The Effect of Learning Start Learning Strategy With A Question (LSQ) on the Mastery of Physics Concepts

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panita Nur Jamilah ◽  
Neng Nenden Mulyaningsih ◽  
Yoga Budi Bhakti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Concept Mastery ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

The implementation of the Model Learning Start With a Question (LSQ) In this study was used to determine the enhancement of the student physics concept in SMK. The method in this study was experimentation using design posttest only comparison group design. The population in this study is a grade X student at SMK Global Teknologi Bekasi. Samples of 2 classes taken by cluster random sampling of 5 classes, one class as the experimental class of class X TKR 1 as many as 30 people and one class as the control class X TKR 3 as many as 30 people. Data collection techniques are conducted by providing a posttest to obtain data on student Physics concept Mastery. The results of the research data have been tested for its normality and homogenization and then the data analysis technique used is a test of two average differences (test-T) with a significant level (α) = 5%. The results showed that there was an increase in the learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class with an average of Thitung 16.24 whereas the 1.697 at a significant level of 0.05 means there is an increase in student learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class. Experimental classes with the implementation Of learning Start With A Question models are better Than the control class using conventional learning models at SMK Global Teknologi Bekasi.

STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN MOTIF BERPRESTASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN MENGGAMBAR TEKNIK

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timbul Purba ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
High Achievement ◽  
Low Achievement ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Achievement Motive ◽  
Analysis Technique

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran elaborasi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa yang memiliki motif berprestasi tinggi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki motif berprestasi rendah dan (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dengan motif berprestasi dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran elaborasi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa yang memiliki motif berprestasi tinggi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki motif berprestasi rendah dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dengan motif berprestasi dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa.   Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran elaborasi dan ekspositori, motif berprestasi, hasil belajar menggambar teknik   Abstract: This research was aimed to: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught drawing techniques with learning strategy elaboration higher than students taught by expository learning strategy, (2) drawing techniques learning outcomes of students who have high achievement motive higher than students who have low achievement motive, and (3) the interaction between learning strategy and achievement motives in affecting student learning outcomes drawing techniques. The research method used was quasi experiment with 2 x 2 factorial design. The analysis technique used is the two-track analysis of variance ANOVA (2 x 2) with a significance level α = 0.05. The findings of the study indicate: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught drawing techniques with learning strategy elaboration higher learning outcomes than students taught by expository learning strategy; (2) drawing techniques learning outcomes of students who have high achievement motive higher than the learning outcomes of students who have low achievement motive; and (3) there is interaction between learning strategy and achievement motives in affecting student learning outcomes drawing techniques. Keywords: elaboration learning strategies and expository, achievement motive, the result of learning drawing techniques

scholarly journals Perbedaan Jigsaw II dan GI terhadap pemahaman konsep dan pemecahan masalah masalah pada kompetensi mendiagnosis permasalahan pengoperasian PC dan Peripheral ditinjau dari motivasi belajar

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pipit Utami ◽  
Pardjono Pardjono
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Better Than

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pemahaman konsep dan pemecahan masalah pada materi KK3: (1) antara siswa yang diajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Group Investigation (GI) ketika motivasi belajar TKJ dikendalikan; dan (2) antara penggunaan tipe pembelajaran kooperatif (tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI) dengan tingkat motivasi belajar TKJ (tinggi dan rendah). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan nonequivalent comparison-group design menggunakan dua kelas perlakuan sebagai variabel bebas yang diberikan pembelajaran kooperatif dengan dua tipe berbeda. Satu kelas menggunakan tipe Jigsaw II, sedangkan kelas yang lainnya diberikan tipe GI. Variabel motivasi belajar TKJ dijadikan sebagai pembagi kategori kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi dan rendah serta sebagai kovarian. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis multivarian kovariat dan desain faktorial dengan progam SPSS 16. Artikel ini menunjukkan tujuan kedua, dengan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) untuk pencapaian pemahaman konsep, pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI baik diaplikasikan untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi dan rendah, akan tetapi untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ rendah lebih baik menggunakan tipe GI; dan (2) untuk pencapaian pemecahan masalah, pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI baik diaplikasikan untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi, siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ rendah maupun siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi lebih baik menggunakan tipe GI. Kata  THE DIFFERENCES OF JIGSAW II AND GI ON THE CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING AND PROBLEM SOLVING IN COMPETENCE OF DIAGNOSING PROBLEMS WHEN OPERATE PC AND PERIPHERAL IN TERMS OF LEARNING MOTIVATIONAbstractThis research aims to describe the differences of concept understanding and problem solving on the KK3 material: (1) between students taught using the cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type when TKJ learning motivation was controlled; and (2) between the use of cooperative learning (Jigsaw Type II and Group Investigation (GI) Type) with the levels of TKJ learning motivation (high and low). This research was quasi-experimental with the nonequivalent comparison-group design using two treatment classes as independent variables which were given cooperative learning with two different types. One class used the Jigsaw Type II while the other used the GI Type. The TKJ learning motivation was used as the divider category of students who have high and low TKJ learning motivation as well as covariant. The data analysis technique in this research was the multivariat analysis of covariate and factorial design using the SPSS 16 program. This article shows the second aim, and the results shows that: (1) for concept understanding achievement, cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type are good to be applied for students who have high and low TKJ learning motivation, but for those who have low TKJ learning motivation, GI Type is better than Jigsaw Type II; and (2) for problem solving achievement, cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type are good to be applied to students who have high TKJ learning motivation, where for those who have high and low TKJ learning motivation GI Type is better than Jigsaw Type II.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA KELAS X SMAN 2 PRAYA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuning Apriani ◽  
Syahrial Ayub ◽  
Hikmawati Hikmawati
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak – Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa kelas X SMAN 2 Praya tahun pelajaran 2015/2016. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen dengan desain penelitian post-test only group design. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah semua siswa kelas X SMAN 2 Praya Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016 berjumlah 400 orang. Pengambilan sampel penelitian menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling, sehingga diperoleh kelas X 4 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas X 6 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah tes multiple choice dengan lima alternatif jawaban. Hipotesis Penelitian diuji menggunakan t-test polled varians, diperoleh thitungsebesar 3,42 dan ttabelsebesar 1,99 pada taraf signifikansi 5 %. Oleh karena  t­hitung > ttabel, maka Ho ditolak dan Ha diterima. Jadi, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa kelas X SMAN 2 Praya tahun pelajaran 2015/2016. Kata kunci: model pembelajaran berbasis masalah, hasil belajar. Abstract – The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of problem based learning model toward physics learning outcomes at SMAN 2 Praya grade X at the academic year 2015/2016. This study was experiment with post-test only control group design. The population of this study were all students of Xth grade with number of students were 400 students. Cluster random sampling was used to choose the class sample with X-4 as experiment class and X-6 as control class. The instrument of this study used multiple choise test with 5 alternative answer. Based from the result, data were analyzed using t-test polled varians. The data obtained 3.42 for the t-hint and 1.99 for the t-table with significant level 5%. Therefore t-hint > t-table, the H0 rejected and Ha be accepted. This result shows that problem based learning model is influencing the stuent’s physics academy result at SMAN 2 Praya Xth grade academic year 2015/2016. Keywords: Problem based learning model, learning outcomes.

scholarly journals The Efforts of Improving Motivation and Learning Outcomes Through The Power Of Two Type in the History Subject at Grade X Iis 3 in Sman 7 Solok Selatan

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-168
Author(s):  
Yondri Fernando ◽  
Siti Fatimah
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Action Observation ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Active Learning Strategy ◽  
Motivation And Learning

The active learning strategy of the Power of Two type means the active learning strategy which in its application uses the strength learning techniques of two people to increase motivation and learning outcomes. Based on this, this research aims to determine the efforts to improve motivation and learning outcomes through the The Power of Two type in the History Subject at grade X IIS 3 in SMAN 7 Solok Selatan. The research method used was a classroom action research. The research was conducted in SMAN 7 Solok Selatan in the second semester of the 2018/2019 academic year. The research subjects were 24 students of grade X IIS 3. The researchwas conducted in 3 cycles: planning, action, observation and reflection phase. The data analysis technique consisted of a descriptive and qualitative analysis. The results of the research were as follows (1) The use of the The Power of Two type could increase the motivation of students of grade XI IIS 3 in SMAN 7 Solok Selatan; in the first cycle the motivation for the medium category was 49.72%, increasing to 58.76%; cycle II and cycle III were included in the high category with a percentage of 69.23% and (2) The use of the The Power of Two type could improve student learning outcomes of grade XI IIS 3 in SMAN 7 Solok Selatan. In the first cycle, the mean score of the student learning outcomes was unsatisfactory: 64.58 with a percentage of completeness of 12.5%. Then, the second cycle increased by an mean score of 71.67 with a percentage of completeness of 20.83%% and in the third cycle of 78.75 with a percentage of completeness 87.5%.

scholarly journals PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL QUANTUM TEACHING

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Winda Maharani
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mastery Learning ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teaching Model ◽  
Grade Student ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Test Sheet ◽  
The Third ◽  
Analysis Technique

Abstract: The problem of this study is the low of the third grade student learning outcomes at Gunung Mekar Elementary School in Mathematics. The results of preliminary observations showed that 58.82% of students have not reached the passing grade and the learning has not been implemented optimally. The aim of this study is for increasing the outcomes of student’s mathematics learning by using Quantum Teaching Model. The kind of this study is a classroom action research, with the data collection’s form is the test sheet. The analysis technique used in this study is a quantitative analysis technique. The results of this study shows that the implementation of Quantum Teaching Model could increase the student’s learning outcomes. The percentage of student’s mastery learning outcomes increased from the first cycle to the second cycle with the percentage of the first cycle is 64.70% (category quite well) and increased to 82.35% (the excellent category) in the second cycle.               Keywords: quantum teaching model, learning outcomes, mathematics Abstrak: Masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah rendahnya hasil belajar siswa kelas III SD Negeri 2  Gunung Mekar pada mata pelajaran matematika. Hasil observasi awal menunjukkan bahwa 58,82% siswa belum mencapai KKM dan pembelajaran belum dilaksanakan secara optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika siswa dengan menerapkan model quantum teaching. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas, alat pengumpul data penelitian berupa soal test. Teknik analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik analisis kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan model quantum teaching pada pembelajaran matematika dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Persentase ketuntasan hasil belajar siswa meningkat dari siklus I ke siklus II dengan persentase siklus I sebesar 64.70% (kategori cukup baik) dan meningkat menjadi 82.35% (kategori sangat baik) pada siklus II.Kata kunci: model quantum teaching, hasil belajar, matematika

scholarly journals Kecerdasan Logis Matematis dan Linguistik sebagai Prediktor Hasil Belajar Matematika

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-256
Author(s):  
Lia Rahmawati ◽  
Ibrahim Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
And Linguistics ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

AbstrakLatar belakang penelitian yaitu pentingnya kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar. Penelitian bertujuan memprediksi hasil belajar matematika siswa berdasarkan kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik. Metode penelitian yaitu korelasional-kuantitatif yang dilaksanakan di SMPN 16 Yogyakarta di kelas VII A, VII B, dan VII C tahun pelajaran 2019/2020.  Peneliti menggunakan 30 siswa sebagai sampel dan teknik cluster random sampling sebagai metode pengambilan sampel, yaitu dengan mengambil 10 siswa pada setiap cluster yang ditetapkan. Dengan penggunaan cluster random sampling, peneliti dapat menentukan sampel dari pengambilan setiap cluster, sehingga sampel yang digunakan bisa merata. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah skala kecerdasan logis matematis dan kecerdasan linguistik. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi ganda yang dilakukan dengan SPSS 25. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik turut andil sebagai prediktor hasil belajar matematika siswa. AbstractThe research background is the importance of mathematical logical intelligence and linguistic in influencing learning outcomes. The research aims to predict student learning outcomes based on mathematical logical intelligence and linguistics. The method of research is correlational-quantitative which was carried out at SMPN 16th Yogyakarta in classes VII A, VII B, and VII C in 2019/2020. Researchers used 30 students as samples and cluster random sampling technique as sampling method, namely by taking 10 students in each cluster that was determined. By using cluster random sampling, researchers can determine the sample from each cluster, so that the sample used can be evenly distributed. The instrument used is a scale of logical-mathematical intelligence and linguistic intelligence. The data analysis technique used multiple regression analysis which was carried out with SPSS 25. The results of the analysis showed that there was a positive effect of mathematical and linguistic logical intelligence on students' mathematics learning outcomes. Mathematical logical intelligence and linguistic contribute as a predictor of student mathematics learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Team Accelerated Instruction Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau Dari Keaktifan Siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wide Sumiati ◽  
A.A Sujadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Activity ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to find out the effectiveness of TAI model through mathematics learning outcomes in terms of students' student activity. This research was a quasi-experimental research. Sampling technique in this research used Cluster Random Sampling technique. Data collection technique used questionnaire and tests. The data analysis technique used two-way variance analysis with unequal cell. The result of this research was that learning using TAI model is not more effective to use (Fobs< Ftable) with 2.859 <4.00; Students who have high student activity, have mathematics learning outcomes that are no better than those with moderate and low-skilled students (Fobs< Ftable) with 0.5576 < 3.15; There is no interaction between the learning model used and the student activity to the students' mathematics learning outcomes (Fobs< Ftable= 0.44 <3.15). A suggestion on the results of this study is in the process of teaching and learning teachers should be able to create an atmosphere of learning that can make students become more active.

scholarly journals The Experimentation of Contextual and Realistic Learning Models in terms of Interpersonal Intelligence

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Utin Desy Susiaty ◽  
Hodiyanto Hodiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Contextual Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

<p>The aims of this study is to find out: (1) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional; (2) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence on each learning model; (4) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional at each level of interpersonal intelligence. This research is using the experimental method. The sampling technique is cluster random sampling. Data collection tools used were questionnaires and tests. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of three-way variance with unequal cells. The results showed that: (1) contextual learning models are better than realistic but provide the same learning outcomes as conventional, while realistic and conventional learning outcomes are equally good; (2) students who have high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (3) In each learning model, students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (4) At each level of interpersonal intelligence, the contextual learning model is better than realistic and conventional.</p>

scholarly journals Pengaruh model problem based learning terhadap keterampilan proses sains dasar dan hasil belajar siswa pada konsep sistem pencernaan makanan pada manusia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
Devi Deratama ◽  
Endang Surahman ◽  
Rita Fitriani
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Basic Science ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The purposes of this research were to investigate the effect of problem based learning models on basic science process skills and student learning outcomes on the concept of a food digestive system in humans. The subjects of this study were students of class XI MIPA of SMA Negeri 1 Tasikmalaya City in two classes. The method that was being used in this research was true experiment. The sample was being taken by cluster random sampling method. To measure the basic science prosess skills of the students used an instrument which consists of 12 questions in the form of essay and to measure the learning outcomes used test consists of 30 questions in the form of multiple choice with 5 option. The analysis technique was ANCOVA (analysis of covariance). The results of this research revealed that there was an impact of the problem based learning model to basic science process skills and learning outcomes of learners on the concept of food digestion system in human and there was a relationship between basic science process skills and learning outcomes. Through this research, we found that the higher the basic science process skills of the students, therefore it will impact to the learning outcomes of the students to be better.

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Student Facilitator and Explaining dan Probing-Prompting Ditinjau dari Penalaran Matematis

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-90
Author(s):  
Annisa Nur Islami ◽  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Wahyu Yulianto
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Better Than

This research aims are to know: (1) are there differences in learning outcomes between learning models Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) and Probing-Prompting (PP)?; (2) whether there are differences in student learning outcomes with high, medium and low reasoning abilities?; and (3) whether there is an interaction effect between learning models and mathematical reasoning on student learning outcomes. This quantitative research is a quasi experiment. The research sample was 80 students in grade 8 at SMP Islam Dewan Da’wah. The sampling technique by cluster random. The research results is: (1) there is no difference in student mathematics learning outcomes between SFE and PP learning models; (2) Student learning outcomes of high mathematical reasoning abilities are better than moderate and low, and student learning outcomes of moderate mathematical reasoning abilities are better than low; (3) not for all student learning outcomes from high, medium and low level of reasoning abilities in SFE learning are better than PP model. In each model, learning outcomes from students’ high level of mathematical reasoning abilities are better than moderate and low, and student learning outcomes from moderate level of mathematical reasoning abilities are better than low.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document