scholarly journals The Maize WRKY Transcription Factor ZmWRKY40 Confers Drought Resistance in Transgenic Arabidopsis

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 2580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Tao Wang ◽  
Jing-Na Ru ◽  
Yong-Wei Liu ◽  
Jun-Feng Yang ◽  
Meng Li ◽  
...  

Abiotic stresses restrict the growth and yield of crops. Plants have developed a number of regulatory mechanisms to respond to these stresses. WRKY transcription factors (TFs) are plant-specific transcription factors that play essential roles in multiple plant processes, including abiotic stress response. At present, little information regarding drought-related WRKY genes in maize is available. In this study, we identified a WRKY transcription factor gene from maize, named ZmWRKY40. ZmWRKY40 is a member of WRKY group II, localized in the nucleus of mesophyll protoplasts. Several stress-related transcriptional regulatory elements existed in the promoter region of ZmWRKY40. ZmWRKY40 was induced by drought, high salinity, high temperature, and abscisic acid (ABA). ZmWRKY40 could rapidly respond to drought with peak levels (more than 10-fold) at 1 h after treatment. Overexpression of ZmWRKY40 improved drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis by regulating stress-related genes, and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) content in transgenic lines was reduced by enhancing the activities of peroxide dismutase (POD) and catalase (CAT) under drought stress. According to the results, the present study may provide a candidate gene involved in the drought stress response and a theoretical basis to understand the mechanisms of ZmWRKY40 in response to abiotic stresses in maize.

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e12484
Author(s):  
Zilin Zhao ◽  
Jiaran Shuang ◽  
Zhaoguo Li ◽  
Huimin Xiao ◽  
Yuling Liu ◽  
...  

Background Golden2-Like (GLK) transcription factors are a type of transcriptional regulator in plants. They play a pivotal role in the plant physiological activity process and abiotic stress response. Methods In this study, the potential function of GLK family genes in Gossypium hirsutum was studied based on genomic identification, phylogenetic analysis, chromosome mapping and cis-regulatory elements prediction. Gene expression of nine key genes were analyzed by qRT-PCR experiments. Results Herein, we identified a total of 146 GhGLK genes in Gossypium hirsutum, which were unevenly distributed on each of the chromosomes. There were significant differences in the number and location of genes between the At sub-genome and the Dt sub-genome. According to the phylogenetic analysis, they were divided into ten subgroups, each of which had very similar number and structure of exons and introns. Some cis-regulatory elements were identified through promoter analysis, including five types of elements related to abiotic stress response, five types of elements related to phytohormone and five types of elements involved in growth and development. Based on public transcriptome data analysis, we identified nine key GhGLKs involved in salt, cold, and drought stress. The qRT-PCR results showed that these genes had different expression patterns under these stress conditions, suggesting that GhGLK genes played an important role in abiotic stress response. This study laid a theoretical foundation for the screening and functional verification of genes related to stress resistance of GLK gene family in cotton.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
Nkulu Kabange Rolly ◽  
Bong-Gyu Mun ◽  
Byung-Wook Yun

A large number of hormonal biosynthetic or signaling pathways genes controlling shoot branching are widely known for their roles in regulating plant growth and development, operating in synergetic or antagonistic manner. However, their involvement in abiotic stress response mechanism remains unexplored. Initially, we performed an in silico analysis to identify potential transcription binding sites for the basic leucine zipper 62 transcription factor (bZIP62 TF) in the target branching related genes. The results revealed the presence of cis-regulatory elements specific to two bZIP TFs, AtbZIP18 and AtbZIP69, rather than AtbZIP62. Interestingly, these bZIP TFs were previously proposed to be negatively regulated by the AtbZIP62 TF under salinity in Arabidopsis. Therefore, we investigated the transcriptional regulation of more axillary branching (MAX, strigolactone), PIN-FORMED (PINs, auxin carriers), gibberellic acid (GA)-biosynthetic genes as well as isopentenyltransferase (IPT, cytokinin biosynthesis pathway) genes in response to drought stress in Arabidopsis Col-0 wild type. In addition, in the perspective of exploring the transcriptional interplay of the selected genes with the AtbZIP62, we measured their expression by qPCR in the atbzip62 (lacking the AtbZIP62 gene) background under the same conditions. Our findings revealed that the expression of AtMAX2, AtMAX3, and AtMAX4 was differentially regulated by drought stress between the atbzip62 and Col-0 wild type, but not AtMAX1. Similarly, the transcripts accumulation of AtPIN3 and AtPIN7 (known as auxin efflux carriers), and that of the AtAXR1 showed similar regulation patterns in atbzip62. However, AtPIN1 expression was downregulated in Col-0, but no change was observed in atbzip62. Furthermore, AtIPT5 and AtIPT7 exhibited a differential transcripts accumulation pattern in atbzip62 and Col-0 wild type (WT). In the same way, the expression of the GA biosynthetic genes AtGA2ox1 and AtGA20ox2, and that of AtRGA1 were differentially regulated in atbzip62 compared to the Col-0. Meanwhile, AtGA2ox1 showed a similar expression pattern with Col-0. Therefore, all results suggest PIN, MAX, IPT, and GA-biosynthetic genes, which are differentially regulated by AtbZIP62 transcription factor, as emerging candidate genes that could be involved in drought stress response mechanism in Arabidopsis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 6952
Author(s):  
Mingxin Yu ◽  
Junling Liu ◽  
Bingshuai Du ◽  
Mengjuan Zhang ◽  
Aibin Wang ◽  
...  

NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2) transcription factors are ubiquitously distributed in eukaryotes and play significant roles in stress response. However, the functional verifications of NACs in Picea (P.) wilsonii remain largely uncharacterized. Here, we identified the NAC transcription factor PwNAC11 as a mediator of drought stress, which was significantly upregulated in P. wilsonii under drought and abscisic acid (ABA) treatments. Yeast two-hybrid assays showed that both the full length and C-terminal of PwNAC11 had transcriptional activation activity and PwNAC11 protein cannot form a homodimer by itself. Subcellular observation demonstrated that PwNAC11 protein was located in nucleus. The overexpression of PwNAC11 in Arabidopsis obviously improved the tolerance to drought stress but delayed flowering time under nonstress conditions. The steady-state level of antioxidant enzymes’ activities and light energy conversion efficiency were significantly increased in PwNAC11 transgenic lines under dehydration compared to wild plants. PwNAC11 transgenic lines showed hypersensitivity to ABA and PwNAC11 activated the expression of the downstream gene ERD1 by binding to ABA-responsive elements (ABREs) instead of drought-responsive elements (DREs). Genetic evidence demonstrated that PwNAC11 physically interacted with an ABA-induced protein—ABRE Binding Factor3 (ABF3)—and promoted the activation of ERD1 promoter, which implied an ABA-dependent signaling cascade controlled by PwNAC11. In addition, qRT-PCR and yeast assays showed that an ABA-independent gene—DREB2A—was also probably involved in PwNAC11-mediated drought stress response. Taken together, our results provide the evidence that PwNAC11 plays a dominant role in plants positively responding to early drought stress and ABF3 and DREB2A synergistically regulate the expression of ERD1.


BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenqing Zheng ◽  
Liang Du

Abstract Background The deubiquitinase (DUB) family constitutes a group of proteases that regulate the stability or reverse the ubiquitination of many proteins in the cell. These enzymes participate in cell-cycle regulation, cell division and differentiation, diverse physiological activities such as DNA damage repair, growth and development, and response to stress. However, limited information is available on this family of genes in woody plants. Results In the present study, 88 DUB family genes were identified in the woody model plant Populus trichocarpa, comprising 44 PtrUBP, 3 PtrUCH, 23 PtrOTU, 4 PtrMJD, and 14 PtrJAMM genes with similar domains. According to phylogenetic analysis, the PtrUBP genes were classified into 16 groups, the PtrUCH genes into two, the PtrOTU genes into eight, the PtrMJD genes into two, and the PtrJAMM genes into seven. Members of same subfamily had similar gene structure and motif distribution characteristics. Synteny analysis of the DUB family genes from P. thrchocarpa and four other plant species provided insight into the evolutionary traits of DUB genes. Expression profiles derived from previously published transcriptome data revealed distinct expression patterns of DUB genes in various tissues. On the basis of the results of analysis of promoter cis-regulatory elements, we selected 16 representative PtrUBP genes to treatment with abscisic acid, methyl jasmonate, or salicylic acid applied as a foliar spray. The majority of PtrUBP genes were upregulated in response to the phytohormone treatments, which implied that the genes play potential roles in abiotic stress response in Populus. Conclusions The results of this study broaden our understanding of the DUB family in plants. Analysis of the gene structure, conserved elements, and expression patterns of the DUB family provides a solid foundation for exploration of their specific functions in Populus and to elucidate the potential role of PtrUBP gene in abiotic stress response.


Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2149
Author(s):  
Nkulu Kabange Rolly ◽  
Byung-Wook Yun

Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient, which contributes substantially to the growth and development of plants. In the soil, nitrate (NO3) is the predominant form of N available to the plant and its acquisition by the plant involves several NO3 transporters; however, the mechanism underlying their involvement in the adaptive response under abiotic stress is poorly understood. Initially, we performed an in silico analysis to identify potential binding sites for the basic leucine zipper 62 transcription factor (AtbZIP62 TF) in the promoter of the target genes, and constructed their protein–protein interaction networks. Rather than AtbZIP62, results revealed the presence of cis-regulatory elements specific to two other bZIP TFs, AtbZIP18 and 69. A recent report showed that AtbZIP62 TF negatively regulated AtbZIP18 and AtbZIP69. Therefore, we investigated the transcriptional regulation of AtNPF6.2/NRT1.4 (low-affinity NO3 transporter), AtNPF6.3/NRT1.1 (dual-affinity NO3 transporter), AtNRT2.1 and AtNRT2.2 (high-affinity NO3 transporters), and AtGLU1 and AtGLU2 (both encoding glutamate synthase) in response to drought stress in Col-0. From the perspective of exploring the transcriptional interplay of the target genes with AtbZIP62 TF, we measured their expression by qPCR in the atbzip62 (lacking the AtbZIP62 gene) under the same conditions. Our recent study revealed that AtbZIP62 TF positively regulates the expression of AtPYD1 (Pyrimidine 1, a key gene of the de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway know to share a common substrate with the N metabolic pathway). For this reason, we included the atpyd1-2 mutant in the study. Our findings revealed that the expression of AtNPF6.2/NRT1.4, AtNPF6.3/NRT1.1 and AtNRT2.2 was similarly regulated in atzbip62 and atpyd1-2 but differentially regulated between the mutant lines and Col-0. Meanwhile, the expression pattern of AtNRT2.1 in atbzip62 was similar to that observed in Col-0 but was suppressed in atpyd1-2. The breakthrough is that AtNRT2.2 had the highest expression level in Col-0, while being suppressed in atbzip62 and atpyd1-2. Furthermore, the transcript accumulation of AtGLU1 and AtGLU2 showed differential regulation patterns between Col-0 and atbzip62, and atpyd1-2. Therefore, results suggest that of all tested NO3 transporters, AtNRT2.2 is thought to play a preponderant role in contributing to NO3 transport events under the regulatory influence of AtbZIP62 TF in response to drought stress.


Author(s):  
Geoffrey Onaga ◽  
Kerstin Wydra

Abstract This chapter provides an overview of the recent significant perspectives on molecules involved in response and tolerance to drought and salinity, the 2 major abiotic stresses affecting crop production, and highlights major molecular components identified in major cereals.


BMC Genomics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Aslam ◽  
Bello Hassan Jakada ◽  
Beenish Fakher ◽  
Joseph G. Greaves ◽  
Xiaoping Niu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transcription factors (TFs) are essential regulators of growth and development in eukaryotes. Basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLHs) is one of the most significant TFs families involved in several critical regulatory functions. Cryptochrome-interacting bHLH (CIB) and cryptochromes form an extensive regulatory network to mediate a plethora of pathways. Although bHLHs regulate critical biological processes in plants, the information about pineapple bHLHs remains unexplored. Results Here, we identified a total of 121 bHLH proteins in the pineapple genome. The identified genes were renamed based on the ascending order of their gene ID and classified into 18 subgroups by phylogenetic analysis. We found that bHLH genes are expressed in different organs and stages of pineapple development. Furthermore, by the ectopic expression of AcCIB2 in Arabidopsis and complementation of Atcib2 mutant, we verified the involvement of AcCIB2 in photomorphogenesis and abiotic stress response. Conclusions Our findings revealed that AcCIB2 plays an essential role in flowering time regulation and abiotic stress response. The present study provides additional insights into the current knowledge of bHLH genes and suggests their potential role in various biological processes during pineapple development.


Plant Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 301 ◽  
pp. 110689
Author(s):  
Xing-Long Ji ◽  
Hong-Liang Li ◽  
Zhi-Wen Qiao ◽  
Jiu-Cheng Zhang ◽  
Wei-Jian Sun ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document