scholarly journals PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DAN PENGGELAPAN DI POLRESTABES MEDAN (The Implementation of Restorative Justice in The Settlement of Criminal Crimes of Fraud and Embezzlement at the Polrestabes Medan)

2022 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-56
Author(s):  
Olma Fridoki, Alvi Syahrin, Sunarmi, Marlina
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Detention Centers ◽  
Normal Human

In the implementation of restorative justice or settlement of cases outside the court, there are no longer any minor criminal cases, but also include cases such as humiliation, persecution, fraud and embezzlement, negligence resulting in injuries, unpleasant acts, even theft, and gambling. The ultimate goal of this restorative concept hopes to reduce the number of prisoners in prison; removing stigma or labels and returning criminals to normal human beings; criminals can realize their mistakes, so they do not repeat their actions and reduce the workload of the police, prosecutors, detention centers, courts, and correctional institutions; saving state finances does not cause resentment because the perpetrator has been forgiven by the victim, the victim quickly gets compensation; empowering the community in overcoming crime, and reintegrating criminals into society. The problems, namely: settlement through restorative justice eliminates criminal acts, or not. This research is normative legal research. The results showed that: Settlement of criminal cases of fraud and embezzlement through restorative justice does not eliminate criminal acts. It is recommended that the criminal policy for settlement of cases should be changed not to retaliate but to restore the losses incurred for the parties in litigation.

KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERMOTIF RINGAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KAMPUNG KUALA GASIB DI KECAMATAN KOTO GASIB KABUPATEN SIAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Direct Participation ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Differences Of Opinion ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation

scholarly journals Telaah Yuridis terhadap Pengaturan Restorative Justice di Kepolisian

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Rena Yulia ◽  
Aliyth Prakarsa
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Criminal Investigation ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Police Investigation ◽  
Perpetrators And Victims ◽  
Investigation Process

Police institutions are the first and main gate in law enforcement efforts. First, the police institution in charge of carrying out each criminal case’s enforcement, then the next stage will be determined by the police. The practice of law enforcement so far tends to be retributive justice, so that only a few cases can be resolved in the police investigation process. Restorative justice appears by offering various advantages, including a simple settlement process, involving both parties, both perpetrators and victims, and the role of a third party to mediate, so that cases can be resolved according to the agreement. The police, as the first institution in the law enforcement process, had already issued regulations regarding the application of restorative justice, as a form of law enforcement efforts to change retributive law enforcement. The purpose of this research judicially examined the regulation of restorative justice at the police investigation phase in line with the enactment of the regulation of the Chief of Police Number: SE/8/VII/2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases and the Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian Police Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation. This research used a qualitative research method with the type of normative legal research through a statutory approach

scholarly journals Diversion In Children Criminal Justice System Through Restorative Justice

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Yudi Hendarto ◽  
Umar Ma'ruf
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Psychological Burden ◽  
Criminal Matters

The formulation of the problem and the purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the diversion urgency in handling juvenile criminal cases, and to describe and analyze Perma No. 4 of 2014 on Diversion in criminal matters menyelesaian children through restorative justice approach. This research method using normative legal research methods dengn type of research is descriptive analytical.� Based on the analysis result No. 4 of 2014 can be presented the following results, that Perma No. 4 of 2014 is needed in handling juvenile criminal cases. This is because during this time the condition of children who are in the coaching institutions, detention and permayarakatan far worse than a face appeared positive aspects of child development. Mixing children with adults in penitentiary have negative effects and its own psychological burden for the child, because he considered himself the same as adults with Perma No. 4 of 2014.Keywords: Diversion, Child Criminal Justice System, Restorative Justice

scholarly journals MENS REA AS THE BASIS OF DIVERSION IN THE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BASED ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (04) ◽  
pp. 62-67
Author(s):  
Nur Chasanah ◽  
◽  
Arief Darmawan SU ◽  
Otto Yudianto ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Mens Rea ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Criminal Penalty ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

Restorative justice or more precisely keadilan restoratif in the Indonesian context is based on the principle of building joint participation between perpetrators, victims, and community groups in resolving a criminal act. The problem has been that in the formulation of the laws and government regulations diversion (diversi) is carried out if a criminal act is committed by a child who is punishable by imprisonment under seven years other than that if criminal acts that were committed by a child is not a repetition of criminal acts (recidive). A research using a normative legal research method found that through legal findings or rechtsvinding (penemuan hukum), judges can formulate criminal law policies through their decisions based on mens rea. Tt is a must for judges to settle criminal cases with a child of 12-years-old age perpetrator and/or the delinguent actor is a recidive via diversion. The provisions of Indonesian criminal procedure law dicates that judges are also obliged to seek diversion towards the settlement of all criminal cases whose actions were committed by children, both those with a criminal penalty over seven years and/or recidive or those who does not included in the two categories.

scholarly journals RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN JUVENILE JUSTICE TO FORMULATE INTEGRATED CHILD CRIMINAL COURT

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 439
Author(s):  
Hafrida - Hafrida
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Offenders ◽  
Article 5

The purpose of this article is to formulate the concept of restorative justice which balanced to protect between child offenders and the victims through the diversion (Victim-offender oriented). This goal will be realized through normative research (legal research) based on Restorative Justice concept.  In Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System the process (SPPA Law), its prioritizes the Diversion Process (Settlement outside the court) carried out through a Restorative Justice approach. Article 5 paragraph (2) of the SPPA Law states Restorative Justice is the settlement of criminal cases by involving perpetrators, victims, families of perpetrators /victims, and other related parties to jointly to find a fair solution by emphasizing recovery and not based on revenge. Empirical conditions show that balanced legal protection between criminal offenders and victims has not implemented. Evaluation of Law Number 11 of 2012 is needed to formulating the Integrated Child Criminal Court.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA ANAK : STUDI PADA PENGADILAN TINGGI TANJUNG KARANG

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
Fitri Dwiarti
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Inhibiting Factors

The purpose of this research to determine and analyze the extent to which restorative justice is implemented in the settlement of juvenile criminal cases at the Tanjung Karang High Court and to determine the inhibiting factors for law enforcers to implement restorative justice in resolving juvenile criminal cases at the Tanjung Karang High Court. This research is an empirical juridical legal research. Based on the research results, the application of restorative justice at the Tanjung Karang High Court has been carried out although it is not optimal. The application of restorative justice to children in conflict with the law in resolving child criminal cases at the Tanjung Karang High Court is still experiencing obstacles. These obstacles include the limping of the substance of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, the short duration of case handling, and the minimum budget.

scholarly journals PENAL MEDIATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION IN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (A DIGNIFIED JUSTICE JURISPRUDENCE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 12-21
Author(s):  
Yoyok Ucuk Suyono , SH. , MHum ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Discretionary Power ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Law

Restorative justice perspective in this paper sees a penal mediation as a non-penal means within the Law. This institution has been utilised as an alternative in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System to deliver dignified justice in criminal cases. Although this model appeared as vague, since stipulated only between the lines in the Indonesia Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the concept of restorativejustice has been existing in the Indonesian Volksgeist (the Spirit of the Indonesian, i.e. Pancasila) from the begining of time. This author would argue bellow that penal mediation has been used to mitigate penal cases by law enforcement institutions in order to achieve dignified justice in the concept of restorative justice, to serve human as human beings recognised by the Law in the Pancasila Legal System. The police may use penal mediation basing upon their discretionary power and the public prosecutors may also use their own prerogative power or the what so called prosecutors power of opportunity in place of the due process and make creative innovations, beginign from misdemeanor or complaint offenses. Even Indonesian judges have broad discretionary authority to use penal mediation in solving criminal cases so that the dignified justice, can be obtained, particularly by victims de lege lata.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMIDIUM DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK

Yurispruden ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Hisbul Luthfi
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Electronic Transactions

ABSTRACTThe application of criminal law that was originally as an effort / last way (Ultimum Remedium)became the first effort/way (Primum Remedium)especially in applying Law No. 11 of 2008 as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016 on Information and Electronic Transactions (UUITE) In this research using a type of normative legal research using statue approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. This study aims to find out how the application of ultimum remedial  principle in the study of criminal law, How to reconstruct the criminal policy of the use of Law No. 11 of 2008 on amendments to Law No. 19 of 2016 on ITE. Surely this requires the existence of over criminalization on the application of criminalization that ensures the existence of disharmony in the application of criminal law, which negates the sense of humanity.Keywords:    Ultimum Remidum, Restorative Justice, LAW ITE  ABSTRAK Penerapan hukum pidana yang semula sebagai upaya/cara terakhir (Ultimum Remedium) menjadi upaya/cara pertama (Primum Remedium) terutama dalam menerapkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 sebagaimana telah diubah atas Undang-undang No 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UUITE) Pada penelitian ini mengunakan jenis jenis penelitian hukum normatif dengan mengunakan Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (Statue Approach), Pendekatan konseptual (Conseptual Approach), dan pendekatan kasus (Case Approach). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimanakah penerapan asas ultimum remidium dalam kajian hukum pidana, Bagaimana rekontruksi kebijakan kriminal penggunaan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 19 tahun 2016 tentang ITE. Tentunya hal ini menyebapkan adanya over ciminalization pada penerapan pemidanaan yang menyebapkan adanya ketidak harmonisan dalam penerapan hukum pidana, dimana meniadakan rasa kemanusiaan.Kata Kunci : Ultimum Remidum, Restorative Justice, UU ITE

scholarly journals MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENANGANAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI UPAYA MEMINIMALISIR KELEBIHAN HUNIAN DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
July Esther ◽  
Bintang ME Naibaho ◽  
Bintang Christine
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

The excess housing in the Indonesian Correctional Institution does not abate. This condition is faced with criminal efforts which should be a final diversion related to the effort to include convicted persons in Corrections Institutions. The aim is to analyze whether the mediation of penal as the application of Restorative Justice can be an alternative effort to minimize excess occupancy inmates in correctional institutions. The use of this research as a recommendation for law enforcement officials in the handling of criminal acts by promoting penal mediation. The research uses normative legal research methods with literature studies. Mediation Penal is considered able to be an intermediary process of mediation or peace between perpetrators of criminal acts with victims of criminal acts as minimizing the excess occupancy that starts from handling the police and prosecutors stage.

scholarly journals Diversion in the Child Criminal Justice System as an Effort to Implement Restorative Justice

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-73
Author(s):  
Dewi Setyowati
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
Constitutional System

The juvenile criminal justice system according to Article 1 of Law Number 11 Year 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children (hereinafter referred to as SPPA Law) is the whole process of resolving cases of children in conflict with the Law from the investigation stage to the guidance stage after undergoing a crime. The application of SPPA involves many parties consisting of the police, prosecutors, legal advisors, courts, and correctional institutions, and child development. One of the law enforcers (structures) in SPPA that has a significant role is the prosecutor's office. The Prosecutor's Office as the prosecuting body that has been given the authority to solve the problems of children in conflict with the Law (hereinafter referred to as ABH) by using diversion to realize Restorative Justice, as stipulated in the provisions of Article 7 Paragraph 1 of the SPPA Law. What if, in this stage, the diversion was not sought for ABH? What is the form of violations experienced by ABH in the criminal justice system, especially at the prosecution stage? The method used is legal/normative research based on laws and regulations relating to one another. The Indonesian Attorney's Office in the constitutional system, as a body related to judicial authority, with a very dominant function as the dominus litis principle, controls the case process that determines whether a person can be declared a defendant and is submitted to the Court based on legal evidence according to the Law, and as ambtenaar executive implementing the decision and court decisions in criminal cases. The SPPA Law material test is a struggle in the context of maintaining the constitutional rights of law enforcers in their duty and is not intended to reject diversion in handling ABH. This provision is related to the protection of the law enforcement profession guaranteed by the constitution. Even though the Supreme Court has declared article 96 of the SPPA Law being applied unconstitutional or revoked, it does not mean allowing law enforcers the police, judges, and prosecutors not to carry out diversion obligations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document