scholarly journals Improving Cancer Patients Satisfaction with Treatment Process: A Pilot Interventional Approach in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan

Background and Objective: Chemotherapy is one of the treatments of choice worldwide to combat cancer. The complex nature of chemotherapeutic agents results in multiple physiological and psychological issues and if the patient and their caregivers (family) are unaware of these effects, poses additional stress which may result in patient dissatisfaction. This pilot project aimed to provide patients'/families' awareness regarding the process of treatment and subsequently to improve their satisfaction level. Methods: This academic project is a mandatory assignment of clinical practicum course (for the degree of Masters in Nursing Sciences (Aga Khan University School of Nursing & Midwifery). An interventional design was employed for this study. A total of 30 cancer patients, that is 15 in the intervention group and 15 as controls were recruited. The project was initiated as an academic requirement (started in Jan 2015) and last for four months (Apr 2015). Patients planned for their first chemotherapy cycle were selected in both groups. A self-developed questionnaire was used to assess the patient satisfaction level regarding the chemotherapy process before and after the standardized and video-based educational intervention. An independent T-test was used to analyze the data. Results: The overall mean score of patient satisfaction level after the intervention was 18.80; whereas, it was 11.93 for another group. The patient's mean satisfaction level was higher for the intervention group. Conclusion: This study indicates video-based intervention for pre-chemotherapy teaching as an effective educational mode to assist patients throughout the treatment process. It can also facilitate in reducing treatment-related stressors and enhance patients' satisfaction levels.

Author(s):  
Pankaj Kumar ◽  
Anjan Adhikari ◽  
Moumita Ray ◽  
Rania Indu ◽  
Sangita Bhattacharya ◽  
...  

Background: Feedback is an important and integral part of any system. Perception of the beneficiaries in any healthcare setup provides impact for refining the system. The assessment of the patients’ satisfaction on different issues regarding healthcare services provides insight about the drawbacks of different healthcare systems. This could assist to upgrade the quality of services through different interventional measures. Present study evaluated the patient satisfaction in outpatient departments (OPD) of a tertiary care hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal.Methods: A total of 500 patients, attending different OPD in a tertiary care hospital were randomly selected for an observational, questionnaire based interview study, initiated in 2016. Some predictors for patients’ satisfaction like ‘outpatient department services’, ‘waiting time’, ‘cleanliness’, ‘privacy’ and ‘any problem faced during health checkup’, ‘overall satisfaction’ were evaluated.Results: Present study showed 78% of the study population was satisfied with the service received and 81% opined that clean environment was effectively maintained in the hospital premises and different outpatient departments. 83%, 84% and 75% of the patients were satisfied regarding the registration process, services received from the doctors and pharmacy, respectively. However, waiting time was too long and privacy was not maintained properly.Conclusions: Present study regarding patients’ satisfaction towards quality health care concluded that optimal care can be provided by combining both medical and social aspects, influencing the psychological factors of the patients. A separate system should be developed on assessment of “need of the patient” as well as guiding the patient for proper use of the health facilities.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Birdie Wahlang ◽  
Purnima Devi Laishram ◽  
Dhriti Kumar Brahma ◽  
Chayna Sarkar ◽  
Joonmoni Lahon ◽  
...  

Background: An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is defined by World Health Organization (WHO) as ‘Any response to a drug which is noxious, unintended and occurs at doses used in man for prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy’. ADRs associated with cancer chemotherapy warrant analysis on their severity and preventability. The outcome would create awareness among health care providers and prevent their recurrence. We have performed a hospital-based prospective observational study designed to analyze the pattern of ADRs to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer patients of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A total of 119 cancer patients were monitored for suspected ADRs during the course of chemotherapy from November 2014 to December 2015. Clinical events were recorded and analyzed with regard to the demographics and drug details of the patients. Results: A total of 106 ADRs were recorded from 119 cases. The ADRs commonly encountered included constipation, nausea, vomiting, alopecia and hematological changes. Cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel and 5-FU were used for the treatment of commonly found cancers in this region affecting the lungs, esophagus and lymphomas. Naranjo’s causality assessment showed 86.7% possible (score 4) and 13.2% probable (score 5–6). Severity of adverse reactions showed 77.4% mild, 18.9% moderate and 3.8% severe. A total of 45.3% of ADRs were preventable reactions such as nausea, vomiting and constipation. Conclusions: This study highlights the role of active monitoring as an important tool for early detection, assessment and timely management of ADRs in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. The observed ADRs were preventable although ADRs such as hiccough, anemia, neutropenia and alopecia were not preventable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S362-S363
Author(s):  
Gaurav Agnihotri ◽  
Alan E Gross ◽  
Minji Seok ◽  
Cheng Yu Yen ◽  
Farah Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although it is recommended that an OPAT program should be managed by a formal OPAT team that supports the treating physician, many OPAT programs face challenges in obtaining necessary program staff (i.e nurses or pharmacists) due to limited data examining the impact of a dedicated OPAT team on patient outcomes. Our objective was to compare OPAT-related readmission rates among patients receiving OPAT before and after the implementation of a strengthened OPAT program. Methods This retrospective quasi-experiment compared adult patients discharged on intravenous (IV) antibiotics from the University of Illinois Hospital before and after implementation of programmatic changes to strengthen the OPAT program. Data from our previous study were used as the pre-intervention group (1/1/2012 to 8/1/2013), where only individual infectious disease (ID) physicians coordinated OPAT. Post-intervention (10/1/2017 to 1/1/2019), a dedicated OPAT nurse provided full time support to the treating ID physicians through care coordination, utilization of protocols for lab monitoring and management, and enhanced documentation. Factors associated with readmission for OPAT-related problems at a significance level of p< 0.1 in univariate analysis were eligible for testing in a forward stepwise multinomial logistic regression to identify independent predictors of readmission. Results Demographics, antimicrobial indications, and OPAT administration location of the 428 patients pre- and post-intervention are listed in Table 1. After implementation of the strengthened OPAT program, the readmission rate due to OPAT-related complications decreased from 17.8% (13/73) to 6.5% (23/355) (p=0.001). OPAT-related readmission reasons included: infection recurrence/progression (56%), adverse drug reaction (28%), or line-associated issues (17%). Independent predictors of hospital readmission due to OPAT-related problems are listed in Table 2. Table 1. OPAT Patient Demographics and Factors Pre- and Post-intervention Table 2. Factors independently associated with hospital readmission in OPAT patients Conclusion An OPAT program with dedicated staff at a large academic tertiary care hospital was independently associated with decreased risk for readmission, which provides critical evidence to substantiate additional resources being dedicated to OPAT by health systems in the future. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
pp. 32-34
Author(s):  
Sravanthi GNS ◽  
Ravi Madhusudhana

Background: Health care quality assurance was gained importance since the 18th century and patient's satisfaction about the surgery and anaesthesia plays an important role in this. And hence proper assessment of the patient satisfaction for the anaesthesia is essential to alter and deliver the needed service. Objective: Toevaluate the patient's satisfaction including pre-op visit, intra-op awareness, post-op pain management and impression on anaesthetic team. Methodology: This was a cross sectional study conducted among 214 patient receiving regional anaesthesia in a tertiary care hospital, Pondicherry. Results: The overall satisfaction about the information about the anaesthesia was seen among 61.7% of the participants. 67.3% and 89.7% of the study participants had overall satisfaction about the pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting therapy. 72% of the study participants were satised with the department and 64.9% would recommend anaesthesia service to others. Conclusion: The satisfaction of the patient plays a pivotal role in the overall quality of health care. The perception of anaesthesia has shown to be poor in studies and hence steps to alleviate such fears should be addressed properly.


2021 ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Asha Premlata Omega Oraon ◽  
Bela Rose Ekka

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the value of Alkaline Phosphatase in cancer breast patients in a tertiary care hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted to estimate the value of Serum Alkaline Phosphatase in 50 cancer breast patients and 50 normal patients of same age as a control group. RESULTS: The level of serum Alkaline Phosphatase was signicantly increased (p<0.05)in cancer patients compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: There is an increase in serum Alkaline Phosphatase in cancer patients compared to the control group and can be a prognostic markers for the progress of the disease.


Background: Breast Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Pakistan alone has the highest rate of Breast Cancer than any other Asian country as approximately 90000 new cases are diagnosed every year out of which 40000 dies. Obesity is also a critical public health problem growing with every passing year in Pakistan and worldwide. Research studies are being conducted worldwide regarding the relation between the two problems. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of obesity in breast cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Methods: BMI is used as a screening tool for overweight and obesity. According to World Health Organization, a body mass index (BMI) over 25 is considered overweight, and over 30 is obese. A retrospective analysis of 262 patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer during 2019 and 2020 was performed. Patients’ hospital records in Oncology were reviewed. The weight in kilograms and height in centimeters of patients were reviewed. Their BMI was calculated and recorded using the SPSS system. Results: The median BMI was 28.25 kg/m2 with an interquartile range of 25.15 - 31.99 kg/m2. Nearly 80% of the study participants had body mass index higher than normal levels (n=203, 77.5%) and out of them approximately half were overweight (n=104, 51.2%) and the remaining were obese (n=99, 48.7%). Conclusion: We conclude from our study that body mass index is positively correlated with breast cancer occurrence and thus the proportion of females having BMI >= 25 was significantly higher among patients.


Author(s):  
Tilak TVSVGK ◽  
Ajay Handa ◽  
Kishore Kumar ◽  
Deepti Mutreja ◽  
Shankar Subramanian

Abstract Background Pulmonary toxicity due to chemotherapeutic agents can occur with many established and new drugs. Strong clinical suspicion is important as the clinical presentation is usually with nonspecific symptoms like cough, dyspnea, fever, and pulmonary infiltrates. Timely discontinuation of the offending agent alone can improve the condition. Methods A prospective observational study on patients receiving chemotherapy at an 800-bedded tertiary care hospital was performed from 2014 to 2016. Consecutive patients on chemotherapy, presenting with nonresolving respiratory symptoms were evaluated with contrast-enhanced computerized tomography of chest, diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), fiberoptic bronchoscopy with lavage, and biopsy, after excluding all causes for pulmonary infections. Descriptive data has been depicted. Results A total of 18 patients were evaluated for persistent symptoms of dry cough, dyspnea, and fever among 624 who received chemotherapy during the study period. Ground-glass opacities on high-resolution CT was the most common imaging finding, others being patchy subpleural consolidation and pleural effusion. Lymphocyte-predominant bronchoalveolar lavage was detected in nine. Eight of the 15 patients who underwent DLCO, had abnormal results. Seven had significant histopathological findings on bronchoscopic lung biopsy, which revealed organizing pneumonia as the most common pattern. Paclitaxel, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors were the common culprit drugs. Discontinuation alone of the culprit drug was effective in 15 and 3 needed oral corticosteroids for relief of symptoms. None of the patients died due to the toxicity. Conclusion An incidence of 2.8% for chemotherapy-induced lung injury was seen in our observational study of 3 years, with parenchymal, interstitial, and pleural involvement due to various chemotherapeutic agents. Oral steroids maybe required in a subset of patients not responding to discontinuation of the culprit agent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document