scholarly journals A review on vaccine pharmacovigilance during covid-19

Author(s):  
Jyothi K Navya ◽  
Archana Jaka ◽  
Velpula Padma sujaya Velpula Padma sujaya ◽  
Pallavi Nayak Rupavath ◽  
Randeep Raj C Vaddadi

Pharmacovigilance is important for collecting, detecting, monitoring adverse events which is the main objective. The adverse events reported should be assessed in order to know the casual relationship and avoid unnecessary effects on the recipient. Many people are vaccinating in a short period, so it is becoming much burden to the pharmacovigilance centers. The international society of pharmacovigilance (ISOP), the French national agency for medicines and health products safety (ANSM), and many others were in continuous collaboration and taking many initiatives to identify the safety and efficacy of vaccines and to provide answers to the raised questions respectively. Through pharmacovigilance, signals were detected, and many adverse events were identified. Pharmacovigilance of BioNTech/Pfizer-m-RNA, Moderna-mRNA vaccine, Covishield, Johnson and Johnson, Vaxzevria, Sputnik V, Convidecia are addressed. With BioNTech/Pfizer-m-RNA 12,249 ADRs, with Moderna-mRNA vaccine 577 ADRs, with Covishield 447 ADRs, with Johnson and Johnson 653 ADRs, with Vaxzevria 743 ADRs were reported. These vaccines resulted in immune thrombocytopenic purpura, cerebrovascular events, thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, facial paralysis, deaths, and many other reactions which may be fatal. But the events reported were less compared to the safety of the patients. All these events were maintained by the Uppsala monitoring center.

Author(s):  
Hendrik Lehnert ◽  
Claire Castello-Bridoux ◽  
Bushan Channaiah ◽  
Karine Martiniere ◽  
Steven Hildemann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Levothyroxine sodium marketed in France was reformulated following a French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety request for a more stringent potency specification. Despite previously established purity and bioequivalence of the new and old formulations, reports of adverse events substantially increased following reformulation. This analysis evaluated the nature and relevance of the medically confirmed safety reports. Methods Spontaneous and solicited individual case safety reports in France were retrieved from 26 March 2015 to 30 June 2016 (old formulation) and 26 March 2017 to 30 June 2018 (new formulation). Rates of reports and adverse events were calculated for the overall patient population and for at-risk subgroups. Adverse events delineated by thyroid-stimulating hormone levels were evaluated. Results A total of 295 and 42 775 reports for the old formulation and new formulation, respectively, were retrieved, with 149 and 5503 medically confirmed. The most common medically confirmed adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of levothyroxine, with generally comparable rates between both formulations (range of differences, 1.8–4.1%). Most cases were not serious (old formulation, 65.8%; new formulation, 78.7%). Reporting rates were similar or higher for the old formulation within subgroups of at-risk patients. Nature/distributions of adverse events by thyroid-stimulating hormone levels as determined by both the marketing authorization holder of levothyroxine and the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety were similar. Conclusions The new formulation safety profile aligns with the established profile of the old formulation of levothyroxine. The benefit–risk profile is unchanged, such that the benefits of using the new formulation in the approved indications outweigh the risks associated with the treatment.


Phlebologie ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (01) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. G. Bruins ◽  
H. A. M. Neumann ◽  
K.-P. de Roos

Summary Aim: The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, results and safety of a very short period of compression after ambulatory phlebectomy. Patients, methods: From September to December 2006 we prospectively studied 49 subsequent patients who underwent ambulatory phlebectomy for branch varicose veins. Post-operatively the treated part of the leg was bandaged for forty-eight hours. Results: No major adverse events occurred. Although 46.9% of treated patients had visible haematomas two days post-operatively, after six weeks this was only visible in one patient. The results of this study show that the clinical outcome of ambulatory phlebectomy in combination with compression for forty-eight hours is at least equal to a conventional (longer) period of compression. Conclusion: Post-operative treatment can be safely reduced without the need of adjuvant compression hosiery. This will reduce patient discomfort after ambulatory phlebectomy without jeopardizing the clinical outcome.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
John Rawlins ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) is a long-established adjunctive therapy that can be applied during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Technical aspects have evolved and there is an established safety and efficacy record across a number of clinical indications in contemporary interventional practice where complex lesions are routinely encountered. The role of ELCA during PCI for thrombus, non-crossable or non-expandable lesions, chronic occlusions and stent under-expansion are discussed in this review. The key advantage of ELCA over alternative atherectomy interventions is delivery on a standard 0.014-inch guidewire. Additionally, the technique can be mastered by any operator after a short period of training. The major limitation is presence of heavy calcification although when rotational atherectomy (RA) is required but cannot be applied due to inability to deliver the dedicated RotaWire™ (Boston Scientific), ELCA can create an upstream channel to permit RotaWire passage and complete the case with RA – the RASER technique.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desye Gebrie ◽  
Desalegn Getnet ◽  
Tsegahun Manyazewal

AbstractDiabetes is a serious threat to global health and among the top 10 causes of death, with nearly half a billion people living with it worldwide. Treating patients with diabetes tend to become more challenging due to the progressive nature of the disease. The role and benefits of combination therapies for the management of type 2 diabetes are well-documented, while the comparative safety and efficacy among the different combination options have not been elucidated. We aimed to systematically synthesize the evidence on the comparative cardiovascular safety and efficacy of combination therapy with metformin-sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus metformin-sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched MEDLINE-PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 15 August 2019 without restriction in the year of publication. We included randomized controlled trials of patients with type 2 diabetes who were on metformin-sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors or metformin-sulphonylureas combination therapy at least for a year. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hypoglycemia, and changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, fasting plasma glucose, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We used a random-effects meta-analysis model to estimate mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes. We followed PICOS description model for defining eligibility and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 guidelines for reporting results. Of 3,190 citations, we included nine trials involving 10,974 participants. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality (risk ration [RR] = 0.93, 95% CI [0.52, 1.67]), serious adverse events (RR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.79, 1.17]) and adverse events (RR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.99, 1.02]) between the two, but in hypoglycemia (RR = 0.13, 95% CI [0.10, 0.17], P < 0.001). Participants taking metformin-sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors showed a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (mean difference [MD] = − 0.10%, 95% CI [− 0.17, − 0.03], body weight (MD = − 4.57 kg, 95% CI [− 4.74, − 4.39], systolic blood pressure (MD = − 4.77 mmHg, 95% CI [− 5.39, − 4.16]), diastolic blood pressure (MD = − 2.07 mmHg, 95% CI [− 2.74, − 1.40], and fasting plasma glucose (MD = − 0.55 mmol/L, 95% CI [− 0.69, − 0.41]), p < 0.001. Combination therapy of metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors is a safe and efficacious alternative to combination therapy of metformin and sulphonylureas for patients with type 2 diabetes who are at risk of cardiovascular comorbidity. However, there remains a need for additional long-term randomized controlled trials as available studies are very limited and heterogeneous.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Habiba Hussain ◽  
Matthew Sehring ◽  
Sheryll Soriano

With extensive loss of life and well-being seen since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the initiation of vaccinations has come with enormous hope towards the end of this pandemic. Detailed discussions regarding the safety and efficacy of these vaccines led to their approval. With such success, there have also been reports of vaccine-associated adverse events—allergic reactions, anaphylaxis, immune thrombocytopenia, and thrombosis. We discuss and report the first case of a healthy young adult male developing extensive thrombosis, after receiving the Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen) vaccine.


2010 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 428-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason S. Weinstein ◽  
Kenneth C. Liu ◽  
Johnny B. Delashaw ◽  
Kim J. Burchiel ◽  
Harry R. van Loveren ◽  
...  

Object The DuraSeal dural sealant system, a polyethylene glycol hydrogel, has been shown to be safe and effective when used with commercial and autologous duraplasty materials. The authors report on the safety and effectiveness of this sealant when used in conjunction with nonautologous duraplasty materials. Methods In this retrospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study, the safety and efficacy of a dural sealant system was assessed in conjunction with primarily collagen-based nonautologous duraplasty materials in a sample of 66 patients undergoing elective cranial procedures at 3 institutions. This cohort was compared with 50 well-matched patients from the DuraSeal Pivotal Trial who were treated with this sealant system and autologous duraplasty material. Results The key end points of the study were the incidences of CSF leaks, surgical site infections, and meningitis 90 days after surgery. The incidence of postoperative CSF leakage was 7.6% in the study group (retrospective population) and 6.0% in the Pivotal Trial population. The incidence of meningitis was 0% and 4.0% in the retrospective and Pivotal Trial groups, respectively. There were no serious device-related adverse events or unanticipated adverse device effects noted for either population. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the DuraSeal sealant system is safe and effective when used for watertight dural closure in conjunction with nonautologous duraplasty materials.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 764-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partha Basu ◽  
Ajay Mehta ◽  
Minish Jain ◽  
Sudeep Gupta ◽  
Rajnish V. Nagarkar ◽  
...  

ObjectivesA global unmet medical need exists for effective treatments for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer, as patients have a short life expectancy. Recently, immunotherapies have shown promising survival benefits for patients with advanced forms of cancer. Axalimogene filolisbac (ADXS11-001), aListeria monocytogenesimmunotherapy with a broad effect on the immune system, is under investigation for treatment of human papillomavirus–associated cancers including cervical cancer.MethodsThis phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ADXS11-001, administered with or without cisplatin, in patients with recurrent/refractory cervical cancer following prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. A total of 109 patients were treated, and 69 were evaluable for tumor response at equal to or more than 3 months postbaseline.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) was comparable between treatment groups (ADXS11-001: 8.28 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.85–10.5 months; ADXS11-001 + cisplatin: 8.78 months; 95% CI, 7.4–13.3 months). The 12- and 18-month milestone OS rates were 30.9% versus 38.9%, and 23.6% versus 25.9% for each group, respectively (34.9% and 24.8% combined). Median progression-free survival (6.10 vs 6.08 months) and the overall response rate (17.1% vs 14.7%) were similar for both groups. ADXS11-001 was generally well tolerated; adverse events were predominantly mild to moderate in severity and not related to treatment. More adverse events were reported in the combination group (429 vs 275).ConclusionsThese promising safety and efficacy results, including the encouraging 12-month 34.9% combined OS rate, warrant further investigation of ADXS11-001 for treatment of recurrent/refractory cervical cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document