scholarly journals Pengaruh Lingkungan Fisik, Lingkungan Non Fisik, dan Keterampilan terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan CV Semeru Jaya Teknik Palembang

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Dedi Hartawan

Humans as one of the components of the organization are the determinants of achieving the organization's vision and mission. For productivity to be maximally achieved an organization must pay attention to the physical environment, non-physical environment and skills. The condition of the work environment that is owned by a company will affect the success or failure of a job that is indicated by the ability of employees to complete work to achieve company goals. The availability of a physical work environment (cleanliness, lighting, air exchange, security, equipment, and or work equipment, and noise) that supports can affect the level of work productivity of employees. Partially the physical work environment has a positive and significant effect on employee productivity. Partially the non-physical work environment calculation shows that the non-physical work environment has a negative influence on employee work productivity. Partially Skills for Employee Productivity of CV. Semeru Jaya Teknik Palembang obtained showed that the non-physical work environment had a negative influence on employee work productivity. It was concluded that the non-physical work environment was felt to be able to support employees in completing the work so the employees would feel satisfied at work, and vice versa.

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 08
Author(s):  
Wahyu Ningrum Handayani ◽  
Shinta Wahyu Hati

The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which the influence of the physical work environment on employee productivity. The type of research used is quantitative research with explanatory research approach. The sample of the research is the operator part workers in the Manufacturing Company. The analytical method used is Multiple Linear Regression using SPSS version 20. The results showed from the five factors related to the physical work environment ie Temperature Variables, Noise, Vibration, Lighting, and air circulation indicate that the five variables have an effect on employee productivity Keyword: Physical Work Environment, Work Productivity, Operator Production Department


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
TIKA ERRY RAHMI ◽  
SIGIT WIBOWO

Health and Work Discipline on Employee Productivity (Study on Employees of PT. PLN (Persero) Central Java & D.I.Y) Distribution Regulatory Areas". This study have a goal to determine and analyze the influence of the physical work environment, work safety, occupational health and work discipline on employee work productivity. The research was carried out on one of the owned companies that specialized in electricity in PT. PLN (Persero) APD Central Java and Yogyakarta Special Region. The research method used is a survey with judgment sampling sampling technique. The population in this study is PT. PLN APD Central Java and Special Region of Yogyakarta, the number of respondents taken in this research is 68 respondents. Based on the results of research and data analysis using Multiple Linear Regression Analysis shows that: (1) Physical work environment has a positive influence and significant effect on employee work productivity (2) Physical work environment has a positive influence and significant effect on employee work productivity (3) Work safety has a positive influence and significant effect on employee work productivity (4) Work discipline has a positive influence and significant effect on employee work productivity. The implication of this research is to continuously improve the work productivity of its employees, the management of PT. PLN (Persero) APD Central Java and Yogyakarta Special Region needs to maintain and improve various policies related to efforts to improve and improve the physical work environment, work safety, occupational health and employee work discipline.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-179
Author(s):  
Sahat Parulian ◽  
Ahmad Hidayat Sutawijaya

This study aims to determine and clarify the effect of work environment and work motivation for workload and its implementation on employee performance. Respondents 67 employees (entire population). Data collection is done through interviews and questionnaires. Data were analyzed using path analysis (SmartPls 3.0 software) and correlation matrix between dimensions (SmartPls 3.0 software). The results showed that: (1) Work Environment and Motivation both partially and simultaneously affect Employee Performance; (2) Work environment, motivation and workload both partially and simultaneously affect employee performance; (3) Workload mediates the work environment and motivation on performance. Based on the analysis of the correlation matrix between dimensions, to improve the Work Environment, which has a positive correlation with Workload, it is recommended to maintain and improve the dimensions of Non-Physical Work Environment and also for employee performance also to improve the Physical Environment dimension. To increase motivation, which has a positive correlation with workload, it is recommended to maintain and improve hygiene. And for employee performance that is increasing the dimensions of intrinsic appreciation. To increase the workload that has a positive correlation with employee performance it is advisable to maintain and improve the dimensions of frustration


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Toto Cahya Praja ◽  
Firmansyah Kusasi ◽  
Iranita Iranita

In the business world today is growing rapidly this can be seen competition between companies.PT. Telesindo Shop as the official dealer of Telkomsel always improves the quality and quantity of the company.In this study reasearchers are interest in conducting research at PT. Telesindo Shop chapter Batam which aims to determine whether there is influence or how much influence the work stress, work conflict and physical work environment on employee performance. This study uses quantitative methods with data collection techniques through quentionnairies. Sample in this study were 30 people using full sample methods.The results of the study concluded that work stress, work conflict and physical environment partially have a positive and significant influence on employee performance. Meanwhile, simultaneously work stress, work conflict and work environment together have influences on employee performance at PT. Telesindo Shop chapter Batam. The most dominant variable is the physical environment. The results of this study imply that work stress, conflict and environment are things that need to be considered to improve employee performance to be better for the realization of company goals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 5090
Author(s):  
Putu Angga Armawan ◽  
I Wayan Suana

Work discipline is a method used by a company to influence the behavior of its employees in order to obey the rules and regulations in the company to achieve the goals of the company. Work discipline is influenced by organizational culture, leadership style, and physical work environment. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of organizational culture, leadership style, and physical work environment on the work discipline of UPT employees. Bali Industrial and Tourism Training Center. This research was conducted at the UPT. Bali Industrial and Tourism Training Center. The number of samples taken was 40 people including the head of the Office, with a saturated sampling method. Data collection is done through interviews and questionnaires. The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression. Based on the results of the analysis it was found that organizational culture, leadership style, and physical work environment had a significant effect on work discipline. Keywords: work discipline, organizational culture, leadership style, physical work environment


Author(s):  
Ayudyah Eka Apsari ◽  
Hari Purnomo

Indonesia is a country with numerous SMEs spread throughout 34 provinces. One of the important problems that need to consent more is labor health and safety. To increase safety, SMEs need to identify factors of occupational health and safety. SMEs need to properly avoid workplace accidents, and the batik industry is no exception. As a first step, it is necessary to identify the OSH factors that can be used in a prevention accident strategy. The population in this study were workers in Indonesia, these batik companies were located in Solo, Yogyakarta, Pekalongan, Cirebon, Minahasa, Bali, Madura, Indramayu, Bengkulu, and Palembang. The questionnaire consisted of latent variables, from the research that has been done, variables that affect work safety are the physical work environment, social work environment, job stress, and work productivity, while the variables that have a significant influence on occupational health are the physical work environment, social work environment, and work stress.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Ahmad Fathur Rozi ◽  
Ahmad Yani Syaikhudin

In organizations or human resources, companies are assets that are considered very potential and important. One that makes employees comfortable is the physical and non-physical environment. From this problem can increase productivity. Human resources in this case employees or employees of organizations or companies should not be underestimated. Organizations or companies must provide a special section that is tasked with handling problems relating to employees, that part is called human resource management (HR) or more commonly called the personnel section. Personnel in this case are human resource managers. The manager's scope includes learning and developing ways for employees to effectively devote all their potential and strengths to help achieve the goals of the organization or company. This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach and this study has a population of 260 respondents and a sample of 80 respondents. The data obtained were analyzed through validity test, reliability test, multiple regression analysis, and hypothesis testing with T test, and analysis of the coefficient of determination (R2). This study has physical work environment variables (X1), coloring indicators, cleanliness, lighting, air, spatial planning, and non-physical work environment variables (X2) indicators are supervision, work atmosphere, reward system, good treatment, security of members, and employee productivity variables (Y) the indicators are human, capital, production process, organizational environment, work environment. From the results of the regression analysis it is known that the greatest influence on employee productivity is the non-physical work environment (X2) which has a coefficient of 0.698. Then the next variable is the physical work environment (X1) with a coefficient of 0.203. Hypothesis testing Then from the results of the T test showed that the two independent variables proved to have a significant effect on employee work productivity. In addition, the adjusted R square determination coefficient test of 0.689 shows that 68.9% of variation in employee productivity can be explained by two independent variables in the regression equation. While the remaining 31.1% is explained by other variables beyond the two variables used in this study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-98
Author(s):  
Ni Made Ayu Nila Septianingrum ◽  
Fitriana Yuliastuti

The convenience of working for employees is one of the keys to success for the company. If employees feel comfortable, their work productivity will increase and have a positive impact on the company. One factor that can provide comfort to employees is the work environment. The work environment is dividing into a physical work environment and a non-physical work environment. This study aims to determine the comparison of physical and non-physical work environments in PBF X in Yogyakarta. The method used is descriptive-analytic, with a cross-sectional approach and using saturated samples. Primary data were obtained by distributing questionnaires to all 25 PBF X employees. Data were processed using Microsoft Excel and presented in tables, diagrams, and descriptive (narrative) forms. The results obtained show a comparison of the mean value of the non-physical work environment is 3.0, and the mean value of the physical work environment is 2.8. The highest mean value in the non-physical work environment is about overtime salaries, while in the physical work environment, selecting paint colors at workplaces appropriate. The conclusion obtained that the non-physical work environment is more influential on respondents doing work in PBF X than the physical work environment. The company or PBF X needs to evaluate to create a comfortable physical work environment for employees so that the working atmosphere can increase company productivity


Widya Accarya ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-119
Author(s):  
I Wayan Astawa ◽  
I Wayan Astawa

Abstrak Penelitian ini dilakukan di STIE BIITM Sahid Bali dengan melihat pengaruh komunikasi, kompensasi dan lingkungan fisik terhadap kinerja tenaga kependidikan di dalamnya. Penelitian menggunakan data kuantitatif dengan mengukur dari kriteria komunikasi, kompensasi, dan lingkungan fisik. Data akan dianalisis secara kuantitatif dengan analisis korelasi berganda, regresi linier berganda, determinasi, uji signifikansi simultan dan parsial. Terdapat pengaruh secara simultan yang signifikan dari komunikasi, kompensasi dan lingkungan kerja fisik terhadap kinerja tenaga kependidikan di STIE BIITM SAHID BALI Ini dapat dilihat dari hasil koefisien korelasi berganda diperoleh adalah 0,852 dan F-hitung 34,769 lebih besar dari F-tabel 2,70 berarti berada pada daerah pernolakan Ho, maka Ho ditolak atau Hi diterima. pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan, baik secara parsial maupun simultan antara komunikasi, kompensasi dan lingkungan kerja fisik terhadap kinerja tenaga kependidikan di STIE BIITM SAHID BALI, variabel-variabel tersebut tetap dipertahankan dan bila memungkinkan untuk ditingkatkan misalnya dengan menerapkan komunikasi yang lebih efektif, meningkatkan kompensasi jika keuangan perusashaan memungkikan dan memprogramkan perbaikan lingkungan kerja fisik. Kata kunci: komunikasi, kompensasi, lingkungan fisik, kinerja   Abstract This research was conducted at STIE BIITM Sahid Bali by looking at the effect of communication, compensation and the physical environment on the performance of the teaching staff in it. The study used quantitative data by measuring the communication criteria, compensation, and physical environment. Data were analyzed quantitatively by multiple correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, determination, simultaneous and partial significance tests. There is a significant simultaneous effect of communication, compensation and physical work environment on the performance of teaching staff in STIE BIITM SAHID BALI This can be seen from the results of the multiple correlation coefficient obtained is 0.852 and F-count 34.769 is greater than F-table 2.70 means it is located in the Ho reign area, then Ho is rejected or Hi is accepted. positive and significant influence, both partially and simultaneously between communication, compensation and the physical work environment on the performance of the teaching staff at STIE BIITM SAHID BALI, these variables are maintained and if possible to be improved for example by applying more effective communication, increasing compensation if corporate finance enables and programs improvements to the physical work environment. Keywords: communication, compensation, physical environment, performance


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document