scholarly journals Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Jenis Pohon Pelindung Yang Akan di Tanam Dipinggir Jalan Menggunakan Metode Promethee II

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 226
Author(s):  
Ardian Fadly Telaumbanua ◽  
Muhammad Syahrizal ◽  
Murdani Murdani
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Tree Species ◽  
Preference Ranking ◽  
Selection System ◽  
Promethee Ii ◽  
The Road ◽  
Microsoft Access ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Selection Of

A protective tree is a group of plants that have long canopy and thick leaves and trunk high enough to be a shade. Usually a protective tree becomes the main plant in a park. But what we often see is the protective tree planted along the road. Its function aside from being a shade tree is also intended to absorb pollution. It is necessary to determine the selection of the best tree species to be planted on the side of the road. The selection of protective tree species still uses a manual system and requires quite a long time. Based on these problems, we need a decision support system (SPK) that can facilitate the selection of the best protective tree species using existing criteria. One method that can be used is the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation II (PROMETHEE II). This method is able to solve any type of problem in decision making with alternatives and criteria that have been given weight. Research using PROMETHEE II produces the composition of the usual protective trees to the best protective trees. The protective tree selection system was built using Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 and Microsoft Access 2010 as a database.

scholarly journals Review of PROMETHEE method in transportation

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74
Author(s):  
Laila Oubahman ◽  
Szabolcs Duleba
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Scale Effects ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Preference Ranking ◽  
Promethee Ii ◽  
Partial Ranking ◽  
Complete Ranking ◽  
Promethee Method

Abstract In recent decades, decision support system has been constantly growing in the field of transportation planning. PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation) method is an efficient decision-making support deployed in case of a finite number of criteria. It provides a partial ranking through PROMETHEE I and a complete ranking with PROMETHEE II. This outranking methodology is characterized by the elimination of scale effects between criteria and managing incomparability with the comprehensive ranking. However, PROMETHEE does not provide guidance to assign weights to criteria and assumes that decision makers are able to allocate weights. This review presents an overview of PROMETHEE models applied in transportation and points out the found gaps in literature.

scholarly journals Penerapan Metode Promethee Sebagai Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemeringkatan Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 381
Author(s):  
Ronal Watrianthos ◽  
Kusmanto Kusmanto ◽  
Elida F. S. Simanjorang ◽  
Muhammad Syaifullah ◽  
Ibnu Rasyid Munthe
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Preference Ranking ◽  
Sample Data ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Main Input ◽  
The Right ◽  
Selection Of

Students rank requires several considerations and criteria. Determination of the criteria must be prepared as much as possible because it is related to the selection of outstanding students. However, this ranking is considered less than optimal and requires a long time because it is processed manually by the school. The right Decision Support System is needed to produce quick and accurate ranking decisions. This study uses the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) as a Decision Support System. This method will use multi-criteria as the main input in decision making. PROMETHEE will be used to analyze criteria based on alternatives compared to rank according to students' grades and abilities. Based on the research sample data, the highest value was 0.739 for alternative A16. This shows that alternative A16 is the best alternative compared to other alternatives based on consideration of all criteria. The development of PROMETHEE with application-based Decision Support Systems is much better because it produces fast and accurate calculations.

scholarly journals Penerapan Metode Promethee Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penetapan Penerima Kartu Indonesia Sehat (KIS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 739
Author(s):  
Reva Octaviani Siregar ◽  
Deci Irmayani ◽  
Masrizal Masrizal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Preference Ranking ◽  
Problem Analysis ◽  
Healthy Environment ◽  
Promethee Method ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Selection Of

Health is a state of well-being of body, soul and society that enables everyone to live productively socially and economically. Therefore, health is the most important element in human life. Health is closely related to economic conditions. factors that affect human health such as healthy food and drinks, a healthy environment and healthy living habits will be fulfilled. Conversely, if a bad economy will make it difficult for individual people to meet some of these factors, if these conditions are ignored, the individual community will find it difficult to improve their health. The problem that occurred at Galang Health Center was the unsatisfactory selection of KIS (Kartu Indonesia Sehat) participants. the selection of KIS (Kartu Indonesia Sehat) participants requires a decision support system (DSS) to speed up and make it easier to make decisions. Decision support systems are used to assist decision making in an organization to facilitate decision making. Where no one knows exactly how decisions should be made. The Promethee method (Preference Ranking Organizational Method for Enrichment Evaluation) is a method used to determine priority (order) in multi-criteria analysis. With the Promethee method, the problem of choosing KIS (Kartu Indonesia Sehat) participants is feasible to use in this study, the stages of research carried out in this study are starting from data collection, problem analysis, method analysis, design and testing of applications to be built, the purpose of this research is to solve the problems of the participants. KIS (Kartu Indonesia Sehat), which have been unsatisfied in terms of the decision of KIS (Kartu Indonesia Sehat) recipients. The results showed that of the three KIS (Kartu Indonesia Sehat) participants who were tested, there were two participants who deserved KIS (Kartu Indonesia Sehat) based on the results of the assessment of the five criteria used so that the calculation results using the Promethee method showed that the net flow from each of the alternatef is -1 for alternative 1 and 0.2 for alternative 2 and 0.8 for the third alternative.

Multi-criteria decision making towards selection of industrial robot

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilip Kumar Sen ◽  
Saurav Datta ◽  
Saroj Kumar Patel ◽  
Siba Sankar Mahapatra
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
Preference Ranking ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Promethee Ii ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Robot Selection ◽  
Selection Of

Purpose – Robot selection is one of the critical decision-making tasks frequently performed by various industries in order to choose the best suited robot for specific industrial purposes. In recent marketplace, the number of robot manufacturers has increased remarkably offering a wide range of models and specifications; thus, robot selection has become indeed confusing as well as complicated task. Selection of an appropriate robot is a sensitive process; it may result massive letdown, if not chosen properly. Therefore, for unravel the selection problem; the purpose of this paper is to explore the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) II method. Design/methodology/approach – Apart from a large variety of robotic systems, existence of various multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) tools and techniques may create confusion to the decision makers’ in regards of application feasibility as well as superiority in performance to work under different decision-making situations. In this context, the PROMETHEE II method has been found as an efficient decision-making tool which provides complete ranking order of all available alternatives prudently, thus avoiding errors in decision making. Findings – In this context, the present paper highlights application potential of aforesaid PROMETHEE II method in relation to robot selection problem subjected to a set of quantitative (objective) evaluation data collected from the available literature resources. Advantages and disadvantages of PROMETHEE II method have also been reported in comparison to other existing MCDM approaches. Originality/value – The study bears significant managerial implications. Proper evaluation and selection of appropriate candidate robot would be helpful for the industries in order to improve product quality as well as to increase productivity. Proper utilization of resources could be ensured. Functioning would be accurate with reduced timespan. As a consequence, company can increase its profit margin in long run.

scholarly journals Modelling and Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Selection of Specific Growth Rate Models of Batch Cultivation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast for Ethanol Production

Fermentation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petrov
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Specific Growth Rate ◽  
Specific Growth ◽  
Batch Cultivation ◽  
Preference Ranking ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Promethee Ii ◽  
Selection Of

This study is focused on using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) for selecting specific growth rate models of batch cultivation by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ten specific growth rate models—Monod, Mink, Tessier, Moser, Aiba, Andrews, Haldane, Luong, Edward, and Han-Levenspiel—were investigated in order to explain the cell growth kinetics by the dependence on glucose. By using the preference ranking organization method (PROMETHEE) II, it was found that the Andrews model was the highest of rank and was the most appropriate one for modelling.

scholarly journals Selection of the Best Method for Underpinning Foundations Using the PROMETHEE II Method

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (13) ◽  
pp. 5373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryszard Dachowski ◽  
Katarzyna Gałek
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Construction Industry ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Preference Ranking ◽  
Promethee Ii ◽  
Jet Grouting ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Selection Of

This article proposes applying the preference-ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE) II in the selection of the optimal solution and ranking of selected methods for underpinning foundations. Analysis of the selected foundation-underpinning methods was based on a complex decision-making problem that included aspects of the three pillars of sustainable development, and it was extended to include technological and constructional criteria. The study used the following criteria for assessing proposed variants: price, bearing capacity, noise and vibrations, necessary equipment, necessary excavations under final structure, failure rates, and necessary foundation shoring. Analysis using the PROMETHEE II method allowed for identifying strengths and weaknesses of selected methods for underpinning foundations. The PROMETHEE II method enabled to create a ranking of foundation-underpinning methods. Jet-grouting and root-pile methods were the highest scorers in this ranking and those that fulfilled the identified criteria to the greatest extent. Moreover, analysis showed that the PROMETHEE II method was useful in solving problems of choice in the construction industry.

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan SNMPTN Jalur Undangan Dengan Metode Electre

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Lidia K Simanjuntak ◽  
Tessa Y M Sihite ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Nuning Kurniasih ◽  
Yuhandri Yuhandri
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Action Selection ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Prospective Students ◽  
College Entrance ◽  
Electre Method ◽  
Selection Of

All colleges each year organize the selection of new admissions. Acceptance of prospective students in universities as education providers is done by selecting prospective students based on achievement in school and college entrance selection. To select the best student candidates based on predetermined criteria, then use Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) or commonly called decision support system. One method in MCDM is the Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Reality (ELECTRE). The ELECTRE method is the best method of action selection. The ELECTRE method to obtain the best alternative by eliminating alternative that do not fit the criteria and can be applied to the decision SNMPTN invitation path.

PEMILIHAN KEPLING TELADAN MENERAPKAN METODE RANK ORDER CENTROID (ROC) DAN METODE ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT (ARAS) DI KECAMATAN MEDAN AREA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza Handayani ◽  
Muhammad Syahrizal ◽  
Kennedi Tampubolon
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Priority Level ◽  
The Village ◽  
Field Area ◽  
Selection Of

The head of the environment is an extension of the head of the village head in assisting or providing services to the community both in the administration of administration in the village and to other problems. It is natural for a kepling to be appreciated for their performance during their special tenure in the kecamatan field area. Previously, the selection of a dipling in a sub-district was very inefficient and seemed unfair for this exemplary selection to use a system to produce an accurate value, and no intentional element. To overcome the process of selecting an exemplary kepling that experiences these obstacles by using an application called a Decision Support System. Decision Support System (SPK) is a system that can solve a problem, and this system is also assisted with several methods, namely the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) method that can assign weight values to each of the criteria based on their priority level. And to do the ranking or determine an exemplary set using the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method, this method provides decision making that takes decisions based on ranking or the highest value.Keywords: Head of Medan Area Subdistrict, SPK, Centroid Rank Order, Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS).

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN KEPALA CABANG TERBAIK BANK SUMUT DENGAN MENERAPKAN METODE VIKOR

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Betrik J Hutapea ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Siti Nurhabibah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Development Bank ◽  
Vikor Method ◽  
The North ◽  
Long Time ◽  
North Sumatra ◽  
Regional Development Bank ◽  
Selection Of

SUMUT Bank is one of the Banks in Indonesia with the name of the company PT. Regional Development Bank of North Sumatra. The North Sumatra Bank has branches in each region in North Sumatra both in the district and in the sub-district, and each of these branches is led by a branch leader or branch head. The head of this branch is responsible for the reversal of the Bank being led. The best and most accomplished branch heads deserve more and more awards. The selection of the best branch heads is selected transparently and structured in the hope that it can be a motivation for all branch heads to be able to further improve the quality and service of the Bank they lead. Making the best branch head selection done manually will take a long time and tends to be less transparent and structured. One solution so that the implementation of the selection can be carried out easily and quickly, it requires a Decision Support System that can provide consistency of assessment. In this study the method used is the VIKOR method (Visekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje). This method makes cracking on alternatives based on criteria that have been determined with an ideal compromise solution or the best solution, so that this system can later be beneficial for the SUMUT Bank to get the title in determining the best branch head.Keywords: Decision Support System, North Sumatra Bank, Branch Head, Vikor

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN GURU BERPRESTASI KOTA MEDAN MENERAPKAN METODE PREFERENCES SELECTION INDEX (STUDI KASUS : DINAS PENDIDIKAN KOTA MEDAN)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fajar Syahputra ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Ikhwan Lubis ◽  
Agus Perdana Windarto
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Basic Education ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Selection Of

The teacher is a major milestone in the world of education, the ability and achievement of students cannot be separated from the role of a teacher in teaching and guiding students. Based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers, in Article 1 explained that teachers are professional educators with the main task of educating, teaching, guiding, directing, training, evaluating, and evaluating students in early childhood education through formal education, basic education and education medium. Whereas in Article 4 of the Act, it is explained that the position of teachers as professionals serves to enhance the dignity and role of teachers as learning agents to function to improve the quality of national education.Decision making is an election process, among various alternatives that aim to meet one or several targets. The decision-making system has 4 phases, namely intelligence, design, choice and implementation. These phases are the basis for decision making, which ends with a recommendation.The Preferences Selection Index (PSI) method is a rarely used decision support system method. This method is a method developed by stevanie and Bhatt (2010) to solve the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). With the right consideration, this method can be one of the tools to determine policies in decision-making systems, especially the selection of outstanding teachers. Determination of policies taken as a basis for decision making, must use criteria that can be defined clearly and objectively.Keywords: Decision Support System, PSI, Selection of Achieving Teachers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document