Properties of Court Decisions and the Mechanism of Their Adoption in Criminal Proceedings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.I. Kachalov ◽  
M.V. Belyaev ◽  
O.V. Kachalova ◽  
E.V. Markovicheva
Keyword(s):  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings

SPECIFIC FEATURES OF PROPERTY INTERESTS PROTECTION OF THE PENAL SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AS REPRESENTATIVE OF A VICTIM

2021 ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
Дмитрий Викторович Кияйкин
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment

В статье проведен анализ существующей практики защиты имущественных интересов уголовно-исполнительной системы Российской Федерации при участии в уголовном процессе в качестве представителя потерпевшего, изложены рекомендации по улучшению данной работы с учетом особенностей сложившейся практики. Раскрываются особенности уголовно-процессуальной защиты на основе материалов территориальных органов и анализа дел указанной категории схарактеристикой эффективных решений иимеющихся проблем по защите имущественных интересов уголовно-исполнительной системы (далее - УИС), материалов практики защиты поуказанным вопросам, аналитических и статистических данных за 2018-2020 гг. Обращено внимание, чтона практике имеются сложности с определением размера возмещаемого ущерба и сроков исковой давности, а также с фактическим исполнением судебных решений овзыскании ущерба в связи с финансовой несостоятельностью должников. Важной проблемой по защите имущественных интересов остается отсутствие методики определения размера причиненного репутационного вреда органам иучреждениям уголовно-исполнительной системы Российской Федерации. Обеспечение своевременного допуска представителя органа илиучреждения УИС имеет существенное значение для защиты имущественных интересов, поскольку юридическое лицо получает фактическую возможность по отстаиванию своих законных интересов лишь смомента допуска представителя - физического лица. Автором определены направления работы должностных и иных заинтересованных лиц по реализации защиты имущественных интересов УИС при участии в уголовном процессе в качестве представителя потерпевшего. The article analyzes the existing practice of protecting the property interests of the Penal system of the Russian Federation when participating in criminal proceedings as a representative of the victim, and provides recommendations for improving this work, taking into account the features of the current practice. The article reveals the features of criminal procedure protection based on the materials of territorial bodies and the analysis of cases of this category with the characteristics of effective solutions and existing problems in protecting the property interests of the Penal system (hereinafter the FPS), materials of defense practice on these issues, analytical and statistical data for the period 2018-2020. Attention is drawn to the fact that in practice there are some peculiarities in determining the amount of damage to be compensated and the limitation period. Due to the financial insolvency of debtors in practice, there is a difficulty with the actual execution of court decisions on recovery of damages. An important problem in protecting property interests remains the lack of a methodology for determining the amount of reputational damage caused to the bodies and institutions of the Russian Federation's penal system. Ensuring the timely admission of a representative of a body or institution of a penal system is essential for the protection of property interests, since a legal entity gets the actual opportunity to defend its legitimate interests only from the moment of admission of a representative - an individual. The author defines the directions of work of officials and other interested persons to protect the property interests of the Penal system of the Russian Federation when participating in criminal proceedings as a representative of the victim.

scholarly journals The right to appeal on criminal procedure under international acts and jurisprudence

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
MSc. Vilard Bytyqi
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Advanced Level ◽  
The World ◽  
The Right ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Comparative Description ◽  
Procedural Aspect

The right to appeal, respectively the right on complaint as per our legal vocabulary, constitutes the basic trunk of the second phase of court decisions in a certain procedure, in particular the criminal proceedings.The aim of this paper is to emphasize the main notions of appeal, but also in other aspects through the comparative description it aims to bring more clarity in differences and similarities that exist in between the appeal which is used in our criminal proceedings and the appeal which is used in the criminal proceedings that take place in the supranational courts. It is known that in courts which consist of international elements, the appeal is positioned in a more advanced level, due to the fact that there are grounds of suspicion used over every element that could be used in any national criminal proceedings.Overall, in any place of the world, the appeal has the goal to remedy court decisions brought by the court of first instance, while, in the procedural aspect it has more or less differences depending on the regulations of criminal procedures of that state. Such difference due to the diversity of the legal systems today are also accepted as the universal legal value, since establishment of international tribunals provides the best practice in this field. 

scholarly journals PROSECUTOR'S SUPERVISION OF LAW CONDUCTING INVESTIGATIVE (SEARCH) ACTIONS

2020 ◽  
pp. 377-386
Author(s):  
Я. Ю. Конюшенко
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
Procedural Guidance ◽  
Compliance With The Law ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of the article is to define the prosecutor's supervision over investigative (search) actions as a legal guarantee of human rights, as well as problematic issues in its implementation and to make proposals to improve the current criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine. The article defines doctrinal approaches to the concepts of "prosecutor's supervision over compliance with the law during the pre-trial investigation" and "prosecutor's procedural guidance of the pre-trial investigation" in the context of investigative (search) actions. The author came to the conclusion that the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine "On the Prosecutor's Office" and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in terms of regulating the functions and powers of the prosecutor during the pre-trial investigation. Based on the study, it is proposed to consider procedural guidance as one of the forms of prosecutor's supervision over the pre-trial investigation, which is implemented directly by the prosecutor or a group of prosecutors who are appointed to carry it out in a particular criminal proceeding. The author also emphasizes the existence of forms of supervision of the highest level prosecutor on the legality of these actions, which are implemented through the demand and study of information on the progress and results of pre-trial investigation, criminal proceedings and certified copies of court decisions and study of compliance with criminal procedure. A number of problematic issues during the prosecutor's supervision in pre-trial criminal proceedings are outlined, which relate to the relationship between the prosecutor's supervision and judicial control over the legality of investigative (search) actions; subjects and subject of supervision of the prosecutor in this sphere; providing the prosecutor-procedural manager and prosecutors of the highest level with instructions and instructions during the investigative (search) actions. To address these issues, it is proposed to amend the current criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine. The study of the materials of criminal proceedings and the survey of the subjects of criminal proceedings indicate the existence of a number of problematic issues that exist during the implementation of the prosecutor's procedural guidance of investigative (search) actions in the context of human rights.

SHORTENED TIMELINE OF APPEAL AGAINST INTERIM COURT DECISIONS MADE AT A PRE-TRIAL STAGE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

2021 ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Polina O. Gertsen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Medical Organization ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article deals with the problem of classifying interim decisions among those that are appealed in a shortened timeline, and determining the list of such decisions, as well as the closely related problem of determining the rules for calculating such a shortened timeline. Currently, the Criminal Procedure law provides for the possibility of appealing a number of interim decisions made at a pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings before the final decision Moreover, for appealing some interim decisions at a pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings, a general period of appeal is provided - 10 days from the date of the court decision, or the same period from the date of serving with a copy of the decision the person who is in custody, while for others a shortened timeline is 3 days from the date of the decision. Meanwhile, it follows from the literal interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation that within a shortened three-day period, court decisions on the election of preventive measures in the form of a ban on certain actions, bail, house arrest, detention, the refusal to apply them or extend their application can be appealed. At the same time, such a conclusion is not confirmed either in the positions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation or in judicial practice. Based on the analysis of the criminal procedure law, the position of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts of the Russian Federation, scientific literature and practice, several problems are highlighted. Thus, the author states the discrepancy between the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation when it comes to establishing the terms for appealing the court decision on a preventive measure in the form of bail. In addition, there is no single criterion for establishing shortened deadlines for appealing interim decisions, and there-fore, the list of such decisions requires analysis. In addition, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation does not contain a norm that determines the rules for calculating daily terms. The author formulates several proposals for amendments. It is proposed to determine the criteria for a shortened appeal timeline as the restriction of the constitutional right to liberty and immunity of a person that requires the immediate judicial review of the lawfulness of such a decision. It is also necessary to correct the phrasing of Article 106 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which defines the procedure for applying a preventive measure in the form of bail, and establish the rule that appeal against such an interim court decision is filed according to the rules of Chapter 45.1 of the Criminal Procedure Code within ten days. The list of court decisions which must be appealed in a shortened timeline must be expanded by a court decision on putting a suspect or an accused into a medical organization providing medical or psychiatric care in hospital settings for forensic examination, as well as the extension of a person’s stay in a medical organization. In addition, the author has analyzed the approaches to the calculation of daily terms and proposes to amend Part 1 of Article 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation by establishing a single procedure for calculating daily terms, which does not take into account the day that served as a starting point of the term.

The Importance of Full and Frank Disclosure in Family Law Financial Proceedings and the Many Consequences of Non-Disclosure

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-125
Author(s):  
Hugh P K Kopsen ◽  
Robyn Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Civil Litigation ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Full Disclosure ◽  
High Court ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Many ◽  
Do So

This article examines the duty of full and frank disclosure of parties to family law financial proceedings in Australia, and the potential consequences of failure to comply with this fundamental obligation. The duty is briefly compared and contrasted with disclosure requirements in civil litigation and criminal proceedings to demonstrate the uniqueness of the family law position. The rationale and content of the duty is considered in light of recent cases including the High Court decisions of Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 and Hall v Hall (2016) 257 CLR 490. The article presents a three-pronged taxonomy of the consequences of non-compliance with the duty, namely evidential, procedural, and final orders/related consequences. We conclude that the absolute nature of the duty and the comprehensive nature of the potential consequences of failure to make full disclosure mean that parties and legal practitioners do so at their peril.

scholarly journals EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN CASES RELATED TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

2020 ◽  
pp. 44-54
Author(s):  
Liudmyla Golovko ◽  
◽  
Viktor Ladychenko ◽  
Olena Gulaс ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Functional Method ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Right

The purpose of the article is to investigate the effectiveness of Ukrainian legislation in the fieldof combating domestic violence, as well as the implementation of the right to a fair trial in casesinvolving domestic violence. The following methods were used in the study: analysis and synthesis,system-functional method, comparative method. Results. The article analyzes the legislation ofUkraine in the field of prevention and counteraction to domestic violence, lists both its advantagesand disadvantages, reveals measures in the field of prevention and counteraction to domesticviolence, responsibility for domestic violence, the main directions of state policy in the field ofprevention and counteraction to domestic violence, types of domestic violence. Legal regulation of judicial protection for victims of domestic violence has been studied. Judicial practice in casesrelated to domestic violence was considered. Problems of exercising the right to a fair trial inUkraine in cases related to domestic violence were revealed. Conclusions. Undoubtedly, theadoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Prevention and Counteraction to Domestic Violence”, theintroduction of criminal liability for domestic violence and amendments to a number of regulationsto address domestic violence is a positive step in combating such a negative phenomenon asdomestic violence. At the same time, a significant number of issues remain unresolved. This isespecially true for the resolution of cases of domestic violence and the exercise of the right to afair trial in cases of domestic violence, as well as for the enforcement of court decisions on theissuance of restrictive orders. The need to develop a form for assessing the risks of recurrenceof domestic violence has been demonstrated, as has been done for police officers during theessessment of the need to issue an emergency injunction. The need to enshrine at the legislativelevel what is the preventive work of police officers with the offender and how it is carried outwas proved, because without proper regulation of this issue, this type of special measure tocombat domestic violence is declarative and not applied in practice. In addition, the problem ofrefusal of public and private executive services to enforce court decisions on the establishmentof restrictive measures is pointed out, which also requires legislative regulation. The need tostrengthen the position of the victim of domestic violence by giving her/him the opportunity toclaim compensation for non-pecuniary damage in criminal proceedings was noted.

scholarly journals Prohibition of Certain Acts and Stipulated Prohibitions in Combination with Bail and House Arrest: First Six Months of Instrumentation

Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Larkina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
House Arrest ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
The Russian Federation

Based on the study of court decisions, the article analyzes the first judicial-investigative practice of applying innovations in the system of procedural coercive measures — preventive measures in the form of a ban on certain actions, as well as bail and house arrest in combination with the prohibitions provided for in part 6 of article 105.1 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The subject of the study were 40 court decisions made by district and higher courts of 17 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The author analyzes these decisions on preventive measures, the initiators of their election, the crimes charged with the accused, the stages of criminal proceedings at which they were taken. Decisions on the election of a ban on certain actions are analyzed according to the criteria: the number of simultaneous prohibitions; the time allowed to leave the premises; the places that the accused is forbidden to visit; the persons with whom they are forbidden to communicate. The analysis of the resolutions on the election of bail and house arrest with simultaneous establishment of certain prohibitions showed that the courts do not always properly motivate their decisions, subjected to defendants not covered by section 6 of article 105.1 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation prohibitions, permitted the defendants to take actions that do not provide their isolation from society. The data given in the article are accompanied by the author’s comments and references to the decisions set in the State automated system of the Russian Federation “Justice”. At the end of the study, the author provides conclusions and proposes to adjust in the near future the judicial practice of application of preventive measures following appropriate explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, taking into account the changes made to the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation by the Federal law of 18.04.2018 No. 72-FZ.

REVIEW OF CASES ON NEWLY OPENED AND NEW CIRCUMSTANCES: UNFA-VOURABLE DISTINCTIONS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

2021 ◽  
pp. 105-114
Author(s):  
Alia R. Sharipova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The article deals with the comparative analysis of the procedure and grounds for reviewing court cases under new and newly discovered circumstances in criminal and arbitration, civil and administrative proceedings. The author proceeds from the idea of common fundamental beginnings of justice in general, and therefore, all types of judicial activities - including an extraordinary review of judicial decisions, which have entered into legal force. The branch specifics of specific procedural institutions should have a special explanation based on the specifics of the branch itself. The author thinks that there is no key basis for reviewing the case on the newly discovered circumstances in the criminal trial and attempts to replace it with one of the new circumstances. In this part, the current criminal procedure law differs unfavourably from the Soviet Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) of the RSFSR of 1960 - among the newly discovered circumstances, there are no those that could indicate a miscarriage of justice made out of direct connection with someone's criminal actions. In the current CPC of the Russian Federation, the list of newly discovered circumstances is closed, and the list of new circumstances that entail the review of the court decisions is, on the contrary, open. Examples of academic papers and administrative enactments justifying such a replacement are given. The author gives his arguments against it and proposes to change the list of grounds for revision, referring to the regulation in other procedural branches, historical and foreign experience. A significant procedural difference of the considered type of extraordinary review of cases in criminal proceedings from other types of proceedings is found. It is the need for applicants to request a review from the prosecutor, not from the court. The greatest objection is the non-alternative procedure: the prosecutor is a participant in the criminal proceedings on the part of the prosecution, he is responsible for the undoubted proof of the charge, which is the basis of the sentence, the abolition of which is requested by another interested person. The negative impact of the prosecutor's mediation between the complainant and the court on access to justice and its quality is argued. It is pointed out that there is no need for prosecutorial checks to resolve the issue of judicial review of the case. The analysis of judicial statistics in different branches of justice shows that criminal proceedings differ sharply by the negligible number of judicial review cases due to newly discovered and new circumstances. The article calls into question the ability to explain this fact by a higher quality of sentences in criminal cases in comparison with other court decisions in other court cases.

15. Challenging Governmental Decisions: The Process

2021 ◽  
pp. 405-427
Author(s):  
Ian Loveland
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Family Practitioner ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Technical Area ◽  
Legal Procedures

This chapter examines the legal procedures an applicant must follow when challenging a government decision and explores how court decisions in this nominally very technical area of administrative law can have profound implications for the meaning in practical terms of such broad constitutional principles as the rule of law and the sovereignty of Parliament. The chapter begins by examining the historical duality with English administrative law of the mechanism through which citizens might question the lawfulness of government action. The chapter then continues to cover the case of Barnard v National Dock Labour Board; the Order 53 reforms; the case of O’Reilly v Mackman (1982); the post-O’Reilly case law; the case of Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Family Practitioner Committee; and public law principle as a defence in criminal proceedings.

scholarly journals Newly Discovered and Exceptional Circumstances in Criminal Procedure of Some European States

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-66
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Theoretical Justification ◽  
The Core ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Principal Directions ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article analyses the core and contents of the proceedings based on newly discovered or exceptional circumstances (hereinafter – PBNDEC) in the criminal procedure law of Ukraine and other European countries. The authors emphasize that the PBNDEC are not designed to eliminate shortcomings of the pre-trial investigation and the trial in criminal proceedings, providing the reserve function in discovering and correcting court errors, but rather serves its own purpose in the mechanism of legal defence. The order the criminal procedure activity during this stage is largely determined by the grounds for its implementation – newly discovered or exceptional circumstances (hereinafter – NDEC). The differences between both groups of such circumstances are provided. Procedural features of the PBNDEC, which separate them from the proceedings on appeal and cassation, are singled out. The goals of this stage in the criminal proceedings are formulated, and the significance of this stage has been revealed. The need for improvement in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine which regulates the PBNDEC has been justified. The articles answer the questions of how efficient the regulation of the PBNDEC in the criminal procedure law of Ukraine is: whether the regulation is in agreement with the standards, whether it is established in the criminal procedure law of European countries, whether any doctrine positions regarding the core of such a stage in criminal proceedings require rethinking or additional theoretical justification, and which, of the normative regulations of such form of appeal and review of the court decisions, the principal directions for improvement are. In order to obtain answers to the aforementioned and other questions, the legal nature and the models of PBNDEC in the criminal legislation of European countries are considered in section two of the article. Section three depicts the procedural specifics of the PBNDEC in the criminal legislation of Ukraine. Section four describes the definition, shows the goals and significance, and introduces the structure of this stage in the criminal proceedings. Section five embraces the characteristics of features of NDEC in the criminal legislation of Ukraine. In section six the grounds for the PBNDEC in the criminal procedure law of Ukraine are analysed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document