scholarly journals BRCA 1/2 Germline Mutation Predicts the Treatment Response of FOLFIRINOX with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Korean Patients

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Ji Hoon Park ◽  
Jung Hyun Jo ◽  
Sung Ill Jang ◽  
Moon Jae Chung ◽  
Jeong Youp Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Korean Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Brca 1

We evaluated the proportion of BRCA 1/2 germline mutations in Korean patients with sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its effect on the chemotherapeutic response of FOLFIRINOX. This retrospective study included patients who were treated at two tertiary hospitals between 2012 and 2020, were pathologically confirmed to have PDAC, and had undergone targeted next-generation sequencing-based germline genetic testing. Sixty-six patients were included in the study (24 men; median age 57.5 years). In the germline test, BRCA 1/2 pathogenic mutations were found in nine patients (9/66, 13%, BRCA 1, n = 3; BRCA 2, n = 5; and BRCA 1/2, n = 1). There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics according to BRCA mutation positivity. Among patients who underwent FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, patients with a BRCA 1/2 mutation showed a higher overall response rate than those without a BRCA 1/2 mutation (71.4% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.004). Patients with a germline BRCA 1/2 mutation showed longer progression-free survival than those without a BRCA 1/2 mutation, without a significant time difference (18 months vs. 10 months, p = 0.297). Patients with a BRCA 1/2 mutation in the germline blood test had a higher response rate to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in PDAC. The high proportion of BRCA 1/2 germline mutations and response rate supports the need for germline testing in order to predict better treatment response.

HALO 202: Randomized Phase II Study of PEGPH20 Plus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine Versus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine in Patients With Untreated, Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil R. Hingorani ◽  
Lei Zheng ◽  
Andrea J. Bullock ◽  
Tara E. Seery ◽  
William P. Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Event Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
End Points ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterized by excessive hyaluronan (HA) accumulation in the tumor microenvironment, elevating interstitial pressure and impairing perfusion. Preclinical studies demonstrated pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) degrades HA, thereby increasing drug delivery. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to treatment with PEGPH20 plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (PAG) or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG). Tumor HA levels were measured retrospectively using a novel affinity histochemistry assay. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; overall) and thromboembolic (TE) event rate. Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by HA level, and objective response rate. An early imbalance in TE events in the PAG arm led to a clinical hold; thereafter, patients with TE events were excluded and enoxaparin prophylaxis was initiated. Results A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned; 246 had HA data; 231 were evaluable for efficacy; 84 (34%) had HA-high tumors (ie, extracellular matrix HA staining ≥ 50% of tumor surface at any intensity). PFS was significantly improved with PAG treatment overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.00; P = .049) and for patients with HA-high tumors (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.00; P = .048). In patients with HA-high tumors (PAG v AG), the objective response rate was 45% versus 31%, and median overall survival was 11.5 versus 8.5 months (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.61). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events with significant differences between arms (PAG v AG) included muscle spasms (13% v 1%), neutropenia (29% v 18%), and myalgia (5% v 0%). TE events were comparable after enoxaparin initiation (14% PAG v 10% AG). Conclusion This study met its primary end points of PFS and TE event rate. The largest improvement in PFS was observed in patients with HA-high tumors who received PAG. A similar TE event rate was observed between the treatment groups in stage 2 of the trial.

ESPAC-3(v2): A multicenter, international, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) versus gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4505-LBA4505 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Neoptolemos ◽  
M. Büchler ◽  
D. D. Stocken ◽  
P. Ghaneh ◽  
D. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Bolus Injection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Significant Difference

LBA4505 Background: Adjuvant 5-FU/FA (ESPAC-1 trial) and GEM (CONKO-001 trial) provide improved survival for patients with resected pancreatic cancer compared to no chemotherapy. The aim of the ESPAC-3 (v2) trial was to compare 5FU/FA vs GEM to identify if either adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significantly better survival. Methods: Patients with an R0/R1 resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomized (stratified for resection margin status and country) <8 weeks of surgery to receive either 5FU/FA (FA, 20 mg/m2, iv bolus injection followed by 5-FU, 425 mg/m2, iv bolus injection given 1–5d every 28 days) or GEM (1,000mg/m2 iv infusion 1d, 8d and 15d every 4 weeks) for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was overall survival; the secondary measures were toxicity, progression free survival and quality of life. 1,030 patients were needed to detect a 10% difference in 2-year survival rates with 90% power. Results: 1,088 patients from 16 countries were randomized from July 2000 to Jan 2007 (5FU/FA = 551, GEM = 537). Median (range) age was 63 (31–85) years; 598 (55%) were men. Median tumor size was 30 (20–350) mm; 384 (35%) were R1 resections; 777 (72%) were node positive; and 263 (25%) were poorly differentiated tumors. Final analysis was carried out on an intention to treat basis with a minimum of 2 years follow-up after 753 (69%) patients had died. Median (IQR) follow-up of 335 alive patients was 34.2 (27.1–43.4) months, equal across treatment groups. Median survival from resection of patients treated with 5FU/FA was 23.0 (95% CI: 21.1, 25.0) months and for patients treated with GEM this was 23.6 (95%CI: 21.4, 26.4) months. Log-rank analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in survival estimates between the treatment groups (c2LR=0.7, p=0.39, HRGEM=0.94 (95%CI: 0.81, 1.08)). There was no significant difference in the effect of treatment across subgroups according to R status (test of heterogeneity c21=0.3, p=0.56). Conclusions: This is the largest adjuvant trial ever conducted for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and showed no significant difference in survival between adjuvant 5FU/FA and adjuvant GEM. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The GALNT14 Genotype Predicts Postoperative Outcome of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Cheng Chiang ◽  
Chau-Ting Yeh ◽  
Tsann-Long Hwang ◽  
Yu-De Chu ◽  
Siew-Na Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Negative Resection Margin ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is notorious for its poor prognosis. The current mainstay of treatment for PDA is surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is difficult to predict the post-operative outcome because of the lack of reliable markers. The single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase14 (GALNT14) has been proven to predict the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response to chemotherapy in various types of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, its role in PDA has not been studied. This study aims to investigate whether the GALNT14 SNP genotype can be a prognostic marker for PDA. A cohort of one hundred and three PDA patients having received surgical resection were retrospectively enrolled. GALNT14 genotypes and the clinicopathological parameters were correlated with postoperative prognosis. The genotype analysis revealed that 19.4%, 60.2% and 20.4% of patients had the GALNT14 “TT”, “TG” and “GG” genotypes, respectively. The patients with the “GG” genotype had a mean OS time of 37.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.2–56.1) and those with the “non-GG” genotype had a mean OS time of 16.1 months (95% CI: 13.1–19.2). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the “GG” genotype had a significantly better OS compared to the “non-GG” genotype (p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the “GG” and “non-GG” genotypes in PFS (p = 0.172). The baseline characteristics between patients with the “GG” and “non-GG” genotypes were compared, and no significant difference was found. Univariate followed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard models demonstrated the GALNT14 “GG” genotype, negative resection margin, and locoregional disease as independent predictors for favorable OS (p = 0.003, p = 0.037, p = 0.021, respectively). Sensitivity analysis was performed in each subgroup to examine the relationship of GALNT14 with different clinicopathological variables and no heterogeneity was found. The GALNT14 “GG” genotype is associated with favorable survival outcome, especially OS, in patients with resected PDA and could serve as a prognostic marker.

scholarly journals Retrospective Survival Analysis of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Germline BRCA or PALB2 Mutations

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim A. Reiss ◽  
Shun Yu ◽  
Renae Judy ◽  
Heather Symecko ◽  
Katherine L. Nathanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
University Of Pennsylvania ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Brca1 Brca2 ◽  
The University

Purpose Germline mutations in the homologous recombination (HR) genes BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 confer an increased risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Tumors associated with mutations in HR genes are sensitive to DNA-damaging agents, such as platinum chemotherapies. We hypothesized that patients with PDAC with germline BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 mutations may benefit preferentially from platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials and Methods Twenty-nine individuals with deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 and a diagnosis of advanced PDAC (mut-positive) were matched 2:1 to patients who were noncarrier or untested (control) by age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, stage, and sex. Patients were identified via one of two available databases at the University of Pennsylvania: the Basser Center for BRCA Registry or the University of Pennsylvania Electronic Medical Patient Record. Treatment history, including exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy, was ascertained. Primary objective was overall survival (OS). Results Patients who were mut-positive had an OS of 21.8 months; control patients had an OS of 8.1 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.62; P < .001). With platinum exposure, patients who were mut-positive had an undefined OS (median follow-up, 20.1 months), versus an OS of 15.5 months in the control patients (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.61; P = .002). In patients not treated with platinum, there was no significant difference in OS between groups (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.17; P = .12). When treated with platinum therapy, patients who were mut-positive had a 1-year OS of 94%, compared with a 1-year OS of 60% in control patients. Conclusion Platinum-based therapy may confer a survival benefit in patients with advanced PDAC who carry a deleterious germline BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 mutation.

scholarly journals Preoperative Score to Stratify Recurrence Risk After Curative Resection of Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Jiang ◽  
SIYI Zou ◽  
Weishen Wang ◽  
Haoda Chen ◽  
Qian Zhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Final Model ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background: Oncological survival after operation of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) is variable depending on various factors. Preoperative risk stratification could guide decision-making in multidisciplinary treatment concepts. We develop and validate a prognostic score for disease-free survival (DFS) in R-PDAC to solve this issue.Methods: 421 R-PDAC patients between January 2012 and December 2015 were enrolled. Performance of the final model was evaluated with respect to discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness. A prognostic score based on the final model was developed, and external validated in 290 patients.Results: On multivariable analysis, age, tumor size, carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9, CA125, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, and systemic-immune-inflammation index were independently associated with DFS. Final model had acceptable calibration, discrimination and internal validity. The prognostic score could delineate low- and high-risk groups with median DFS of 19.6 and 10.1 months (P<0.0001). Tumors in high-risk group exhibited more aggressive pathobiological behaviors. Additionally, at 1-year follow-up, the restricted mean survival time was longer with adjuvant chemotherapy than those without in low-risk patients. However, no significant difference was detected in high-risk patients.Discussion: The prognostic score could accurately predict DFS preoperatively in R-PDAC patients and provide reference for risk-adapted strategies formulation for R-PDAC management in the future.

When will it be better? Lenvatinib combined with TACE for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of real-world evidence in China.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 281-281
Author(s):  
Lan Zhang ◽  
Yanhong Wang ◽  
Ningling Ge ◽  
Yu-Hong Gan ◽  
ZhengGang Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Treatment ◽  
Real World ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Combination Strategy ◽  
Significant Difference

281 Background: TACE and lenvatinib has each shown to prolong overall survival in patients with unresectable HCC, combination of which may also improve clinical outcomes and have been widely used in the real world accordingly. However, the optimal timing of adding on lenvatinb to TACE remains unclear. We are aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety between two combination strategies. Methods: From Nov 2018 to Jun 2020, 79 consecutive patients had received a combination treatment of lenvatinib and TACE. Patients followed up for more than 2 months were included in this analysis. They were classified as early-combination group(add on lenvatinib before or after the first TACE ) and late-combination group(add on lenvatinib after at least two procedures of TACE ). Tumor response and progression-free survival (PFS,time from the first day of prescribing lenvatinib to progression or death) were assessed according to RECIST1.1 criteria. Liver function were also evaluated at baseline and every 2 months later. AEs were recorded during the combination treatment period according to CTCAE 5.0. Results: A total of 48 u-HCC patients was finally enrolled. Median follow-up in all patients was 9.3(5.3-14.3)months. Patients’ baseline characteristics were similar in two groups. For early-combination group(n=22)and late-combination group(n=26), the mean age was 65±9.7 and 61±11.6years(p=0.2);BCLC stage C HCC was 59% and 54%(p=0.89);and Child-Pugh A proportion was 81.8% and 77%(p=0.73) respectively. The objective response rate(ORR) was 22.9% in total 48 cases. There was no significant difference in response rate (18.2% vs 26.9%, P=0.51) or disease control rate (90.9% vs 92.3%, P=1.00). Median PFS was significantly longer in the early-combination group than that in late-combination group (14.5 vs 8.9 months; p=0.048). The safety profile was similar between two groups. Grade 3/4 adverse events were 3 (13.6%) and 2 cases(7.7%) respectively (P=0.65). Conclusions: This is to date the first real-world data of the combination timing of lenvatinib with TACE in u-HCC patients. Early-combination strategy may be a better option for the u-HCC patients with a longer mPFS.

A phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of proxalutamide (GT0918) in subjects with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Tie Zhou ◽  
Dingwei Ye ◽  
Zhongquan Sun ◽  
Qinggui Meng ◽  
Dalin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Psa Progression

108 Background: GT0918 is a 2nd generation of AR antagonist and capability to down-regulate AR level. This study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, Ph II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy in patients with mCRPC, and to determine the optimal dose for Ph III study. Methods: Patients with historically confirmed mCRPC who progressed after/intolerant to/reluctant to receive Docetaxel and previously treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide were excluded. All the patients received up to 6 cycles or, unacceptable toxicity, or loss of clinical benefit as recommended by PCWG3. Primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression (TTPP), objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profiles. Results: As of June 30, 2019, 108 treated with GT0918 at three dose levels: 100 mg (n =37), 200 mg (n = 35) and 300 mg (n = 36), the median age of patients was 70.0 years (range 63-77), 88% of patients had stage IV disease at the initial diagnosis and 69.4% had Gleason score ≥ 8. The median duration of disease was 2.88 years. All received prior endocrine therapy, 35.2% received prior chemotherapy, 29.6% received Docetaxel. The median PSA at baseline was 35.285ng/ml, PSA response rate (≥50 % reduction from baseline) was 41.9%. The median time to PSA progression was not reached. There was no significant difference among three arms. Of 19 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 15.8% (all were PR) assessed by IRC with RECIST v 1.1, with 20.0% (1/5), 22.2% (2/9), 0 (0/5) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. The DCR assessed by IRC was 78.9% (CR 0+PR15.8%+SD 63.2%). Of 26 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 19.2% assessed by investigators (CR 3.8%+PR 15.4%), with 11.1% (1/9), 20.0% (2/10), 28.6% (2/7) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. Overall, AEs were experienced by most of patients (94.4 %, n=102). AEs leading to drug interruption were reported in 13 patients (12.0%), 9 (8.3%)of them were suspected to be drug related. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 6 patients (5.6%), 3(2.8%) were possibly related to GT0918. 14 patients (13.0%) experienced Grade 3 and 4 AEs. 17 patients (15.7%)experienced SAE, 5(4.6%) of them were suspected to be related to study drug. Most of AEs were mild or moderate. The common suspected AE (≥10%) were asthenia (17.6%, n=19), anemia (14.8%, n=16), AST increased (14.8%, n=16), ALT increased (13.0%, n=14), decreased appetite (13.0%, N=14), white blood cell count decreased (12.0%, n=13), proteinuria (12.0%, n=13). Conclusions: GT0918 showed a manageable safety profile. This study provided preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with mCRPC. 200mg/day is recommended dose for Ph III trial. Clinical trial information: CTR20170177.

scholarly journals 1538P Deleterious germline mutations in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S945
Author(s):  
Z. Zhao ◽  
X. Li ◽  
Q. Liu ◽  
T. Ma ◽  
H. Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma

scholarly journals Complete Radiologic Response of Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Microwave Ablation Combined with Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hakon Blomstrand ◽  
Karin Adolfsson ◽  
Per Sandström ◽  
Bergthor Björnsson
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a bleak prognosis, especially for the majority of patients diagnosed with metastatic disease. The primary option for palliative treatment is chemotherapy, and responses beyond first-line treatment are rare and typically short. Here, we report a case of a 63-year-old woman with PDAC in the head of the pancreas who was initially successfully treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine. However, disease recurrence with liver and para-aortic lymph node metastases was detected only two months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. First-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine-nab/paclitaxel was commenced. The results were discouraging, with disease progression (liver and lung metastases) detected at the first evaluation; the progression-free survival was just two months (64 days). Surprisingly, the response to second-line palliative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin was excellent; in combination with the ablation of a liver metastasis, this treatment regimen resulted in a complete radiological response and an 11-month treatment-free interval with a sustained good performance status.

scholarly journals Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Response to Chemotherapy

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safi Shahda ◽  
Kirsten M. Timms ◽  
Ashley A. Ibrahim ◽  
Julia E. Reid ◽  
Harvey M. Cramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
Mutation Data

Purpose Mutations or copy number abnormalities of genes involved in homologous recombination (HR) occur in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). DNA-based measures of HR deficiency (HRD) have been developed and may help identify tumors with better response to DNA-damaging agents. This study aimed to describe the HR pathway mutations and HRD status and determine their association with treatment response and outcome in patients with PDAC. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of tumor samples from patients treated at Indiana University for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. Patients were included if they received gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (control) or fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) and had adequate follow-up to assess survival and response to therapy. Tumor analysis generated a three-biomarker HRD score and mutation data for 44 genes. Results Ninety-one samples met inclusion criteria, and 78 samples (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded, n = 15; fine-needle aspiration, n = 63) generated mutation data. HRD analysis was successful for 57 samples (HRD score: median, 18; range, 5 to 61); the primary cause of failure was low tumor cellularity. Six BRCA1/ 2 mutations were detected, four with HRD scores in the top decile ( P = .011). There was no statistically significant correlation between HRD score and radiographic response (odds ratio per interquartile range, 1.40; P = .32 adjusted for treatment) in either treatment group. In patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, HRD score dichotomized at the median was not associated with progression-free survival (median, 5.3 v 9.4 months for low v high HRD score, respectively; P = .083) or overall survival (median, 11.9 v 10.7 months for low v high HRD score, respectively; P = .76). Conclusion Mutations in DNA repair genes occur in PDAC, and HRD scores can be generated in the majority of patients. The HRD score was not significantly associated with higher response rate or prolonged survival in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document