ACCOUNTING OF INFORMATION ON CRIMINAL CASES INITIATED AGAINST PERSONS HELD IN PENAL INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT STATE AND PROSPECTS

2021 ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
Надежда Викторовна Грязева ◽  
Валерий Викторович Кубанов
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Activity ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Electronic Database ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Current State ◽  
Penal Institutions ◽  
The Status ◽  
Entire Complex ◽  
The Russian Federation

В статье анализируются вопросы совершенствования сбора, учета, поиска и представления информации об уголовных делах, возбужденных в отношении лиц, содержащихся в учреждениях уголовно-исполнительной системы. Исследована структура электронной базы данных «Преступления, совершенные подозреваемыми, обвиняемыми, осужденными, содержащимися в учреждениях уголовно-исполнительной системы Российской Федерации», введенной в эксплуатацию в 2020 г. Для сравнения приводятся характеристики электронной базы данных, действующей с 2008 по 2020 г. В ходе анализа ведомственного нормативного акта, регулирующего рассматриваемую сферу деятельности, выявлены пробелы в отображении информации, имеющей значение для эффективного предупреждения пенитенциарных преступлений, и сформулированы соответствующие предложения по их устранению. Изучение материалов уголовных дел о преступлениях, совершаемых лицами в период нахождения в учреждениях, обеспечивающих изоляцию от общества, в статусе подозреваемого, обвиняемого, осужденного, позволило заключить, что последние при совершении таких преступлений, как побеги и мошенничества с использованием средств сотовой связи, применяют личный опыт преступной деятельности. Сделан вывод о том, что современные автоматизированные информационные системы, используемые в пенитенциарных учреждениях, не должны ограничиваться узкой задачей учета информации об уголовных делах, возбужденных в отношении лиц, содержащихся в учреждениях уголовно-исполнительной системы. Исследуемая электронная база данных дает широкие возможности для избирательного поиска и последующего анализ всего комплекса сведений, связанных с пенитенциарной преступностью. The article analyzes the issues of improving the collection, accounting, search and presentation of information about criminal cases initiated against persons held in penal institutions. The structure of the electronic database is investigated: «Crimes committed by suspects, accused, convicted persons held in institutions of the penal system of the Russian Federation», commissioned in 2020. For comparison, the characteristics of an electronic database operating from 2008 to 2020 are given. During the analysis of the departmental normative act regulating the sphere of activity under consideration, gaps in the display of information relevant for the effective prevention of penitentiary crimes were identified and appropriate proposals for their elimination were formulated. The study of the materials of criminal cases on crimes committed by persons during their stay in institutions providing isolation from society in the status of a suspect, accused, convicted allowed us to conclude that the latter, when committing crimes such as escapes and fraud using cellular communications, use personal experience of criminal activity. It is concluded that modern automated information systems used in penitentiary institutions should not be limited to the narrow task of recording information about criminal cases initiated against persons held in institutions of the penal system. The electronic database under study provides ample opportunities for selective search and subsequent analysis of the entire complex of information related to penitentiary crime.

MECHANISM FOR COMMITTING CORRUPTION-RELATED CRIMES BY DELIVERING PROHIBITED ITEMS TO THE TERRITORY OF INSTITUTIONS THAT PROVIDE ISOLATION FROM SOCIETY

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Надежда Викторовна Грязева
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Activity ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Close Attention ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Special Environment

В работе представлен механизм совершения коррупционных преступлений посредством доставки запрещенных предметов на территорию исправительных учреждений лицами из числа сотрудников органов и учреждений УИС, который изложен в виде последовательного (поэтапного) ряда процессов взаимодействия участников события прошлого, результатом которых являются следы-отображения, содержащие криминалистически значимую информацию о самом преступлении и участвующих в нем лицах. Пристальное внимание уделено преступной деятельности субъектов - должностных лиц органов и учреждений УИС - как системообразующему элементу рассматриваемой криминалистической категории. Субъектам расследования - следователям Следственного комитета РФ - для полноты, всесторонности и объективности установления обстоятельств по уголовным делам необходимо изучение закономерностей преступной деятельности должностных лиц, совершающих коррупционные преступления, проявляющихся в окружающей обстановке в виде материальных и идеальных следов, а также специфики деятельности учреждений УИС, образующей особую обстановку, элементы которой используют участники преступного события. В статье обозначены основные элементы механизма преступлений рассматриваемой группы: преступная деятельность субъекта; поведение и деятельность иных участников события; обстановка совершения преступления; отдельные элементы обстановки, используемые участниками события; орудия, средства преступления и иные предметы, используемые для достижения цели преступления; обстоятельства, положительно или отрицательно влияющие на достижение планируемого результата. На основе общего представления о механизме преступления и практических материалов в работе представлены основные этапы совершения коррупционных преступлений сотрудниками учреждений, обеспечивающих изоляцию от общества. The article presents the mechanism of committing corruption-related crimes by the delivery of prohibited items to the territory of correctional institutions by officers and employers of bodies and institutions of the penal system, which is set out in a sequential (phased) of a number of processes of interaction of participants of events of the past, resulting in traces of the display that contains forensically relevant information about the crime and involved persons. Close attention is paid to the criminal activity of subjects-officials of bodies and institutions of the penal system, as a system-forming element of the considered criminalistic category. The subjects of the investigation - the investigators of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for completeness, comprehensiveness and objectivity of establishing the circumstances in criminal cases it is necessary to study patterns of criminal activity of officials committing crimes of corruption, manifested in the environment in the form of material and ideal traces, and also specificity of activity of establishments the FPS forming a special environment whose elements are using members of the criminal event. The article outlines the main elements of the mechanism of crimes groups: criminal activities of the subject; the behavior and activity of other participants of the event; the scene of the crime; individual elements of the scene used by the participants of the event; implements, tools of crime and other items used to achieve the goal of the crime; the circumstances positively or negatively influence the achievement of the planned result. Based on a general understanding of the mechanism of crime and practical materials, the paper presents the main stages of committing corruption crimes by employees of institutions that provide isolation from society.

scholarly journals Constitutional-Legal and Administrative-Legal Bases of the Status of Migrants

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-267
Author(s):  
S. Popova ◽  
Yu. Chernov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Order ◽  
Theoretical Aspect ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Status ◽  
Internal Migrants ◽  
The Russian Federation

The study of the constitutional and legal basis of the status of migrants will allow to determine and summarize the rights and obligations of these persons, which significantly affect the formation of legal social order. This article discusses the constitutional, legal and administrative basis of the status of migrants, regulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation. Considering the issue of the current state of the migration legislation of the Russian Federation, the theoretical aspect of migration as the mobilization of people to change their permanent residence is highlighted. The causes of this phenomenon and the classification of categories of migrants are determined. The definitions of external and internal migrants are differentiated, on the basis of which the constitutional norms of foreign persons who entered the territory of the Russian Federation are further studied. According to Federal laws, the basic rights and obligations of immigrants who entered the Russian Federation for different definitions of reasons and circumstances are distinguished. The article considers the administrative and legal basis of the status of migrants in the context of violation of the rule of law according to the norms of the Code of administrative violations. The Institute of citizenship is singled out as a status that directly affects the scope of individual rights and freedoms, which allows it to be singled out as a special status of a migrant. In conclusion, the above topic is summarized.

scholarly journals LEGAL STATUS OF EMPLOYEES OF THE CRIMINAL EXECUTIVE SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2(52)) ◽  
pp. 113-116
Author(s):  
Natalia Evgenievna Kuznetsova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Penal System ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Executive System

The purpose of the study is devoted to the actual problems of the status of employees of the penal system. The paper identifies the problems of determining the status of employees of the penal system, and also suggests some methods and mechanisms for solving these problems.

FUNDAMENTALS OF THE CONCEPT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A UNIFIED PENAL SYSTEM (HYPOTHESIS): SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT, LEGISLATION, ENFORCEMENT

2021 ◽  
pp. 71-78
Author(s):  
Ренат Зинурович Усеев
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Spatial Development ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Section 8 ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Deductive Method ◽  
Penal Institutions ◽  
The Russian Federation

Раздел 8 Концепции развития уголовно-исполнительной системы Российской Федерации на период до 2030 года предусмотрел создание в структуре российской пенитенциарной системы учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы объединенного типа. Первое такое учреждение начнет свою работу в 2024 г. Автором на уровне гипотезы предлагается рассмотреть основные вопросы, связанные со становлением и развитием учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы объединенного типа. В связи с этим в настоящей статье рассмотрены три основополагающих направления развития данных учреждений: пространственное развитие, законодательство, правоприменение. Каждый из указанных аспектов проанализирован автором с точки зрения как проблем, так и предполагаемых путей их решения. Цель работы - на основе исследования географии исправительных учреждений, уголовно-исполнительного законодательства РФ и правоприменительной деятельности показать основные проблемы, связанные с развитием учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы объединенного типа, и возможные пути их решения. Среди проблем показаны проблемы территориального (пространственного) размещения учреждений объединенного типа, законодательства и правоприменения вновь создаваемых учреждений. Методами исследования в научной статье явились универсальные методы (анализ и синтез, индукция и дедукция, аналогия и моделирование); эмпирические методы (обобщение, классификация); теоретические методы (идеализация, абстрагирование, гипотетико-дедуктивный метод) и др. Выводы и результаты работы определяются достижением ее целей. Section 8 of the Concept for the Development of the Penitentiary System of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2030 provided for the creation of a unified type of penal institutions in the structure of the Penal System of Russia. The first institution such type will begin its work in 2024. The author at the hypothesis level analyses the main issues related to the formation and development of institutions of the unified penal system. In this regard, the author considers three fundamental areas of development of the institutions under consideration: spatial development, legislation, law enforcement. Each of these projects was analyzed by the author in terms of both problems and suggested ways to solve them. The purpose of the work is to show on the basis of a study of the geography of correctional institutions, penal enforcement legislation of the Russian Federation and law enforcement activities the main problems associated with the development of penal correction institutions of a unified type and possible ways to solve them. Among the problems are the problems of territorial (spatial) placement of institutions of a unified type, legislation and enforcement of newly created institutions. The research methods in the scientific article were universal methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, analogy and modeling); empirical methods (synthesis, classification); theoretical methods (idealization, abstraction, hypothetical-deductive method) and others. The conclusions and results of the work are determined by the achievement of its goals.

Improvement of criminal-procedural legislation, regulating the activities of employees, establishments and bodies of the penal system

2019 ◽  
pp. 111-118
Author(s):  
Александр Борисович Диваев
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Investigation ◽  
Penal System ◽  
House Arrest ◽  
Effective Implementation ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation

В представленной статье рассмотрен ряд вопросов совершенствования регламентации процессуальных полномочий органов и учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы Российской Федерации. Высказаны предложения по модернизации ряда норм, устанавливающих статус органов и учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы и их должностных лиц как органов дознания. Рассмотрен круг проблем, связанных с более четким процессуальным регулированием механизма исполнения меры пресечения в виде домашнего ареста. Даны предложения по внесению изменения в уголовно-процессуальное законодательство, которые должны содействовать более эффективной реализации полномочий по контролю за арестованными со стороны уголовно-исполнительных инспекций. Сформулировано предложение по устранению терминологической неточности, допущенной в ст. 397 Уголовно-процессуального кодекса Российской Федерации. The article deals with a number of issues of improving the regulation of procedural powers of bodies and institutions of the penal system of the Russian Federation. In particular the proposals for the modernization of a number of rules establishing the status of the bodies and institutions of penal system, and their officials, as criminal investigation bodies. In addition, the range of problems associated with a more precise procedural regulation of the mechanism of execution of preventive measures in the form of house arrest. In this regard, proposals were made to amend the criminal procedure legislation, which should contribute to a more effective implementation of the powers to control arrested persons by the penal inspections. In conclusion, a proposal to eliminate the terminological inaccuracy in article 397 of the Criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation is formulated.

scholarly journals Concept of Digital Evidence, Current Status and Its Role in the Evidentiary Process

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Cherdantsev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Digital Evidence ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Significant Information ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article analyzes the international current state of the concept of digital evidence, its meaning, types and role in the process of proving in criminal cases in the practical activities of the preliminary investigation bodies of the Russian Federation, considers some problems arising in law enforcement practice, suggests the author's classification of modern digital traces, studies and compares international practice governing the practical application of digital evidence, their concept and content. The problem of gaps in the legal regulation of digital evidence is considered, as well as the possibility of introducing amendments to the current legislation concerning the legal recognition of digital evidence along with traditional types of evidence, as well as the regulation of the use of digital evidence in criminal proceedings, and a proposal is made to introduce a number of amendments to the current legislation of the Russian Federation, where it is necessary to secure definitions of digital evidence, thus legalizing it, stating in the following re At the same time, it is noted that there is no need to introduce a separate article to regulate digital (electronic) evidences, because it is rather difficult to determine the volume of digital (electronic) evidences (digital criminally significant information), at least because there is no unanimity in this respect and there was no unanimity, besides, due to the dynamic development of electronics, including personal ones, this norm quickly lost its relevance and required amendments, creating a certain gap in legal regulation, which is more complicated.

THE SPECIFICS OF THE CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE SPHERE OF LAND RELATIONS: CRIMINOLOGICAL ASPECT

2019 ◽  
pp. 55-65
Author(s):  
Pavel Petrovich Orlov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Activity ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
National Plan ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Land Relations ◽  
Analysis Center ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Regional Programs ◽  
Government Institution

We consider criminological regularities, tendencies and state of crimes committed in the sphere of land relations. The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics of crimes committed in this area. We study and analyze statistical data of federal government institution “Main Information and Analysis Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation” on crimes of an economic orientation where the land plot acts as a subject of criminal encroachment. We designate the key factors that directly affect the commission of crimes of the investigated type. Based on the study of criminal cases in the field of land relations we reveal that the age of 45 to 49 years is characterized by the greatest criminal activity. A distinctive feature of crimes committed in the sphere of land relations – the presence of a certain social status-was characterized. The determine features of crimes committed in this sphere are formulated. In addition, we propose a number of constructive measures aimed at preventing crimes committed in the sphere of land relations. We analyze regional programs of subjects of the Russian Federation providing security and protection of private, state, municipal and other forms of ownership. We believe that it is possible to present the prevention of crimes committed in the field of land relations in the form of a plan that includes elements of general and special prevention. The conclusion is formulated and justified on the need to highlight the prevention of crimes committed in the field of land relations as an independent section of the national plan to combat corruption.

scholarly journals On the Issue of the Principles of State Service in the Penal System of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Artem M. Bobrov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
State Service ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Internal Affairs

This article reveals the essence of the basic principles of public service, their implementation in the penal system of the Russian Federation. It is noted that the existing variety of definitions of principles entails some uncertainty. Therefore, it is proposed to adhere to a philosophical approach to determining the principles of public service in the penal system. It is noted that the current legislation regulating the status of employees of prisons and the procedure for serving the service does not take into account the specifics of the penal system, since the new provisions aimed at implementing the general principles of public service copy the similar norms of Federal Law of November 30, 2011 №. 342-FL «On Service in the Internal Affairs Bodies of the Russian Federation and Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation». It is concluded that it is necessary to detail the general principles of public service in conjunction with existing standards governing the activities of bodies and institutions of the penal system, the enforcement of criminal sentences, and the detention of defendants.

THE PROBLEM OF THE SUICIDAL PREVENTION AMONG CONVICTED, SUSPECTED AND ACCUSED PERSONS

2021 ◽  
pp. 143-148
Author(s):  
Вячеслав Александрович Шиханов ◽  
Евгений Юрьевич Акулов
Keyword(s):  
Suicidal Behavior ◽  
Suicidal Behaviour ◽  
Prison System ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Penal Institutions

В статье рассматриваются проблемы, препятствующие эффективной профилактике суицидального поведения среди осужденных, подозреваемых и обвиняемых в учреждениях уголовно-исполнительной системы. Для выполнения данной работы авторами проанализированы соответствующие статистические данные. Рассмотрены определения суицидального поведения, суицида, представлена классификация суицидов. В работе исследованы нормативно-правовые акты, а также методические рекомендации ФСИН России, регулирующие деятельность уголовно-исполнительной системы по профилактике суицидального поведения. Актуальность данной статьи обусловлена тем, что количество самоубийств на протяжении нескольких лет остается на одном уровне, несмотря на применение множества разработанных программ и иной документации, регулирующей данную сферу деятельности. В статье авторами обращается внимание на проблему, связанную с сокращением численности штата сотрудников. На основании исследования авторы пришли к выводу, что для устранения самоубийств среди осужденных, подозреваемых и обвиняемых в совершении преступлений в уголовно-исполнительной системе необходимо в первую очередь решить проблему, связанную с кадровыми вопросами. Также необходимо оказывать помощь осужденным в восстановлении и поддержании социально полезных связей. The article addresses the problems impeding the effective prevention of suicidal behaviour among convicts, suspects and accused in penal institutions. To carry out this work, the authors analyzed the statistics that are reflected in this work. The definitions of suicidal behavior, suicide are considered, the classification of suicides is presented. The work investigated regulatory legal acts, as well as methodological recommendations of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, regulating the activities of the penal system to prevent suicidal behavior. We believe that the relevance of this article is due to the fact that the number of suicides for several years remains at the same level, despite the application of many developed programs, and other documentation governing this area of activity. The article by the authors draws attention to the problem associated with the reduction in the number of staff. Based on their study, the authors, having studied these problems, came to the conclusion that in order to eliminate suicides among convicts, suspects and accused of committing crimes, the prison system must first solve the problem of personnel issues. It is also necessary to assist convicts in restoring and maintaining socially useful ties.

scholarly journals Initiation of Criminal Proceedings against a Particular Person as the Ground for Recognizing him as a Suspect (para 1, part 1, art. 46 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation)

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 71-78
Author(s):  
I. V. Smolkova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Russian Federation

The paper is devoted to the analysis of a new ground for recognition of a person as a suspect, introduced under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, namely, the initiation of a criminal case against the person. The ground under consideration has caused controversial debates among criminal process scholars. The author has carried out a retrospective analysis of the legislative regulation of this ground for giving a person the status of the suspect. The paper evaluates various doctrinal approaches to its merits and disadvantages. The author also demonstartes the need for the new ground for recognition of a person as the suspect in law enforcement on the basis of statistical data, according to which more than half of criminal cases in Russia are initiated against a particular person. The study at question reveals an interconnection between initiation of proceedings upon commission of a crime and a particular person. The conclusion is substantiated that the recognition of a person as a suspect in case of initiation of criminal proceedings against him is aimed at ensuring his right to protection from criminal prosecution. However, the issuance of the order to initiate criminal proceedings against a particular person entails the possibility of implementation of coercive criminal procedural measures against him. It is shown that suspicion forms the substantive basis of recognition of a person as the suspect. The author criticises the approach according to which the issuance of the order to initiate criminal proceedings against a particular person forms an allegation that he has committed an act prohibited under the criminal law. Under this approach the assumption is made that can later be either proven or refuted in the course of further investigation. The author criticises the practice of dividing criminal cases into a judicial perspective and lacking such a perspective, which entails violations of the rights and legitimate interests of individuals suspected in committing crimes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document