scholarly journals Study Rheological Behavior of Polymer Solution in Different-Medium-Injection-Tools

Polymers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Li ◽  
Cheng Fu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Haoran Cheng

Previous studies showed the difficulty during polymer flooding and the low producing degree for the low permeability layer. To solve the problem, Daqing, the first oil company, puts forward the polymer-separate-layer-injection-technology which separates mass and pressure in a single pipe. This technology mainly increases the control range of injection pressure of fluid by using the annular de-pressure tool, and reasonably distributes the molecular weight of the polymer injected into the thin and poor layers through the shearing of the different-medium-injection-tools. This occurs, in order to take advantage of the shearing thinning property of polymer solution and avoid the energy loss caused by the turbulent flow of polymer solution due to excessive injection rate in different injection tools. Combining rheological property of polymer and local perturbation theory, a rheological model of polymer solution in different-medium-injection-tools is derived and the maximum injection velocity is determined. The ranges of polymer viscosity in different injection tools are mainly determined by the structures of the different injection tools. However, the value of polymer viscosity is mainly determined by the concentration of polymer solution. So, the relation between the molecular weight of polymer and the permeability of layers should be firstly determined, and then the structural parameter combination of the different-medium-injection-tool should be optimized. The results of the study are important for regulating polymer injection parameters in the oilfield which enhances the oil recovery with reduced the cost.

1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.T. Szabo

A study was made of the movement of 1-PV slugs of polymer solutions in cores that had been treated previously with sulfonate and then flushed with previously with sulfonate and then flushed with brine. The data revealed premature polymer breakthrough. These results were attributed to low polymer retention and an inaccessible pore volume polymer retention and an inaccessible pore volume to polymer flow. The shapes and absolute values of the polymer breakthrough curves depended on the type of polymer and sulfonate used. When no brine flush followed the sulfonate solution, an even earlier polymer breakthrough was observed. This phenomenon was thought to be related mainly to a phenomenon was thought to be related mainly to a polymer/sulfonate interaction. polymer/sulfonate interaction. Solutions of 10 chemically different polymers were blended with solutions of four sulfonates. After standing, these mixtures separated into two layers - a top layer highly concentrated in polymer and a bottom layer containing a higher sulfonate concentration. Viscosities, fractional volumes, and interfacial tensions to oil of the separated layers depended on the particular polymer/sulfonate system. These layers were found to be separate phases with a measurable, but very low, interfacial phases with a measurable, but very low, interfacial tension at the phase boundary. The effect of salinity and polymer concentration on phase separation also was studied. Phase separation of polymer/sulfonate systems also occurred in Berea core flow tests, resulting in differing mobilities of the separated phases. This phenomenon can result in a low recovery efficiency in low-tension surfactant flooding. An improvement in tertiary oil recovery efficiency was achieved, however by using low salinity in the mobility bank. Introduction This study discusses low-tension oil displacement, wherein an aqueous surfactant slug is driven by a polymer solution. Many papers have dealt with such systems, particularly as they relate to tertiary oil recovery; however, little attention has been devoted to polymer behavior in the polymer/sulfonate mixing zone. Recently, Trushenski et al. reported that high mobility had developed in the polymer/sulfonate mixing zone. The mechanism for this phenomenon was not proposed. They also showed that because of polymer/sulfonate incompatibility, phase separation can occur, which can lead to excessive sulfonate retention through "phase entrapment." This study investigates this phase-separation phenomenon and its effect on flow behavior in the phenomenon and its effect on flow behavior in the polymer/sulfonate mixing zone. polymer/sulfonate mixing zone. POLYMER INJECTION INTO POLYMER INJECTION INTO SULFONATE-TREATED BEREA CORES PROCEDURE PROCEDURE In one set of experiments, two sulfonate solutions [Witco TRS-18/40, (1/1) and Amoco H-4344-1 Tm] were injected into separate Berea cores. Concentrations were 2 wt % (0.02 kg/kg) in 2%. NaCl brine, volume was 2 PV, and the injection rate was 14 ft/D (4.27 m/d). Thereafter, 3 PV of 2% NaCl brine was injected at the same rate. This was followed by 1 PV of 600-ppm polymer solution in 2% NaCl brine, then by 2% NaCl brine. During the last two cycles, the injection rate was 4 ft/D (1.22 m/d). During both polymer injection and the subsequent brine flush, the inlet pressure was recorded and effluent samples were taken to analyze polymer concentration. Polymer concentrations were determined by radioactivity in the case of C14-tagged polymers (Polymers 454 and 340 trade mark) and by the viscosity measurement technique when Kelzan MF (trade mark) was used. In the second set of experiments, a polymer solution directly followed the sulfonate solution. Injection rates were the same as in the first set of experiments. Both sets of experiments used Berea cores, 5.08 cm in diameter and 14.2 cm in length. Each polymer solution was filtered through a separate Berea core disk with about 500 md permeability and with diameter and length of 5.08 and 1.4 cm, respectively. SPEJ P. 4


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 191270
Author(s):  
Leiting Shi ◽  
Shijie Zhu ◽  
Zhongbin Ye ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Xinsheng Xue ◽  
...  

The polymer solution for oil displacement is subjected to strong shear action in practical application, and this action will affect its percolation characteristics in porous media. The effects of mechanical shearing on the solution properties and seepage characteristics of modified hydrophobically associated polymers and dendrimers with two different aggregation behaviours were studied. The results showed that mechanical shearing did not affect hydrophobic microzones. Polymers can re-associate to restore part of the network structure, thereby improving shear resistance (dendritic hydrophobically associating polymers > hydrophobically modified partially hydrolysed polyacrylamide). Polymers with ‘cluster’ aggregation behaviour enhanced solution performance, enabling them to establish higher resistance coefficient (RF) and residual resistance factor (RRF) in porous media but also bringing about injection difficulties. Increasing the injection rate would increase the injection pressure, but the established RF and RRF showed a downward trend. Mechanical shear pretreatment effectively improved the injectability of the polymer. To achieve polymer injection and flow control, pre-shearing polymer solution and low-speed injection can be used in field applications.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1073-1076 ◽  
pp. 2310-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Xian Wang ◽  
Wan Jing Luo ◽  
Jie Ding

Due to the common problems of waterflood in low-permeability reservoirs, the reasearch of finely layered water injection is carried out. This paper established the finely layered water injection standard in low-permeability reservoirs and analysed the sensitivity of engineering parameters as well as evaluated the effect of the finely layered water injection standard in Block A with the semi-quantitative to quantitative method. The results show that: according to the finely layered water injection standard, it can be divided into three types: layered water injection between the layers, layered water injection in inner layer, layered water injection between fracture segment and no-fracture segment. Under the guidance of the standard, it sloved the problem of uneven absorption profile in Block A in some degree and could improve the oil recovery by 3.5%. The sensitivity analysis shows that good performance of finely layered water injection in Block A requires the reservoir permeability ratio should be less than 10, the perforation thickness should not exceed 10 m, the amount of layered injection layers should be less than 3, the surface injection pressure should be below 14 MPa and the injection rate shuold be controlled at about 35 m3/d.


2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 672
Author(s):  
Daniel León ◽  
John Scott ◽  
Steven Saul ◽  
Lina Hartanto ◽  
Shannon Gardner ◽  
...  

After successful design and implementation phases that included both subsurface and facilities components, an EOR polymer injection pilot has been operational for two years in Australia's largest onshore oil field at Barrow Island (816 MMstb OOIP). The pilot's main objective was to identify a suitable EOR technology for the complex, highly heterogeneous, very fine-grained, bioturbated argillaceous sandstone—high in glauconite, high porosity (∼23 %), low permeability (∼5 mD, with 50+ mD streaks)—reservoir that will ultimately increase the recovery of commercial resources past the estimated ultimate recovery factor with waterflooding (∼42 %). This was achieved using the in-depth flow diversion (IFD) methodology to access new unswept oil zones—both vertically and horizontally—by inducing growth in the fracture network. During the pilot operating phase, the main focus has been on surveillance and monitoring activities to assess the effectiveness of the process, including: injection pressure at the wellheads—indicating any increase in resistance to flow; pressure fall off tests at the injectors—to determine fracture growth, if any sampling and lab analysis at the producers—to identify polymer breakthrough; frequent production tests—quantifying reduction in water cut and oil production uplift; and, pressure build up surveys at the producers. These activities provided input data to the fit for purpose simulation model built in Reveal incorporating fractures and polymer as a fourth phase. With more than 96 % compliance to the surveillance plan, this paper will present the present findings and evaluation of the results, which may lead to the continuation of the pilot in other patterns of the reservoir and, possibly, to further expansion in the field.


Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Yuan Cheng ◽  
Wulong Tao ◽  
Shalake Sarulicaoketi ◽  
Xuhui Ji ◽  
...  

The production of a low permeability reservoir decreases rapidly by depletion development, and it needs to supplement formation energy to obtain stable production. Common energy supplement methods include water injection and gas injection. Nitrogen injection is an economic and effective development method for specific reservoir types. In order to study the feasibility and reasonable injection parameters of nitrogen injection development of fractured reservoir, this paper uses long cores to carry out displacement experiment. Firstly, the effects of water injection and nitrogen injection development of a fractured reservoir are compared through experiments to demonstrate the feasibility of nitrogen injection development of the fractured reservoir. Secondly, the effects of gas-water alternate displacement after water drive and gas-water alternate displacement after gas drive are compared through experiments to study the situation of water injection or gas injection development. Finally, the reasonable parameters of nitrogen gas-water alternate injection are optimized by orthogonal experimental design. Results show that nitrogen injection can effectively enhance oil production of the reservoir with natural fractures in early periods, but gas channeling easily occurs in continuous nitrogen flooding. After water flooding, gas-water alternate flooding can effectively reduce the injection pressure and improve the reservoir recovery, but the time of gas-water alternate injection cannot be too late. It is revealed that the factors influencing the nitrogen-water alternative effect are sorted from large to small as follows: cycle injected volume, nitrogen and water slug ratio, and injection rate. The optimal cycle injected volume is around 1 PV, the nitrogen and water slug ratio is between 1 and 2, and the injection rate is between 0.1 and 0.2 mL/min.


1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (05) ◽  
pp. 527-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Farouq Ali

Abstract A comprehensive mathematical model was developed to simulate the downward or upward flow of a steam/water mixture in a well. Comparisons of model predictions with actual field data for both steam injection for oil recovery and geothermal production showed the validity of the model.The proposed model is based on mass and momentum balances in the wellbore and on heat balance in the wellbore and the surrounding media. Unlike the previous models, the pressure calculation accounts for slip and the prevailing flow regime, based on noted correlations. Furthermore, heat loss to the surrounding formations is treated rigorously. The overall heat transfer coefficient involved permits the consideration of a variety of well completions.The model was employed for a series of tests to evaluate the effects of the injection pressure, injection rate, time, and well completion on the downhole steam pressure and quality. It was found that the slip concept and the flow regime are essential elements in wellbore steam/water flow calculations. Pressure drop was found to increase with a decrease in the injection pressure, as also with more obvious parameters. An increase in the injection pressure or tubing size and/or a decrease in the injection rate led to a decrease in steam quality at a given depth. Introduction Most steam injection operations for heavy oil recovery involve injection of wet steam down the tubing and occasionally down the casing/tubing annulus. Computations of reservoir heating by the injected steam require a knowledge of steam pressure and quality at the formation face. At the same time, it is important to know the heat loss to the surroundings during flow in the wellbore, as well as the casing temperature, for an appropriate well completion. Although several investigators have presented wellbore models for steam injection, none considered the flow regime concept in a unified approach. Furthermore, all models employed only approximate solutions of the one-dimensional radial heat conduction equation to investigate the heat loss.Vertical two-phase flow of water and steam occurs in geothermal wells. Among the geothermal reservoirs, only a few areas are classified as vapor-dominated systems, producing dry to superheated steam. All others are hot-water systems and generally produce a mixture of water and steam at the surface. Here, again, it is necessary to consider two phase flow in the wellbore, coupled with heat transfer, to predict steam pressure and quality at the surface. This problem was considered in detail by Gould.The main purpose of this work was to develop an integrated and comprehensive wellbore model to simulate vertical, nonisothermal, two-phase flow phenomena. The model is a combination of the previous model of Pacheco and Farouq Ali and the pressure/flow-regime correlations of Gould et al., Chierici et al., and Duns and Ros, as well as a number of refinements such as the rigorous treatment of heat flow, geothermal gradient, etc. Mathematical Model The system to be modeled consists of three parts:the fluid flow conduit (tubing or annulus),tubing/casing annulus, casing wall, and cement,the formation encircling the cement. Within the conduit, steady, homogeneous, one-dimensional, two-phase flow is assumed. This is described mathematically by combining a two-phase mass balance with a momentum balance and is as follows (the vertical coordinate z is taken positive in the downward direction). SPEJ P. 527^


2018 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 04001
Author(s):  
Warut Tuncharoen ◽  
Falan Srisuriyachai

Polymer flooding is widely implemented to improve oil recovery since polymer can increase sweep efficiency and smoothen heterogeneous reservoir profile. However, polymer solution is somewhat difficult to be injected due to high viscosity and thus, water slug is recommended to be injected before and during polymer injection in order to increase an ease of injecting this viscous fluid into the wellbore. In this study, numerical simulation is performed to determine the most appropriate operating parameters to maximize oil recovery. The results show that pre-flushed water should be injected until water breakthrough while alternating water slug size should be as low as 5% of polymer slug size. Concentration for each polymer slugs should be kept constant and recommended number of alternative cycles is 2. Combining these operating parameters altogether contributes to oil recovery of 53.69% whereas single-slug polymer flooding provides only 53.04% which is equivalent to 8,000 STB of oil gain.


2020 ◽  
pp. 2004-2016
Author(s):  
Dahlia Abdulhadi Al-Obaidi ◽  
Mohammed Saleh Al-Jawad

The Gas Assisted Gravity Drainage (GAGD) process has become one of the most important processes to enhance oil recovery in both secondary and tertiary recovery stages and through immiscible and miscible modes.  Its advantages came from the ability to provide gravity-stable oil displacement for improving oil recovery, when compared with conventional gas injection methods such as Continuous Gas Injection (CGI) and Water – Alternative Gas (WAG). Vertical injectors for CO2   gas were placed at the top of the reservoir to form a gas cap which drives the oil towards the horizontal oil producing wells which are located above the oil-water-contact. The GAGD process was developed and tested in vertical wells to increase oil recovery in reservoirs with bottom water drive and strong water coning tendencies. Many physical and simulation models of GAGD performance were studied at ambient and reservoir conditions to investigate the effects of this method to enhance the recovery of oil and to examine the most effective parameters that control the GAGD process.      A prototype 2D simulation model based on the scaled physical model was built for CO2-assisted gravity drainage in different statement scenarios. The effects of gas injection rate, gas injection pressure and oil production rate on the performance of immiscible CO2-assisted gravity drainage-enhanced oil recovery were investigated. The results revealed that the ultimate oil recovery increases considerably with increasing oil production rates. Increasing gas injection rate improves the performance of the process while high pressure gas injection leads to less effective gravity mediated recovery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Gyanfi ◽  
Wilberforce Nkrumah Aggrey ◽  
Ernest Ansah Owusu ◽  
Kofi Ohemeng Prempeh

With most polymers employed in polymer enhanced oil recovery exhibiting one or both non-Newtonian behaviours that is shear thickening and thinning at different shear rate, it is expedient to analyse the impact of these non-Newtonian behaviours in polymer optimisation. CMG simulation suite was employed to analyse the permeability pinch-out formation with a five (5) spot injection well pattern for a 360days simulation run using a 90days polymer injection well cycling. Shear thinning polymer was found not to be conducive for lower permeable formation as a high percentage of the polymer was retained. NPV was affected by polymer injection rate which controlled polymer optimisation


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document