplet size was found to vary greatly among nozzle designs, with the greatest droplet size and smallest drift-prone fine droplet production observed with air-inclusion designs utilizing a pre-orifice. Increasing the operating pressure from 207 to 414 kPa resulted in a decrease in median droplet size and an increase in the production of droplets 100 µm or less in size. Conclusion: Herbicide formulations and spray nozzle designs tested varied widely in droplet size spectra and thus the potential for spray drift. Increasing operating pressure resulted in decreased droplet size and an increase in the production of drift-prone droplets. Additionally, median droplet size alone should not be used to compare spray drift potential among spray solutions but should include relative span and V100 values to better predict the potential for spray drift due to drift-prone spray droplets.

scholarly journals Developing a comprehensive Drift Reduction Technology risk assessment scheme

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Connor Ferguson ◽  
Andrew J. Hewitt ◽  
John A. Eastin ◽  
Robert J. Connell ◽  
Rory L. Roten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Environmental Stewardship ◽  
Rating System ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Spray Application ◽  
Reduction Scheme ◽  
Exposure Risk ◽  
Rating Systems ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Drift Reduction Technologies (DRTs) are becoming increasingly important for improving spray applications in many countries including New Zealand (NZ). Although there is a growing database on the performance of DRTs, there is no rating system showing the effectiveness of the DRT’s performance. In Europe, DRTs are classified relative to current reference technologies as part of the rating systems used to establish spray drift risk reduction. We have recommended some key elements of such a comprehensive exposure risk reduction scheme for any country, based on prior and on-going research into the performance of specific DRTs in row, tree, and vine crops. Our intention was to create a rating system to determine the effectiveness of a given technology. This rating system would improve spray application practices and environmental stewardship for a wide range of crops and application scenarios.

scholarly journals Advances in developing a new test method to assess spray drift potential from air blast sprayers

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e0207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Grella ◽  
Emilio Gil ◽  
Paolo Balsari ◽  
Paolo Marucco ◽  
Montserrat Gallart
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Test Bench ◽  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Air Blast ◽  
Spray Process ◽  
Drift Potential ◽  
Index Value

Drift is one of the most important issues to consider for realising sustainable pesticide sprays. This study proposes and tests an alternative methodology for quantifying the drift potential (DP) of air blast sprayers, trying to avoid the difficulties faced in conducting field trials according to the standard protocol (ISO 22866:2005). For this purpose, an ad hoc test bench designed for DP comparative measurements was used. The proposed methodology was evaluated in terms of robustness, repetitiveness and coherence by arranging a series of trials at two laboratories. Representative orchard and vineyard air blast sprayers in eight configurations (combination of two forward speeds, two air fan flow rates, and two nozzle types) were tested. The test bench was placed perpendicular to the spray track to collect the fraction of spray liquid remaining in the air after the spray process and potentially susceptible to drift out of the treated area. Downwind spray deposition curves were obtained and a new approach was proposed to calculate an index value of the DP estimation that could allow the differences among the tested configurations to be described. Results indicated that forward speed of 1.67 m/s allows better discrimination among configurations tested. Highest DP reduction, over 87.5%, was achieved using the TVI nozzles in combination with low air fan flow rate in both laboratories; conversely, the highest DP value was obtained with the ATR nozzles in combination with high air fan flow rate. Although the proposed method shows a promising potential to evaluate drift potential of different sprayer types and nozzles types used for bush and tree crops further research and tests are necessary to improve and validate this method.

scholarly journals Phase Doppler technology for infield assessment of drift potential

2013 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 381-381
Author(s):  
R.L. Roten ◽  
R.J. Connell ◽  
A.J. Hewitt
Keyword(s):  
Particle Size ◽  
Particle Size Distribution ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Model Output ◽  
Agricultural Equipment ◽  
Spray System ◽  
Drift Potential ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Drift Models ◽  
The Given

Laserbased technologies for droplet analysis have existed for decades but most of these devices are not suitable to be moved once calibrated PhaseDoppler interferometer (PDI) technology has enabled the capture of live infield spray particle data such as the particle size distribution velocity and flux which are essential to accurately measure and model the drift of agricultural equipment The objective of this study was to develop and implement methods to determine if drift could be detected and if so to use the data obtained to crossreference its validity with spray drift models AGDISP and WTDISP The spray apparatus consisted of a 12V trailertype sprayer outfitted with a 50 cm high fournozzle boom with 110SG02 nozzles delivering 238 litres/ha at 34 bar This setup was selected to maximise the output of the sprayer and produce the worstcase drift scenario for the given spray system It was observed that driftable particles of a passing and a static sprayer could be detected within close proximity of 8400 cm2 These results also agreed with the model output generated

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document