scholarly journals Study on Risk Factors and Microorganisms for Surgical Site Infection following Caesarean Section among 100 Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Bangladesh

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-96
Author(s):  
Sayma Afroz ◽  
Maliha Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Bacteriological Study ◽  
E Coli

Background: Lower uterine caesarean section is a common mode of delivery now and surgical site infection is one of the most common and dreaded complication of surgery. It is associated with significant morbidity and delayed recovery and it lengthens hospital stay and costs. Identifying risk factors for surgical site infection in caesarean wound and modifying them can be beneficial for patient management during surgery and optimizing good clinical outcome. Identifying microorganisms with their sensitivity has epidemiological as well as therapeutic implications. Objective: To identify risk factors for surgical site infection in caesarean section wound and find out microorganisms responsible for such infection. Materials and Methods: In this study 100 women with surgical site infection after caesarean section were included. They were selected randomly from four maternity units of Dhaka Medical College Hospital. Each patient of caesarean section was followed strictly up to discharge from hospital and also for 30 days postoperatively for any evidence of infection. Wound swab was sent in each case for microbiological study. Data were collected in structured questionnaire and analysed by computer using spreadsheet. Results: Among 100 women studied, 73% had inadequate or no antenatal check-up, 52% had duration of labour pain >12 hours, 52% had duration of ruptured membrane >12 hours, 94% women underwent emergency caesarean section, 62% had operation time >1 hour, 61% had haemoglobin level <60%, 46% women had intervention by untrained birth attendant, and 43% women had >500 mL blood loss during operation. In bacteriological study, microorganisms were identified in 55% cases, among them Staphylococcus aureus (20%), E. coli (11%), Acinetobacter (7%), Pseudomonas (6%) and Proteus (5%). During sensitivity test Staphylococcus aureus was mostly sensitive to ceftriaxone (50%) and amikacin (33%) and E. coli to amikacin (80%). In four cases (2 proteus and 2 pseudomonas) out of 55 organisms were resistant to all antibiotics. Conclusion: Most of the risk factors for surgical site infection during caesarean section identified in this study can be modified through intervention. However, the microorganisms detected from our patients showed a high degree of resistance for commonly prescribed antimicrobials in our set-up. J Enam Med Col 2019; 9(2): 90-96

scholarly journals Profile of Aerobic Bacteria in Surgical Site Infection Following Caesarean Section and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern in Silchar Medical College, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (35) ◽  
pp. 3030-3034
Author(s):  
Nazrana Choudhury ◽  
Abul Barkat Fuzayel Ahmed ◽  
Debadatta Dhar Chanda ◽  
Achinta Kumar Borthakur
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Bacterial Isolates ◽  
Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern

BACKGROUND Caesarean section is one of the most common surgeries performed in women of reproductive age group. Postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is the third most frequently reported nosocomial infection. Recovery after caesarean section can be more demanding for a woman who develops a post-operative surgical site infection that can even lead to death. Surveillance of surgical site infection is an important infection control activity. A better understanding of the spectrum of pathogens causing SSI as well as their susceptibility pattern is important for prompt management of patients. The main objectives of this study were to identify the bacterial agents causing postoperative wound infection in caesarean section, as well as determine the in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of different bacterial isolates and also to examine the risk factors of postoperative caesarean infection. METHODS This is an observational (cross sectional study) where 100 cases of postoperative caesarean section wound infection admitted in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology ̦ Silchar Medical College were studied. Pus samples were collected and cultured, and the pathogenic isolates were tested against different antimicrobial agents by standard disc diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer method) as per the recommendation of Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. RESULTS The study revealed Staphylococcus aureus 38.1 % of which 21.9 % were methicillin resistant (MRSA), as the most common organism responsible for SSI followed by Escherichia coli 23.8 % and Klebsiella pneumoniae 16.7 %. Staphylococcus aureus was 100 % sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid 78.1 % and 71.9 % sensitive to erythromycin and ciprofloxacin respectively. The most sensitive antimicrobials for Gram negative isolates were polymyxin B 96.2 %, imipenem 94.2 % and ciprofloxacin 76.9 %. Emergency C-section (83 %), premature rupture of membranes (PROM) 30 %, prolong labour 26 %, history of previous caesarean section 22 %, anaemia 15 % cases and BMI ≥ 25 (16 %) were found to be risk factors. CONCLUSIONS The findings of preponderance of Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative bacilli in this study with good antibiotic sensitivity against the fluoroquinolone and aminoglycosides is of local clinical relevance. KEY WORDS Caesarean Section, Surgical Site Infection, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern, Bacterial Isolates, MRSA Strains

scholarly journals Assessment of risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4518
Author(s):  
Aditi Sangwan ◽  
Vani Malhotra
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Group I ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Wound Discharge ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Assessment of surgical site infection is an important factor to determine the functioning of the health care system. Objectives of this study was to estimate the incidence of surgical site infection among caesarean section cases and to determine the risk factors associated with surgical site infection and comparison with patients having healthy wounds.Methods: One thousand pregnant women who underwent caesarean section were divided into two groups: Group 1 (cases): Those who had SSI within 30 days of caesarean section and Group 2 (controls): Those who didn’t have SSI.Results: Mean age of group I was 25.35±4.40 and 21.12±3.60 years in group II (p >0.05). Mean gestational age of group I cases was 38.07±1.88 weeks and in group II, it was 38.17±2.06 weeks (p >0.05). A total of 37 (82.5%) women in group I and 931 (96.98%) women in group II underwent emergency caesarean section (p <0.05). In group I, mean duration of surgery was 1.0±0.13 hours and 1.02±0.21 hours in group II (p <0.05). Maximum number of patients i.e. 22 (55%) had wound discharge between 4-7 days followed by 11 (27.5%) between 8-10 days. Mean wound discharge was 7.32±3.45 days in group I. Majority of women, i.e. 27 (67%) found to be sterile in the present study followed by 7 (17.5%) women were found to have staphylococcus aureus.      Mean duration of resuturing was 17.42±6.98 days.  Mean baby weight in group I was 2.72±0.53 kg and in group II it was 2.95±0.53 kg (p <0.001).Conclusions: Risk of developing SSI after caesarean section is multi-factorial and found to be influenced by emergency surgery, PROM, pre-operative anaemia, multiple vaginal examinations, interrupted skin suturing, raised BMI, nulliparity, emergency caesarean, duration of surgery.

scholarly journals Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection following elective foot and ankle surgery: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinghong Meng ◽  
Yanbin Zhu ◽  
Yansen Li ◽  
Tao Sun ◽  
Fengqi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in elective foot and ankle surgeries and identify the associated risk factors. Methods This was designed as a retrospective study, including patients who underwent elective surgery of foot and ankle between July 2015 and June 2018. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative parameters were collected from the medical records, the laboratory report, the operation report, and the outpatient follow-up registration database. SSI was defined in accordance with the Center for Disease Control criteria. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the independent risk factors for SSI. Results A total of 1201 patients undergoing 1259 elective foot/ankle surgeries were included, of whom 26 (2.1%) had an SSI, representing an incidence rate of 1.3% for superficial SSI and 0.8% for deep SSI, respectively. The results for organism culture showed Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 7 cases, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in 6, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) in 5, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci (MRCNS) in 2, Escherichia coli in 2, and Proteus mirabilis in 1 case. Five factors were identified to be independently associated with SSI, including prolonged preoperative stay (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.30), allograft or bone substitute (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.51 to 5.30), elevated FBG level (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.26), lower ALB level (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.19 to 3.05), and abnormal NEUT count (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.12). Conclusions SSI following elective foot and ankle surgeries is low, but relatively high in forefoot surgeries, requiring particular attention in clinical practice. Although most not modifiable, these identified factors aid in risk assessment of SSI and accordingly stratifying patients and therefore should be kept in mind.

Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England

2013 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Wloch ◽  
J Wilson ◽  
T Lamagni ◽  
P Harrington ◽  
A Charlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Site Infection

scholarly journals Irrigation Versus Suction Alone During Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Tae Gyeong Lee ◽  
Soomin Nam ◽  
Hyung Soon Lee ◽  
Jin Ho Lee ◽  
Young Ki Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

Purpose: To compare the surgical outcomes of peritoneal irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy and to identify the risk factors of surgical site infection in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.Methods: Data from patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis between January 2014 and March 2016 were reviewed. We compared the irrigation and suction alone groups with regard to the following parameters: postoperative complication incidence rate, length of hospital stay, operation time, time to flatus, time to diet commencement, and duration of postoperative antibiotic.Results: A total of 578 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Twenty-five patients were excluded from the analysis because of need for drain insertion, loss to follow-up, simultaneous surgery for another indication, presence of an appendix tumor, or pregnancy. A total of 207 patients (37.4%) had undergone irrigation, and 346 patients (62.6%) received suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy. The preoperative fever rate was significantly higher in the irrigation group than in the suction alone group. Operative time was also significantly longer in the irrigation group than in the suction alone group (53.8 ± 18.5 minutes vs. 57.8 ± 21.4 minutes, P = 0.027). The postoperative complication rate was higher in the irrigation group than in the suction alone group (4.5% vs. 12.6%, P = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that irrigation and preoperative fever were risk factors for surgical site infection after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.Conclusion: There is no advantage to irrigating the peritoneal cavity over suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Irrigation may actually prolong the operative time and therefore be detrimental.

scholarly journals Risk factors for hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a case-control study

2006 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
pp. 1167-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. CARNICER-PONT ◽  
K. A. BAILEY ◽  
B. W. MASON ◽  
A. M. WALKER ◽  
M. R. EVANS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Control Study

A case-control study was undertaken in an acute district general hospital to identify risk factors for hospital-acquired bacteraemia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Cases of hospital-acquired MRSA bacteraemia were defined as consecutive patients from whom MRSA was isolated from a blood sample taken on the third or subsequent day after admission. Controls were randomly selected from patients admitted to the hospital over the same time period with a length of stay of more than 2 days who did not have bacteraemia. Data on 42 of the 46 cases of hospital-acquired bacteraemia and 90 of the 92 controls were available for analysis. There were no significant differences in the age or sex of cases and controls. After adjusting for confounding factors, insertion of a central line [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 35·3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3·8–325·5] or urinary catheter (aOR 37·1, 95% CI 7·1–193·2) during the admission, and surgical site infection (aOR 4·3, 95% CI 1·2–14·6) all remained independent risk factors for MRSA bacteraemia. The adjusted population attributable fraction, showed that 51% of hospital-acquired MRSA bacteraemia cases were attributable to a urinary catheter, 39% to a central line, and 16% to a surgical site infection. In the United Kingdom, measures to reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired MRSA bacteraemia in acute general hospitals should focus on improving infection control procedures for the insertion and, most importantly, care of central lines and urinary catheters.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusSurgical Site Infection

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 890-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Harbarth ◽  
Benedikt Huttner ◽  
Pascal Gervaz ◽  
Carolina Fankhauser ◽  
Marie-Noelle Chraiti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Intervention Study ◽  
Comorbid Condition ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Surgical Duration

We prospectively evaluated 46 possible risk factors for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) surgical site infection (SSI) among patients with MRSA carriage in a large intervention study. Of 6,130 study patients, 68 (1.1%) developed MRSA SSI, which occurred a median of 14 days after surgery. Risk factors associated with MRSA SSI were receipt of emergency surgery, presence of comorbid condition, receipt of immunosuppressive therapy, receipt of contaminated surgery, and a surgical duration longer than the 75th percentile. MRSA carriage on admission did not predict MRSA SSI.

scholarly journals Caesarean section in a tertiary care centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 3106
Author(s):  
Rina V. Patel ◽  
Divyanshi J. Shani ◽  
Parul T. Shah ◽  
Dipali Pandey
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College

Background: Caesarean section constitutes a major surgical procedure characterized with morbidity even if it is performed a planned procedure. Postoperative infection in obstetrics continues to affect the practice of every surgeon. Infection can cause an increase in patient’s stay in the hospital, create discomfort, cause disfigurement and lead to morbidities to the patient. Thus, preventive measures need to be constantly evaluated and updated and hence authors have to study and analyse prevalence of postoperative infectious morbidities.Methods: The study was conducted in an Urban Based Medical College Hospital in Ahmedabad. It was a retrospective cross-sectional study of 50 cases of patients who suffered infectious complications post caesarean from 1st March 2019 to 31st March 2020.Results: The prevalence rate of surgical site infection in my study is 5.9% whereas of post-operative puerperal sepsis is 0.6%, of post-operative urinary tract infection is 1.09%, of post-operative breast abnormalities is 0.16%. The most common infectious morbidity amongst all was surgical site infection (surgical site) infection and its prevalence was 5.9%.Conclusions: The development of post-operative infection is an important event that can be prevented by taking proper precautions and following prescribed guidelines. There should be specific use of antibiotics in the post-operative period. In the event of early signs of sepsis antibiotics should be administered properly as per culture sensitivity report. The decrease in infection rate also indirectly reduce the health costs involved in treating them post operatively.

scholarly journals Incidence, risk factors and Microorganisms for post caesarean Surgical Site Infection In A Tertiary Care Centre in Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Shahfinaz Mehzabin ◽  
Mohmmad Mahbub Elahi ◽  
Debashish Bar ◽  
Banalata Sinha ◽  
Tahmina Akter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Microbiological Methods ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
History Of

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication following caesarean section (C-section) and mainly responsible for increased maternal morbidity and higher treatment costs. This study will determine the incidence and risk factors of surgical site infections following caesarean section in Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective observational study which was conducted among patients having post caesarean surgical site infections attending post-natal outdoor clinic of DMCH from January, 2019 to December, 2019. Data were collected in structured questionnaire. Culturebased microbiological methods were used to identify causal agents in postoperative wounds. Results: Overall SSI rate following caesarian section was 4.44%.Patient related risk factors were inadequate antenatal check-up, emergency procedures, malnutrition (22.44%), anaemia (21.46%) associated comorbidity (59.46%), history of rupture membrane >12 hours (40.98%) and had history of prolonged labour pain >12 hours (16.10%).Surgery related risk factors were repeated per vaginal examinations by untrained birth attendant (21.95%) & duration of surgery>1 hour (62.93%). The most common organisms responsible for SSI were Staphylococcus aureus 44(21.46%) and Escherichia coli 31(15.12%). The most sensitive antibiotics were aminoglycosides, cephalosporin & cloxacillin. Conclusion: Most of the risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section identified in this study can be modified through intervention. However the microorganisms detected from our patient showed a high degree of resistance for commonly prescribed antimicrobials in our set-up. J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 28, No.2, October, 2019, Page 136-141

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document