scholarly journals Provisional Notes on How “Hilarious” Living Under Sharia Law (The Case of Aceh)

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Reza Idria

Abstract Drawing upon anthropological theory of resistance and testing its limits, I will present a closer observation on how dissenting voices to the state project of Sharia in contemporary Aceh look on the ground. Without thereby renouncing its violent effects, some ethnographic stories I recount in this writing will reveal how the implementation of Sharia in contemporary Aceh has created inherently amusing situations and how it has occasionally become a humor producing machine.

Author(s):  
Milad Dokhanchi

Problematizing Asef Bayat’s notion of “post-Islamism,” this article proposes an alternative definition for the concept, having in mind the case of Iran. The current conception of the term “post-Islamism” may be challenged via a survey of post-revolutionary Islamist movements that resisted the state and as well as Ayatollah’s Khomeini’s concession to the concept maslahat (expediency), through which state expressed preference for modern reason over sharia law. The case of Islamists contesting state power questions the monolithic image of Islamism drawn by Bayat as movements longing to create a state based on the doctrine of velāyat-e faqih. Also Khomeini’s concession to maslahat indicates that the Islamic state must be seen as one of the participants in “post”-Islamist secularizing trends in Iran. Hence, Bayat’s post-Islamism was more of an inevitable political phenomenon adopted by the state itself than a conscious project adopted by Muslim secularist intellectual figures seeking to put an end to Islamism. Unlike Bayat’s post-Islamism, which celebrates the end or a “break” from an Islamist paradigm, this article then invites readers to expose Islamism to post-modern critique, the result of which would not be a negation but rather a revival of Islamism that takes into account the contingencies of the post-modern condition. Similar to post-Marxism and post-anarchism, post-Islamism maintains the ethos of the traditional canon, Islamism in this case, while rejecting its authoritarian and universalist tendencies. A post-Islamist politics has yet to emerge, yet its introductory philosophical foundations have been already developed in the 1990s by figures such as Abdolkarism Soroush and Morteza Avini. Soroush’s post-Islamism, however, ultimately landed in a modernist liberal episteme, hence remained Islamist, while Avini, despite his support for the state, offered a much more radical critique of Islamism while remaining faithful to its ethos.


2019 ◽  
pp. 283-305

The Qur'an is the primary source of Islamic law. General and special sharia norms are derived from its text. This aspect of the Qur'an has been the subject of interest of numerous Islamic scholars in the context of interpreting the normative ayahs - ajatu'l-ahkam. The Hajj is one of the five pillars of Islam. It is prescribed by the Qur'an and the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad, s.a.w.s. The basic regulations of Hajj are derived from the Qur'anic ayahs, and they are stated in various Qira'at variants. The recorded Qira'at versions eliminate certain doubts, extend or give new meaning to the Qur'anic text. Although their form differs, Qira'ats are intertwined, which indicates their unique source and origin. Without contradiction and exclusivity, the Qira'ats support, explain and interpret one another, which can be of great importance, especially for the Qur'an commentators and Islamic jurists who derive specific Sharia rules from them. In this paper, we will deal with Sharia law commentaries on Hajj regulations by eminent Islamic scholars, but only from the perspective of Qira'at. The following Sharia laws were analyzed: Sa'j between Safe and Merwa, Reason for banning sexual intercourse, ugly words and quarrels during Hajj, Performing Umrah, Redemption for intentional killing an animal while a hajji is in the state of Ihram, Maintaining personal hygiene while performing Hajj and Performing qurbani.


Author(s):  
Helmi Helmi ◽  
Saiful Bahri ◽  
Riyandi Riyandi ◽  
Nurazizah Nurazizah ◽  
Nurmasyitah Nurmasyitah

One form of the development of fiqh is to make the charge of fiqh in the form of theoretical laws into practical laws by putting them in the legislation of a certain State or territory in the State. After being granted the right to implement Islamic sharia by the State, Aceh as a provincial territory within the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia had the opportunity to realize fiqh laws into legislation termed Qanun, in order to regulate the behavior of its people to be under the auspices of sharia law. Throughout the course of the application of Islamic sharia based on various Qanun that was built, its implementation has never been separated from various problems and criticisms, both from the internal elements of Aceh, National and International. Among the cases that finally led to the problem was the birth of the Aceh PERGUB Number 5 of 2018. The problem that arose was a sharp criticism contents of some of the PERGUB contents which was deemed to deviate from the previous Qanun and deviated from the provisions of fiqh, even further claimed as an effort to dwarf the Islamic sharia. However, if examined objectively, it is not certain that the regulation will deviate from the existing Qanun and fiqh. But like a hot ball that is rolling, the debate that occurs in response to the PERGUB is sometimes no longer at the level of finding a solution, but it has led to things that are political.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 146-162
Author(s):  
Sead Bandžović ◽  

With the overthrow of the regime of Reza Pahlavi in 1979, the Iranian revolution ended the existence of the 2,500-year-old Persian Empire and built the Islamic Republic of Iran on its foundations. The revolution was the product of three independent social structures that merged at one point. One was the structure of constitutionalism that grew out of a century-long struggle for democracy supported by modernists; the second was Islamism as a movement to set Sharia law as the primary law supported by rural elements in society in response to Western urban elites and accepted by merchants; and the third is the nationalist structure, driven by rage fueled by Iran's long subordination to European powers. The basic principle of the Islamic Republic of Iran, proclaimed by the new constitution from 1979, is the positioning of God as the supreme bearer of people's sovereignty and people who are only marginal representatives of his power on Earth. Ayatollah Homenini, the supreme leader of the Islamic Revolution and the Iranian state, in this regard created a thesis about the Islamic State as a political representation, created on the basis of the people's will, in order to enforce God's laws. In practice, such system meant setting up Sharia (religious) laws as the only source of law in regulating social, legal and other relations within the community. A dichotomy has been created in the management of the state, so there are two groups of authorities. The first, the conciliar, consists of the Supreme leader, the Council of Guardians (Shora-ye Negahban-e Qanun-e assassi), the Council of Experts (Majles-e Khobragan Rahbari) and the Judgment Council. The task of these councils is to oversee the activities of all levels of government in order to preserve the unity, sovereignty and integrity of the Iranian political system. The conciliar government supervises and advises the republican part of the government, ie. its legislative, executive and judicial aspects. In addition to conciliar government, there is a republican government that creates laws and political decisions in accordance with religious teachings and under the supervision of theocratic political institutions. All laws and court decisions must be based on the principles of the Qur'an, and their proper interpretation requires an understanding of religious principles. On the basis of the constitution, a special High Judicial Council was established, which amended the pre-revolutionary laws (criminal, commercial, civil and procedural), thus creating the so-called “Transitional law”. The biggest changes affected the area of criminal law, where the principle of talion revenge was introduced (“an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”) and the strict punishment of extramarital relations and same-sex relationships. In the domain of marital and family law, a man is given a number of rights, thus putting the woman, as a marital partner, in a more unequal position. Husbands were facilitated in divorce, temporary marriages with more than one woman were allowed, while on the other hand women were allowed the right to divorce only if it was explicitly allowed by her husband during the marriage. The revolution also introduced new sources in the regulation of legal relations. Thus, by an order of the Supreme Judicial Council of 23 August 1982, judges were ordered to use direct authoritative Islamic texts or sources on which to base their judgments in resolving disputes. Judges are required by this Order to address the Council of Guardians of the Constitution if they cannot determine with certainty whether a regulation is in accordance with Sharia law or not. If the judge does not know which law to apply, he must contact the Office of Ayatollah Khomeini for further instructions. In addition to the internal one, the revolution caused radical changes in the foreign policy field, positioning Iran as an important participant in numerous international processes at the regional and global level.


Author(s):  
Inger Sjørslev

Inger Sjørslev: Introduction: Indigenous peoples in the world and in anthropology The introduction presents the main themes of the articles, which derrive from a workshop held by The University of Copenhagen in cooperation with IWGIA, The International Workgroup for Indigenous Affairs, and the Ethnographic Department of the National Museum, Copenhagen. The workshop dealt with the situation of indigenous peoples in the globalized world and the State of current anthropological theory in relation to the indigenous issues, as this is presented by the „objects“ themselves within international fora, mainly the United Nations. Other themes are the concept of culture in relation to indigenous societies and anthropologists’ role in promoting the culture concept as a basis for dealing with indigenous rights, the questions of authenticity and reflexivity in relation to indigenous peoples’ culture, and the professional and ethical role of the anthropologist in dealing with indigenous issues.


rahatulquloob ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 73-80
Author(s):  
Abdul Raheem ◽  
Dr. Adil Zaman Kasi

Islam is the religion of peace as per its will and spirit it spreads peace throughout the world. As it is mentioned in the holy book Quran: "مَنْ قَتَلَ نَفْسًا بِغَيْرِ نَفْسٍ أَوْ فَسَادٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ فَكَأَنَّمَا قَتَلَ النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا وَمَنْ أَحْيَاهَا فَكَأَنَّمَا أَحْيَا النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا" This spirit of peace and will reflects in every field of life. Islam imposes different types of Hudood (Punishments) to ensure peace. Allah Almighty called Qisas as life itself, as Allah directed us in holy Quran. وَلَكُمْ فِي الْقِصَاصِ حَيَاةٌ يَا أُولِي الْأَلْبَابِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَتَّقُونَ  The importance of Qisas is very much clear in Islam as it is mentioned in above verse. Pakistan is also an Islamic country as its base is on Islamic Ideology so Qisas and Diyat law is part of our judiciary. Similarly an incident took place that an US intelligence person Raymond Davis killed two people in Lahore. If this case is seen in the context of Shariah, many aspects of it come to the fore. From a Shariah point of view, Shariah has declared qisas as life۔ Shari'a prescribes severe punishments for crimes against the sovereignty of the state. According to Sharia law and the constitution of Pakistan, Raymond Davis crimes are of this nature. According to Sharia, he is punished for qisas and blatant violation of the Constitution of Pakistan.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
Ervina Halilović ◽  

The main topic of this work is related to the Sharia marriage law. The work has been divided into three parts, the organisation of the Sharia courts and application of the Sharia law, the procedure of joining two people in marriage and ending a marriage. The subject of the research concerns the time period during the Austro Hungarian Monarchy and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia when the Sharia law was implemented to regulate the private law relations amongst Muslims. Taking into consideration that Islam was one of the accepted religions during this period, the religious rules are separated from the state rules and according to that the Sharia courts have continued their existence, which were established on the grounds of Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Ottoman Empire. According to the norms of the Sharia law the Sharia courts were resolving the private law relations amongst Muslims. With the aim to present a full review on this topic various court decisions have been researched in the Archives of the Tuzla Canton and which are related to the Kotar Sharia court Tuzla 1899 – 1944.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Benjamin O. L. Bowles

Goldstein, D. M. (2012), Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian City (Durham: Duke University Press), 344 pp., 9 photographs, 1 map, ISBN: 978-0-8223-5311-9 (paperback).Daniel M. Goldstein’s Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian City (2012) is a thickly described and richly detailed ethnography of uncertainty in the barrios of Cochabamba, Bolivia. It holds important insights for legal anthropology, particularly where the sub-discipline intersects with the anthropology of the state and the anthropology of human rights. The ethnographic detail is exemplary, with the work here having serious implications for anthropological theory and opening up several avenues for further investigation. That it opens new debates more than it offers cohesive answers – as is, admittedly, possibly fitting for the ‘uncertain anthropology’ that Goldstein advocates – both is the prime strength of the work and can be offered as a gentle critique. I consider this to be because of the ambitious breadth of the work to the extent that directions that were implied were ultimately left somewhat unexplored. This review article is an attempt to consider the prime contributions of Outlawed and to tentatively map some of these implied connections.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Sandberg

Concerns about legal pluralism, the co-existence of more than one legal system within a state, have become pronounced in recent years, owing to fears about the operation of sharia law in Western societies. At the same time, the concept of legal pluralism has become ubiquitous within legal literature. Paradoxically, the concept is both politically controversial and academically banal. This article contends that a major failing of the concept of legal pluralism has been the inability to distinguish legal norms from other forms of social control. It is suggested that this failure can be overcome by developing the concept of a ‘legal order’ as found in the work of Maleiha Malik and the understanding of law as discourse in the work of the German theorists Niklas Luhmann and Robert Alexy. It is argued that developing these approaches provides a means by which legal norms can be distinguished without adopting either a wholly objective or a completely subjective approach and without focusing exclusively upon the legal norms generated by the state.


Islamology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Sergio Castaño Riaño

Migration in Belgium in the 1960s represented the beginning of a social transformation process that has turned the traditionally Catholic country into a multicultural reality where Islam has achieved more significance. Consequently, the government had to adapt different structures to the new reality, and people had to learn to live together. In this regard, the Muslim community demanded public spaces to develop cultural and religious events. Second and third generations of Belgian Muslims conserve their family roots and require space for Islam in Belgium. As a result, progressively, the state has incorporated soft elements of Sharia Law in national and local legislation to respond to Muslim requirements. This fact has opened a debate in Belgium and has created controversies in some environments. Thus, this article analyses the implementation of Sharia Law legislation in Belgium and its consequences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document