MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENANGANAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI UPAYA MEMINIMALISIR KELEBIHAN HUNIAN DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN

The excess housing in the Indonesian Correctional Institution does not abate. This condition is faced with criminal efforts which should be a final diversion related to the effort to include convicted persons in Corrections Institutions. The aim is to analyze whether the mediation of penal as the application of Restorative Justice can be an alternative effort to minimize excess occupancy inmates in correctional institutions. The use of this research as a recommendation for law enforcement officials in the handling of criminal acts by promoting penal mediation. The research uses normative legal research methods with literature studies. Mediation Penal is considered able to be an intermediary process of mediation or peace between perpetrators of criminal acts with victims of criminal acts as minimizing the excess occupancy that starts from handling the police and prosecutors stage.

Download Full-text

KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERMOTIF RINGAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KAMPUNG KUALA GASIB DI KECAMATAN KOTO GASIB KABUPATEN SIAK

JURNAL HUKUM DAS SOLLEN ◽

10.32520/das-sollen.v1i4.333 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (4) ◽

Author(s):

ELMA YANTI

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Indigenous People ◽

Criminal Case ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

Legal Research ◽

Direct Participation ◽

Criminal Offenses ◽

Differences Of Opinion ◽

Law Enforcement Officials

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation

Download Full-text

PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM TINDAK PELAKU PENYEBARAN HOAKS

Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i09.p01 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (9) ◽

pp. 1301

Author(s):

Glery Lazuardi

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Research Method ◽

Analytical Approach ◽

Legal Research ◽

Law Enforcement Officials

Tujuan penelitian ini yakni memberikan masukan kepada aparat penegak hukum agar menggunakan pendekatan Restorative Justice terhadap pelaku penyebaran informasi tidak benar atau hoaks. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan pendekatan Restorative Justice dapat diterapkan kepada pelaku penyebaran hoaks. Sebab, penerapan Restorative Justice sudah sesuai dengan falsafah bangsa Indonesia, yaitu Pancasila khususnya sila ke-4, yang mengedepankan musyawarah. Dengan demikian, harapannya upaya pemidanaan terhadap pelaku penyebaran hoaks dapat dikurangi dan dilakukan pendekatan melalui cara mediasi antara korban dengan pelaku penyebaran hoaks. The purpose of this study is to provide input to law enforcement officials using the Restorative Justice approach to the perpetrators of disseminating hoaxes. This study uses a normative legal research method with a descriptive analytical approach. The results of this study indicate that the Restorative Justice approach can be applied to the perpetrators of hoax distribution. Because, the application of Restorative Justice is in accordance with the philosophy of the Indonesian people, namely Pancasila especially the 4th precepts, which prioritizes deliberation. Thus, the hope of efforts to reduce the perpetrators of hoax distribution can be reduced and approach is carried out through mediation between the victim and the perpetrators of the spread of hoaxes.

Download Full-text

EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PRODUSEN MAKANAN DI INDONESIA

Jurnal Gagasan Hukum ◽

10.31849/jgh.v1i02.7696 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (02) ◽

pp. 146-161

Author(s):

Ruli Purnamasari ◽

Solihan Solihan ◽

Viyola Azzahra

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Consumer Protection ◽

Criminal Responsibility ◽

Health And Safety ◽

Food Products ◽

Health Law ◽

Legal Research ◽

Consumer Protection Act ◽

Food Law ◽

Law Enforcement Officials

Abstrak Efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap produsen makanan berbahaya menuju Indonesia Sehat 2025 tersebut didasarkan apabila pelaku usaha memproduksi dan memperdagangkan produk makanan yang mengandung bahan kimia serta membahayakan kesehatan dan keselamatan konsumen, maka pelaku usaha/produsen melanggar Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan, Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan, Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang perlindungan Konsumen. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normative yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui Faktor yang mempengaruhi terhadap efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap produsen makanan berbahaya menuju Indonesia Sehat 2025. Faktor hukumnya, yaitu lemahnya sanksi terhadap pelanggarnya, proses penanganan masalah berbelit-belit, kurang profesionalnya para aparatur penegak hukum dan kurangnya koordinasi antar penegak hukum. Tanggung jawab pidana produsen terhadap kerugian yang diderita konsumen akibat makanan berbahaya yang diproduksi, dipasarkan, ditawarkan dan diperdagangkannya, secara yuridis, dalam konsepsi Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait lainnya. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ON FOOD MANUFACTURERS IN INDONESIA Abstract The effectiveness of law enforcement against dangerous food producers towards Healthy Indonesia 2025 is based on if business actors produce and trade food products that contain chemicals and endanger the health and safety of consumers, then the business actor/producer violates Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, Law No. Law Number 18 of 2012 concerning Food, Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This research is a normative legal research that aims to determine the factors that influence the effectiveness of law enforcement against producers of dangerous food towards Healthy Indonesia 2025. The legal factors are the weakness of sanctions against violators, the process of handling problems is complicated, the lack of professionalism of law enforcement officials and the lack of coordination between law enforcement. The producer's criminal responsibility for the loss suffered by the consumer due to the dangerous food produced, marketed, offered and traded, legally, in the conception of the Consumer Protection Act and other relevant laws and regulations. Keywords: Effectiveness, Law Enforcement, Food Producers

Download Full-text

MERINTANGI PENGUBURAN JENAZAH COVID-19 DITINJAU BERDASARKAN PASAL 178 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA

LEGALITAS ◽

10.31293/lg.v5i2.5115 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 104

Author(s):

Muhammad Rezky Rinaldy Dan Syamsudin

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Research Method ◽

Criminal Code ◽

The Body ◽

Legal Research ◽

Corona Virus ◽

The World ◽

Law Enforcement Officials ◽

The Impact

Indonesia and even the world now feel the impact of the Corona virus outbreak (covid-19), in connection with it hindering the burial of the bodies of victims who died. The phenomenon of corpse rejection of corona virus patients (covid-19) continues to occur in various regions. In fact, the body must be buried immediately no later than 4 hours after being declared dead. The main reason people are reluctant to accept the bodies of patients co-19 because of fear of contracting. While the medical ensure that the body will not transmit the virus. The body in the coffin has been wrapped and declared sterile. The type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results of the study showed that obstructing officers who will carry out official burials could indeed be convicted. Law enforcement officials can use Article 178 of the Criminal Code. not a complaint offense. Law enforcement officials can immediately take action without anyone complaining. "If the incident fulfills the elements contained in Article 178 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrators can be charged. However, it must look at intentions and actions as a condition for imposing a crime on someone.

Download Full-text

Decision Making in the Process against Children Diversion Dealing with the Law Has not Aged 12 Years

International Journal of Scientific Research and Management ◽

10.18535/ijsrm/v7i7.lla05 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (07) ◽

Author(s):

I Pande Ketut Arya Yarsita ◽

Rodliyah ◽

RR. Cahyowati

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Law Enforcement ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Social Research ◽

Best Interests ◽

District Court ◽

Research Report ◽

The Social ◽

Law Enforcement Officials ◽

The Law

This study aims to examine and analyze the concept of decision making in the diversion process for children facing the law who are not yet 12 years old; and law enforcement decision making in the diversion process for children who are faced with a law that is not yet 12 years old (Study of the Chairperson of the Mataram District Court Number: 22/Pen.Div/2017/PN Mtr). The concept of decision making in the diversion process for children facing the law that is not yet 12 years old is the judge in imposing sanctions for children considering recommendations in the social research report made by community counselors to express and find data and information objectively about the development and background of life children from various sociological, psychological and other aspects while still paying attention to the best interests of the child. Law enforcement of decision making in the diversion process against children who are faced with a law that is not yet 12 years old emphasizes restorative justice which is the goal in the implementation of the diversion of cases of children facing the law. Law enforcement officials both Investigators, Community Guidance and Professional Social Workers conduct deliberations to reach a decision based on restorative justice that prioritizes the best interests of children.

Download Full-text

IMPLEMENTASI RESTITUSI ANAK SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI ANAK KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA DI PROVINSI RIAU

Jurnal Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum ◽

10.36085/jpk.v3i1.1179 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 25-42

Author(s):

Dewi Lisnawati

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Sexual Assault ◽

Sexual Violence ◽

Child Protection ◽

Government Regulation ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Child Victims ◽

Legal Research ◽

Law Enforcement Officials ◽

Victims Of Crime

ABSTRAKSetiap anak yang menjadi korban tindak pidana berhak mendapatkan restitusi seperti yang tertuang di dalam peraturan pelaksana dari Pasal 71 D Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak No. 35 Tahun 2014 yakni Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana. Pelaksanaan restitusi kepada korban hanya ditujukan kepada beberapa tindak pidana tertentu saja termasuk tindak pidana kekerasan seksual. Diterbitkannya Peraturan Pemerintah tersebut bertujuan untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap korban khususnya anak-anak atas penerapan hak restitusi. Penelitian ini termasuk tipologi penelitian hukum empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan restitusi bagi anak yang menjadi korban tindak pidana kekerasan seksual di Provinsi Riau berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 tahun 2017 belum berjalan dengan baik. Hal ini disebabkan oleh beberapa kendala yakni kurangnya kesadaran dari aparat penegak hukum untuk mendorong terlaksananya restitusi bagi anak yang menjadi korban tindak pidana, administirasi pengajuan permohonan restitusi yang rumit, dan kendala restitusi yang tidak dibayarkan dan ketentuan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 yang kurang jelas. Fokus penelitian ini adalah penerapan restitusi pada anak korban tindak pidana berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017.Kata kunci: restitusi; anak korban tindak pidana; kekerasan seksualABSTRAKEvery child who is a victim of a crime is entitled to get restitution as stipulated in the implementing regulations of Article 71 D of the Child Protection Act No. 35 of 2014 namely Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017 concerning Implementation of Restitution for Children Who Become Victims of Criminal Acts. The implementation of restitution to victims is only aimed at a number of specific criminal acts including sexual violence. The issuance of this Government Regulation aims to provide legal protection for victims, especially children, on the application of restitution rights so that they can run well. This research is a typology of empirical legal research. The results showed that the implementation of restitution for children who were victims of sexual violence in Riau Province based on Government Regulation No. 43 of 2017 has not gone well. This is caused by several constraints namely lack of awareness from law enforcement officials to encourage the implementation of restitution for children who are victims of criminal acts, administration of submission of complex restitution applications, and restitution constraints that are not paid and the unclear provisions in Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017. The focus of this research is on the provisions stipulated in Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017 concerning the implementation of restitution for children who are victims of criminal acts.Keywords: restitution; child victims of crime; sexual assault

Download Full-text

Determining State’s Financial Losses in Corruption: An Institutional Power and Constraint in Indonesia

Lentera Hukum ◽

10.19184/ejlh.v8i1.21923 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 95

Author(s):

I Made Gemet Dananjaya Suta ◽

I Gusti Agung Mas Prabandari ◽

Ni Luh Gede Astariyani

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

State Institution ◽

Legal Research ◽

Institutional Power ◽

Financial Audit ◽

Law Enforcement Officials ◽

Financial Losses

One of the main elements in corruption is the loss of state finances. It results in confusion impacting law enforcement officials' performance in eradicating corruption. In Indonesia, the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) is an institution authorized to assess state financial losses. In practice, the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) is another institution with similar power. This study analyzed which institutions have the more appropriate power in determining state financial losses in corruption. Using legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study showed that the BPK is an institution granted the constitutional power to examine state finances' management and responsibility, asserting its more legitimate institution to handle the power to assess the financial losses. Consequently, the BPK is the only state institution that can determine state financial losses. At the same time, the BPKP is only authorized to assess or audit the calculation of state financial losses as an indication of irregularities detrimental to state finances. This study concluded that only the BPK can assess and determine state financial losses used in examining the alleged corruption before the court. KEYWORDS: Institutional Powers, Financial Audit Institution, Corruption.

Download Full-text

PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEPEMILIKAN TANAH INDONESIA OLEH WARGA NEGARA ASING MELALUI PERJANJIAN NOMINEE

Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i12.p04 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (12) ◽

pp. 1862

Author(s):

Fithrah Fithrah

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Research Methods ◽

Public Interest ◽

Research Method ◽

Scientific Paper ◽

Land Ownership ◽

The State ◽

Legal Research ◽

The Public ◽

The People

Tujuan penulisan karya ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengkaji pengaturan terkait kepemilikan tanah di Indonesia oleh orang asing melalui perjanjian nominee dan upaya penegakan hukumnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil dari penulisan karya ilmiah ini ialah penegakan hukum terhadap praktek kepemilikan tanah oleh orang asing melalui perjanjian nominee dapat dilakukan oleh kejaksaan selaku organ negara yang mewakili kepentingan publik, baik melalui sarana perdata maupun pidana. Hal ini perlu dilakukan guna melindungi tanah Indonesia dimiliki oleh orang asing dan guna mendukung upaya negara mewujudkan tugas konstitusionalnya, yakni menguasai tanah bagi sebesar-besarnya kesejahteraan rakyat tanpa harus memberikan ketidakadilan bagi Warga Negara Asing. The purpose of writing this scientific paper is to examine regulations related to land ownership in Indonesia by foreigners through nominee agreements and law enforcement efforts. The research method used is normative legal research methods using statute and conceptual approaches. The result of writing this scientific paper is that law enforcement against the practice of land ownership by foreigners through nominee agreements can be carried out by the prosecutor as the state organ representing the public interest, both through civil and criminal means. This needs to be done in order to protect Indonesian land owned by foreigners and to support the state's efforts to realize its constitutional duties, namely to control the land for the maximum welfare of the people without having to give injustice to foreign citizens.

Download Full-text

Telaah Yuridis terhadap Pengaturan Restorative Justice di Kepolisian

Wajah Hukum ◽

10.33087/wjh.v5i2.716 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 562

Author(s):

Rena Yulia ◽

Aliyth Prakarsa

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Third Party ◽

Criminal Investigation ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

Legal Research ◽

Police Investigation ◽

Perpetrators And Victims ◽

Investigation Process

Police institutions are the first and main gate in law enforcement efforts. First, the police institution in charge of carrying out each criminal case’s enforcement, then the next stage will be determined by the police. The practice of law enforcement so far tends to be retributive justice, so that only a few cases can be resolved in the police investigation process. Restorative justice appears by offering various advantages, including a simple settlement process, involving both parties, both perpetrators and victims, and the role of a third party to mediate, so that cases can be resolved according to the agreement. The police, as the first institution in the law enforcement process, had already issued regulations regarding the application of restorative justice, as a form of law enforcement efforts to change retributive law enforcement. The purpose of this research judicially examined the regulation of restorative justice at the police investigation phase in line with the enactment of the regulation of the Chief of Police Number: SE/8/VII/2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases and the Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian Police Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation. This research used a qualitative research method with the type of normative legal research through a statutory approach

Download Full-text

Peningkatan Kemampuan Matematika Anak Didik Pemasyarakatan dengan Program Holistik sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan

Kosmik Hukum ◽

10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i1.8834 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

pp. 18

Author(s):

Rama Fatahillah Yulianto

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Justice System ◽

Formal Education ◽

Learning Model ◽

Self Concept ◽

Moral Formation ◽

Math Skills ◽

Law Enforcement Officials ◽

The Government

Law Number 11 year 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System is a concrete manifestation of Restorative Justice, which regulates diversion, in which Law Enforcement Officials are obliged to seek diversion for children. So far, the education provided by the government for Children in Conflict with the Law is only limited to formal education and moral formation education, no less important than that mathematical ability should also be a concern for the government with a low level of mastery of mathematics in Indonesia. The learning model that emphasizes comfort and pleasure for children is considered to be very effective in teaching math skills to children at LPKA. This study aims to identify a learning model that is in accordance with the characteristics of education in LPKA. So that it is hoped that children after being free can integrate with the community and have the same abilities as children who are outside the institution, as well as improve the self-concept possessed by children. The benefits of this study can provide input in formulating policies regarding the education system in LPKA.Keywords: ABH, Diversion, Education

Download Full-text