scholarly journals The Effect of Physical Work Environment, Work Safety, Occupational Health and Work Discipline on Employee Productivity

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
TIKA ERRY RAHMI ◽  
SIGIT WIBOWO

Health and Work Discipline on Employee Productivity (Study on Employees of PT. PLN (Persero) Central Java & D.I.Y) Distribution Regulatory Areas". This study have a goal to determine and analyze the influence of the physical work environment, work safety, occupational health and work discipline on employee work productivity. The research was carried out on one of the owned companies that specialized in electricity in PT. PLN (Persero) APD Central Java and Yogyakarta Special Region. The research method used is a survey with judgment sampling sampling technique. The population in this study is PT. PLN APD Central Java and Special Region of Yogyakarta, the number of respondents taken in this research is 68 respondents. Based on the results of research and data analysis using Multiple Linear Regression Analysis shows that: (1) Physical work environment has a positive influence and significant effect on employee work productivity (2) Physical work environment has a positive influence and significant effect on employee work productivity (3) Work safety has a positive influence and significant effect on employee work productivity (4) Work discipline has a positive influence and significant effect on employee work productivity. The implication of this research is to continuously improve the work productivity of its employees, the management of PT. PLN (Persero) APD Central Java and Yogyakarta Special Region needs to maintain and improve various policies related to efforts to improve and improve the physical work environment, work safety, occupational health and employee work discipline.

Author(s):  
Ayudyah Eka Apsari ◽  
Hari Purnomo

Indonesia is a country with numerous SMEs spread throughout 34 provinces. One of the important problems that need to consent more is labor health and safety. To increase safety, SMEs need to identify factors of occupational health and safety. SMEs need to properly avoid workplace accidents, and the batik industry is no exception. As a first step, it is necessary to identify the OSH factors that can be used in a prevention accident strategy. The population in this study were workers in Indonesia, these batik companies were located in Solo, Yogyakarta, Pekalongan, Cirebon, Minahasa, Bali, Madura, Indramayu, Bengkulu, and Palembang. The questionnaire consisted of latent variables, from the research that has been done, variables that affect work safety are the physical work environment, social work environment, job stress, and work productivity, while the variables that have a significant influence on occupational health are the physical work environment, social work environment, and work stress.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 08
Author(s):  
Wahyu Ningrum Handayani ◽  
Shinta Wahyu Hati

The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which the influence of the physical work environment on employee productivity. The type of research used is quantitative research with explanatory research approach. The sample of the research is the operator part workers in the Manufacturing Company. The analytical method used is Multiple Linear Regression using SPSS version 20. The results showed from the five factors related to the physical work environment ie Temperature Variables, Noise, Vibration, Lighting, and air circulation indicate that the five variables have an effect on employee productivity Keyword: Physical Work Environment, Work Productivity, Operator Production Department


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Dedi Hartawan

Humans as one of the components of the organization are the determinants of achieving the organization's vision and mission. For productivity to be maximally achieved an organization must pay attention to the physical environment, non-physical environment and skills. The condition of the work environment that is owned by a company will affect the success or failure of a job that is indicated by the ability of employees to complete work to achieve company goals. The availability of a physical work environment (cleanliness, lighting, air exchange, security, equipment, and or work equipment, and noise) that supports can affect the level of work productivity of employees. Partially the physical work environment has a positive and significant effect on employee productivity. Partially the non-physical work environment calculation shows that the non-physical work environment has a negative influence on employee work productivity. Partially Skills for Employee Productivity of CV. Semeru Jaya Teknik Palembang obtained showed that the non-physical work environment had a negative influence on employee work productivity. It was concluded that the non-physical work environment was felt to be able to support employees in completing the work so the employees would feel satisfied at work, and vice versa.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 2107
Author(s):  
Briyan Artha Ginting ◽  
I Wayan Suana

Productivity is the ability to achieve certain tasks in accordance with predetermined standards. Companies must create safe work environment to motivate employees so that they can increase overall company productivity. Purpose of the study is to explain the effect of work discipline, occupational health and safety on the work productivity of Sariasih Garment employees with 51 people as samples, using saturated sample method. Data collected through observation, interviews and questionnaires and analyzed by multiple linear regression. Based on the results, work discipline, occupational health and work safety have  positive and significant effect on employee work productivity. It is expected that company pays attention to employees' compliance with regulations in doing their jobs and the company is able to create a safe, comfortable and clean work environment. Employees have enthusiasm and protection while working so that employees are able to increase work productivity in order to create maximum work results. Keywords: work productivity, work discipline, work health and safety


Jurnal Ecogen ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 503
Author(s):  
Radot Rosana Devika.RG ◽  
Rini Sarianti

This study was conducted to determine (1) the effect of physical work environment and internal communication on employee morale, (2) the effect of physical work environment on employee morale, (3) the effect of internal comunication on employee morale. This research is descriptive associative. The population in this study were employees of the Education Office of West Sumatra Province with 182 employees. The total sample is determined using the Slovin formula and cluster proportional random sampling. From this pattern, 125 employees were obtained as research samples. The technique used to analyze data is multiple regression analysis. Based on this study, it was found that (1) physical work environment and internal communication had a positive and significant effect on the morale of West Sumatra Provincial Education Office employees (2) physical work environment had a positive influence and significantly affected the morale of West Sumatra Provincial Education Office employees (3) internal communication had a positive effect and significant to the morale of employees of the Education Office of West Sumatra Province. Keyword: physical work environment, internal communication, employee work spirit


PSYCHE 165 ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 183-192
Author(s):  
Harry Theozard Fikri ◽  
Rahma Dwi Putri

This study aims to see whether there is a relationship between the Physical Work Environment and Occupational Health and Safety in the Yellow Forces in Padang City, with a population of 283 people. The sampling technique used is a simple random sampling technique, namely the technique of taking sample members from the population carried out randomly regardless of the strata that exist within the population. The number of samples in this study were 62 people. from 0.314 to 0.908 and the reliability coefficient is 0.931. While the coefficient of validity on the occupational health and safety scale moves from 0.322 to 0.764 and the reliability coefficient is 0.942. Hypothesis test results show the magnitude of the reliability coefficient of 0.479 with a significant level of p = 0,000 meaning that it can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between the work environment and occupational health and safety, with a positive direction. This means that if the research has a high work environment then work health and safety will also be high. Likewise, if you have a low physical work environment, eating health and safety will also be low. The effective contribution Environment with of the Physical Work Occupational Health and Safety in the Yellow Forces in the City of Padang is 23%.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Ahmad Fathur Rozi ◽  
Ahmad Yani Syaikhudin

In organizations or human resources, companies are assets that are considered very potential and important. One that makes employees comfortable is the physical and non-physical environment. From this problem can increase productivity. Human resources in this case employees or employees of organizations or companies should not be underestimated. Organizations or companies must provide a special section that is tasked with handling problems relating to employees, that part is called human resource management (HR) or more commonly called the personnel section. Personnel in this case are human resource managers. The manager's scope includes learning and developing ways for employees to effectively devote all their potential and strengths to help achieve the goals of the organization or company. This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach and this study has a population of 260 respondents and a sample of 80 respondents. The data obtained were analyzed through validity test, reliability test, multiple regression analysis, and hypothesis testing with T test, and analysis of the coefficient of determination (R2). This study has physical work environment variables (X1), coloring indicators, cleanliness, lighting, air, spatial planning, and non-physical work environment variables (X2) indicators are supervision, work atmosphere, reward system, good treatment, security of members, and employee productivity variables (Y) the indicators are human, capital, production process, organizational environment, work environment. From the results of the regression analysis it is known that the greatest influence on employee productivity is the non-physical work environment (X2) which has a coefficient of 0.698. Then the next variable is the physical work environment (X1) with a coefficient of 0.203. Hypothesis testing Then from the results of the T test showed that the two independent variables proved to have a significant effect on employee work productivity. In addition, the adjusted R square determination coefficient test of 0.689 shows that 68.9% of variation in employee productivity can be explained by two independent variables in the regression equation. While the remaining 31.1% is explained by other variables beyond the two variables used in this study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-98
Author(s):  
Ni Made Ayu Nila Septianingrum ◽  
Fitriana Yuliastuti

The convenience of working for employees is one of the keys to success for the company. If employees feel comfortable, their work productivity will increase and have a positive impact on the company. One factor that can provide comfort to employees is the work environment. The work environment is dividing into a physical work environment and a non-physical work environment. This study aims to determine the comparison of physical and non-physical work environments in PBF X in Yogyakarta. The method used is descriptive-analytic, with a cross-sectional approach and using saturated samples. Primary data were obtained by distributing questionnaires to all 25 PBF X employees. Data were processed using Microsoft Excel and presented in tables, diagrams, and descriptive (narrative) forms. The results obtained show a comparison of the mean value of the non-physical work environment is 3.0, and the mean value of the physical work environment is 2.8. The highest mean value in the non-physical work environment is about overtime salaries, while in the physical work environment, selecting paint colors at workplaces appropriate. The conclusion obtained that the non-physical work environment is more influential on respondents doing work in PBF X than the physical work environment. The company or PBF X needs to evaluate to create a comfortable physical work environment for employees so that the working atmosphere can increase company productivity


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Dindin Bernhardin ◽  
Ridwan Syahril Ismail

This study aims to analyze the effect of occupational health and safety on employee productivity at PT. Haletora Powerindo. The sampling technique in this study uses a nonprobability sampling technique with saturated sampling method that is 75 employees. Analysis and testing of hypotheses used are multiple linear regression methods with research instruments using a questionnaire.The results showed that the occupational health program partially affected the work productivity of employees at PT Haleyora Powerindo. The work safety program partially affects the work productivity of employees at PT Haleyora Powerindo. Occupational health and work safety programs simultaneously affect the work productivity of employees at PT Haleyora Powerindo.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document