scholarly journals PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI SIKAP OPTIMIS DAN PESIMIS SISWA SMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Lenny Kurniati ◽  
Asef Umar Fakhruddin

Pessimism is the attitude or perspective of an individual who is depicted by uncertainty, despair, and there is no hope for something faced. Conversely, optimism is the attitude of someone who sees things positively. This study aims to find out how students who have optimistic and pessimistic attitudes, and find out the differences in students' mathematics achievement between optimistic and pessimistic students, and if there are better ones. This research was conducted in 4 (four) State High Schools in Semarang City, and 498 XII graders has been chosen randomly. The result is that 55% of students are pessimistic, and 45% are optimistic. The research hypothesis that there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between optimistic and pessimistic students has been proven in the results of this study. Significant differences were also confirmed through the results of statistical calculations, and can be indicated by the average score of the optimistic students is higher than pessimistic students. Further discussion is needed on the implications of the results of this study on mathematics education broadly.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103
Author(s):  
Eni Rosetti

IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ON LESSONS OF LIMIT THROUGH VARIATION PEER-TEACHING MODELSThis research aims to improve Mathematics learning activities and improve mathematics learning achievement of the Limit material through the variation peer-teaching models model for class XI MIPA 3 students in the 2018/2019 academic year. This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 9 Bogor. This research was conducted from January 2019 to June 2019. The subjects in this Classroom Action Research were students of SMA Negeri 9 Bogor in class XI MIPA 3, totaling 35 students consisting of 13 male students and 22 female students. Data collection techniques with written tests and observations. Data analysis using comparative description analysis and qualitative description. The results of this Classroom Action Research are: students' mathematics learning activities in the initial conditions, cycle I and cycle II have increased. The average score of student learning activities in the initial conditions of 2.74 increased to 3.77 in the first cycle and increased to 4.30 in the second cycle, while the mathematics learning achievement of students in the initial conditions, cycle I and cycle II increased. The average value of student achievement in the initial conditions of 39.13 increased to 71.17 in the first cycle and increased to 88.13 in the second cycle. The percentage of students who completed also increased, in the initial condition, students who completed learning were only 17.14%, increasing to 50% in cycle I and increasing to 80% in cycle II. This increase is due to the variation peer-teaching models learning method, all students can be actively involved in learning. Students who are appointed as tutors are active in helping their group members overcome learning difficulties. Students who have difficulty learning actively ask questions and discuss with tutors who are their own friends.


Author(s):  
Endang Istikomah ◽  
Astri Wahyuni

This study aim to describe the student’s mathematics anxiety on the use of technology in mathematics learning. It is a quantitative descriptive research by involving second year students of Mathematics Education Program  in Universitas Islam Riau (UIR) who took Technology-based Mathematics Learning course. They were selected based on saturation sampling. Data were collected through questionnaire, in-depth interview and documentation. The results show the high level of each dimension of mathematics anxiety among students. The average score in each indicator of cognitive, affective, and physiological dimension were high. In addition, interview revealed that most of the students expressed their anxiety in the first lecture and when obtained the task of applying particular software in mathematics learning. It is mainly due to unpreparedness and lack of knowledge about the application of software. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the level of students’ mathematics anxiety is relatively high.  Keywords: Mathematics anxiety, Technology-based, Mathematics learning,


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Henry Suryo Bintoro ◽  
Eka Zuliana

<p>Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) apakah penggunaan <em>interactive multimedia</em> pada pembelajaran matematika berbasis kurikulum 2013 menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada pembelajaran konvensional? (2) manakah yang memberikan prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik, antara siswa-siswa yang mempunyai kecerdasan intrapersonal tinggi, sedang, dan rendah? (3) apakah terdapat interaksi antara pembelajaran matematika dan kecerdasan intrapersonal siswa terhadap prestasi belajar matematika? Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas V SD Negeri kecamatan Kota Kabupaten Kudus tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Pemilihan sampel dengan cara <em>cluster random sampling</em>, diperoleh siswa kelas V SD 1 Muhammadiyah sebagai kelas eksperimen dan siswa kelas V SD 1 Gondangmanis sebagai kelas kontrol. Kelas eksperimen diajar menggunakan <em>interactive multimedia</em> berbasis kurikulum 2013, sedangkan kelas kontrol diajar dengan pembelajaran konvensional. Data diperoleh dengan metode angket untuk mengamati kecerdasan intrapersonal siswa dan metode tes untuk menentukan prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang kemudian dianalisis dengan analisis variansi dua jalan 2 x 3. Hasil penelitian adalah (1) Pembelajaran matematika menggunakan <em>interactive</em> <em>multimedia</em> berbasis kurikulum 2013 menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada dengan pembelajaran konvensional, (2) Kecerdasan intrapersonal yang lebih tinggi menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada kecerdasan intrapersonal yang lebih rendah, dan (3) Perbedaan prestasi dari masing-masing pembelajaran matematika konsisten pada masing-masing tingkat kecerdasan intrapersonal dan perbedaan prestasi belajar dari masing-masing tingkat kecerdasan intrapersonal konsisten pada masing-masing pembelajaran matematika.</p><em>The purpose of this research was to determine: (1) whether the use of interactive multimedia based curriculum in 2013 mathematics learning resulted mathematics achievement in a better than conventional learning? (2) Which gives mathematics learning achievement better, between students who have intrapersonal intelligence high, medium, and low? (3) whether there is an interaction between mathematics and intrapersonal students' mathematics achievement? The population in this research were students of class V Elementary School Kudus City District school year 2014/2015. Selection of sample by random cluster sampling, obtained by fifth grade students of SD 1 Muhammadiyah as an experimental class and fifth grade students of SD 1 Gondangmanis as the control class. Experimental class taught using interactive multimedia-based curriculum in 2013, while the control class was taught by conventional learning. Data obtained by the questionnaire method to observe the students' intrapersonal intelligence and the test method to determine the learning achievement of the students then analyzed with two-way analysis of variance 2 x 3. The results of the study are (1) Learning math using interactive multimedia-based curriculum in 2013 resulted in the achievement of learning mathematics better than with conventional learning, (2) Intelligence intrapersonal higher yield learning achievement better than intrapersonal intelligence are lower, and (3) The difference in the achievement of each learning of mathematics is consistent at each level of intrapersonal intelligence and differences in learning achievement of each level of intrapersonal intelligence consistently on each of the learning of mathematics.</em>


Author(s):  
Hidayat Bahktiar ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)</p>


Author(s):  
Utin Desy Susiaty ◽  
Dwi Oktaviana

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) manakah yang memberikan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, metode ceramah atau metode diskusi; (2) manakah yang memiliki prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, mahasiswa laki-laki atau perempuan; (3) pada masing-masing model pembelajaran, manakah yang mempunyai prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, mahasiswa laki-laki atau perempuan; (4) pada masing-masing jenis kelamin, manakah yang memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik, metode ceramah atau metode diskusi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan populasi seluruh mahasiswa semester 5 di kelas pagi Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika IKIP-PGRI Pontianak. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik stratified cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 68 mahasiswa. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi metode dokumentasi untuk mendapatkan nilai MID mata kuliah Matematika Ekonomi tahun akademik 2015/2016 sebagai data kemampuan awal dan nilai UAS mata kuliah Matematika Ekonomi untuk data prestasi belajar matematika mahasiswa. Uji hipotesis penelitian menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan sebagai berikut. (1) Pembelajaran matematika ekonomi menggunakan metode ceramah menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang sama dengan metode diskusi. (2) Mahasiswa laki-laki maupun perempuan memiliki prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. (3) Pada masing-masing metode pembelajaran, mahasiswa laki-laki maupun perempuan memiliki prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. (4) Pada masing-masing jenis kelamin, pembelajaran matematika ekonomi menggunakan metode ceramah dan metode diskusi menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. Kata kunci: metode ceramah, metode diskusi, jenis kelamin Abstract The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) which learning method produces student’s better mathematics learning achievement, speech method or discussion method; (2) which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, male or female; (3) viewed from learning methods, which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, male or female; (4) viewed from gender, which learning method produces better mathematics learning achievement, speech method or discussion method. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of 5th semester in morning class Program Study of Mathematics Education IKIP-PGRI Pontianak. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 68 students. The data collection technique was include the documentation method to get the 2015/2016 MID Test of Economy Mathematics subject for initial capability data before the experiment and Final test of Economy Mathematics subject for mathematics student’s achievement data. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. Based on these results it can be concluded as follows. (1) Economy mathematics learning using speech method produced the same mathematics achievement as using discussion method. (2) For male or female students have the same mathematics achievement. (3) Viewed from learning method, male or female students have the same mathematics achievement. (4) Viewed from gender, economy mathematics learning using speech method and discussion method have the same mathematics achievement. Keywords: speech method, discussion method, gender


Author(s):  
NI Nyoman Kawiwati

This research is to determine the effect of learning model and critical thinking skills toward mathematics learning achievement of class XI IPA students in senior high school in Gianyar by controlling students’ numeric aptitude. This research used treatment by level 2x2 design and analysis of covariance. The sample was 80 people using multistage random sampling. The results by controlling numeric aptitude are: students learning achievement taught using PAIKEM model is higher than those taught in conventional model. There is an interaction effect between learning model and critical thinking skills toward students’ mathematics achievement. Given high critical thinking skills, students taught using PAIKEM models displayed higher results compared to those in conventional learning who were best in a lower critical thinking skills. Finally, based on the results, it can be recommended to SMA Mathematics teachers to increase students’ Mathematics achievement by using PAIKEM model accurately and to see of students critical thinking skills.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Habib Ratu Perwira Negara

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas masing-masing kategori model pembelajaran, motivasi belajar siswa dan interaksinya terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Madiun yang terdiri dari 4 kelas. Penentuan sampel menggunakan cluster random sampling. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode tes dan metode angket. Uji hipotesis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan sel tak sama dengan taraf signifikansi 0,05. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah (1) prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Artikulasi lebih baik dari model pembelajaran Talking Stick, (2) jika ditinjau dari masing-masing tingkatan motivasi belajar, siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi prestasi belajarnya jauh lebih baik dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar sedang maupun rendah dan (3) model pembelajaran Artikulasi lebih efektif dari model pembelajaran Talking Stick untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar siswa, untuk setiap tingkat motivasi belajar siswa.Abstract:  The aims of this research were to find out the effectivennes of each categories of learning model, motivation to study and their interaction towards student mathematics learning achievement. The population was all students of grade VIII Five Junior High School of Madiun City consisted of four class. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0.05. The conclution of this research that (1) the model of Articulation learning gives a better mathematics achievement than model of Talking Stick learning, (2) students with the high motivation to study had better achievement than students with the medium and low motivation to study, and (3) the model of Articulation learning was more effective than the model of Talking Stick learning to enhance students mathematics learning achievement for each level of students motivation to study.


Author(s):  
Nila Sari Latif

This study aims to identify the improvement in mathematics learning achievement for students of grade VIII A at SMPN 9 Marusu by applying discovery learning models using LKPD. Subjects of this study were 26 students of grade VIII A SMPN 9 Marusu academic year of 2018/2019. This study is a classroom action research conducted in two cycles in which consisting of several stages, namely planning, implementation, observation and evaluation as well as reflection. Data collection method applied were students’ learning achievement test conducted at the end of each cycle, observation, reflection, documentation and student responses. The collected data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative method. The achievement achieved after the discovery learning models using LKPD was applied are: (1) in cycle I, the average score of mathematics learning achievement of students is 61.92 increasing to 75.38 in cycle II. The deviation standard in the first cycle is 12.66 and increasing to 9.48 in the second cycle of the ideal score 100, (2) There is an increase in the frequency of student activities and student attitudes. Based on the above research achievement, it can be concluded that there is an increase in mathematics learning achievement for students of grade VIII A at SMPN 9 Marusu by applying discovery learning models using LKPD.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Dedy Kintaka

The purpose of this research was to find out correlate between economical family background, parents attention and learning intencity with mathematics learning achievement of all junior high schools in Sedayu. This research was conducted in 3 junior high schools in Sedayu, the population was 460 students and the sample was 92 students using random sampling taking technique. Data collection technique using a questionnaire and a test technique. The result of minor hipotesis are Sig = 0,000<0,05; Sig = 0,032<0,05; and Sig = 0,010<0,05. Meanwhile the result of mayor hipotesis is Sig = 0,000 < 0,05. So, there are  positive correlate and significant between economical family background, parents attention and learning intencity with mathematics learning achievement as collective and partial. It is expected that students, parents and teachers care about economical family background, parents attention and learning intencity to mathematics learning achievement increasingly.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Sudirman .

The study is a classroom action research which aims at describing (1) the improvement of Mathematics learning result through problem solving approach by Polya strategy of class XI IPA students at SMAN 2 Kalukku, (2) the improvement of Mathematics problem solving skill by Polya strategy. The subject is students of class XI IPA of SMAN 2 Kalukku, as many as 31 people consisted of 11 male and 20 female students. The technique used to analyze the data is qualitative and quantitative analyses. The qualitative data is used on students’ activities while the quantitative data is used on students’ learning achievement and students’ response. The results indicate that (1) the application of problem solving approach by Polya strategy can improve students’ learning achievement on Mathematics indicated by the descriptive analysis of the average score of students’ learning achievement 65.42 at cycle I to 75.06 at cycle II; (2) the application of problem solving approach by Polya strategy can improve students’ problem solving skill on Mathematics indicated by percentage descriptive analysis, which is problem comprehension stage 83.87% at cycle I to 90.32% at cycle II, problem solving planning stage 87.10% at cycle I to 96.77% at cycle II,


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document