MOTIVATION FACTORS AT WORK

There are many theories about motivation. Different scholars have tried to find out why some people want to work and some do not, why some people are better than others and what motivates them to achieve results. There is one but a very simple recipe on how to motivate people. The motive depends on the individual, the situation or the people with whom we are working. Motivation theories can only be used as a tool. But commanders need to know when and how to use the right tool (theory).Motivation is a very specific topic and not very elaborate among us. Therefore, we took the courage to choose this subject as a course. In order to make the work as rich as possible we have used different literature."To win competitive advantage and survive in the global economy, managers must motivate their employees. Motivation is a complex psychological process in which demands and desires create driving forces that aim at achieving goals.

Download Full-text

Workforce Diversity: Boon or Bane to the Organisation

IIBM'S Journal of Management ◽

10.33771/iibm.v4i1-2.139 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 7-16

Author(s):

Aiman Hasan

Keyword(s):

Competitive Advantage ◽

Global Economy ◽

Workforce Diversity ◽

Critical Area ◽

Research Papers ◽

Diverse Workforce ◽

Hrm Practices ◽

The People ◽

Fast Pace ◽

The Individual

Workforce diversity is a critical area of competence for any organisation. It is an important asset for every organisation that seeks competitive advantage in the global economy. With the change in needs at the fast pace, the association among the people from varied culture, background, beliefs etc. has increased substantially. Wambui et.al. state that HRM practices need to promote diversity for business to grow effectively. The paper discusses the various benefits of a having a diverse workforce along with the challenges linked to it (post #me too movement also). The study of various literature and research papers and books has been done which reveals that diversity is all about differences. The manner in which we analyse and use these differences will determine whether diversity is an asset or liability to the individual and the organization. Workforce diversity can prove to be a strong pillar to the organisation if managed appropriately. There is need to lead a diverse workforce that can give diverse benefits to the organisation.

Download Full-text

Mudra (shishu) – an effective scheme in startups

Journal of Management and Science ◽

10.26524/jms.2019.28 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (4) ◽

pp. 222-226

Author(s):

K.C. Kavipriya

Keyword(s):

Economic Development ◽

Individual Development ◽

High Rate ◽

Small Scale ◽

Poor People ◽

Employment Opportunities ◽

The People ◽

The Individual ◽

The Right ◽

Small Scale Industries

Economic Development of a country depends upon the individual development; Creation of more Employment opportunities is the right way to strengthen our Economy. By way of strengthening Small scale units, ultimately more people will get Employment. More over Small scale Industries required less amount of Capital. These are the main reasons to start the scheme MUDRA. The scheme MUDRA was launched in the year 2015 by Government of India. In India most of the people are depending upon small scale businesses as their source of livelihood. Most of the individuals depend on un-organised sectors for loans and other credit facilities which have high rate of interest along with unbearable terms and conditions. Ultimately it will lead these poor people to fall in debts. This paper is an attempt to educate the readers about MUDRA Yojana.

Download Full-text

“Defend your right!” How the populist radical right uses references to rights and freedoms to discursively construct identities

New Perspectives ◽

10.1177/2336825x211052973 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 2336825X2110529

Author(s):

Alexander Alekseev

Keyword(s):

Radical Right ◽

Social Rights ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Social Actors ◽

Populist Radical Right ◽

The People ◽

Marine Le Pen ◽

The Individual ◽

The Right ◽

Discourse Historical Approach

The article explores how the European populist radical right uses references to rights and freedoms in its political discourse. By relying on the findings of the existing research and applying the discourse-historical approach to electoral speeches by Marine Le Pen and Jarosław Kaczyński, the leaders of two very dissimilar EU PRR parties, the Rassemblement National and the Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, the article abductively develops a functional typology of references to rights and freedoms commonly used in discourses of European PRR parties: it suggests that PRR discourses in Europe feature references to the right to sovereignty, citizens’ rights, social rights, and economic rights. Such references are used as a coherent discursive strategy to construct social actors following the PRR ideological core of nativism, authoritarianism, and populism. As the PRR identifies itself with the people, defined along nativist and populist lines, rights are always attributed to it. The PRR represents itself as the defender of the people and its rights, while the elites and the aliens are predicated to threaten the people and its rights. References to rights in PRR discourses intrinsically link the individual with the collective, which allows to construct and promote a populist model of ethnic democracy.

Download Full-text

The Politics of Paternalism

Government Paternalism ◽

10.23943/princeton/9780691164373.003.0009 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Julian Le Grand ◽

Bill New

Keyword(s):

Well Being ◽

The State ◽

The Government ◽

The Individual ◽

The Right ◽

Better Than

This chapter examines the politics of paternalism. It first considers the question of whether the government can do better than the individual, outlining a set of justifications for government paternalism and showing how the state can intervene to improve the well-being of its citizens. It then discusses possible ways in which the government could be held to account to ensure that, in its paternalistic interventions aimed at improving its citizens' well-being, it does actually pursue the “right” agenda. It argues that the government can indeed raise the well-being of individuals who suffer from reasoning failure, even when allowance is made for possible reasoning failure among those individuals who constitute the government. However, democratic mechanisms must be put in place to ensure that the latter do not pursue their own agenda and turn the paternalistic state into an instrument of authoritarianism.

Download Full-text

Definiteness in written Swedish by Finnish-speaking immersion pupils at the end of immersion

Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education ◽

10.1075/jicb.17001.nyq ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 57-84

Author(s):

Eeva-Liisa Nyqvist

Keyword(s):

Control Group ◽

Group Level ◽

Individual Level ◽

Definite Form ◽

Spontaneous Writing ◽

Acquisition Order ◽

The Individual ◽

The Right ◽

Better Than

Abstract There are two primary goals for this study – first, to analyse definiteness and article use in spontaneous writing in Swedish by 15-year-old Finnish immersion students (n = 162) and secondly, to compare their performance with that of non-immersion students at the same age (n = 67). Analyses at the group level show that immersion students usually perform significantly better than the control group, but they also reveal similar problems to what L2-Swedish non-immersion students have demonstrated in previous studies, such as omission of indefinite articles and difficulty in choosing the right definite form of the noun. Still, these inaccuracies occurred less often in the data from the immersion students. The studied constructions also show at the group level an acquisition order similar to that reported in previous studies, explainable by different aspects of complexity and cross-linguistic influence. Analyses on the individual level, however, show different acquisition orders depending on the criteria being used.

Download Full-text

The Missionary as an Anthropological Field-Worker

Africa ◽

10.2307/1155973 ◽

1931 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 164-177 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Diedrich Westermann

Keyword(s):

Social Order ◽

New Order ◽

Inner Life ◽

Field Worker ◽

The People ◽

New Ideas ◽

The Individual ◽

Opening Paragraph ◽

The Right

Opening ParagraphThe following remarks are not addressed to specialists, but to those Europeans and Africans working in Africa who have for professional reasons an interest in getting to know the native better and, if possible, in making this knowledge available to a wider circle. This applies pre-eminently to missionaries. They, more than any other body of men, have an interest in studying the people among whom they work. It is their aim to transform the inner life of the tribe and of the individual. They are co-operating in creating a new religious, moral, and often social order. Only those who know the traditional environment of the native have the opportunity and the right of effecting such a transformation, as they are thus in a position to forge links between the old and the new, and in consequence will make the new ideas develop naturally from the old ways of thought. Old traditions must not be pushed on one side and ignored, on the contrary they should be carefully studied to see if there is not embedded in them something that can be incorporated in the new order, or something that has to be transformed.

Download Full-text

The Creation of a “True Antient and Indubitable” Right: The English Bill of Rights and the Right to Be Armed

Journal of British Studies ◽

10.1086/386031 ◽

1993 ◽

Vol 32 (3) ◽

pp. 226-249 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Joyce Lee Malcolm

Keyword(s):

New Right ◽

Bill Of Rights ◽

The People ◽

Conservative Revolution ◽

Single Flower ◽

The Creation ◽

English Law ◽

The Individual ◽

The Right ◽

The Relationship

The seventh of the thirteen “ancient and indubitable” rights proclaimed in the English Declaration of Rights was neither ancient nor indubitable. It declared “that the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their conditions, and as allowed by Law.” The right of ordinary subjects to possess weapons is perhaps the most extraordinary and least understood of English liberties. It lies at the heart of the relationship between the individual and his fellows and between the individual and his government. Few governments have ever been prepared to make such a guarantee, and, until 1689, no English parliamentary body was either. Its elevation that year to the company of ancient and indubitable rights unmasked the deep-seated distrust between the governing classes and the crown. Together with the equally novel article that gave Parliament greater control over standing armies, this right was meant to place the sword in the hands of Protestant Englishmen and the power over it in the hands of Parliament.The actual novelty of this right had eluded historians for a variety of reasons. First, its framers were taken at their word when they described it as ancient and indubitable. Indeed, Whig historians preferred to believe there had been a conservative revolution. Thomas Macaulay rejoiced that “not a single flower of the crown was touched. Not a single new right was given to the people. The whole English law, substantive and adjective, was, in the judgment of all the greatest lawyers … almost exactly the same after the Revolution as before it.

Download Full-text

فلاحی ریاست میں عہدہ داروں کے چناؤکا معیار

Al-Idah | Shaykh Zayed Islamic Centre, University of Peshawar ◽

10.37556/al-idah.038.01.0624 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (- 1) ◽

Author(s):

Abzahir Khan ◽

Muhammad Ayub

Keyword(s):

Welfare State ◽

The State ◽

Mutual Relationship ◽

Human Beings ◽

Collective Rights ◽

The Work Of Sohfi Allahyar "Sabot Ul - Ojizin" Is In Harmony With Today's Times

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations ◽

10.37547/tajssei/volume02issue12-25 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 02 (12) ◽

pp. 141-145

Author(s):

Khimmatova Zarina Akhtamovna ◽

Keyword(s):

Central Asia ◽

Common People ◽

Important Place ◽

The Enlightenment ◽

The People ◽

Islamic Religion ◽

History Of ◽

The Common ◽

The Individual ◽

The Right

The article analyzes the solidarity of “Sabot ul – ojizin's” work with the present period, which took an important place in the history of Uzbek enlightenment in the second half of the XVII century and the beginning of the XVIII century in Central Asia, the major representative of the Naqshbandian sect, Sofi Allahyar's "Sabot ul – ojizin". The work of sohfi Allahyar "Sabot ul - ojizin" is a work created due to the spiritual need of his time. The main purpose of the creation of the work is to educate the perfect person, to strive for the perfection of the individual. It is up to the people to start them on the right path by revealing the Enlightenment of the Islamic religion, to encourage them not to fall under the influence of the ideas of the memorization of different currents and fanatic groups. In the article, the work studied the socio – philosophical views aimed at starting the people on the right path, and in turn revealed that at that time for material benefit, he was struggling with enlightenment, occupying the minds of the common people and distributing various superstitious teachings. The article analyzes the ideas put forward in the work" Sabot ul – ojizin", the philosophical views, the solidarity of such enlightened views as leading the people towards perfection with today's times.

Download Full-text

Sources of toleration: Individuals, cultures, institutions

Philosophy & Social Criticism ◽

10.1177/0191453719843767 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 45 (4) ◽

pp. 360-369

Author(s):

Volker Kaul

Keyword(s):

Practical Reason ◽

John Rawls ◽

Institutional Design ◽

Institutional Setting ◽

Clash Of Civilizations ◽

Institutional Frameworks ◽

The People ◽

The Individual ◽

The Right ◽

Different Sources

Nowadays the question of toleration is less related to an international clash of civilizations than to the clashes that take place within the states and polities themselves. The article addresses the sources of toleration in this new global scenario, starting from the following set of questions: Do the sources of toleration differ across time and space? Does toleration have different roots in different civilizational contexts, such as China, India or Islam? Or, is toleration the result of particular institutional frameworks and designs? In this case, does the concept of toleration vary from one institutional setting to the other? Do empires, republics and democracies give rise to different forms of toleration? And last but not least, isn’t toleration rather a matter of individual morality, as many liberal theories sustain? The article distinguishes between three different sources of toleration: individuals, cultures and institutions. Kant and contemporary liberals, as John Rawls who follows him, situate the source of toleration in the individual itself and the capacity for practical reason. More communitarian-oriented thinkers, as Michael Walzer, defend ‘a historical and contextual account of toleration and coexistence’, arguing that ‘the best political arrangement is relative to the history and culture of the people whose lives it will arrange’. The institutionalist account, which goes back to John Locke’s A Letter Concerning Toleration establishing the separation between state and church, holds that it is the right institutional design that grounds toleration. The article concludes that political strategies aiming to cultivate toleration must take into account the causes of intolerance.

Download Full-text